Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

[US/IRL] 6x17/18 - "The End" (2.5 Hour Series Finale) [** SPOILERS WITHIN **]

1181921232453

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,871 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    7

    Can people SERIOUSLY say it's sufficient for them not to know any of these things and just to surmise and theorise? If that's the case, then we end up having to surmise and theorise over EVERY SINGLE plot mystery over 6 seasons, most of which have come to unfulfilling ends.

    Ron Moore famously declared, when composing the end of the BSG story, that “It’s the Characters, Stupid.” He wanted to focus on what happened to the characters and their story, and the plot and mysteries took second place.
    Same thing with Lost .
    The show had lots of big mysteries. Many people enjoyed it for these mysteries, but if the show is really about the characters, the mysteries were a mistake. And we still would have puzzled over them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,824 ✭✭✭RoyalMarine


    9
    perfect ending. have to admit, i loved every second of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,534 ✭✭✭Dman001


    9
    Makes ZERO sense. like zero! Desmond could go down to pull the stone so someone could kill Flocke? Ok. But if he's then mortal what risk does he pose at all? Absolutely no risk!! lol i mean what's he capable of doing as a mortal to the world?

    Here's a massive plot failing imo: Flocke can't leave the Island. That much is established. So we surmised if he killed the candidates he could leave. Ehhhh no. He had motive and opportunity to do so if that were the case. So what danger did he pose? He's trapped on the island, seemingly the only way to kill him is to pull the plug/stone, which presumably is the very act that WOULD risk the fate of the world. I assume from the complete meltdown of the island that the release of magical electromagnetism could be an OOOOOOPS.

    Someone have a go at rationally explaining this to me. please!!!
    Ha yes I just realized there are holes in my theory. :D

    Well what would make more sense is that Desmond was brought to the island so he could pull the cork and destroy the island, ultimately killing everyone including FLocke.

    Edit: I don't believe FLocke was truely mortal after pulling the cork. Watching the fight scene between him and Jack in this episode, he was still seemed pretty ruthless to me.

    Edit 2: Also remember MiB had a very negative view of humanity, so another reason to contain him on the island.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭jimbling


    7
    Maybe Smokey becomes human only while the cork is pulled / when the light is out?

    Obviously you can't leave the cork out, that would bring on the destruction of the Island (and presumably the world).... so... perhaps when you put the cork back in, Flocke turns back into Smokey?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭TonyD79


    9
    seadnamac wrote: »
    Beat me to it!

    As someone mentioned earlier by Jack saving the Island's light he also saved the light which all the losties in the Church needed to move on.

    As for explaining all the mysteries well certain things are better left unexplained. For instance the X files went downhill when it started to explain too much towards the end. If you just want good characterisation then go watch Greys Anatomy which is void of complex mysteries.

    Would have been better if it was Ben instead of Kate who killed Flocke.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,045 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    TonyD79 wrote: »
    As for explaining all the mysteries well certain things are better left unexplained. For instance the X files went downhill when it started to explain too much towards the end.
    It went downhill because they too made it up as they went along. They then tried to knit it altogether with the bees and the clones and the alien soldiers and the hybrids and the greys and the... etc etc. It made little sense.
    "Lost" wasn't planned either so any explanation would probably have failed.

    BUT that doesn't mean it can't be done. "Babylon 5" had a complex story arc with lots of mysteries but it all tied up in the end very well. It's definitely the exception to the rule but it shows it can be done.
    If you just want good characterisation then go watch Greys Anatomy which is void of complex mysteries.
    I wouldn't say GA is an example of good characterisation. "Lost", for all its flaws, is a very good example of a character-based show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭kingcurls


    7
    I have so much i want to contribute and debate but it's a minefield in here right now so i'll have to focus on issues as they arise:

    1. Jacob was seeking others to protect the Island. From what? Smokie? And before smokie from who or what? If from specifically Smokie, why? The Finale just showed Flocke/Smokie to be pretty clueless in what he was trying to achieve. Once the plug was pulled he became mortal and it shocked him. Why? -Because he had no clue what it would achieve. How could he? He was never ever down there in the cave.

    1a. Why did Jack willingly let Desmond pull the plug? Even help him down there? No logical reasoning for it.

    2. Why did the island need protecting? What was so special about this magical island that the fate of the world depended on it? Jacob previously talked about the Island being a "cork" to keep the darkness in, presumably the Island being the vessel in which it is contained. What was the darkness? Smokie? Doubtful. Electromagnetism from the magical cave with a plug? Hmmmmm.


    Can people SERIOUSLY say it's sufficient for them not to know any of these things and just to surmise and theorise? If that's the case, then we end up having to surmise and theorise over EVERY SINGLE plot mystery over 6 seasons, most of which have come to unfulfilling ends.

    1. I thought it was made pretty clear in Across the Sea that they were protecting the light from ordinary people or "Man" because they believed it to hold power which every man craves, did you not see that episode?

    1a. Jack did not tell Desmond to pull any plug he didnt know what was there just that he had to get desmond to it, not once did jack say go down there and pull a plug.

    2. same as question 1


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 147 ✭✭dudeitshurley


    jimbling wrote: »
    Maybe Smokey becomes human only while the cork is pulled / when the light is out?

    Obviously you can't leave the cork out, that would bring on the destruction of the Island (and presumably the world).... so... perhaps when you put the cork back in, Flocke turns back into Smokey?

    Ok i'm gonna run with this for a second for ya :P

    So Desmond is special for his ability to withstand electromagnetism. Presumably something to do with the Hatch Implosion? Again just another thing we have to surmise lacking in any semblance of an answer. So, Des is special so he can remove the cork, giving anybody a window to kill Flocke.

    Problems: Massive Problems: I always understood the smoke monster as having the ability to take the shape of others. i.e. Locke. How does pulling the plug render him both mortal and leave him in the shape of John Locke? Remember he is NOT John Locke. That man is dead. So how is smokie enabled to still assume his shape? One would have to interpret that pulling the plug rendered smokies powers redundant. After all it made him mortal. And i STRONGLY disagree with the poster (sorry lol) who said he doesnt think he is completely mortal. He clearly is. People fired bullets at smokie all season and he walks through them not a scratch yet Jack punches him and he bleeds. Set in stone: mortal.

    Furthermore, Jack is not special in a similar way to desmond, how does he withstand it to put the plug back in? He doesn't even die as a result of it, he crawls out of there. So how did he manage it? If someone says, well he's the Protector he has powers, then it begs a simple question - why didnt jacob do it himself and kill smokie? Because it was once his brother? Doubtful as he is the one who says they have to try kill him.

    sigh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,779 ✭✭✭A Neurotic


    7
    Disappointed in Desmond actually. Was expecting him to become supercharged and start blasting EM at MiB or something.

    I do hope Hurley granted Vincent immortality for his pivotal role in events.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,045 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    BOBBY wrote: »
    lost's biggest mystery,,
    how the feck did albert know how to put on his seatbelt in the airplane, the dudes a few hundred years old, i presume this was his first time on a plane, yet he ran in, sat down and put on his belt, i started roaring laughing to myself instantly !!
    I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought that! I spent longer puzzling over that mystery than nearly anything else in the episode :D I eventually figured that Albert learnt about seat belts via his contact with the Dharma initiative or by exploring the downed plans in the jungle. Seriously, I spent a couple of minutes thinking on this...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,693 ✭✭✭✭Basq


    9
    ixoy wrote: »
    I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought that! I spent longer puzzling over that mystery than nearly anything else in the episode :D I eventually figured that Albert learnt about seat belts via his contact with the Dharma initiative or by exploring the downed plans in the jungle. Seriously, I spent a couple of minutes thinking on this...
    Glad to hear your priorities are in the right place ixoy!

    "No.. feck the polar bears and sharks with Dharma logos. How'd that lad know how to put on a seat belt?

    :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 147 ✭✭dudeitshurley


    kingcurls wrote: »
    1. I thought it was made pretty clear in Across the Sea that they were protecting the light from ordinary people or "Man" because they believed it to hold power which every man craves, did you not see that episode?

    1a. Jack did not tell Desmond to pull any plug he didnt know what was there just that he had to get desmond to it, not once did jack say go down there and pull a plug.

    2. same as question 1

    1. This is the same magical cave that MIB originally trawled the Island 3 times over without finding it, the same magical cave the losties never once saw despite being on the island a long period. Protecting it from 'man' doesnt seem like much of a task.

    1a. Missing the point entirely. Jack nor Flocke told desmond to do anything. But how can both of them be helping him down there willingly? Simply because they both had 'faith' that desmond going down there would have results they desired?

    It's pretty clear that neither of them had 1 iota of a clue what would happen when desmond went down there but they both willingly helped each other get him down there. A little too neat for my liking. Then again i probably answered my own question above with the 'faith' word!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,390 ✭✭✭EKRIUQ


    2
    Some good questions here

    http://www.eonline.com/videos/v53991_unanswered-lost-questions.html

    And some more answers including MIB's real name that was used in the script


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,871 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    7
    ixoy wrote: »
    BUT that doesn't mean it can't be done. "Babylon 5" had a complex story arc with lots of mysteries but it all tied up in the end very well. It's definitely the exception to the rule but it shows it can be done.
    .
    Babylon 5 had a 5 year plan right from the start ,it was well planned out unlike Lost.
    I knew long ago that the writers were making Lost up as they went along so I never got too interested in all the mythology or mysteries.
    I feel sorry for all the addicts who spent their every waking moment postulating and trying to rationalise all the mysteries .
    I liked it because it for the scifi elements and the good characters (Locke,Ben,Desmond,Mr Eko,Sayid etc )
    I didnt expect many answers and we didnt get many .
    Very enjoyable show and in an era of junk tv its a nice change.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    9
    Makes ZERO sense. like zero! Desmond could go down to pull the stone so someone could kill Flocke? Ok. But if he's then mortal what risk does he pose at all? Absolutely no risk!! lol i mean what's he capable of doing as a mortal to the world?

    Here's a massive plot failing imo: Flocke can't leave the Island. That much is established. So we surmised if he killed the candidates he could leave. Ehhhh no. He had motive and opportunity to do so if that were the case. So what danger did he pose? He's trapped on the island, seemingly the only way to kill him is to pull the plug/stone, which presumably is the very act that WOULD risk the fate of the world. I assume from the complete meltdown of the island that the release of magical electromagnetism could be an OOOOOOPS.

    Someone have a go at rationally explaining this to me. please!!!

    My quite longwinded thoughts on your question.

    I found it clear after "Across the Sea" that none of the characters (including Jacob & MIB) actually had a clue what was exactly going on with the island. MIB's original plan to get off the island was to kill Jacob, however after doing this he realised that with the Candidates being on island he still couldnt leave. After failing in his attempts to kill all the Candidates he found out from Widmore that Des was "special" and could destroy the island. I think he weighed up his options and decided that it would be easier to destroy the island than to kill the candidates and/or the new protector. Jack on blind faith in Jacob believed what Des would do would not destroy the island but help kill Flocke. From Flockes reaction to bleeding I dont believe he ever thought pulling the cork would make him mortal & lead to his eventual death. Even Des believed after his flashes into the flash sideways during "Happy ever after" that pulling the cork would bring them all into the Flash Sideways. None of the had full information, they were each going on second, third, fourth etc hand knowledge gleamed from other characters.

    The cork is just another button. Would the island sinking mean the end of the world?? That information was passed down from Mother presumably gained from the previous protector. Just like the button we'll never know if the world outside of the island would have ended because the failsafe was used to "re-cork" the power. We've been left to decide it ourselves.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,045 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    Babylon 5 had a 5 year plan right from the start ,it was well planned out unlike Lost.
    I knew long ago that the writers were making Lost up as they went along so I never got too interested in all the mythology or mysteries.
    I feel sorry for all the addicts who spent their every waking moment postulating and trying to rationalise all the mysteries .
    I liked it because it for the scifi elements and the good characters (Locke,Ben,Desmond,Mr Eko,Sayid etc )
    I didnt expect many answers and we didnt get many .
    Very enjoyable show and in an era of junk tv its a nice change.
    Well put. I initially wanted the mysteries explained. I'd get annoyed when questions would be answered with more questions. And then one day, I think it was in Season 3, I decided not to bother any more and just enjoy the ride. It was a lot more fun after that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 147 ✭✭dudeitshurley


    Just a quick point off current train of thought:

    Character Development - Ben. I feel they made a mess of a once great character in s6, reducing him to a mere pawn in an overall game in which nobody knew the rules or what the game actually was. Nevertheless, the constant flip-flops between good and bad for no specific reason became tenuous. Killing Widmore for example then choosing to go to the Good side again. Why'd he do that? petty revenge? Widmore broke 'the rules' in getting alex killed? Bottom line the only person who got Alex killed was ben himself, that realisation had struck him already in the show yet he still kills Widmore out of revenge, malice, spite. Then turns good again.

    a caricature of himself in s6.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,080 ✭✭✭TonyD79


    9
    ixoy wrote: »
    I'm glad I'm not the only one who thought that! I spent longer puzzling over that mystery than nearly anything else in the episode :D I eventually figured that Albert learnt about seat belts via his contact with the Dharma initiative or by exploring the downed plans in the jungle. Seriously, I spent a couple of minutes thinking on this...


    So you guys forgot Alberts visits to the mainland to recruit? Remember he was video taping Juliets sister back in season 3 for Ben? Id imagine he travelled around by plane a few times aswell as using the Sub.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,681 ✭✭✭ziggy


    9
    This post has been deleted.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 18,045 Mod ✭✭✭✭ixoy


    I like some of Sci fi author David Brin's musings:
    But let's hold that though and start with the issue of LOST leaving a million questions unanswered. Sometimes it is good to answer everything at the end of a story cycle. For example, I tied up ALL of Isaac Asimov’s loose ends in Foundations' Triumph! And the Asimov fans were very happy. But I don’t expect that from a saga like LOST, where the writers, though brilliant, were also clearly passing around a bong at every story session, shouting at each other “Hey, wait! What if they then turn around and see THIS!!!”
    But really, I can dig it. The writers are pot-heads, but not coke heads. They routinely lose memory and focus, but no actual brain cells. They are creative wizzes and they do characters very well and they gave us all a great time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    9
    Ok i'm gonna run with this for a second for ya :P

    So Desmond is special for his ability to withstand electromagnetism. Presumably something to do with the Hatch Implosion? Again just another thing we have to surmise lacking in any semblance of an answer. So, Des is special so he can remove the cork, giving anybody a window to kill Flocke.

    Problems: Massive Problems: I always understood the smoke monster as having the ability to take the shape of others. i.e. Locke. How does pulling the plug render him both mortal and leave him in the shape of John Locke? Remember he is NOT John Locke. That man is dead. So how is smokie enabled to still assume his shape? One would have to interpret that pulling the plug rendered smokies powers redundant. After all it made him mortal. And i STRONGLY disagree with the poster (sorry lol) who said he doesnt think he is completely mortal. He clearly is. People fired bullets at smokie all season and he walks through them not a scratch yet Jack punches him and he bleeds. Set in stone: mortal.

    Furthermore, Jack is not special in a similar way to desmond, how does he withstand it to put the plug back in? He doesn't even die as a result of it, he crawls out of there. So how did he manage it? If someone says, well he's the Protector he has powers, then it begs a simple question - why didnt jacob do it himself and kill smokie? Because it was once his brother? Doubtful as he is the one who says they have to try kill him.

    sigh.

    Smokie had taken over Lockes form and was left stuck in it. His own body was a skeleton by that point in the show (I know Lockes body was burried) so I think it makes more sense that he was left stuck in the form he was in when the cork was pulled.

    I'd say the Jack point was down to him being the protector but its something we'll never know. He died shortly after so its not really too big a deal to me. I think Jacob didnt do it himself because he didnt have a breeze what was going on down there as much as anyone else. He knew what Mother told him and what he probably saw from Des surviving the Hatch Ex/Implosion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 147 ✭✭dudeitshurley


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    My quite longwinded thoughts on your question.

    I found it clear after "Across the Sea" that none of the characters (including Jacob & MIB) actually had a clue what was exactly going on with the island. MIB's original plan to get off the island was to kill Jacob, however after doing this he realised that with the Candidates being on island he still couldnt leave. After failing in his attempts to kill all the Candidates he found out from Widmore that Des was "special" and could destroy the island. I think he weighed up his options and decided that it would be easier to destroy the island than to kill the candidates and/or the new protector. Jack on blind faith in Jacob believed what Des would do would not destroy the island but help kill Flocke. From Flockes reaction to bleeding I dont believe he ever thought pulling the cork would make him mortal & lead to his eventual death. Even Des believed after his flashes into the flash sideways during "Happy ever after" that pulling the cork would bring them all into the Flash Sideways. None of the had full information, they were each going on second, third, fourth etc hand knowledge gleamed from other characters.

    The cork is just another button. Would the island sinking mean the end of the world?? That information was passed down from Mother presumably gained from the previous protector. Just like the button we'll never know if the world outside of the island would have ended because the failsafe was used to "re-cork" the power. We've been left to decide it ourselves.

    right i'll accept the theory whilst disagreeing!

    Anybody any clue how Des can "flash" into the "flash-sideways"? FST = purgatory. Chronologically he gained an awakening in the FST first THEN in the original timeline. Even allowing for his ability to see the future (due to the magical electromagnetism of course) how can he 'flash' into the afterlife????


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,354 ✭✭✭MR NINE


    7
    Maybe I'm missing something here (I probably am) but what was the point of all the time travel? I had assumed it was so that they could detonate the bomb and as a result create the alt timeline. But since the alt timeline was actually purgatory, was there any point at all to the time travel?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 147 ✭✭dudeitshurley


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Smokie had taken over Lockes form and was left stuck in it. His own body was a skeleton by that point in the show (I know Lockes body was burried) so I think it makes more sense that he was left stuck in the form he was in when the cork was pulled.

    I'd say the Jack point was down to him being the protector but its something we'll never know. He died shortly after so its not really too big a deal to me. I think Jacob didnt do it himself because he didnt have a breeze what was going on down there as much as anyone else. He knew what Mother told him and what he probably saw from Des surviving the Hatch Ex/Implosion.

    So in short what you are saying is:

    Jacob: Not a breeze
    Jack: not a breeze
    MIB: not a breeze
    Des: not a breeze but sure feck it ill take the plug out

    Why is everyone so content with nobody actually having a breeze as to what the island is or why they are protecting it when all they are going on (seemingly) is the ramblings of a murderous Protector (Mother) who was in 1 episode of a 6 season run???!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 458 ✭✭bossa_nova


    9
    MR NINE wrote: »
    Maybe I'm missing something here (I probably am) but what was the point of all the time travel? I had assumed it was so that they could detonate the bomb and as a result create the alt timeline. But since the alt timeline was actually purgatory, was there any point at all to the time travel?

    not sure ..., but i geass they had to go back in time to set off the bomb to make the hatch to crash the plane....etc, so the time travel always had to happen .. if you get my drift:o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,598 ✭✭✭✭prinz


    9
    right i'll accept the theory whilst disagreeing! Anybody any clue how Des can "flash" into the "flash-sideways"? FST = purgatory. Chronologically he gained an awakening in the FST first THEN in the original timeline. Even allowing for his ability to see the future (due to the magical electromagnetism of course) how can he 'flash' into the afterlife????

    He 'flashes' into the FST when he dies like everyone else.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,924 ✭✭✭✭RolandIRL


    7
    prinz wrote: »
    He 'flashes' into the FST when he dies like everyone else.
    that's not "flashing", that's after the main story arc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,298 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    9
    ixoy wrote: »
    I like some of Sci fi author David Brin's
    But let's hold that though and start with the issue of LOST leaving a million questions unanswered. Sometimes it is good to answer everything at the end of a story cycle. For example, I tied up ALL of Isaac Asimov’s loose ends in Foundations' Triumph! And the Asimov fans were very happy. But I don’t expect that from a saga like LOST, where the writers, though brilliant, were also clearly passing around a bong at every story session, shouting at each other “Hey, wait! What if they then turn around and see THIS!!!”

    I dont want it to appear as I'm blindly defending the writers but I think its unfair to make these comparisons between a book to a 6 series tv show. If the writers were writing Lost as a book I'd assume they would probably have done a much better job in answering questions. I never head of Deavid Brin before but he seems to be bigging himself up on answering "ALL" the loose ends in a book when he didnt have to deal with actor issues such as puberty (Walt), wanting out (Eko), arrests (Ana Lucia), pandering to audience hate (Niki & Paolo) and pandering to audience love (giving Ben a much larger role than earlier envisaged). On the other hand it could be said that the writers should have foreseen some of these issues (Walt) and maybe stuck to their guns on others issues if it meant they tied up more loose ends.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 147 ✭✭dudeitshurley


    prinz wrote: »
    He 'flashes' into the FST when he dies like everyone else.

    really? Because when he was in the magical cave he said he believed they will go somewhere and he's seen/felt it. i.e. it was very clear (and in earlier episodes) that Des was aware of the 'truth' in both the FST and original timeline. which implies he caught glimpses of purgatory in his consciousness in the original timeline.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,354 ✭✭✭MR NINE


    7
    bossa_nova wrote: »
    not sure ..., but i geass they had to go back in time to set off the bomb to make the hatch to crash the plane....etc, so the time travel always had to happen .. if you get my drift:o

    Yeh I do theres a few things like that. For example Faraday had to go back in time in order to get killed by his own mother etc. It just seems time travel was a bit unnecessary though. Faraday could have just died a different way and it didn't have to be the losties that caused the incident. But yeh I suppose mainly it was a story telling mechanism in order to tell/show the audience about the DI.

    I always expected time travel to be a vital part of the programs resolution, kinda bothers me a bit that it ended up being fairly unimportant. I'd have felt a lot better about the show if they hadn't bothered with overly supernatural stuff like time travel and moving the island.


Advertisement