Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish times journalist says that Irish fee paying schools not elitist !!!

  • 29-09-2009 01:04PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 724 ✭✭✭jonsnow


    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/education/2009/0929/1224255433096.html

    Pretty nauseating stuff.Maintains that Clongowes is populated by the "sons and daughters of ordinary hardworking people", and lone parents-although she does admit that it costs 16,000 a year.If it wasn,t some kind of elite school why spend that kind of dosh so!!!.

    this is so typical of some of our elite in Ireland.They view themselves as ordinary and hardworking and see themselves as having got ahead purely by their own hard work and talents-never acknowledging all the old boy and old girl networks that have protected and helped them to success their entire lives.


    "Am I giving my children an advantage! I,m trying my hardest"




    A PARENT'S VIEW: Those of us who opt to send their children to fee-paying schools should not be demonised – we have a right to choose the best option for our children, argues ORLAITH CARMODY
    Some people describe the kind of school I’ve chosen for my three sons as “fee-paying”, implying that I pay for their education. In fact I don’t. The State does that, as it is has undertaken to pay the salaries of teachers in second-level schools to a defined ratio, based on the number of students in the school.
    I pay for my three sons’ accommodation and supervision at school, their books, sports, music lessons, tours and all the other bits and pieces that every parent of teenagers knows about.
    After a lot of thought, I have deliberately chosen this kind of education, in a school with a Jesuit tradition, because I believe it will help to bring out the best in my boys, and hopefully teach them something about giving back to society. This is my right as a parent.
    Since September 1st, the Department of Education and Science has increased the ratio of pupils to teachers in State-run second-level schools from 18 pupils per teacher to 19. Times are tough, and bigger class sizes are inevitable. For fee-paying schools, the medicine was even harsher: one teacher for every 20 pupils.
    This is the first time since 1967 that a distinction of this nature has been introduced to the system, and it will affect 28,000 students in 55 so-called fee-paying schools around the country.
    Things could get worse. The Irish Times recently reported how the Department of Finance has recommended a ratio of one teacher to 38 pupils in fee-paying schools.
    I believe this singling out of the fee-paying sector is blatant discrimination.
    My children have the same right to the provision of teaching services as every other child in the State, regardless of whether I choose to have them educated at a local school, with an expectation of an informal annual “voluntary contribution” from me; or at a school with a formal annual contribution that I choose to pay, out of my after-tax income, for additional educational supports.
    The bottom line here is that pupils educated “privately” or at fee-paying schools currently cost the State much less than those educated at non-fee-paying schools, so it would appear that the Department of Finance is engaged in a spot of economic nonsense.
    Close down private schools tomorrow and all these children land into the State system looking for classroom accommodation, bus transport and per-capita grants, all of which will have to be funded by the taxpayer at enormous expense. This will be on top of the estimated €100 million the Department of Education and Science already spends on teachers’ salaries in fee-paying schools.
    Memo to the Department: These teachers will have to be paid, irrespective of the kind of school in which they teach.
    The sole alternative is to remove State support, leaving a few, very elite schools with prohibitive fee levels.
    In my view, our fee-paying school sector is not, in any sense, elitist. Am I giving my children an advantage? Make no mistake about it: I’m trying my hardest.
    My grandmother was a teacher sin a rural primary school who had been lectured by Eamon de Valera at college in Carysfort. She often concealed above-age children from the school inspector; children of 13 or 14 who she had persuaded, often with great difficulty, to stay in school for a seventh or even an eighth class, knowing that it was the only education they would ever get.
    A determined widow, she coached her daughter, my mother, to win a scholarship to Monaghan’s Louis Convent in the 1940s. My mother then coached me to win a scholarship to Mount Anville in the 1970s, and despite not being able to go there, I have that all-for-education tradition coursing in my veins.
    Now I run the risk of a double “elitist” charge, because not only have I chosen a school with a particular ethos for my sons, but one that is boarding as well. But you don’t lightly choose a school that costs €16,000 a year. You know exactly the cost to you, in so many ways.
    But it is worth all the hours their Dad and I work because of the independent, grounded, thinking individuals who I believe will emerge at the far end, with the ambition and hopefully the ability to make a difference. At the school, Clongowes Wood College in Co Kildare, they call it becoming “Men for Others”, and I see it demonstrated every single time I’m there.
    A friend of mine at the school, a lone parent, gets very irate when people describe these schools as elitist. She works every hour in the day to pay for her son’s keep, but is happy to do so because of how he has grown over the past few years. She says that it is her choice to work hard, pay her taxes and do the best she can for her son, rather than “cream the State’’ (her expression) for a house and various allowances, which she figures would probably leave her better off.
    I have never met a spoiled brat at the school, either pupil or parent, only people who, like myself, value children and their education above all else. We also value justice, and would like to see the departments of Education and Science and Finance respect the 1967 Education Act, which promised equal access to teaching services for all children.
    We don’t have elite schools in this country, as they do across the water. We have privately-managed schools where education is provided by the State, and where after that parents choose to have a particular ethos, Catholic, Protestant or other, taught to their children at their own expense. They are populated by the sons and daughters of ordinary, hard-working people exercising their democratic right to choose.


«13456

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,703 ✭✭✭Mr.David


    jonsnow wrote: »
    If it wasn,t some kind of elite school why spend that kind of dosh so!!!.



    So that your kids could learn how to use question marks?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,931 ✭✭✭az2wp0sye65487


    Doesn't sound too un-reasonable an argument to me


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    I don't see the problem.

    The State pays for the basic education of the students (teachers etc), and parents fees provide the rest on top of that.

    Are those children supposed to be denied those facilities just because others are?


  • Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I know a fair few people and their friends who went to private schools.

    Their parents might think the schools are "elite" and all that, but the kids normally couldn't give a toss. Talking to your average fee-paying school graduate you wouldn't have a clue that they went to one.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 78 ✭✭Johnny Weasel


    Maybe the schools should introduce less elitist sports in to the facility. I'm sure the same arguments wouldn't be made if baseball and ice hockey were played and not rugby.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,562 ✭✭✭leeroybrown


    The OP should take their blinkers off. Regardless of their personal opinion of private schools the children who attend them are all entitled to the same level of state sponsored education as children in other schools. Treating them differently would be nauseating.

    I'm sure that pretty much every parent in this country is putting their hand in their pocket to pay for their child's free education. Books, heating supplements, maintenance supplements, trips all end up coming out of parents pockets. The parents of the kids in these private schools are just taking it a bit further. Some of them just do it to get their kids out of their way for the school terms. Most of the people I know that went to a private school (I didn't) were the children of two hard working parents with decent jobs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,417 ✭✭✭Tefral


    Went to a fee paying school myself, Im hardly elitist!
    My father was a mechanic, my mam was/is a housewife (or homemaker as they like to say lol), hard working and defo working class family!

    Most of the people that went with me were from one parent families etc. No snobs in with us at all in fact. I suggest OP that you may not tar us all with the same brush! My dad wanted to give me the best education that i could get to give me a good headstart in life, nothing wrong with that and in fact isnt that what all parents want for their kids regardless if they have the money to send kids to a fee paying school or not!

    I know id break my balls to give my kids the very best i can.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,143 ✭✭✭✭chopperbyrne


    I'd love to be able to spend €48,000 a year after tax and still live comfortably too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    I'd love to be able to spend €48,000 a year after tax and still live comfortably too.

    Where do you get that figure from?
    Most fee-paying schools are around €5,000 a year, none are €48,000.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,184 ✭✭✭✭Pighead


    You're a snob OP!. An inverted snob maybe, but a snob all the same. You don't like it when you see Pighead cycle past you on his shiny new BMX. "He's such a show off" you grumble. You hate it when you see Terrry buy the best beer in the off license. "Hope it chokes you" you sneer"

    Instead of directing hatred towards the people who are paying that little bit extra for hopefully that little bit more quality why don't you open a bicycle shop or an off license and benefit from the people who are making you so bitter, jealous and angry?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,143 ✭✭✭✭chopperbyrne


    Where do you get that figure from?
    Most fee-paying schools are around €5,000 a year, none are €48,000.

    The person in the article mentioned that it cost €16,000 a year for that school and that her three sons were attending.

    I may have went to a lowly public school, but I can multiply 16,000 by 3.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    because I believe it will help to bring out the best in my boys, and hopefully teach them something about giving back to society. This is my right as a parent.

    lol and make sure that they're a step above the plebs.


  • Posts: 81,308 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Nathaniel Fancy Self-expression


    They DO want the best for their kids. Would you prefer if they were rolling around in money and refused to provide for their families as best they could?

    As long as it's not used as a status symbol in and of itself and the kids don't grow up thinking just having gone to a fee paying school means they're great, I see no problem.
    I liked the article myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,419 ✭✭✭Cool Mo D


    The person in the article mentioned that it cost €16,000 a year for that school and that her three sons were attending.

    I may have went to a lowly public school, but I can multiply 16,000 by 3.

    Maybe you should learn how to divide 16,000 by three?

    It looks clear from context that she's paying 16,000 a year for the three of them.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,562 ✭✭✭leeroybrown


    I'd love to be able to spend €48,000 a year after tax and still live comfortably too.
    Based on the article it seems to be one boarder and two day pupils. A day pupil should cost considerably less than a boarder so I'd say that it's more like €32,000. It's still not a small amount though...
    Cool Mo D wrote: »
    Maybe you should learn how to divide 16,000 by three?

    It looks clear from context that she's paying 16,000 a year for the three of them.
    No. I'd say that €16,000 per year is about right for a single boarder.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    By the way, you all know that Clongowes takes seven boys a year for free?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,137 ✭✭✭artyeva


    i too went to a fee paying secondary school that definately wasn't elitist... although saying that it's probably one of the cheapest boarding schools in the country and i went as a day pupil. they provided scholarships for pupils whose parents mightn't have otherwise been able to afford the fees and i was lucky enough to avail of that.

    it's not that my folks had ideas above their station, or had any elitist ideals or anything - it was the only school in the town that was the same religious ethos of my parents. having said that, all through my 6 years there was always only a 51% intake of that religion - it was the ethos of the school but not restrictive to that. iykwim..

    would i send my kids there? probably. the pupil-teacher ratios are still excellent, they have great sports facilities and pupils have the opportunity to study subject liks art, HE, all the sciences, and languages. something that's not provided in the secondary schools where i live now. i don't think there's anything elitist about wanting yer kids to get the best education you can afford, whatever that may be. :confused:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Problem is that this country has an education system where the quality of a childs education is decided by mammy and daddys ability to stuff cash into a schools bank account. Given that kids are meant to be our greatest resource it's a travesty that this is still perpetuated.

    Cherish all the children of the nation equally me arse


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,949 ✭✭✭✭IvyTheTerrible


    By the way, you all know that Clongowes takes seven boys a year for free?

    Seven?! Wow give that school a medal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,769 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    don't know about elitist but 16K a year for school is f*cking insane


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,562 ✭✭✭leeroybrown


    I know someone who decided to send their kids as day pupils to a private school (about €5,000 per child) on the basis that all the other schools that were close enough to be considered had abjectly poor reputations and she had heard nothing but bad things from the other parents with children at them. She slaved away doing an extra job part-time to make sure she could afford it. I really think the state needs to realise why people are paying to choose schools.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Seven?! Wow give that school a medal.

    Well someone has to clean little Edward and Sneachtas' dorm :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,949 ✭✭✭✭IvyTheTerrible


    I know someone who decided to send their kids as day pupils to a private school (about €5,000 per child) on the basis that all the other schools that were close enough to be considered had abjectly poor reputations and she had heard nothing but bad things from the other parents with children at them. She slaved away doing an extra job part-time to make sure she could afford it. I really think the state needs to realise why people are paying to choose schools.

    A lot of these schools have poor reputations because unfulfilled mammies trying to live through their kids can't accept that their little snowflake actually isn't mentally capable of getting 600 points in the Leaving, so of course it must be the school's fault.

    (And before someone says that a lot of private schools have better results, a lot of them have entrance exams so of course the average is higher).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    Seven?! Wow give that school a medal.

    Yes seven. Assuming fees of 6,000 a year that is €42,000 a year that they have no obligation to give but are anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,831 ✭✭✭genericguy


    A lot of these schools have poor reputations because unfulfilled mammies trying to live through their kids can't accept that their little snowflake actually isn't mentally capable of getting 600 points in the Leaving, so of course it must be the school's fault.

    (And before someone says that a lot of private schools have better results, a lot of them have entrance exams so of course the average is higher).

    agreed.

    i wouldn't be interested in sending any children i may have to one of these schools, irrespective of my income. i went to an absolute shithole school, and although i probably wouldn't choose one of those for my children either, public schools are far better for character development than private schools full of fintans and andreas, and that in my view is far more important than a 600 point leaving certificate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 357 ✭✭K-Ren


    I love private schooling. It meant that when I went to secondary school, any pretentious dickwads that might have ruined 5 years of my life were all holed up together in some place far, far away!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,562 ✭✭✭leeroybrown


    A lot of these schools have poor reputations because unfulfilled mammies trying to live through their kids can't accept that their little snowflake actually isn't mentally capable of getting 600 points in the Leaving, so of course it must be the school's fault.
    It wasn't the academic results that scared her off. It was the poor reputations that the schools had developed across other areas (the way the school was run, discipline, bullying, etc) combined with the concerns of the other parents who had to deal with the kids who spent time there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    A lot of these schools have poor reputations because unfulfilled mammies trying to live through their kids can't accept that their little snowflake actually isn't mentally capable of getting 600 points in the Leaving, so of course it must be the school's fault.

    (And before someone says that a lot of private schools have better results, a lot of them have entrance exams so of course the average is higher).
    The enterance exams are normally to determine what stream the child is put in, not to determine if the child gets into school.
    There are however interviews done prior to the child being accepted, to make sure that he/she can fit in, is interested in education etc.

    The thing is that the type of parents that send their children to private school tend to care deeply that their child gets educated. You tend to get less disruptive children, and if they are disruptive, a quick call home usually sorts things.
    All it takes is one or two children to wreck the education of all the others, only one or two parents who don't care. If a parent doesn't care about their child's education, they aren't going to spend thousands on it.

    You are also more likely to have social problems in certain public schools.
    The achievement difference between public and private schools is mostly attitude IMO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,255 ✭✭✭✭The_Minister


    genericguy wrote: »
    agreed.

    i wouldn't be interested in sending any children i may have to one of these schools, irrespective of my income. i went to an absolute shithole school, and although i probably wouldn't choose one of those for my children either, public schools are far better for character development than private schools full of fintans and andreas, and that in my view is far more important than a 600 point leaving certificate.

    :rolleyes: Nice stereotpyes.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,184 ✭✭✭✭Pighead


    K-Ren wrote: »
    I love private schooling. It meant that when I went to secondary school, any pretentious dickwads that might have ruined 5 years of my life were all holed up together in some place far, far away!
    How on earth can you call somebody a pretentious dickwad for attending a private school!

    In that case the lads who don't bother going with education at all should call you a pretentious dickwad for attending school. The boys with no footwear should call you a pretentious dickwad for buying your Nike runners etc etc etc etc!


Advertisement
Advertisement