Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

The "Torturer Of Tehran" Now Has The Woman Who Is To Be Stoned!

2»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Sanjuro


    Biggins wrote: »

    Her lawyer who escaped Iran, is now under arrest in Turkey.

    The same lawyer is currently trying to defend a poor young guy who was falsely accused of sodomy and is facing execution. Even though his 'victim' publicly stated that the accusation was made under duress and has no truth to it.

    The way Iran is portrayed by western media is pretty skewed. But it's very hard to defend an regime that is pretty sick in it's views on women and homosexuality.

    Iran set to execute 18-year-old on false charge of sodomy.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 34,567 ✭✭✭✭Biggins


    First of all Superinfinity, the quote you posted IS FROM A COMMENT!
    ..But hey!!! Lets try and pass that that off as part of a newspaper article!

    Secondly - LAY OFF THE DIRECT INSULTS!


    When your finish your endless ranting, go get an education more so and learn to get that chip off your shoulder.

    Again I ask please show ANY ACTUAL NEWS REPORT where she was on trial previously for murder!
    * For the record, she was originally accused of having an "illicit relationship" and during THAT trial they tried to taint her as a murderer - but as even that article you posted about says - she was not found guilty in that respect!

    Now the Iranians in order to try and spin things, are saying that there was a murder trail and she was NOW found guilty!

    Any excuse to justify their hanging her and save face!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,079 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    The Snipping stops now. Please do not back seat mod. If you have a problem with a post, Please report it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    Biggins wrote: »
    Some breaking news update:



    The below article includes a picture of them - including his young daughter whom I believe they put in prison also at one stage to get him to give himself up!
    Madness!

    The article is in jpeg format due to The Times site being pay per view and ye wouldn't be able to see/read it otherwise:

    http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/83/wwwthetimescoukttonewsw.jpg
    Holy crap.
    Iranian chicks do have faces.

    MrDarcy wrote: »
    I wonder how quick the people here condemning the imminent treatment/execution of this poor woman, will turn on the US when they eventually decide to go in there and sort out the governance of Iran, which I hope they do before this year is out. The same nutcases that are running Iran and giving us this story to talk about, also want to hold a nuclear weapon.

    Morale of the story: ECONOMIC SANCTIONS DON'T HAVE ANY EFFECT ON NUTCASE GOVERNMENTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I'd like to make a pre-emptive strike about the imminent U.S. strike.
    Dear U.S., please stay the **** out of other countries.
    The Iranian people need to sort this out by themselves.
    Killing hundreds of thousand of people, and then saying that you are doing it to help them does not actually help. It only makes things worse.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 585 ✭✭✭MrDarcy


    Terry wrote: »
    Holy crap.
    Iranian chicks do have faces.




    I'd like to make a pre-emptive strike about the imminent U.S. strike.
    Dear U.S., please stay the **** out of other countries.
    The Iranian people need to sort this out by themselves.
    Killing hundreds of thousand of people, and then saying that you are doing it to help them does not actually help. It only makes things worse.

    Yeah just like the Iraqi people managed to rid themselves of Saddam on their own. That c*nt would never have ended up swinging from a rope, and his two scumbag sons would never have ended up lying on a table covered with ****ty blue morgue sheets for the whole world to see, only one country had the balls to go in and sort him out for once and for all.

    The technology now exists to remotely take out the likes of all these religious nutcase dictators for once and for all, North Korea, Iran, all these nutjob countries, the world (not just the US), should have a plan to eliminate the nutcases that are running these places.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    Noreen1 wrote: »
    Thanks for that Einhard. You made me do some investigating. It seems AI highlight different cases, according to which of their websites you visit. I found this on their US site...

    It looks like Amnesty's local branches pick and choose which issues they're going to publicise according to the prejudices of their target national audience. I can understand that to some degree, but it is still a shocking example of playing politics by an organisation which claims to advocate for ALL those suffering violations of their human rights. Amnesty, and any other organisation of its type, should be above such petty politicing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    MrDarcy wrote: »
    Yeah just like the Iraqi people managed to rid themselves of Saddam on their own. That c*nt would never have ended up swinging from a rope, and his two scumbag sons would never have ended up lying on a table covered with ****ty blue morgue sheets for the whole world to see, only one country had the balls to go in and sort him out for once and for all.

    The technology now exists to remotely take out the likes of all these religious nutcase dictators for once and for all, North Korea, Iran, all these nutjob countries, the world (not just the US), should have a plan to eliminate the nutcases that are running these places.
    It's a bit early in the thread for this, but here it is anyway.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 585 ✭✭✭MrDarcy


    Terry wrote: »
    It's a bit early in the thread for this, but here it is anyway.


    Sure we'll just keep tolerating this then...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    MrDarcy wrote: »

    The technology now exists to remotely take out the likes of all these religious nutcase dictators for once and for all, North Korea, Iran, all these nutjob countries, the world (not just the US), should have a plan to eliminate the nutcases that are running these places.

    Who decides who the nutjobs are though?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    MrDarcy wrote: »
    Sure we'll just keep tolerating this then...
    I'll see your 4 people and raise you this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    Terry wrote: »
    I'll see your 4 people and raise you this.

    How many of those casualties were as a result of Allied action as opposed to suicide bombers? I don't see how the blame can be apportioned to America when a brainwashed mentally handicapped child carries a suicide bomb into a market place and kills dozens.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,235 ✭✭✭Dave147


    MrDarcy wrote: »
    Sure we'll just keep tolerating this then...

    You might put a warning with your link that it contains sensitive photo's. I would imagine there are many people reading this thread who don't want to see innocent people being hanged.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    Einhard wrote: »
    How many of those casualties were as a result of Allied action as opposed to suicide bombers? I don't see how the blame can be apportioned to America when a brainwashed mentally handicapped child carries a suicide bomb into a market place and kills dozens.
    Yeah, those massive bombing campaigns are far less effective than IEDs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    Terry wrote: »
    Yeah, those massive bombing campaigns are far less effective than IEDs.

    I think the following is much over-used on boards, and I don't like using it myself, but :confused:

    What on earth does the above have to do with my post?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 585 ✭✭✭MrDarcy


    Terry wrote: »
    Yeah, those massive bombing campaigns are far less effective than IEDs.

    Your argument is so typically Irish. It's 2010 for Christs sake, why should we tolerate government's stoning people and hanging them from cranes, etc???

    I also notice that you casually brushed over the fact that I mentioned that our new approach to dealing with these nutjob regimes should not involve the US exclusively, even though for having the balls to go in and sort out the **** that the rest of us would rather "just didn't keep on happening", I take my hat off to them and I thank them. However I am of the view that we need to come up with some sort of a worldwide model for liberty, freedom and the right to a normal existance for people who are on the planet, and where we have nutjob character or characters that selfishly deprive their people of these things, they should realise then that the Predator drones will not be circling too far away in the sky above.

    I personally would donate money to a fund that would take out the regime in Iran or North Korea. It doesn't have to involve mas killing, I'm thinking of a surgical strike that wipes out the whole top layer of the problem.

    Leaving the actions of the US aside, there is no fear of justice or retribution whatsoever for any dictator or war criminal on this earth. Then we act all surprised and disgusted when we see mad sh*t happening like a woman being stoned or a gay kid being hung in Iran. What else should we expect, humans being humans, people, including nutcase dictators and insane national presidents, will always do what they are allowed get away with.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,449 ✭✭✭SuperInfinity


    MrDarcy wrote: »
    Your argument is so typically Irish.

    What a load of shíte.

    You know very well it has NOTHING to do with being Irish. There is nothing "so typically Irish" about it at all. It could just as easily be made by any nationality. Can you actually believe that? Come on.

    I guarantee you a billion times over that there is NOTHING Irish about it and it could be shown as if you had arguments from different countries you wouldn't have the slighest clue what nationality the person was that was making them.
    MrDarcy wrote: »
    It's 2010 for Christs sake, why should we tolerate government's stoning people and hanging them from cranes, etc???

    Why should we tolerate the US executing people? Why should we tolerate the US killing millions of innocent civilians?

    You need to get your arguments straight before you start making comments about this. Why should we "tolerate" it? LOL, are you mad? You obviously don't even care about the civilians of those countries or you would say the US are wrong to massacre millions of them both directly and indirectly for economic purposes every few years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,487 ✭✭✭banquo


    I love how this was in The Life Of Brian. Shows how insanely backward they are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,919 ✭✭✭Einhard


    banquo wrote: »
    I love how this was in The Life Of Brian. Shows how insanely backward they are.


    Ummm, you saw Muslims in The Life of Brian?


Advertisement
Advertisement