Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

I know you all read the Daily Mail, but we should boycott it

  • 22-06-2010 03:15AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,561 ✭✭✭


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1286909/No-excuses-forget-context-Bloody-Sunday.html

    No excuses, but never forget the context of Bloody Sunday

    Bloody Sunday was a shameful day in the proud history of the British Army.
    For 30 minutes, in the fear and confusion of that fateful afternoon in 1972, Paratroopers policing an illegal march lost their discipline and self-control.
    When the shooting was over, 13 civilians lay dead. A 14th died later in hospital.
    Truly, the Saville Report into the events of 38 years ago makes devastating reading for everyone who shares the Mail's fierce admiration of our Armed Forces and our awe of the sacrifices they've made for us, from Northern Ireland to Afghanistan.
    Yes, there may be many explanations for the Paras' conduct in that half-hour of mayhem and panic in Londonderry.
    It must be remembered that this was a time of immense tension in Northern Ireland, when soldiers were spat at and abused daily by the Catholic population they'd been called in to protect.
    Just three days earlier, two police officers had been murdered by the IRA, the latest of 68 members of the security forces to have died at the hands of terrorists in the previous 12 months.
    Meanwhile, the Bloody Sunday demonstrators were no Martin Luther King peace marchers. Many were hostile. Some, including one of the victims, were armed with nail bombs.
    Cranking up the tension yet further, as Lord Saville makes clear, the IRA were shadowing the crowd (among them, armed with a sub-machine gun which he may have fired, was Martin McGuinness, now - sickeningly - Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland).
    But this is explaining the context, not offering excuses. The fact is that, on this occasion, our troops fell abominably short of the high standards of discipline and restraint we expect from them, and which they almost always deliver.

    Although we are slightly mystified as to how he can be so certain, Lord Saville finds that the Paras shot first, without warning or provocation. Moreover, unarmed protesters were shot as they fled or lay wounded, while many soldiers later lied about their actions.

    As David Cameron (who was five at the time of the tragedy) had no choice but to say, in his dignified apology on behalf of the Government: 'What happened on Bloody Sunday was both unjustified and unjustifiable. It was wrong.'
    True, many may question the reliability of evidence given to an inquiry that began more than a quarter of a century after the events it examined - and God alone knows why Lord Saville took 12 staggering years to prepare his report.
    Countless others will point out that more than 1,000 members of the security forces were murdered in cold blood in Northern Ireland, by terrorists who have long since been released from jail.

    There were no 12-year, £191million inquiries for those victims, who died defending our democracy - nor for the families of the Omagh dead, whose requests for justice were so cynically betrayed by the Labour government.
    But such protests are fruitless. The bitter truth is that the Saville Inquiry was set up (and how fortuitous for Tony Blair that he's not around to reap what he has sown) as just one of a series of squalid moral compromises in the name of the peace process.


    We will never know if it was necessary. But what is undeniable (apart from the fact that it made some lawyers very rich) is that Northern Ireland today is more peaceful than it's been for decades.
    For this, the overwhelming glory must go to the police and 250,000 soldiers who served there, of whom all but a handful showed almost superhuman restraint.
    As we illustrate on our front page, these men, and their sons and grandsons who are dying now in Afghanistan, are the true face of the British Army. And nothing can diminish the debt we owe them.


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Millicent


    We don't all read the Daily Mail, just so you know...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,670 ✭✭✭Doc


    Never once bought one so dont think my boycotting it is going to do much.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,739 ✭✭✭✭starbelgrade


    I know you all read the Daily Mail, but we should boycott it

    Says the person who read the Daily Mail, started a thread about it, copied and pasted an article from it, then insinuated that everyone else on AH reads that newspaper.

    Nice work dude. No wonder you can't get no sleep - must be hard work trying to make sure no-one steals your big tar brush.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 80 ✭✭gulf


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1286909/No-excuses-forget-context-Bloody-Sunday.html

    No excuses, but never forget the context of Bloody Sunday

    Bloody Sunday was a shameful day in the proud history of the British Army.
    For 30 minutes, in the fear and confusion of that fateful afternoon in 1972, Paratroopers policing an illegal march lost their discipline and self-control.
    When the shooting was over, 13 civilians lay dead. A 14th died later in hospital.
    Truly, the Saville Report into the events of 38 years ago makes devastating reading for everyone who shares the Mail's fierce admiration of our Armed Forces and our awe of the sacrifices they've made for us, from Northern Ireland to Afghanistan.
    Yes, there may be many explanations for the Paras' conduct in that half-hour of mayhem and panic in Londonderry.
    It must be remembered that this was a time of immense tension in Northern Ireland, when soldiers were spat at and abused daily by the Catholic population they'd been called in to protect.
    Just three days earlier, two police officers had been murdered by the IRA, the latest of 68 members of the security forces to have died at the hands of terrorists in the previous 12 months.
    Meanwhile, the Bloody Sunday demonstrators were no Martin Luther King peace marchers. Many were hostile. Some, including one of the victims, were armed with nail bombs.
    Cranking up the tension yet further, as Lord Saville makes clear, the IRA were shadowing the crowd (among them, armed with a sub-machine gun which he may have fired, was Martin McGuinness, now - sickeningly - Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland).
    But this is explaining the context, not offering excuses. The fact is that, on this occasion, our troops fell abominably short of the high standards of discipline and restraint we expect from them, and which they almost always deliver.

    Although we are slightly mystified as to how he can be so certain, Lord Saville finds that the Paras shot first, without warning or provocation. Moreover, unarmed protesters were shot as they fled or lay wounded, while many soldiers later lied about their actions.

    As David Cameron (who was five at the time of the tragedy) had no choice but to say, in his dignified apology on behalf of the Government: 'What happened on Bloody Sunday was both unjustified and unjustifiable. It was wrong.'
    True, many may question the reliability of evidence given to an inquiry that began more than a quarter of a century after the events it examined - and God alone knows why Lord Saville took 12 staggering years to prepare his report.
    Countless others will point out that more than 1,000 members of the security forces were murdered in cold blood in Northern Ireland, by terrorists who have long since been released from jail.

    There were no 12-year, £191million inquiries for those victims, who died defending our democracy - nor for the families of the Omagh dead, whose requests for justice were so cynically betrayed by the Labour government.
    But such protests are fruitless. The bitter truth is that the Saville Inquiry was set up (and how fortuitous for Tony Blair that he's not around to reap what he has sown) as just one of a series of squalid moral compromises in the name of the peace process.


    We will never know if it was necessary. But what is undeniable (apart from the fact that it made some lawyers very rich) is that Northern Ireland today is more peaceful than it's been for decades.
    For this, the overwhelming glory must go to the police and 250,000 soldiers who served there, of whom all but a handful showed almost superhuman restraint.
    As we illustrate on our front page, these men, and their sons and grandsons who are dying now in Afghanistan, are the true face of the British Army. And nothing can diminish the debt we owe them.

    Get a life.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭ynotdu


    The Daily Mail Newspaper has an English version and an Irish version.

    It is not so evident now but still happens.
    Englands version panders to the lowest common denominator 'Little Englanders in its Editorials and panders in the Irish version to 'Little Irelanders'

    In its English version it once called Ireland "A swamp"

    There are inconsistancys in the OP's post,but he is coming from the right direction about the rag!


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 23,257 Mod ✭✭✭✭GLaDOS


    Cake, and grief counseling, will be available at the conclusion of the test



  • Moderators Posts: 8,948 ✭✭✭x PyRo


    tl;dr


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭ynotdu


    x PyRo wrote: »
    tl;dr

    You would not find a sensible Headline like that in the Daily Mail!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,038 ✭✭✭Seloth


    Crap begetting crap :p

    Never touched that paper in my life and never plan to either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,876 ✭✭✭pirelli


    Says the person who read the Daily Mail, started a thread about it, copied and pasted an article from it, then insinuated that everyone else on AH reads that newspaper.

    Nice work dude. No wonder you can't get no sleep - must be hard work trying to make sure no-one steals your big tar brush.

    I think your missing the point.

    They didn't die for british democracy, they were murdered. Peace in northern ireland was shattered because of it and this was mentioned throughout the Day the apology was made by the british goverment. Bloody sunday contributed if not caused much of the unrest and violence in northern ireland.

    Tragically There was 150 fatalities of the british soldiers. The northern irish people lost more than 6000 souls to the violence perpetrated/contributed to by deceit and lies of the british administration. The daily mail even aknowledges their lies. Perhaps this is all debatable and if so then perhaps the daily mail shouldn't ignite more controversy and rather accept that very administrations full apology and what it means rather than redefine it to suit their vain glory.

    Daily mail claim that 250,000 thousand police and army service persons brought peace to northern ireland and praise the superhuman effort of the soldiers and police. There was no mention of the 6 thousand victims killed and their families superhuman suffering all of whom were civilians; they appear to go unmentioned. As if their contribution pales in signifigance to the dedication of english service men.

    Of the soldiers who lost their lives, it was the soldiers families that suffered and not the administration the daily mail pay homage too and that same administration that covered up and allowed the atrocities to escalate to violence and unrest that contibuted to the loss of 6000 nothern irish people to violence.

    Why not pay tribute to the dedication of british taxi drivers and wish them safe passage on their three superhuman trips abroad to thailand every year.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭Butch Cassidy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,099 ✭✭✭Dean820


    You're living in the past, maaaaaaaaaan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,409 ✭✭✭old_aussie


    I know you all read the Daily Mail, but we should boycott it

    You know jack sh_it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭Bob the Builder


    Ah yes, I get the Daily Mail every day. Anyway, too late, I've already cleaned my arse with that days newspaper.

    Thats about as far as my use for that newspaper goes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 587 ✭✭✭some_dose


    Isn't there already a thread about this article?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,575 ✭✭✭✭FlutterinBantam


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1286909/No-excuses-forget-context-Bloody-Sunday.html

    No excuses, but never forget the context of Bloody Sunday

    Bloody Sunday was a shameful day in the proud history of the British Army.
    For 30 minutes, in the fear and confusion of that fateful afternoon in 1972, Paratroopers policing an illegal march lost their discipline and self-control.
    When the shooting was over, 13 civilians lay dead. A 14th died later in hospital.
    Truly, the Saville Report into the events of 38 years ago makes devastating reading for everyone who shares the Mail's fierce admiration of our Armed Forces and our awe of the sacrifices they've made for us, from Northern Ireland to Afghanistan.
    Yes, there may be many explanations for the Paras' conduct in that half-hour of mayhem and panic in Londonderry.
    It must be remembered that this was a time of immense tension in Northern Ireland, when soldiers were spat at and abused daily by the Catholic population they'd been called in to protect.
    Just three days earlier, two police officers had been murdered by the IRA, the latest of 68 members of the security forces to have died at the hands of terrorists in the previous 12 months.
    Meanwhile, the Bloody Sunday demonstrators were no Martin Luther King peace marchers. Many were hostile. Some, including one of the victims, were armed with nail bombs.
    Cranking up the tension yet further, as Lord Saville makes clear, the IRA were shadowing the crowd (among them, armed with a sub-machine gun which he may have fired, was Martin McGuinness, now - sickeningly - Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland).
    But this is explaining the context, not offering excuses. The fact is that, on this occasion, our troops fell abominably short of the high standards of discipline and restraint we expect from them, and which they almost always deliver.

    Although we are slightly mystified as to how he can be so certain, Lord Saville finds that the Paras shot first, without warning or provocation. Moreover, unarmed protesters were shot as they fled or lay wounded, while many soldiers later lied about their actions.

    As David Cameron (who was five at the time of the tragedy) had no choice but to say, in his dignified apology on behalf of the Government: 'What happened on Bloody Sunday was both unjustified and unjustifiable. It was wrong.'
    True, many may question the reliability of evidence given to an inquiry that began more than a quarter of a century after the events it examined - and God alone knows why Lord Saville took 12 staggering years to prepare his report.
    Countless others will point out that more than 1,000 members of the security forces were murdered in cold blood in Northern Ireland, by terrorists who have long since been released from jail.

    There were no 12-year, £191million inquiries for those victims, who died defending our democracy - nor for the families of the Omagh dead, whose requests for justice were so cynically betrayed by the Labour government.
    But such protests are fruitless. The bitter truth is that the Saville Inquiry was set up (and how fortuitous for Tony Blair that he's not around to reap what he has sown) as just one of a series of squalid moral compromises in the name of the peace process.


    We will never know if it was necessary. But what is undeniable (apart from the fact that it made some lawyers very rich) is that Northern Ireland today is more peaceful than it's been for decades.
    For this, the overwhelming glory must go to the police and 250,000 soldiers who served there, of whom all but a handful showed almost superhuman restraint.
    As we illustrate on our front page, these men, and their sons and grandsons who are dying now in Afghanistan, are the true face of the British Army. And nothing can diminish the debt we owe them.

    Get some sleep pal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,816 ✭✭✭✭galwayrush


    Who needs to buy it when we can read it all here.:pac::pac::pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,252 ✭✭✭✭stovelid


    Its definitely one of Bono's more illogical and bombastic ditties and I for one would be glad to see it gone. I mean, why can't the children just keep their shoes on if somebody has broken bottles on the street? :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,661 ✭✭✭General Zod


    I would propose a boycott of linking to DM articles on AH.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭Scrummage


    Ye well said last poster


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,594 ✭✭✭bonerm


    I find the Daily Mail is an absorbing read. That's why I wipe my arse with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,941 ✭✭✭thebigbiffo


    ynotdu wrote: »
    The Daily Mail Newspaper has an English version and an Irish version.

    It is not so evident now but still happens.
    Englands version panders to the lowest common denominator 'Little Englanders in its Editorials and panders in the Irish version to 'Little Irelanders'

    In its English version it once called Ireland "A swamp"

    There are inconsistancys in the OP's post,but he is coming from the right direction about the rag!

    no great lover of the mail but the irish version is very different to the 'middle england' mentality across the water.

    in fairness to the irish editorial - they went after wilford (the commander of the paras on bloody sunday) and demanded an apology on sunday. they published photos of him and his wife and their lovely little retirement cottage in belgium where he teaches fine art - they even go so far as to call him the 'butcher of the bogside'.

    not the kind of words you'd expect from a paper that wasn't independent of their hateful english sister paper


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,060 ✭✭✭✭biko


    Meanwhile, the Bloody Sunday demonstrators were no Martin Luther King peace marchers. Many were hostile. Some, including one of the victims, were armed with nail bombs.
    Fairly sure that was a plant.
    Northern Ireland today is more peaceful than it's been for decades.
    For this, the overwhelming glory must go to the police and 250,000 soldiers who served there, of whom all but a handful showed almost superhuman restraint.
    F*ck off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,798 ✭✭✭goose2005


    pirelli wrote: »
    Tragically There was 150 fatalities of the british soldiers. The northern irish people lost more than 6000 souls to the violence perpetrated/contributed to by deceit and lies of the british administration.

    Actually 502 British soldiers were killed (plus seven TA), and only 3,526 died total, 718 of whom were not Northern Irish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,241 ✭✭✭Sanjuro


    This is old news. Old as in the entire thing was posted last week.

    [/thread]


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,559 ✭✭✭✭AnonoBoy


    biko wrote: »
    Fairly sure that was a plant.

    And the Saville Enquiry agrees.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,941 ✭✭✭thebigbiffo


    biko wrote: »
    Fairly sure that was a plant.


    F*ck off.

    nope. one young lad actually was carrying a nail bomb - read it in the Times supplement last week - but saville reckoned the soldier who shot him could not have known this and therefore couldn't have justifiably shot him. the soldiers did however take the nail bomb out of his pocket and place it in his hand before inviting photographers to take pictures - trying to justify shooting a 17 year old boy.

    however, you're second point is more than fair :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 852 ✭✭✭moonpurple


    the article opens up with

    "Bloody Sunday was a shameful day in the proud history of the British Army."

    events 35 years ago

    how about shameful activities that saw small children forced to leave the safety of their beds and go in fear to a church hall

    in the last 4 weeks

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0618/breaking1.html

    you want to be annoyed... be annoyed with the rira cira


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,404 ✭✭✭Pittens


    if there are people from the daily mail who look at page impressions and ad revenue they must be delighted with the OP who didnt even have the sense to print the entire article without a link ( or parts if that is against the bye laws).

    OP is a Daily Mail plant!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,941 ✭✭✭thebigbiffo


    Pittens wrote: »
    if there are people from the daily mail who look at page impressions and ad revenue they must be delighted with the OP who didnt even have the sense to print the entire article without a link ( or parts if that is against the bye laws).

    OP is a Daily Mail plant!

    to be fair. even if a large percentage of the few hundred who view this page click through the link, it wont even make a fraction of a percent hit on their page impressions - the daily mail website is one of the most viewed in the uk. dont think it'd be worth the time for a plant to bother postin this on boards


Advertisement
Advertisement