What was the Attorney General doing at Bilderberg this year?.

Paul Gallagher was their for the big question of whether the euro will survive. Bilderberg are afraid that the countries in trouble will leave and the euro and will fall apart.

They are worried for "PIGS" Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain

Jimmy Garlic wrote: »

Paul Gallagher, the man that advises the government on all matters legal was an attendee at this years Bilderberg meeting in Sitges, Spain. No coverage whatsoever in the Irish media, I think the people of Ireland deserve an explanation as to why the chief law officer of the state is attending a private meeting where democracy is subverted and policy is made by a handful of elites.

Bilderberg's only activity is its annual Conference. At the meetings, no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued. Since 1954, fifty-seven conferences have been held. The names of the participants are made available to the press. Participants are chosen for their experience, their knowledge, and their standing; all participants attend Bilderberg in a private and not an official capacity.

http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/meeting2010.html

Explain again how democracy is subverted, policy is made and why Paul Gallagher has to explain what he was doing as a private individual at a private meeting?

prinz wrote: »

http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/meeting2010.html

Explain again how democracy is subverted, policy is made and why Paul Gallagher has to explain what he was doing as a private individual at a private meeting?

it's a secret meeting of "elites" sure what else could they be doing other than furthering the cause of the NWO and plotting to take over the world!

Jimmy Garlic wrote: »

Paul Gallagher, the man that advises the government on all matters legal was an attendee at this years Bilderberg meeting in Sitges, Spain. No coverage whatsoever in the Irish media, I think the people of Ireland deserve an explanation as to why the chief law officer of the state is attending a private meeting where democracy is subverted and policy is made by a handful of elites.

Peter Sutherland was also in attendance, intrestingly he is a former Attorney General ( Now chairman of Goldman Sachs International). The Irish media would tell us about the evils of headshops 1000 times a day if they could get away with it but won't say boo when the Trilateral Commission meets in Dublin or the Attorney General attends Bilderberg.

http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/meeting_2010_2.html

If you expect any serious answers you have definitely started this topic in the wrong forum.

Corkfeen wrote: »

Conspiracy Theories -> That a way.....;)

Ah bless, it's nice to see the wannabe Mods about.

oppenheimer1 wrote: »

Policy is not formed by the AG. Should every citizen have to declare where they go on holiday from now on?

Don't be so naive. He just happened to choose to go there on a private holiday did he? And as to policy being formed by the AG, of course it isn't; it's formed by former Attorneys-general as soon as they move into the private (mainly banking) sector. Even the dogs on the street know that. He's being groomed. Peter Sutherland can't live forever.

prinz wrote: »

http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/meeting2010.html

Explain again how democracy is subverted, policy is made and why Paul Gallagher has to explain what he was doing as a private individual at a private meeting?

See above. Or did the bank-bailout not happen? Did the Irish government not turn tens of billions of Euros of private corporate debt into sovereign debt to cover the gambling debts of senior bondholders, on the advice (instructions) of men like Peter Sutherland and Dermot Gleeson (both former AGs;)) and now incredibly well-connected international bankers? I must have imagined it. Maybe the tinfoil is affecting my brain.

Democracy is subverted when senior government officials use their office to further their own careers (and line their own pockets) by being bought off by a clique of high powered rich private interests at the expense of the people they are supposed to serve. You should look at the definition of a "banana republic".

andrew wrote: »

Plotting to take over the world obviously. As attorney general of a tiny Western European island, he surely plays an important role in deciding these kind of things.

Smug, superior condescending sarcasm? Well I'd never expect that from a pro-establishment spindoctor. I'd love to know who you work for. Haven't you been trying to sell the pro-nuclear,pro-TEPCO, pro-profiteering "company line" over in the Nuclear disaster thread aswell?

Isn't Peter Sutherland, Chairman of BP, Chairman of Goldman Sachs International, Director of Royal Bank of Scotland etc.,etc. also a former attorney general of a tiny western European island?

How about Dermot Gleeson? Architect of the collapse of AIB. I'd say he's in the poorhouse now too. Chairman of AIB, Board member of Independent News and Media, ombudsman for DeBeers, etc. etc., Isn't he also a former attorney general of a tiny western European island?

phantom_lord wrote: »

it's a secret meeting of "elites" sure what else could they be doing other than furthering the cause of the NWO and plotting to take over the world!

See above. All three, former (or current) AGs of a tiny western European island and all coincidentally alumni of the same secret society that does it's business behind closed doors.

But of course ye're right lads, they just happened to go on a private holiday in the same place as Bilderberg and when they meet behind closed doors they're just knocking back a couple of beers, having a game of Scrabble and talking about wimminz parts. Nothing to do with putting the interests of billionaires and elites ahead of the interests of the world's population at all.

I'll get my tinfoil hat. Conspiracy forum ..>> thataway y'said?:D

Deleted User wrote: »

Seriously, go to the Conspiracies forum... That post hurts my head to read. Was it necessary to say "tiny western european island" so many times?

As for "private corporate debt into sovereign debt".. If you have a pension, you're most likely one of the senior bond holders you hate so much.

A well reasoned,well thought out and finely articulated rebuttal sir... up there with, "Yeah, well so's your face".:pac:

With regard to the "tiny Western European island" I felt I should mention it a few times (in response to one of your mates' arguments) as I wasn't sure you'd be able to join the dots. I obviously didn't mention it enough times. I'll PM you a drawing.

I don't hate the bondholders and I am perfectly well aware that private pension funds constitute a large percentage of these. I feel very sorry for those people. They shouldn't have entrusted their savings to the likes of Peter Sutherland. A bumper year for Goldman Sachs' executives this year I believe. No more nor less than organised crime.

However, I still fail to see, how you reckon the Irish State is responsible for the losses of private individuals. It certainly wasn't entitled to the profits.

Btw, my position is one espoused by nearly every independent internationally regarded economist in the world including a couple of Nobel Laureates. It is also the position of the ECB now after we've been fcuked royally, but no doubt you consider these people tinfoil hat merchants too.