Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

If Mohammed had sex with his 9 year old wife does that make him a pedophile?

1568101113

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Aisha was 19 years old when she married the Prophet Muhammed.
    Why change facts? Are you perhaps ashamed of what it says?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Wrong!!!

    She was 6 or 7 but he made her a woman at 9, nice of him to wait.

    This is why 9 is the age a girl can be married off in Islamic countrys.

    All of them? Really?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭The Highwayman


    Nodin wrote: »
    All of them? Really?

    No not all, did I say that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    "in Islamic countrys" was the phrase you used. Perhaps you might define what makes an 'Islamic country' so we're clearer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,952 ✭✭✭deravarra


    Wrong!!!

    She was 6 or 7 but he made her a woman at 9, nice of him to wait.

    This is why 9 is the age a girl can be married off in Islamic countrys.

    What Hadith are you using to get the age of Aisha to be 19?


    Do you actually know which hadith was used for the age being 6, and the source for the hadith?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,952 ✭✭✭deravarra


    Why change facts? Are you perhaps ashamed of what it says?

    Facts? Which "facts"?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 33 dharma protector


    Hi I do not want to get too involved here, but I would like to supply some 'missing information to the debate. Speaking strictly as an historian I think it fair to say that Muhammad did exist however I do not think it possible to know what went on with the information we have and the way it was handed down (although their are excellent clues) but that is another days work :). respectfully I add this for the attention of Irish Convert and Nodin

    First Irish Convert

    The information you are using to maintain she was 19 is from a Ahmadiyya Muslim Site. Now I have a lot of time for the Ahmadiyya faith. They believe themselves to be the true muslims and the kind of islam they advoate is most humane, reformed ( or original as they say) and noble. However the are very much a tiny fringe movement in the Islamic world, They are not accepted as Muslims at all by mainsteam Islam and are persecuted and even killed in the Islamic world for their interpretation of Islam. They are particularly reviled in pakistan where if they even try to call themselves Muslims, they risk imprisonment and often worse, as can be seen in recent murderous suicide attacks against them. I am afraid that Ahmadiyya interpretations are not worth the paper they are written on in the Islamic world, although I would like them to. :) If all Muslims were Ahmadiyya this would not be an issue but they are not, they are a tiny minority not even recognised in the wider community are being part of it.

    Second Nodin

    The qestion of defining what is or is not an Islamic country is a how long is a piece of string question and allows people to dodge the qestion because it allows Muslims to say that whatever country is mentioned is not an Islamic country or one that follows a true islamic system, as suits the debators needs at the time. On this issue what can be siad with certaintly, is that in the world at this time, is that in the Islamic world some countries have secular law, some a mixture of secular and Shariah, and some only Shariah. In every instance, one will find a direct correlation to the degree to which a society will allow (or a least ignore), the marraige of a 9 yr old girl, to the degree to which it says it follows Sariah. For example, Turkey (secular) does not allow it at all while Saudi and Yemen ( Sunni ) and Iran (Shia) do. That is a fact

    Just wanted to clarify that, I don't mean this in disrespectful manner and look forward to your reply.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭BlaasForRafa


    Bottom line is Wikipedia articles are not always reliable so shouldn't be used as a definitive source.

    Or that you find defending Islams pro-pedophilia stance objectionable as most normal people do.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,952 ✭✭✭deravarra


    Or that you find defending Islams pro-pedophilia stance objectionable as most normal people do.

    Pro paedophilia? Islam's "pro paedophilia" stance?

    Care to expand?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Second Nodin

    The qestion of defining what is or is not an Islamic country is a how long is a piece of string question and allows people to dodge the qestion because it allows Muslims to say that whatever country is mentioned is not an Islamic country or one that follows a true islamic system, as suits the debators needs at the time. On this issue what can be siad with certaintly, is that in the world at this time, is that in the Islamic world some countries have secular law, some a mixture of secular and Shariah, and some only Shariah.

    Its not a deflection. He stated "islamic countrys". That could be every one with a majority muslim population, Iran, Iran and Saudi....its a vague and nebulous term.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,388 ✭✭✭gbee


    deravarra wrote: »
    Pro paedophilia? Islam's "pro paedophilia" stance? Care to expand?

    It' an endless spin on words, isn't it? IMO, there was no need to put the adjective Pro in the comment.

    Fact: where Islamic law allows marriage to children under say 16 years of age, is a serious sexual assault or a paedophile offence in most 'Western' Countries ~ by law.

    Opinions on the laws in each country can be emotional, as most 'westerners' would be abhorred to even think of marrying a child.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,952 ✭✭✭deravarra


    gbee wrote: »
    It' an endless spin on words, isn't it? IMO, there was no need to put the adjective Pro in the comment.

    Fact: where Islamic law allows marriage to children under say 16 years of age, is a serious sexual assault or a paedophile offence in most 'Western' Countries ~ by law.

    Opinions on the laws in each country can be emotional, as most 'westerners' would be abhorred to even think of marrying a child.


    There are a lot of Islamic countries whose main tracts of law are derived in part from Shariah Law. They dont have "pro paedophilia" laws ...

    So, the accusation of "Islamic" pro paedophilia laws is a nonsense.

    If that accusation were to stick, one would have to show without any doubt, that all Islamic countries whose laws have been taken from Shariah Law encourage, support and legalise paedophilia in their countries.

    I challenge anyone here to do that :)

    And just on an aside - quite a lot of countries have their laws showing AOC as being under than 16 years old barrier... the majority of them are not Islamic. So, are we to take it that these too, according to your logic as shown above, are "pro paedophile"?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,322 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Nodin wrote: »
    Its not a deflection. He stated "islamic countrys". That could be every one with a majority muslim population, Iran, Iran and Saudi....its a vague and nebulous term.
    Yes but as dharma protector points out "In every instance, one will find a direct correlation to the degree to which a society will allow (or a least ignore), the marraige of a 9 yr old girl, to the degree to which it says it follows Sariah. For example, Turkey (secular) does not allow it at all while Saudi and Yemen ( Sunni ) and Iran (Shia) do. That is a fact". So it is a bit of a deflection

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Yes but as dharma protector points out "In every instance, one will find a direct correlation to the degree to which a society will allow (or a least ignore), the marraige of a 9 yr old girl, to the degree to which it says it follows Sariah. For example, Turkey (secular) does not allow it at all while Saudi and Yemen ( Sunni ) and Iran (Shia) do. That is a fact". So it is a bit of a deflection

    So you know exactly what countries are or are not included in the term "Islamic countrys"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,952 ✭✭✭deravarra


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Yes but as dharma protector points out "In every instance, one will find a direct correlation to the degree to which a society will allow (or a least ignore), the marraige of a 9 yr old girl, to the degree to which it says it follows Sariah. For example, Turkey (secular) does not allow it at all while Saudi and Yemen ( Sunni ) and Iran (Shia) do. That is a fact". So it is a bit of a deflection


    I would suggest you provide a list of countries that are islamic, and then we'll have a looksee for the age of consent in each of those countries.

    Let's do the same for "christian" countries .... and ... oh no we can't pick the other country in the middle east for fear of being called anti semitic (even though the AOC there is from 14)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,227 ✭✭✭The Highwayman


    Nodin wrote: »
    So you know exactly what countries are or are not included in the term "Islamic countrys"?

    You can get bogged down semantics all you want to try and cloud the issue. The FACT that in the countrys where a 9 year old girl can be married to a man as old as 50/60 is because Mohammed did it. Since Mohammed is the example of the 'prefect Muslim' then if he did it then its ooooooook.
    This is the teachings of the muslim faith is it not?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,952 ✭✭✭deravarra


    You can get bogged down semantics all you want to try and cloud the issue. The FACT that in the countrys where a 9 year old girl can be married to a man as old as 50/60 is because Mohammed did it. Since Mohammed is the example of the 'prefect Muslim' then if he did it then its ooooooook.
    This is the teachings of the muslim faith is it not?

    Not at all ... we dont want to cloud the "issue" buddy ... but we aren't buying into your pseudo psychology and trying to make this out to be what it isnt.

    If, as you suggest, Mohammed was a paedophile, and we muslims, as you put it should follow the example of the "prefect (sic) Muslim", why arent there more Islamic countries allowing paedophilia? ( whatever your definition of that is)

    Why are these countries that allow very young girls to be married off in the minority amongst other Islamic countries?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    You can get bogged down semantics all you want to try and cloud the issue. The FACT that in the countrys where a 9 year old girl can be married to a man as old as 50/60 is because Mohammed did it. Since Mohammed is the example of the 'prefect Muslim' then if he did it then its ooooooook.

    What countrys?
    'Islamic countrys'
    Which countrys are Islamic?
    'Islamic ones'

    Thats a clear and concise way of going about things all right.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 33 dharma protector


    Hi Nodin

    I was merly pointing out and actually agreeing with you that the term Islamic countries does not have any real relevance to this particular debate other than in the broadest of terms, actually for that matter either does Muslim, because what islamic countries or what Muslims do or do not do is not central to the debate ( somewhat relevant but not central). It is what claims and instructions Islam stands for that is paramount.

    Let me be clear ( i thought i was)

    I believe mohammad exsisted

    I do not claim to actually know whether or not he married and had sex with a 9 year old girl ( i just dont have suffient and reliable historical data to make or reject that claim)

    Weather you or I belive it or not is irrelevant.

    But Now ( listen, this bit is vital) :)

    Mainsteam ( not ahmadiyya) Islam claims that he did, according to their most solid sources ( there are many, I do have them, from the most Mainstream respected Islamic sources, please can we agree that i don't have to re produce them here, but I can if you want, it would be easier and more helpful to the debate if you checked and verifyed for yourself from whatever mainstream Islamic sources you care to use, rather than believe me, that way you don't just have to accept ( and suspect) what i am saying, but can find out directly yourself. ( no blind faith required by me) :)

    So, Mainstream Islam makes this claim, not just crackpot fringe groups ( or the ahmadiyya, who as explained above, have a diffeent interpretation )

    So. again once again, the point still stands. What you or I think does not matter. For example I may think that contraception is fine for Catholics but that is not what the Catholic church says. What the vatican says is catholism is catholism untill changed. What Islam claims and instructs may not be what all Muslims agree with or practice but it remains Islam

    On a related note, It is simply a non point to say that if Islam permits this why is is not more widespread. Most humans regardless of background are not sexually attracted to children, and therefore have not desire to do such a thing. Whatever causes Paedophilla is not an issue for the vast majority or humanity, Muslim or not, so whether is is permissable or not is not going to change our behaviour. You or I are not going to suddenly find children attractive just because some law says you could.

    However ( and this is important) where such a law is in force, it will not make paedophilla any more likely it will allow those with paedophine tendencies to claim devine sanction for their behaviour and get away with it, as happens throughout the Islamic world where these aspects of the Shariah are implemented.

    To return to my first point concerning the unimportance of the term Islamic countries for this debate. You have not addressed the point, which still stands. Some Islamic countries have secular law (turkey), some mix, the secular and Shariah(egypt) and some say Shariah alone ( saudi, iran) but there is a direct correlation between a country allowing ( or merely ignoring) the marraige of 9 year olds, and the degree to which they claim adherance to the sharia.This is a easily checked fact.Just pick a country, note its legal or mixed legal system and then check the minimum age for marraige of a female. Please check this out yourself, again is is better that you do this than blindly believe me. Do not believe what I say but check it out for yourself.

    Please stay engaged. I hope I am am making my points in a fair way, I do not intend to anger or belittle anyone. I just believe in presenting facts in as honest and resaonble way possible. I hope I have.

    Have a good weekend

    DP


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin



    To return to my first point concerning the unimportance of the term Islamic countries for this debate. You have not addressed the point, which still stands. Some Islamic countries have secular law (turkey), some mix, the secular and Shariah(egypt) and some say Shariah alone ( saudi, iran) but there is a direct correlation between a country allowing ( or merely ignoring) the marraige of 9 year olds, and the degree to which they claim adherance to the sharia.This is a easily checked fact.Just pick a country, note its legal or mixed legal system and then check the minimum age for marraige of a female. Please check this out yourself, again is is better that you do this than blindly believe me. Do not believe what I say but check it out for yourself.

    None of which I'd bother disputing and none of which - again - makes any difference whatsoever to the statement
    This is why 9 is the age a girl can be married off in Islamic countrys.

    being made a sweeping generalisation by the fact that "Islamic countrys" is a vague catch all term.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    deravarra wrote: »
    Not at all ... we dont want to cloud the "issue" buddy ... but we aren't buying into your pseudo psychology and trying to make this out to be what it isnt.

    If, as you suggest, Mohammed was a paedophile, and we muslims, as you put it should follow the example of the "prefect (sic) Muslim", why arent there more Islamic countries allowing paedophilia? ( whatever your definition of that is)

    Why are these countries that allow very young girls to be married off in the minority amongst other Islamic countries?
    All of this bears no relevance to the matter at hand.

    The thread title's quite simple...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 33 dharma protector


    Ok Thanks Nodin

    This is a bit about semantics ( the term has some real meaning in so far as we arte not talking about Buddhist countries or latin countries or whatever, to be far to Highwayman I think all he is guilty of is using a little shorthand)

    but i accept your point in full

    to you accept mine ?
    that Mainstream Islam does indeed allow the marraige of 9 year old girls based on what it belives and teaches is the example of Mohammad ( regardless of whatever indivdual Mulsim or countries may think or do.

    ?
    Thanks for replying


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,952 ✭✭✭deravarra


    All of this bears no relevance to the matter at hand.

    The thread title's quite simple...

    Yes, IT IS all in the title - and it's been explained that Muslim scholars believe that Mohammed did not have sex with a "9 year old wife" - as Aisha was more than that age when she married him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,020 ✭✭✭BlaasForRafa


    deravarra wrote: »
    Yes, IT IS all in the title - and it's been explained that Muslim scholars believe that Mohammed did not have sex with a "9 year old wife" - as Aisha was more than that age when she married him.

    No, One scholar has said she was 19, all the other available evidence presented in this thread says that she was 9 and much as you may dislike it, Mohammed does appear to have been a pedophile.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    deravarra wrote: »
    Yes, IT IS all in the title - and it's been explained that Muslim scholars believe that Mohammed did not have sex with a "9 year old wife" - as Aisha was more than that age when she married him.
    One scholar does not refute the other evidence. You're clutching at straws trying to defend what cannot be defended.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    to you accept mine ?
    that Mainstream Islam does indeed allow the marraige of 9 year old girls based on what it belives and teaches is the example of Mohammad ( regardless of whatever indivdual Mulsim or countries may think or do.

    ?
    Thanks for replying

    "mainstream" Islam? Suffice to say that I don't think a majority of the worlds muslims would - in this day and age - approve of such a practice.

    If anyone wants to produce statistics that show rates of such marriage per head of the various muslim countries, it would be useful. At the moment theres far too much vague waffle about the subject -nobody has shown its even a common practice where its known to be allowed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 360 ✭✭greenmachine88


    how do we know he had secks with a 9 year old?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,952 ✭✭✭deravarra


    No, One scholar has said she was 19, all the other available evidence presented in this thread says that she was 9 and much as you may dislike it, Mohammed does appear to have been a pedophile.

    What "available evidence" would that be?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,952 ✭✭✭deravarra


    One scholar does not refute the other evidence. You're clutching at straws trying to defend what cannot be defended.

    Do you know what the "other evidence" is?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    No, One scholar has said she was 19, all the other available evidence presented in this thread says that she was 9 and much as you may dislike it, Mohammed does appear to have been a pedophile.

    ....which conclusion presumes he married her for sexual and not dynastic/charitable considerations. Considering his other wives were all of age, it rather seems unlikely that he was that way inclined.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement