Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Liverpool squad/keeper/spending comparison thread [read post #161]

1235717

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,442 ✭✭✭✭jesus_thats_gre


    Is there any resources online that shows the transfers, in and out, made by Chelsea since Ambramovich bought them?


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,400 Mod ✭✭✭✭lordgoat


    eagle eye wrote: »
    There was a huge overhaul required at Liverpool. Do you expect us to believe that Liverpool sacked Houllier because everything was hunky dory? I don't think so.
    As I said previously it can be argued that United had the groundwork laid but Ferguson chose to build a team the way he wanted it, Benitez is the same as Ferguson he likes to do things his way. His success at Valencia both with a team which had many of Cuper's players and then again later on with a team he built himself proves that he has what it takes.
    Therfore imo he deserves the time to get the club running the way he wants it to run just like Ferguson got all the time in the world at United.

    There's not much difference in Houlliers best 11 and Saint Rafa's. To compare Benitez to ferguson is quite a bit off the mark as well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,089 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Is there any resources online that shows the transfers, in and out, made by Chelsea since Ambramovich bought them?

    http://www.transferleague.co.uk/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,492 ✭✭✭MementoMori


    Just to update this

    Summer 2009 Dealings

    Players Out
    Alonso £30m
    Arbeloa £3.5m
    Leto £3m
    Hammill £500k
    Hobbs £300k (Received £400k but there was a sell-on clause)
    Anderson £250k
    Hyypia 0
    Pennant 0
    Total In £37.55m

    Players In
    Johnson £17m
    Aquilani £17m
    Kyrgiakos £2m
    Chris Mavinga - minimal training compensation
    Aaron King - minimal training compensation
    Jesus Fernandez - minimal training compensation
    Total out £36m

    Net Profit £1.55m

    Mavinga went into the reserves and Fernandez and King into the Academy so I don't think they should be used when comparing with other teams spending.
    Also the fingers involved are unlikely to be much in terms of transfer fees with Mavinga 18, and King and Fernandez 16.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    but virtually every transfer in this day & age is inclusive of add ons & performance related payments?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,492 ✭✭✭MementoMori


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    but virtually every transfer in this day & age is inclusive of add ons & performance related payments?

    I know but in the majority of cases the prices quoted do tend to be ex of the add-ons. Given there is an element of uncertainty about transfer fees anyway, I'm ok with this. Also it's easier.:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    but i think you either use the fees incl potential add on's, or you don't.

    for example as far as i know the fees for Aquilani & Johnson (Aquilani especially) is heavily based on future add on's etc. yet you've quoted the full fee in your listing incl potential add ons, but then when it comes to Alonso you've quoted the fee excl add ons.

    ah well either way! we all know Rafa is pants in the transfer market ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,492 ✭✭✭MementoMori


    Just wanted to update this to include Hyppia to give a comprehensive account of the value of the players at the club when Rafa took over and to show that people who talk about Rafa being a poor judge of players are slightly misinformed.

    This is the list of the players who have been sold who were at the club before Rafa arrived
    2004
    Markus Babbel £0m - In a sense very unlucky with his illness
    Danny Murphy £2.5m - Looks like a pretty poor price now
    Michael Owen £8m - Coco the clown - deal done before Rafa arrived
    Emile Heskey £6.25m - Looks like a poor price now

    2005
    Antonio Nunez £1.5m - Legacy of the Owen deal more Coco the clown magic
    Milan Baros £6.5m - Looks a reasonable price
    Diouf £4m - Looks like a poor price now
    Smicer £0m
    Henchoz £0m
    Alou Diarra £2m

    2006
    Kirkland £3m - Always thought we should have got more
    Mellor £500k - Could have got more looks fair now though
    Traore £2m - No comment
    Hamman £0 - Shocking
    Morientes £3m - Probably fair
    Cheyrou £0 - No comment

    2007
    Dudek £0 - Free to Real Madrid. Gah!
    Zenden £0 -Arrived on a free, left on a free
    Cisse £6m - Doesnt look like we got value here - broken leg didnt help
    Diao £0m - No comment
    Warnock £1.5m - Looks like a bit of a bargain given what Villa paid this summer (£6.5m plus £1.5m in add-ons)
    Sinama-Pongolle £2.7m - Probably about fair

    2008
    Le Tallec £1m - Just glad to get anything
    Kewell £0m - No comment
    Riise £4m - A decent price in a sale :eek:
    Finnan £2m - Looks like a stroke of genius with his injury

    2009
    Hyppia £0m - I don't think anyone can find fault with this one.

    I said it already but in general the price we received for a lot of thes players were pretty poor. I'm hopeful that with Parry gone things should improve a fair bit. One has to wonder how exactly Parry would have done if he had been handling the sale of Alonso. Probably would have gotten 100 Real Madrid shirts with Ronaldo on the back.:eek:

    Anyway the total is £56.45m for 27 players or just over an average of £2m.
    Even allowing for bad luck with regard injuries/sickness (Babbel/Diouf) as well as not doing great with regard to letting players go for free, combined with wiht being poor at achieving decent prices for some players, it's clear to see the squad wasn't in great shape when Rafa took over.

    Now lets have a look at the updated list of players Rafa has bought and sold during his time at the club.
    Garcia £6m £4m
    Nunez £0m £1.5m
    Pellegrino £0m £0m
    Josemi £2m £0m
    Kronkamp £0m £2m
    Morientes£6.3m £3m
    Carson £.75m £3.25
    Zenden £0m £0m
    Barragan £0m £680,000
    Gonzalez £4.5m £4.2m
    Sissoko £5.6m £8.2m
    Crouch £7m £11m
    Bellamy £6m £7.5m
    Paletta £2m £1.5m
    Pennant £6.7m £0m
    Keane £19m £16m
    Alonso £10.5m £30m
    Arbeloa £2.6m £3.5m
    Leto £1.85m £3m

    Rafa has made a profit of £18.53m on players he brought into the club and subsequently sold.

    While there were undoubtedly "flops" the only ones you could classify as such were the following

    Pennant (net cost £6.7m) - Did help win a CL so even for Rafa's worst flop still got some use out of him.
    Keane (net cost £3m) - Keane is an unusal case but to summarise for those who don' know any better - [The initial fee was £19m plus £1.3m in add-ons. When he was sold back to Spurs the basic fee was £12m with £4m in add-ons as long as Spurs didnt get relegated plus another £3m in the more standard add-ons. Depending on how Spurs do over the next few seasons/how Keane performs in terms of playing matches/scoring goals, there is a reasonable possibility of getting nearly all of the £19m paid for him initially back, with £16m already received.] As such he doesn't look likw quite the masive flop some people would have you think.
    Morientes (net cost £3.3m) - The move to England didn't work out. Still managed to recoup £3m so not a total disaster.
    Josemi (net cost £3m) - Has to be considered a flop

    While there are a couple of others in there who didnt set the Premier League alight, Rafa didn't exactly lose much money on these. (Gonzalez, Paletta) There were a lot more who were stepping stone players who Rafa moved on at a profit in order to buy better players. (Bellamy, Sissoko, Carson). Alonso stands out as a player who was integral to the team who was moved on for significant profit [I don't think it's necessary to rehash the ins and outs of his sale, the relevant point here is that when he was sold he was moved on for approximately £20m in profit]

    There is also the key fact that the squad is in much stronger shape than when Rafa took over and there are a number of players in the current squad who would realise a fair bit more than was paid for them if they were to be sold. There are also very few players who you would expect to see significantly negative returns if they were sold on in the next while.
    I would say only Babel and Dossena are the only two who you would expect to realise less than 80% of their cost if they were sold today. This is more than balanced by the vast majority of the players who if they were sold would realise a profit. There is also the fact that there are a number of the youth players (a fair few who have arrived at the club under Rafa's auspices)who even if they don't make the grade at Liverpool over the next few years are likely to recoup a decent profit in terms of being sold on.

    In general I think if you look at the facts, it is inescapable that Rafa is up there with the very best when it comes to the transfer market.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    when getting rid of Palletta, wasn't it a straight swap for Insua?

    now thats a great piece of business!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,492 ✭✭✭MementoMori


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    but i think you either use the fees incl potential add on's, or you don't.

    for example as far as i know the fees for Aquilani & Johnson (Aquilani especially) is heavily based on future add on's etc. yet you've quoted the full fee in your listing incl potential add ons, but then when it comes to Alonso you've quoted the fee excl add ons.

    ah well either way! we all know Rafa is pants in the transfer market ;)

    Aquilani's fee is broken down into a number of installments and add-ons(something like pay €6m this year, €4m next year, €4m year after , €3m year after €3m year after) Basically there is a total of €20m basic, the payment of which is spread out over the next 4/5 years. These are not add-ons as they are not dependent on anything. This €20m (equivalent to £17m) must be paid even if he never plays for Liverpool. There are also add-ons to the value of
    £3m which will fall due when certain events occur. Typically theseare probably the usual mix of player appearances, player scoring(moreso this one for strikers) and the club acheiving things (winning the league, winning the CL, qualifying for Europe). However the fact is that we owe Roma this £17m no matter what plus possibly the additional £3m dependent on various circumstances. I have a link to the Roma page which showed the breakdown in detail (Hurrah for whatever regulation forces the Italian clubs to do this - I think it's a stock exchange thing - was also how Riise's transfer fee was confirned) but I'm not arsed tracking it down at the moment.

    {Given Aquilani's injury record I'm pretty sure the club is insured so that if he picks up an injury in his first game and his career is over, the club would received a large pay-out which would go a fair bit towards covering the payments to Roma}

    Also to be more than scruplously fair I don't generally include any of the add-ons Livepool might receive (unless I'm pretty much 100% they will/have been paid a la Keane) but in most cases where it isn't clear what amount of add-ons in a deal, I will include the overall figure Liverpool have to pay. For instance I'm pretty sure that at least some of Johnson's price is add-ons but I didn't see any reports which even hinted at this. Better to play it safe on this I think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,492 ✭✭✭MementoMori


    Mr Alan wrote: »
    when getting rid of Palletta, wasn't it a straight swap for Insua?

    now thats a great piece of business!

    Fup off with the questions :mad::mad::mad:
    I have simplified some of the stuff especially the swap deals for clarity/ease in my own records. None of the overall accuracy has been comprimised.:D

    I did see a rumour that due to Insua getting called up to the Argies senior squad we might owe some add-ons - I don't think it's anything massive money but it's Just another example of how tricky trying to track add-ons would be.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,372 ✭✭✭✭Mr Alan


    :D

    sorry, i'll leave you alone now!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,848 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    Pennant (net cost £6.7m) - Did help win a CL so even for Rafa's worst flop still got some use out of him.

    Helped win a CL for who? AC Milan won that final if you recall!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,952 ✭✭✭Morzadec


    Pennant (net cost £6.7m) - Did help win a CL so even for Rafa's worst flop still got some use out of him.

    Pennant wasn't there in Istanbul was he? He was very good in the 2007 final though.

    Interesting analysis.

    My brief conclusion would be as follows:

    -Has Rafa made mistakes in the transfer market? Yes.

    -Has Rafa done a good job in the transfer market, given the rescources? Definitely Yes.

    -Has Rafa made any high value transfer mistakes? Debatable. Keane obviously springs to mind but the fact we got most of the money back. Nevertheless we made a decent loss and missed out on the opportunity to but another player for that season, which may have slightly hurt us. (also debatable whther he was Rafa's signing). If Dossena at £7m counts as 'high value' (Idon't really think he does) then this was a bad signing. For Babel, time will tell but so far he has to be seen as a bad signing.

    -Has Rafa had success in the transfer market when able to spend larger amounts of cash?
    Yes. Johnson already looks well worth the fee which I will admit appeared overpriced. We'll see about Aquilani, but Rafa has brought in some top players who may have been viewed as somewhat 'unproven' (certainly in the PL) given the amount we were spending. Some of these players' market values would now be double or treble the amount Rafa paid for them - Mascherano, Kuyt, Alonso (Obviously gone now but trebled our money on him), Torres.


    I think this last point is the most important to take into account regarding Rafa in the transfer market. There was a lot of debate about Glen Johnson in the summer and whether he was worth £17m, and there was a lot of people laughing at Rafa for spending what appeared to be an inflated fee. Meanwhile, most people who regularly watch Liverpool and know Rafa and the way he likes his teams to play felt that Johnson (while overpriced somewhat) was a great addition to our team. This is what I posted the day Johnson was confirmed:-


    Originally posted by Morzadec:
    'Wow very shocked, didn't think we would pay such an inflated figure.

    However I trust Rafa in his transfer dealings, and if he is willing to spend such a figure on Johnson this could be taken as an indication that our transfer budget is higher than many of us (including me) expected. Which is great news.

    Time will tell if it was a good deal. If I have one criticism of Arbeloa it was that he is lightweight/weak, and Johnson certainly isn't, he's a tank. I just felt that Arbeloa linked up very well with Kuyt and Gerrard on the right-hand side and rarely gave the ball away. Let's hope Johnson can continue this and add a bit more crossing quality/attacking threat.

    Many have pointed to his defensive frailties. I can't say I've seen enough of Portsmouth playing to comment on this, but I would assume this is maybe what comes with being a very attacking fullback. If anyone saw Alves playing for Brazil last night, they were demonstrating how far up the pitch he was at all times and how it left Brazil completely exposed at the back. Yet no one would doubt Alves's quality. The RTE lads were saying that when you play with fullbacks so high up, you need a holding midfielder, which Brazil did not employ last night.

    We have Alonso and, more specifically, Mascherano as holding mids. I have said before that Rafa seems to want the main width of his team to come from the full-backs. He wants attacking full-backs, and it will be attacking qualities, pace and the ability to get forward which will be prioritised. Johnson certainly has these attributes, and I feel he is the ideal mould of player to fit into our system. I think this is what Rafa is thinking and why he is prepared to pay over-the-odds.

    I'll be dissappointed if Arbeloa leaves, and I still think 18m is too much for Johnson. But I could name a hell of a lot of other transfers that have been inflated. The nature of the market has changed. Fans are often complaining that we don't splash out, and don't compete with other clubs in the transfer market. But Johnson's signing (whether you agree with it or not) at least shows we are doing that.'


    The point here is that when Rafa has been allowed to 'overspend' is when our squad really improves. It's similar to United 'overspending' on Carrick - his price seemed inflated but he really improved their squad.

    Rafa's failings have been when he's been forced to buy cheap players as our budget has fallen way short of the needs of our squad. He's had some success here too obviously, but it's so much harder to find top players when forced to only spend £5m or so. How many players do you think Rafa felt he needed to buy when he took over, or even after Istanbul? Possibly over 10.

    Now? It's a case of more quality depth in one or two positions. Rafa's funds won't have to be scattered across so many players. And if he is properly funded, his success rate can only improve.

    So with this in mind I'll conclude with this question:

    Can we expect Rafa's transfer dealings in the future to be successful?

    I would be very confident of a yes if the appropriate funds are given.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    can you not read? where did i say that? I stated a fact. That he's nearing a rush record.

    we need a goal sharpish.

    first of all. kyut has played 10 more games all ready in europe compared to rush.

    the format of the competitions are totally different now to what they were when rush played.

    it's an irrelevant point.

    how many goals has gerrard got 27/28? twice rushes record so what does that say? stevie g is twice the striker rush was? LOL

    your point is TOTALLY irrelevant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,909 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    ntlbell wrote: »
    first of all. kyut has played 10 more games all ready in europe compared to rush.

    the format of the competitions are totally different now to what they were when rush played.

    it's an irrelevant point.

    how many goals has gerrard got 27/28? twice rushes record so what does that say? stevie g is twice the striker rush was? LOL

    your point is TOTALLY irrelevant.

    you saying he's mediocre at CL level is plain INCORRECT.

    He's scored in every round of the competition


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,337 ✭✭✭✭monkey9


    ntlbell wrote: »
    your point is TOTALLY irrelevant.

    It doesn't really stop you though, does it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    you saying he's mediocre at CL level is plain INCORRECT.

    He's scored in every round of the competition

    he's medicore regardless of what he's playing in.

    his touch is awful

    his decision making is awful.

    his passing is awful

    his close control is awful.

    his tackling is awful.

    the fact a few goals have gone in off his shin doesn't change that fact.

    he is mediocre.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,909 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    ntlbell wrote: »
    he's medicore regardless of what he's playing in.

    his touch is awful

    his decision making is awful.

    his passing is awful

    his close control is awful.

    his tackling is awful.

    the fact a few goals have gone in off his shin doesn't change that fact.

    he is mediocre.

    I can only shake my head at such a moronic post


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    ntlbell wrote: »
    he's medicore regardless of what he's playing in.

    his touch is awful

    his decision making is awful.

    his passing is awful

    his close control is awful.

    his tackling is awful.

    the fact a few goals have gone in off his shin doesn't change that fact.

    he is mediocre.

    that post stinks of a massive shoulder chip


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    lol, that post is awful.

    ----

    Best team on the night won, no question. Poor performance in many different respects, and once we went two down in that environment it was always going to be tough. Not much else to say, nights like this will come along every so often.

    maybe you could address one or two of the points?

    how do you rate his first touch compared to other players in the same league?

    ....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,909 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    ntlbell wrote: »
    maybe you could address one or two of the points?

    how do you rate his first touch compared to other players in the same league?

    ....


    allow me . . .



    his touch is average

    his decision making is very good

    his passing is good

    his close control is decent

    his tackling is good

    .
    .
    .

    His crossing is very good
    His work-rate is excellent
    His finishing is pretty good

    (or do those stats not matter?)

    Put it this way - i'd much rather him than Antonio "step-over" and run to corner" Valencia


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,591 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    ntlbell wrote: »
    maybe you could address one or two of the points?

    lol, delusionaments


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    allow me . . .



    his touch is average

    his decision making is very good

    his passing is good

    his close control is decent

    his tackling is good

    .
    .
    .

    His crossing is very good
    His work-rate is excellent
    His finishing is pretty good

    (or do those stats not matter?)

    Put it this way - i'd much rather him than Antonio "step-over" and run to corner" Valencia

    decsiion making is very good? lol it's TERRIBLE. there was numerous examples tonight.

    if his close control was good he wouldn't constantly fall over the ball, seriously, i'm not takin the piddle here but i enjoy watching him for the comical side of his game.

    his work-rate is EXCELLENT.

    but as our man tony said there what good is it when everything else is so bad?

    tony's right he wouldn't get near the first 11 in any other top club


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,287 ✭✭✭✭ntlbell


    LuckyLloyd wrote: »
    lol, delusionaments

    lol i'll avoid tackling any of the points because your right NTL lolz


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,591 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    ntlbell wrote: »
    lol i'll avoid tackling any of the points because your right NTL lolz

    coleman_wtf.gif


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,909 ✭✭✭✭whatawaster


    ntlbell wrote: »
    tony's right he wouldn't get near the first 11 in any other top club

    well he's better than Park.
    He's better than Nani
    He's better than Valencia.
    He gets in the Dutch team
    He'd get in the United team.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,848 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    ntlbell wrote: »
    tony's right he wouldn't get near the first 11 in any other top club

    He's near, pretty much in, first 11 in a pretty rampant Dutch side, ranked 3rd in the world is it?


Advertisement