Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Removing religious influence from schools not in my remit, says Minister

123457»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,018 ✭✭✭Mike 1972


    Dionysus wrote: »
    Then what, exactly, were you trying to say?

    I was questioning why theyre called national schools when they are clearly nothing of the sort.

    But wouldnt this have been a lot easier if you asked in the first place rather than jumping to conclusions ?

    Goodnight !


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,291 ✭✭✭wild_cat


    as a person who stuidied archaeology that would greatly annoy me lol but i guess we can all single our ridiculous scenarios similar to that that may not have anything to do with the church at all. did you read the other post on this forum about stupid things you were taught in school?plenty of ridiculous things taught by teachers, not nuns/priests.

    Im not sure if iv mentioned this before but my view is that the schools should be connected to the church, but i dont necessarily feel the teachers should all be nuns and priests. my local school is catholic run, was originally run by the nuns but now is all fully qualified teachers... yet it still has the strong catholic element to it. I feel that is the way it should be. I dont think that being a nun or priest entiles you to teach children education. but I personally feel they are a welcoming and warm presence regarding the religious aspects such as when they go to mass etc. or the odd visit in class from the local priest.

    I've read the whole thread, its not as out there as being pulled up by " the locks".

    Given the average age of most priests and nuns that are in parishes and schools today they were all around in the era of "abuse" and most of them turned a blind eye. Theres a middle generation out there that were young at the time when those events took place and were in boarding schools/orphanages etc. Everyone knew what was going on, even the people who were not being abused, ask any student from St.Peters in Wexford in the sixties/seventies. They were not listened to as no man of God could comit acts like that.

    So with the average age of the clergy they were all involved in the cover up, nothing warm or fluffy about hiding rapists and child molesters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,420 ✭✭✭Dionysus


    Mike 1972 wrote: »
    I was questioning why theyre called national schools when they are clearly nothing of the sort.

    Em, they are named National Schools because that is, well, what they were, in fact, named. They were, equally in fact, multidenominational when they were initially established in 1831 and it was only subsequently that they became de facto denominational schools. In law today, however, the National School system remains a de jure multidenominational one.

    Next time, save the nitpicking.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 18,300 ✭✭✭✭Seaneh


    retards fighting over something they know nothing about.

    sure tis what boards is about don't ya know!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17,485 ✭✭✭✭Ickle Magoo


    First off I definitely think it should be first come first served, I will admit I am unaware of the situation so I won't say that what your telling me is bull, I will admit I am shocked that that case could happen though. I completely agree that that should not be allowed happen under any circumstances. I have my beliefs, but I would NEVER think that because I am baptised that I am in any way more important than anybody else baptised or non baptised.

    I understand your point, I really do. However, it seems like an issue in which someone will always be left unhappy as I still feel there are many people who wish religion to stay part of the school so the question is who do we alienate, the people who have chosen not to take part in any religion, or those who want religion in school? There are no easy answers to this.

    This is why I stated that I think the Educate Together schools are the way forward, they need to be supported more and more need to be set up. This will enable choice within communities.

    In this day and age religious discrimination and segregation in primary schools is archaic and appalling. The fact that the status quo suits the majority of Irish people does not make it right, in fact the education system here is in direct contravention of the human rights charter, so much for a modern western country.

    Schools do not pick pupils based on the local catchment area, they accept pupils according to who applies and they set an application which specifically asks for a baptismal cert. They are perfectly within their rights to give preferential enrolment to the children that meet their religious criterion and not those who apply first or live closest. Look at the case in Dublin where all those kids were left with no school & the council had to cobble together a port-a-cabin for them.

    We had a look around our local schools and were told not to bother applying to some, they were already oversubscribed and the chance of them picking a non-Catholic, who they would have to make alternative arrangements for during sacraments, etc, was nil. I hear of people who have to travel 40 min round trips to get their kid to an ET, it's just not good enough that people who contribute equally to the state funds are having such trouble fulfilling a basic requirement for their children. Public funds should be spent on state schools for the public, not elite religious establishments that segregate and discriminate. If someone wants to send their kid to a faith school that can discriminate against my kid, why should I have to fund it?

    If schools discriminated or segregated pupils based on race or disability there would, quite rightly, be a public outcry - even though the majority of pupils in school are neither. Why is religious discrimination not only accepted here, it's often lauded?! It's shameful. :mad:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5 deburgo1


    There does not appear to be much evidence to suggest that the vast majority of clerics and holy men (lay) are not into paedophile activity. Remember it is just a short time ago when anyone suggesting that clerics (priests or bishops) were practicing paedophiles wre considered lunatics.
    I cannot see any good or healthy reason why priests should be present at schools.
    The former rc BISHOP OF ACONERY tOM fLYNN STATED THAT CHILDREN AND YOUNG PERSONS SHOULD NOT BE EXPOSEd to excessive fundamentalism.
    Th eschools wre built by the people and funded by the state and have nothing whatever to do with the clerics. The bishop patronage business is meerly an administyrative arrangement and only serves to allow the RC church or other churches to extract substantiaal funds from the state for management and chaplency SERVICES. Th epayments are not to the priest (one time managers)but directly in bulk to the bishop prick.
    I did not allow the local parish priest attend at the local school while my children attended, I deemed it best that there was no contact with him and I am happy that that was the right course of action.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5 deburgo1


    very true- they are national schools.
    Th eclerical patron thing is just an administrative arrangement. It never did bestow any ownership or control and can easly be removed. It should be removed. If it is not to be removed and if this matter is openly decided rather than decided by cute hoors then state funding should be removed. State funding fro state schools. We as parents were denied the right to educate our children free from religious balderdaash and I very much resent that. the number of people holding ssuch resentment will grow and have effct but if there is inaction perhaps the effects will be very undesirable as perhaps must be the case.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 233 ✭✭rohatch


    Dionysus wrote: »

    Your argument would be much stronger if you could show some historical empathy on this issue.

    We all know what the history is, it has been done to death on boards.
    Thaedydal wrote: »
    Also the schools can legally discriminate and not hire teachers who are active Catholics and teachers can be dismissed if comes to the attention of the board of management they are not living in accordance to catholic ideals.

    The fact that IF YOU WERE ABUSED, you have to request a copy of the schools own procedures on child abuse, from the schools board of management which is chaired by a priest. WHY!
    Since we are living in a nation that has very strong christian links then obviously either roman catholic church or church of ireland. and before anyone jumps down my neck of living in the now and ireland being a different country now, i think it would be a very drastic decision to sever the ties between the church and state/education as it runs deep into our history for hundreds of years and who are you to decide it is time to cut that link now and undo all that work when there are still plenty of people who are happy to have this connection?

    You see people this is the problem. Our country is full of stupid fools who feel like this below.

    "Sure didn't they only fcuk a few thousand kiddies

    Sure didn't they only kill a few children (and they probably deserved it)

    Sure didn't they make up the bible and all those stupid extra rules that are not in the original bible, or the other original bible before than one where god went a little bit mad

    Sure I got beaten around the place in school but it did me no harm"

    WAKE THE FCUK UP PEOPLE


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 233 ✭✭rohatch


    Ikky Poo2 wrote: »
    Ignorance is always a bad thing. Why shouldn't schools teach about religions?

    BECAUSE IT IS BULLSH1T


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    rohatch wrote: »
    BECAUSE IT IS BULLSH1T

    "It"? Surely you mean "they"? One way or the other, it is an interesting way of dismissing a variety of rich cultural traditions from around the world. Maybe we should do the same with history? And geography? After all they're "bull****" too, aren't they?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,183 ✭✭✭dvpower


    Ikky Poo2 wrote: »
    Ignorance is always a bad thing. Why shouldn't schools teach about religions?

    Schools should teach about religions. They shouldn't teach that one particular religion is the right one or that the incredible claims that religions make have any basis in fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,566 ✭✭✭Funglegunk


    rohatch wrote: »
    <<Everything you've said>>

    Jesus Christ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,833 ✭✭✭worded


    Ikky Poo2 wrote: »
    "It"? Surely you mean "they"? One way or the other, it is an interesting way of dismissing a variety of rich cultural traditions from around the world. Maybe we should do the same with history? And geography? After all they're "bull****" too, aren't they?

    My invisible friend is better than your invisible friend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    dvpower wrote: »
    Schools should teach about religions. They shouldn't teach that one particular religion is the right one or that the incredible claims that religions make have any basis in fact.

    My point exactly.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    worded wrote: »
    My invisible friend is better than your invisible friend.

    Satan?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,581 ✭✭✭✭TheZohanS


    rohatch wrote: »
    BECAUSE IT IS BULLSH1T


    If that is how you engage in discussion I have no other choice but to tell you not to post in this thread again.

    If you do post in this thread again you will be banned.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 42,905 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    How did this manage to get into the Lonely Hearts forum? :confused:

    As for the RC church controlling the schools, I gather from the grapevine that the church may hand them once they have managed to saturate the different boards with their Opus Dei representatives!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    kbannon wrote: »
    How did this manage to get into the Lonely Hearts forum? :confused:

    Its the second time today thats happened with a thread....

    Could be Modwar.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭RonMexico


    Am I the only one hoping that we can get political influence removed from decision making in this country?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,018 ✭✭✭Mike 1972


    RonMexico wrote: »
    Am I the only one hoping that we can get political influence removed from decision making in this country?

    What are you suggesting ? Military dictatorship :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,916 ✭✭✭RonMexico


    No I was just suggeting that the current shower of gombeens couldn't make an intelligent informed decision to save themselves. They **** up everything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 631 ✭✭✭moretothegirl


    rohatch wrote: »
    Our country is full of stupid fools who feel like this below.

    "Sure didn't they only fcuk a few thousand kiddies

    Sure didn't they only kill a few children (and they probably deserved it)

    WAKE THE FCUK UP PEOPLE

    with an attitude like that I dont think theres even any point to responding to this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,129 ✭✭✭pljudge321


    RonMexico wrote: »
    No I was just suggeting that the current shower of gombeens couldn't make an intelligent informed decision to save themselves. They **** up everything.

    Imagine the good that could be achieved if a party in government collectively decided they didn't care about getting re-elected. Of course the converse is also true.


Advertisement