Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Possible social welfare cuts in Ireland?

145791014

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Deise Tom


    RichardAnd wrote: »

    People can call these heartless but my hat is off to FF for having the balls to do something that's very necessary but very unpopular (with most people).

    I would love to know if Enda Kenny or Eamon Guilmore would have the balls to purpose what FF are doing to try and turn things around. Somehow i doubt they would. Maybe FG might do something, but not to the same extent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 725 ✭✭✭rightwingdub


    Deise Tom wrote: »
    I would love to know if Enda Kenny or Eamon Guilmore would have the balls to purpose what FF are doing to try and turn things around. Somehow i doubt they would. Maybe FG might do something, but not to the same extent.

    FG would be too spinless to reform the welfare state and Labour are a bunch of bleeding heart do gooders.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Deise Tom


    CoalBucket wrote: »
    I have a suggestion for all the people in here who think it's a great life on the dole or having to claim social welfare payments. How about ye try living on € 196 a week for a couple of months and see how ye get on.

    Everyone knows that to live on €196 is not easy. The Government have not said they will cut it, if a person was interested in getting off their ass and look for some work and to have proof that they are doing so. Its the people that sit on it 24/7 that they are going after.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 gombeen nation


    i can't believe the begrudging attitude of some people. the vast majority of people on the dole don't want to be on the dole. i look for work, yet there is none. i have to give up my old punto (having a car is a great thing even if it is an old banger) and the internet is next.

    my only regret is getting sucked into the whole aspirational bull****, i owe alot on a credit card and i am angry with myself for thinking the good times would never end. still if the government offers me a job i would take it, there is plenty of potholes out there needing filling!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,858 ✭✭✭Deise Tom


    AARRRGH wrote: »

    It is easy if you don't waste money on rubbish like junk food and alcohol.

    add in drugs off all kinds.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    i can't believe the begrudging attitude of some people. the vast majority of people on the dole don't want to be on the dole. i look for work, yet there is none. i have to give up my old punto (having a car is a great thing even if it is an old banger) and the internet is next.

    my only regret is getting sucked into the whole aspirational bull****, i owe alot on a credit card and i am angry with myself for thinking the good times would never end. still if the government offers me a job i would take it, there is plenty of potholes out there needing filling!


    there is plenty of work. maybe you need to re-skill?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    i can't believe the begrudging attitude of some people. the vast majority of people on the dole don't want to be on the dole. i look for work, yet there is none. i have to give up my old punto (having a car is a great thing even if it is an old banger) and the internet is next.

    my only regret is getting sucked into the whole aspirational bull****, i owe alot on a credit card and i am angry with myself for thinking the good times would never end. still if the government offers me a job i would take it, there is plenty of potholes out there needing filling!

    I think you've misunderstood what the new bill is. It's not to punish those who want to work, it's to punish those who don't want to work.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 gombeen nation


    courses guarantee u nothing. i would rather work. i have done plenty of courses; soul destroying. i don't mind working for my dole, but then again alot of unions wouldn't like me under cutting their members. that's what is so charming about ireland so many vested interests, so many gombeens.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    courses guarantee u nothing. i would rather work. i have done plenty of courses; soul destroying. i don't mind working for my dole, but then again alot of unions wouldn't like me under cutting their members. that's what is so charming about ireland so many vested interests, so many gombeens.

    If you are determined to be successful you can be successful. Maybe stop blaming others for your problem and you might get somewhere...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    courses guarantee u nothing. i would rather work. i have done plenty of courses; soul destroying. i don't mind working for my dole, but then again alot of unions wouldn't like me under cutting their members. that's what is so charming about ireland so many vested interests, so many gombeens.

    You seem to have a very negative outlook/attitude i dont think i'd be too quick to hire you


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭jonsnow


    AARRRGH wrote: »
    If you are determined to be successful you can be successful. Maybe stop blaming others for your problem and you might get somewhere...

    what are you some knock off tony robbins.thats not true-being determined to be successful is an advantage but it doesnt guarantee that you will be a success.nothing does.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    jonsnow wrote: »
    what are you some knock off tony robbins.thats not true-being determined to be successful is an advantage but it doesnt guarantee that you will be a success.nothing does.

    It's more than an advantage. I don't know any highly ambitious, motivated people who have spent any significant amount of time on the dole.

    For example, me, I am certain I could walk into another job now. Why? Because I am highly educated, highly skilled, have worked very hard to understand and succeed at office politics, and have built up a number of bullet proof references.

    Everything that happens to you in life comes down to your own decisions. Make better decisions and you will have a better life.

    Btw I've never listened to a Tony Robbins tape in my life. And I feel sorry for people who want to work. But if your life isn't working out the only one to blame is you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭jonsnow


    ntlbell wrote: »
    You seem to have a very negative outlook/attitude i dont think i'd be too quick to hire you

    yeah well in the interview maybe he can lie about how hes a winner and he doesn,t want to continue being a human parasite on the dole and he runs 20 miles to his local library where hes learning mandarin all day.maybe youl,d give the guy a shot then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭jonsnow


    AARRRGH wrote: »
    It's more than an advantage. I don't know any highly ambitious, motivated people who have spent any significant amount of time on the dole.

    For example, me, I am certain I could walk into another job now. Why? Because I am highly educated, highly skilled, have worked very hard to understand and succeed at office politics, and have built up a number of bullet proof references.

    Everything that happens to you in life comes down to your own decisions. Make better decisions and you will have a better life.

    Btw I've never listened to a Tony Robbins tape in my life. And I feel sorry for people who want to work. But if your life isn't working out the only one to blame is you.

    so external factors play no part in how a persons life turns out.Your life mightn,t be working out for any number of reasons that have nothing to do with your attitude or decisions ie accident,serious illness.So your point doesnt really hold water there are always factors beyond your control.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,121 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    courses guarantee u nothing. i would rather work. i have done plenty of courses; soul destroying. i don't mind working for my dole, but then again alot of unions wouldn't like me under cutting their members. that's what is so charming about ireland so many vested interests, so many gombeens.


    True, things like FAS courses are a joke but imagine this, you have one job and two people want it. One has spent the last 6 months on a FAS course, the other one the dole, which do you hire?

    I rest my case.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    jonsnow wrote: »
    so external factors play no part in how a persons life turns out.Your life mightn,t be working out for any number of reasons that have nothing to do with your attitude or decisions ie accident,serious illness.So your point doesnt really hold water there are always factors beyond your control.

    External factors play a very minor part for most people, yet people continue blame everyone else but themselves for their problems.

    Obviously if someones in an accident and can't work that is an exceptional situation, but 99% of people don't have that excuse.

    Are you one of those people who think other people are responsible for how you feel?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭jonsnow


    AARRRGH wrote: »
    External factors play a very minor part for most people, yet people continue blame everyone else but themselves for their problems.
    I disagree
    AARRRGH wrote: »
    Are you one of those people who think other people are responsible for how you feel?
    well yeah.If people are jerks it makes me feel angry,if people are nice it makes me feel good,if a cute girl smiles at me that makes me feel really good.Are you unaffected by how other people treat you!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    jonsnow wrote: »
    well yeah.If people are jerks it makes me feel angry,if people are nice it makes me feel good,if a cute girl smiles at me that makes me feel really good.Are you unaffected by how other people treat you!!!

    Do they create the feelings in you, or do you?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭jonsnow


    AARRRGH wrote: »
    Do they create the feelings in you, or do you?

    lets say for arguments sake i walked up to you and punched you in the face for no reason.If you experience some strong feelings- ie.fear anger.Dont try and blame me.After all they are YOUR feelings.Take some personal responsibility man;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    AARRRGH wrote: »
    Do they create the feelings in you, or do you?


    Tony Robbins, rofl


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    jonsnow wrote: »
    lets say for arguments sake i walked up to you and punched you in the face for no reason.If you experience some strong feelings- ie.fear anger.Dont try and blame me.After all they are YOUR feelings.Take some personal responsibility man;)

    I'm trying to make you see the concept of personal responsibility is all encompassing. Once you understand this you can take full control of your life and stop blaming others for your failings.

    It's an abstract concept; you either get it or you don't...

    But to answer your question, it is a no brainer for me that I am responsible for how I react to the event. I could choose to get angry or scared or whatever. The final decision is mine. I am responsible.

    You'll never meet a highly successful person who has a victim mentality. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 683 ✭✭✭Scram


    kinda funny how this thread started a few weeks ago and then the goverment come out with "social wellfare bill"..makes yah think


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 175 ✭✭zielarz


    Yes, I'm for social welfare cuts. 10% every year so after 10 years there is no social welfare at all. That's the simplest way to teach people responsibility for their actions.
    The alternative is to raise taxes which would mean penaltizing the productive part of the society even more...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,700 ✭✭✭irishh_bob


    AARRRGH wrote: »
    I'm trying to make you see the concept of personal responsibility is all encompassing. Once you understand this you can take full control of your life and stop blaming others for your failings.

    It's an abstract concept; you either get it or you don't...

    But to answer your question, it is a no brainer for me that I am responsible for how I react to the event. I could choose to get angry or scared or whatever. The final decision is mine. I am responsible.

    You'll never meet a highly successful person who has a victim mentality. :)


    im all for personal responsibility , unfortunatley , you seem to believe the onus is all on the victims side , you also seem to lump all grievances in together , i wouldnt equate the reduction in ones wellfare by the goverment to being brutally assaulted in ones home by a masked intruder , thier are degrees of victimhood to which the expected outcomes must be considered , your post is over simplistic and a tad smug


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,382 ✭✭✭✭AARRRGH


    irishh_bob wrote: »
    im all for personal responsibility , unfortunatley , you seem to believe the onus is all on the victims side , you also seem to lump all grievances in together , i wouldnt equate the reduction in ones wellfare by the goverment to being brutally assaulted in ones home by a masked intruder , thier are degrees of victimhood to which the expected outcomes must be considered , your post is over simplistic and a tad smug

    Note this is a long post, if you're only going to skim it or read one part, jump to the third last paragraph.

    No, you're just not getting it. And you had to use an extreme example ("being brutally assaulted in ones home by a masked intruder") to make your point.

    I'll try to explain futher.

    Most people aren't victims. If you lose your job and can't find another job you aren't a victim; you are the result of a life of poor choices.

    I'm going to use me as an example (not because I am "smug" but because I subscribe to the personal responsibility philosophy). I am highly qualified - I have a masters degree in computer science and I am a qualified accountant. I diversified my skills so I'd always have something to fall back on should I lose my job. I can work in nearly any area of IT (I made an effort of have experience as a programmer, tester, system admin and designer), and obviously I can work in finance. This was a conscious decisions so I would always be employable. I'm also constantly updating my skills so I am valuable to employers.

    I run a business on the side so I have a second income should I ever need one.

    I save about 2/3's of my wages every month so I have a massive rainy day fund and I will never have to worry about being in debt.

    I have made an effort to have contacts in many companies and learnt how to play the game of office politics so I know what managers like and understand.

    Basically I have done as much as I can be reasonably expected to do to make sure:

    a) I will never be first on the redundancy list
    b) I am the kind of employee who can walk into another job
    c) I will never need to be in a position where I am worried about the dole being cut

    I have taken total responsibility for my finances and career.

    But it goes further. Now I'll use your extreme "brutally assaulted in ones home by a masked intruder" example.

    I am aware the world is a ****ed place. It is literally full of selfish greedy scumbags who would screw you over if they could. Being aware of this, I have made an effort to reduce my chances of ever being assaulted (attackers choose their victims, there are ways you can avoid being selected).

    I go to the gym, I do martial arts training, I am aware of my surroundings and who is around me at all times, and I never go to bed without making sure every door and window is locked. I also make an effort not to associate with the wrong people or get myself in a situation where I could be in danger.

    IF someone came up from behind me and brutally assulted me I would consider myself a victim, but if I am any way responsible for the assault (walking up a dark alley on my own, getting myself involved in something I can't handle, being drunk on the street and giving someone a dirty look, etc.) then no way am I a victim. If I could and should have made a decision which would have prevented the incident than I am not a victim.

    In any situation I am responsible for how I react to it both emotionally and physically. If we continue with your extreme example, if I am a hemophiliac and I am attacked, I will probably be in a physically worse shape after the assault. Who is responsible for that? Me of course. My condition is what's causing the extreme injuries, not the assault.

    But I don't like extreme examples. Let's take a normal day to day argument. Let's say there are two girls: girl1 is easy going, girl2 is sensitive. A man makes a joke about fat girls being ugly. Girl1 laughs. Girl2 gets upset. Do you really think the man is responsible for creating their emotional response, or did each girl independently generate her own response?

    Here's the best bit: as soon as girl2 realises she is responsible for how she feels, not the world, she can fix herself and stop being so sensitive. She is able to break her victim mentality and stop being a victim.

    There are of course genuine situations where people can claim to genuinely be a victim, e.g. a car slaming into you from behind because they weren't watching the road, a tile landing on your head and killing you, etc.), but these are extreme situations and have nothing in common with the man who can't find a job because he has no skills due to a life of poor decisions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 511 ✭✭✭Smiley Burnett


    Deise Tom wrote: »
    I would love to know if Enda Kenny or Eamon Guilmore would have the balls to purpose what FF are doing to try and turn things around. Somehow i doubt they would. Maybe FG might do something, but not to the same extent.

    do you actually think that it takes "balls" to bail out Anglo-Irish bank with taxpayers money, and on the other hand take money from the health service, from the elderly, from children with special needs?
    thats not "balls"!! thats "neck"!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,046 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    zielarz wrote: »
    Yes, I'm for social welfare cuts. 10% every year so after 10 years there is no social welfare at all.
    You might want to recheck your sums there but that's not how percentages work.

    In any case, eleiminating all social welfare is beyond the pale for me. A person who has been in employment for 20 years loses their job: they should have some basic social welfare to get by until they find something else. The problem is simply that the dole is more than we can afford and there are plenty of abusers in the system that have no intention of working. These long term leeches DO need to receive 100% welfare cuts however.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,007 ✭✭✭✭thebman


    murphaph wrote: »
    You might want to recheck your sums there but that's not how percentages work.

    In any case, eleiminating all social welfare is beyond the pale for me. A person who has been in employment for 20 years loses their job: they should have some basic social welfare to get by until they find something else. The problem is simply that the dole is more than we can afford and there are plenty of abusers in the system that have no intention of working. These long term leeches DO need to receive 100% welfare cuts however.

    Well if there were no social welfare people would save money for when they are unemployed in theory anyway.

    Obviously some people would end up doing silly things like not having any money when they get laid off but I think in theory no unemployment benefit would not be a bad thing.

    Obviously you would still need benefits for those that cannot work though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 152 ✭✭Gus99


    In terms of the weekly JSA/JSB rate, I think there should be much more emphasis on how much you have actually contributed previously through PRSI, before being unemployed. Instead of having a (generally) flat rate for JSA (I know it varies if you are younger etc), why not basically abolish JSA and have everyone qualify for JSB, where the amount is linked to your previous earnings.

    http://www.citizensinformation.ie/categories/social-welfare/social-welfare-payments/unemployed-people/jobseekers_benefit

    This would have the dual benefit of providing a cushion to (and giving back to) people who have made significant PRSI contributions in the past, while making the "career unemployment" option much less attractive.

    Lots of other countries pay higher amounts (but for a certain period) than we do to people who have just been made unemployed (% of last salary, capped at x) - surely this is a more equitable approach?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,046 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Gus99 wrote: »
    In terms of the weekly JSA/JSB rate, I think there should be much more emphasis on how much you have actually contributed previously through PRSI, before being unemployed. Instead of having a (generally) flat rate for JSA (I know it varies if you are younger etc), why not basically abolish JSA and have everyone qualify for JSB, where the amount is linked to your previous earnings.

    http://www.citizensinformation.ie/categories/social-welfare/social-welfare-payments/unemployed-people/jobseekers_benefit

    This would have the dual benefit of providing a cushion to (and giving back to) people who have made significant PRSI contributions in the past, while making the "career unemployment" option much less attractive.

    Lots of other countries pay higher amounts (but for a certain period) than we do to people who have just been made unemployed (% of last salary, capped at x) - surely this is a more equitable approach?
    It's clearly the way to go to start tackling career benefit thieves and to provide that cushion to those who have recently lost their jobs after years contributing in PRSI. Ireland and the UK are unusual in Western Europe in operating a flat "dole" but ours is of course about 3 times more than their's and is unsustainable.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement