IRA want their Drugs Back

genericguy wrote: »

the IR-fcuking-A have never done anything with the interests of the irish people at heart since the days of arthur griffith.

Ill tell that to the families of those who died in the war of independence/hunger strikes/civil rights marches/any number of incidents sure You cant seriously believe that can you?

Either way, I am talking about the baseless comments being made..

---

I cant be any more certain that you or anyone else on this thread whether the provos were dealing drugs. But I wont go shouting the provos are saints and never touched drugs as they were a massive, distributed organisation.. but then again some people on this thread wil shout the opposite :rolleyes:


I can speak from personal experience though in a suburb of dublin. The shinners were 'rats'... ie would rat out dealers. You didnt want them to know you dealt drugs.

genericguy wrote: »

it's clearly not over if they are going around now shooting people and attempting to bomb shops.

i'm not going to bother pointing out the irony of you calling someone a bullshitter.

oh good god!!!! are they the IRA?????? the provos have disbanded!!! can you not understand that. These could easily be scumbag elements of the RA left over! MAybe they're clowns throwing the name of the IRA around to shít people up! ive seen it done before!

and YES they are complete bull**** comments! back them up otherwise!! thats the way the interweb works!

Winty wrote: »

Great comeback, next we will be fighting in the playgound, My brother is bigger than your brother

You should join a debating society, tell me where you live and I will check google for ya

LOL you are hilarious... a 15 or so line comment.. you ignore all of it and take the last line showing my frustration with your clear inability to debate like grown up.

PROVIDE REFERENCES !! lol.. is that really hard for you to understand. Sure, make a point that evidence would lead you to believe that they dealt drugs...

Winty wrote: »

As I grew up in Derry in the 80's i know one or two things about the boys thanks and I am aware that the "IRA" is disbanded but its members still walk the streets of my home town and they are not doctors or teachers so they turned to drug dealing to make a living after they disdanded

Cheers Auvers from Lusk

hear say from a someone who clearly has a gripe with them

SlabMurphy wrote: »

You won't answer my questions because your talking complete BS . I ask simple questions, if the IRA were so invovled in drug importation and selling - and yet he cannot produce anything. It's laughable what the IRA have been accused of down the years, from having nuclear capability to salmon poaching, porn video tapes, etc, etc

And I also notice, you had no comments on the Brits presence in Afghanistan and Europe getting flooded with heroin ? Do you not think a few of the Brits could be onto a ' little earner ' ? But then of course we heard for years that it was only supposed to be Republican propaganda that they were colluding with the loyalists........

( And don't be given us a stupid link from wiki as ' proof ' )

When was the last time the IRA where caught doing anything in this country? They get away with terrorism and drug running because fools think their "cause" is worth protecting. All they have to do is fund and watch over the drugs, they never need to lay a hand on them just put their names to them and use violence to make they're point.

The war on drugs suits those in power, it's a completely unwinnable war that they can use to incite fear and hatred in the people. That's why heroin production has gone up since the yanks and Brits rolled into Afghanistan they don'#t want to lose their favorite enemy.

the OP of this thread has to be high on something its the only way i can explain this nonsense.

He clearly knows nothing about history or how the media operates. Falling fowl to horse tripe this young man has lol.

good luck

Winty wrote: »

What?

Come agian, what are you trying to say, type slow if you need to

What???

By quoting someone else, that generally means i was replying to that person.

i think you need to read my comment again, and the comment i was replying to. If you read a bit slower you might understand, i wont be taking odds though.