This is just fcuking sick

amacachi · 02-05-2009 10:10AM

kickoutthejams wrote: »

F*ck am I hard right now.

Might want to stay away from kids for a while.

Lockstep · 02-05-2009 10:12AM

amacachi wrote: »

Might want to stay away from kids for a while.

*facepalm*

lgoring21 · 02-05-2009 10:27AM

CathyMoran wrote: »

I dont believe in the death penalty, but at the very least he or "it" should be in prision for life

thats the thing....prisions are more like holiday camps these days.... its comin to the stage where its like pattin the back of those who do wrong....prisions should mean the conditions of prisions in thailnd or countries like that....make them really suffer instead of watchin tv doin courses...as in prision for life?? yeah right no matter what crime these days nobody ever sees their days out in prision....

Lockstep · 02-05-2009 10:30AM

lgoring21 wrote: »

thats the thing....prisions are more like holiday camps these days.... its comin to the stage where its like pattin the back of those who do wrong....

Have you ever seen the inside of a prison? I don't mean as a con, but at all?
Holiday camp? Lol

lgoring21 wrote: »

prisions should mean the conditions of prisions in thailnd or countries like that....make them really suffer instead of watchin tv doin courses...as in prision for life?? yeah right no matter what crime these days nobody ever sees their days out in prision....

Read Damage Done by Warren Fellows and tell me that you'd be happy with anyone being treated like the Thai prison system.

galwayrush · 02-05-2009 10:30AM

I'm sure he will be treated well in prison. Give him time, he'll get what's coming to him many times over.:cool:

galwayrush · 02-05-2009 10:32AM

lgoring21 wrote: »

thats the thing....prisions are more like holiday camps these days.... ...

Apparently they are in this country if you're a dissident republican prisoner.:rolleyes:

brianthebard · 02-05-2009 10:34AM

Mrmoe wrote: »

Why should emotion be taken out of this situation? What this guy did was sickening. He should thanks his lucky stars that he makes it to prison in one piece. What exactly is wrong with someone taking revenge against this guy?

The AH dumb as **** mob strikes again. No one sees the irony in beating the **** out of a guy who beat the **** out of children I suppose? Really cathartic and cleansing for you and society as a whole is it?

Nodin · 02-05-2009 10:41AM

I see the significance of the woman who retracted her accusation made when she was 10 in this country not a few days ago is not dawning on a few here...

leitrim lad · 02-05-2009 10:45AM

ronbyrne2005 wrote: »

Would killing the guy or torturing him make you feel better?

i would torture him with a nail bar and a tire lever , and maybe beat him with a bell hook, as if this story is true he deserves none other than a decade of torture

typical english waster, all they know how to say is "all right mate"

dlofnep · 02-05-2009 10:46AM

Karma, karma, karma, karma, karama prison rapeeee.

(Sung to Karma Chameleon).

What comes around, goes around. This scumbag will get his come-uppance.

amacachi · 02-05-2009 10:53AM

Nodin wrote: »

I see the significance of the woman who retracted her accusation made when she was 10 in this country not a few days ago is not dawning on a few here...

Aye, but that says more about the courts than anything else. Apparently the families had been feuding for ages, so there were two options, either a fella raped someone to make a point, or else the other family were making up stories to get him. And apparently it was decided beyond a reasonable doubt that rape was the more likely case, despite no physical evidence.

Nodin · 02-05-2009 10:59AM

amacachi wrote: »

Aye, but that says more about the courts than anything else.

True.
This fecker was convicted by a court, wasn't he?

Mr.Lizard · 02-05-2009 11:02AM

Interesting article on the sidebar about a computer program that created a hypothetical image of what Maddie McCann looks like aged six.

Thing is I put my own high-powered personal computer to the same task and it came out with this result

(Might have to send it back to Dell.)

brianthebard · 02-05-2009 11:05AM

amacachi wrote: »

despite no physical evidence.

That doesn't concern you at all no?

Nodin · 02-05-2009 11:07AM

Mr.Lizard wrote: »

Interesting article on the sidebar about a computer program that created a hypothetical image of what Maddie McCann looks like aged six.

Thing is I put my own high-powered personal computer to the same task and it came out with this result (Might have to send it back to Dell.)

Was on the news earlier....
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/age_progression_technology

amacachi · 02-05-2009 11:16AM

Nodin wrote: »

True.
This fecker was convicted by a court, wasn't he?

True, from what I understand there was considerable evidence though.

brianthebard wrote: »

That doesn't concern you at all no?

Yes it does, that was my point, how the hell was he convicted when it was just his word against hers/her family's? Which is another reason why despite my being mostly in favour of the death penalty I wouldn't want it back without a proper overhaul of the whole justice system.

Caoimhín · 02-05-2009 11:21AM

tony1kenobi wrote: »

and you can't rely on the Sun for facts unless you want facts on Jennifer Ellisons tits.

Yes please.

Jeapy · 02-05-2009 11:21AM

OP, i saw this headline in the newspaper and purposely didnt read it. It's vile and Im pretty sure i'd find it upsetting. Can you edit your original post to at least describe whats in the link so those of us who don't want to read it don't click it?
*Saying all that, I'm assuming your link is about baby p's stepdad and a rape case? I'm not clicking to be sure.

Nodin · 02-05-2009 11:47AM

Jeapy wrote: »

OP, i saw this headline in the newspaper and purposely didnt read it. It's vile and Im pretty sure i'd find it upsetting. Can you edit your original post to at least describe whats in the link so those of us who don't want to read it don't click it?
*Saying all that, I'm assuming your link is about baby p's stepdad and a rape case? I'm not clicking to be sure.

The title of the thread is "This is just fcuking sick". What precisely did you expect?

By the way "Anal Rampage III" - its not a nature documentary.

Jeapy · 02-05-2009 11:53AM

Nodin wrote: »

The title of the thread is "This is just fcuking sick". What precisely did you expect?

you could describe plenty of things as sick...the rape of a 2 year old is beyond "sick". I'm not easily offended, but I don't want to read any more details on this story.
I'd have clicked the link, only for the fact that I'd already seen the headline and didn't want to read any further. I'm just pointing out that the first post could have given a little detail about what the link was about.

Nodin · 02-05-2009 11:57AM

Jeapy wrote: »

. I'm just pointing out that the first post could have given a little detail about what the link was about.

If he did what I normally do, he'd have pasted an extract of about a paragraph from the story...which means you'd have read the detail you don't want to read.

I'd avoid the english news today, were I you.

Jeapy · 02-05-2009 11:59AM

Nodin wrote: »

If he did what I normally do, he'd have pasted an extract of about a paragraph from the story...which means you'd have read the detail you don't want to read.

I'd avoid the english news today, were I you.

Ya, but you might have posted the headline with it and I'd have avoided it. So many disturbing details in the baby p case as it is. It is beyond "sick". I'll avoid the papers and we'll agree to disagree.

Trog · 02-05-2009 12:32PM

AlmightyCushion wrote: »

How in the name of fúck does someone rape a 2 year old.

Well first you go to the shop and buy some candy. Or you can just take it from some other baby...

/Paedophilia

raah! · 02-05-2009 01:35PM

heh heh, the first line is "the twisted fiend.."
Those papers crack me up.

Although I agree in that you do have to be pretty demented to rape a 2 year old. My guess is he was trying to get at his ex or something..

aDeener · 02-05-2009 01:52PM

brianthebard wrote: »

The AH dumb as **** mob strikes again. No one sees the irony in beating the **** out of a guy who beat the **** out of children I suppose? Really cathartic and cleansing for you and society as a whole is it?

and what if it were brianthebard's son that this monster raped? im sure you would happily see him sit out 10 years in prison in front of big screen tvs and having access to mobile phones.:rolleyes:

Mrmoe · 02-05-2009 02:06PM

brianthebard wrote: »

The AH dumb as **** mob strikes again. No one sees the irony in beating the **** out of a guy who beat the **** out of children I suppose? Really cathartic and cleansing for you and society as a whole is it?

Ah thats right, we should really be giving him a kiss and a cuddle, the poor man, he has had it tough alright.:rolleyes:

Lockstep · 02-05-2009 02:29PM

aDeener wrote: »

and what if it were brianthebard's son that this monster raped? im sure you would happily see him sit out 10 years in prison in front of big screen tvs and having access to mobile phones.:rolleyes:

The whole point is that the justice system is meant to be objective. We're meant to take crimes as they occur, not imagining how we'd feel if our own kids were the ones damaged as we'd be....biased.

Lockstep · 02-05-2009 02:29PM

Mrmoe wrote: »

Ah thats right, we should really be giving him a kiss and a cuddle, the poor man, he has had it tough alright.:rolleyes:

Where did Brian say anything of the sort?
If all else fails, create a strawman.

Disease Ridden · 02-05-2009 02:38PM

Sorry brianthebard, but if a grown man goes and rapes a 2 year old child he deserves, not only to get the sh'ite kicked out of him, but to be made dead. Seriously, theres too many socially liberal people these days for anybodies good; those criminals are lost causes, incapable of changing their sick, twisted ways. While you could philosophize about the fact that nobody is ultimately responsible for their actions, thats irrelavent. For a society to work for the benefit of the vast majority you need to get rid of the bad apples by either extermination, locking them up or by otherwise instilling enough fear into them that the chance of them commiting their depraved or violent acts is lessened.

Mrmoe · 02-05-2009 02:41PM

kickoutthejams wrote: »

The whole point is that the justice system is meant to be objective. We're meant to take crimes as they occur, not imagining how we'd feel if our own kids were the ones damaged as we'd be....biased.

The justice system should be objective up until the point that a person is proven and convicted of committing a crime. You need subjectivity when issuing a punishment as each circumstance is different. For me the severity of the punishment should reflect the heinousness of the crime committed. In order to do this you need to be subjective. This is the justice that I would like to see. The word justice conveys equity to me. Spending time in prison where all your physical needs are catered for is nowhere equal punishment for what this guy did.

This is just fcuking sick

Comments