Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Pregnant widow flogged and shot dead by the Taleban

245678

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭we'llallhavetea_old


    i feel physically sick after reading the op.

    how the fcuk can anyone do that to another human being? if you did less than that to a dog you'd be locked up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,593 ✭✭✭Sea Sharp


    Absolutely disgusting. Was there any mention of what happened to the daddy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,331 ✭✭✭✭bronte


    2010 people...how proud we should be . :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    the usa backed government still has the death penelty for women that commit adultry afaik. they not much better then the taliban when it come to human rights but at least they'll allow mcdonalds !oops i mean democracy

    Well generally speaking, states don't give a rats ass about "human rights" in so much as starting a war over it. Its almost a given you can do much as you want within your own borders as long as you don't screw with anyone else. The exception to that is supposedly genocide, but even there you wouldn't want to hold your breath.

    Getting down to womens rights, its as old as war to use the treatment of women as an example of the rightness of the cause and the low nature of the enemy. Unfortunately there seems to exist the notion that they're serious. What will make the various parties happy is a state that promises to stop its territory being used as a base or haven for elements that will attack their interests. If that state whips and shoots pregnant women, you'll find they'll live with it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,566 ✭✭✭✭Fratton Fred


    Sea Sharp wrote: »
    Absolutely disgusting. Was there any mention of what happened to the daddy?

    they gave him a slap on the back and took him down the pub to celebrate getting his leg over.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,540 ✭✭✭Giselle


    how the fcuk can anyone do that to another human being? if you did less than that to a dog you'd be locked up.

    Two human beings. There was a little baby killed too.:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,308 ✭✭✭Ricardo G


    Giselle wrote: »
    They will tell you that the Qu'ran is the UNALTERABLE word of god, and in it god specifies the punishment for sex outside of marraige. So they are upholding gods will. Because god had guns.

    Islam isn't used as a cover for sadism by these guys, its used as justification.


    I'm sure God does'nt specify 200 lashes of a whip and a bullet in the Skull, and i would also be certain he would not condone the killing of an unborn child. If so he is sicker than the bastards that carried out this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,560 ✭✭✭K.Flyer


    Ricardo G wrote: »
    Horrible story but why the hell would you whip someone.......and then shoot them? strange :confused:

    Afghanistan - Taliban - Islam - Sharia Law !!

    And the followers of Islam living in Ireland / UK and other countries want to be allowed to impose Sharia Law as they see fit.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 804 ✭✭✭round tower huntsman


    got away with a warning:eek: now thats just wrong,sexist. should've killed both of them equal rights etc...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,098 ✭✭✭Stinicker


    Ush1 wrote: »
    It's absolutely shocking and despicable but just something to think about. Are the US so much better as they still legally kill people with the death penalty? Obviously it's more humane the way they do it, but it's still the state killing someone.

    Maybe I should start a thread on this seperately?

    At least the US delivers justice for real crimes, what that woman did was not a crime and whatever happens between two consenting adults is nobodys business, especially not the state or any religious group. I would love to see those three "mullahs" getting executed for crimes against humanity, and would gladly be the executioner to pull the trigger and pop a bullet into each of their skulls.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,971 ✭✭✭we'llallhavetea_old


    Giselle wrote: »
    Two human beings. There was a little baby killed too.:(

    :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭Donkey Oaty


    Ush1 wrote: »
    It's absolutely shocking and despicable but just something to think about. Are the US so much better as they still legally kill people with the death penalty? Obviously it's more humane the way they do it, but it's still the state killing someone.

    Maybe I should start a thread on this seperately?

    Two things.

    1) This story isn't about the state killing anyone. Afghanistan's government does not have the death penalty for adultery - it's 7-15 years in prison.

    2) The US government does not execute adulterers either, and the people they do kill have a trial by jury.

    The Taliban are bad guys.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,484 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    Stinicker wrote: »
    At least the US delivers justice for real crimes, what that woman did was not a crime and whatever happens between two consenting adults is nobodys business, especially not the state or any religious group. I would love to see those three "mullahs" getting executed for crimes against humanity, and would gladly be the executioner to pull the trigger and pop a bullet into each of their skulls.

    Define the US delivering justice though? Killing someone?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭Kasabian


    got away with a warning:eek: now thats just wrong,sexist. should've killed both of them equal rights etc...

    Or maybe killed none of them :eek:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Ush1 wrote: »
    It's absolutely shocking and despicable but just something to think about. Are the US so much better as they still legally kill people with the death penalty? Obviously it's more humane the way they do it, but it's still the state killing someone.

    Maybe I should start a thread on this separately?
    Yes, I'd appreciate it.
    This is about yet another sad un-necessary death. Be it caused by one side or another.
    These things should be exposed so that others can say "Not in our name please!"
    Thats all, no hidden agenda.


  • Posts: 1,060 ✭✭✭ Jasper Melodic Rehabilitation


    i dont think your can say all muslims would react in this way these men represent the most hardcore element of Islam .The Catholic bible has some sadistic passages of retribution , as far as i know they are not carried out . That being said this is barbarism against woman shouldnt be ignored or tolerated .

    I hope her child and herself are in a better place:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,484 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    Two things.

    1) This story isn't about the state killing anyone. Afghanistan's government does not have the death penalty for adultery - it's 7-15 years in prison.

    2) The US government does not execute adulterers either, and the people they do kill have a trial by jury.

    The Taliban are bad guys.

    So the US are the good guys then, despite them killing people for certain things?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 804 ✭✭✭round tower huntsman


    actually the usa illeagaly kill people as well- iraq illeal war.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,540 ✭✭✭Giselle


    Ricardo G wrote: »
    I'm sure God does'nt specify 200 lashes of a whip and a bullet in the Skull, and i would also be certain he would not condone the killing of an unborn child. If so he is sicker than the bastards that carried out this

    I think you may have missed the irony.

    The Qu'ran is the only education a lot of these guys have. The only book they ever read, the only law they ever know. They have/choose to use an interpretation of that book that suits their purpose. To control and rule the population. The Qu'ran is particularly harsh on women.

    She may have been raped, but in the absence of reliable, multiple, male witnesses, its assumed she was a very bad girl. She may have flashed her hair, or a wrist and driven some vulnerable man into a fit of lust. Or begged for it, and knowingly taken a man from the path of righteousness. Maybe she failed to prevent someone from looking in her window and he saw her face.

    Hard to know who the victim is in those circumstances.:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,848 ✭✭✭Andy-Pandy


    I blame men with full beards. The Taliban, Santa and ZZ Top, all the same to me.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭Kasabian


    Biggins wrote: »
    Yes, I'd appreciate it.
    This is about yet another sad un-necessary death. Be it caused by one side or another.
    These things should be exposed so that others can say "Not in our name please!"
    Thats all, no hidden agenda.

    I fear your thread is heading towards an anti US rant


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭Donkey Oaty


    Ush1 wrote: »
    So the US are the good guys then, despite them killing people for certain things?

    You asked if they were so much better, given that they have the death penalty.

    In this case, yes. Undoubtedly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 804 ✭✭✭round tower huntsman


    Andy-Pandy wrote: »
    I blame men with full beards. The Taliban, Santa and ZZ Top, all the same to me.
    never trust a man that cultivates on his face what grows freely on his arse:D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    Kasabian wrote: »
    I fear your thread is heading towards an anti US rant
    Yes, I fear it too and that is NOT what I want or desire.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭Kasabian


    Biggins wrote: »
    Yes, I fear it too and that is NOT what I want or desire.

    I know, but it will be hi-jacked . AH is gone to sh1t

    It should be named Off Topic


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭Donkey Oaty


    Giselle wrote: »
    She may have been raped:rolleyes:

    Oddly, this distinction is often not made by the Afghan (i.e. non-Taliban) judiciary and the penalty for rape/adultery is the same.

    Mind you, an Afghan rapist can sometimes pay "blood money" and avoid prison.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 804 ✭✭✭round tower huntsman


    Kasabian wrote: »
    I fear your thread is heading towards an anti US rant
    not anti usa just anti hypocrisy.
    the usa back a government in the same country that also allows death penalty for women for sexual crimes such as being raped without 4 male witnesses to verify she was actually raped and not screwing around:confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭Donkey Oaty


    not anti usa just anti hypocrisy.
    the usa back a government in the same country that also allows death penalty for women for sexual crimes such as being raped without 4 male witnesses to verify she was actually raped and not screwing around:confused:

    Have you a source for that, huntsman? I'd appreciate it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,688 ✭✭✭Kasabian


    not anti usa just anti hypocrisy.
    the usa back a government in the same country that also allows death penalty for women for sexual crimes such as being raped without 4 male witnesses to verify she was actually raped and not screwing around:confused:

    I think you'll find that the Afghan Government are also at war with the Taliban


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,216 ✭✭✭Mrmoe


    Giselle wrote: »
    They will tell you that the Qu'ran is the UNALTERABLE word of god, and in it god specifies the punishment for sex outside of marraige. So they are upholding gods will. Because god had guns.

    Islam isn't used as a cover for sadism by these guys, its used as justification.

    Most of the aspects that require interpretation though are not in the Qu'ran. I am quoting this from wikipedia so take it as it is:
    However, stoning as punishment for sexual sin is not prescribed in the Qur'an, but is prescribed in the hadith—oral traditions relating to the words and deeds of the Islamic prophet Muhammad.

    It is the way they interpret it that is the cause of so much violence and suffering. There are many islamic that do not carry out such atrocities. I know many muslims who abhor such violence and cruelty. What I would like them to do is explain why their view is right and the view of the vast majority of the muslim world is wrong.

    I do not think society can ever eradicate such behaviour by violence alone. We need to understand why they do these things and reason with them showing them the error of their way. However, this doesn't mean that a militaristic approach should be abandoned but you can see currently that bombing the Taliban into submission does not work.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement