Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

ML or GP

13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 182 ✭✭ScholesyIsGod


    I am a bit surprised to see some of the glowing reviews that the Magners League has got, and how low some opinions of the Premiership are.

    Some of the Magners games are like watching paint dry, i watched about 20 minutes the Dragons and Ulster game and decided to switch back to the Newcastle and Everton match instead.

    And while there are some really poor games in England there are some cracking games as well. Irish, Bath and Gloucester all play very enjoyable brands of rugby.

    They're both of a very similar standard imo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    well the weakest team in the magners are the Dragons and Connacht,Glasgow.They are probably slightly weaker than the average low table GP club.

    Edinburgh,Ulster,Scarlets are all mid table and probably have slightly stronger teams than mid table prem.

    Leinster,Munster,Ospreys,Cardiff all have stronger teams than their top GP counterparts imo.

    Look at sale as an example,came to munster and got thrashed.They were one of the best teams in the prem


    Dont know where your getting this. GP have a better record against the ML in head to head matches this year.


  • Posts: 4,333 ✭✭✭ Addilynn Gifted Conductor


    Dont know where your getting this. GP have a better record against the ML in head to head matches this year.


    Im basing it on the strength of the squads,seeing as this seems to be how people are judging the strength of a league.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,772 ✭✭✭toomevara


    Crash wrote: »
    You do know he's not English right? :)

    Lol, West Brit actually...(I'll save 'em the trouble of making that particular post!)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭Crash


    I didn't think you could be a Munster west brit, thought it was just reserved for us south side Leinster boys ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,960 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Crash wrote: »
    I didn't think you could be a Munster west brit, thought it was just reserved for us south side Leinster boys ;)

    Us northside Leinster boys are just as west brit :P Well I am anyway!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    well the weakest team in the magners are the Dragons and Connacht,Glasgow.They are probably slightly weaker than the average low table GP club.

    Edinburgh,Ulster,Scarlets are all mid table and probably have slightly stronger teams than mid table prem.

    Leinster,Munster,Ospreys,Cardiff all have stronger teams than their top GP counterparts imo.

    Look at sale as an example,came to munster and got thrashed.They were one of the best teams in the prem

    Probably not too far off the truth. In the powergen cup Ospreys and Cardiff Blues are in the top four of english and welsh teams. Hard to tell with the lower ranked teams.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    Do you not have to live in britian, in the west to consider yourself a west brit. Confused...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    The people who say the Premiership in England is up-the-jumper obviously don't watch it enough. Last weekend alone shoves their lazy presumption down the u-bend.

    Which u bend is that..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    Good debate , enjoyed it! Think I've proven my point. There's alot of conjecture and canard posts that hold little weight.

    One of the funnier comments was that international competition is a bad way to judge how good the teams are in comparison to each other. I mean on what other basis can a teams status be judged , perhaps a dance off or a lively discussion between the players would suit better. Why have competitive rugby matches at all.:)

    The performance of the ML teams in the HC is indisputable, that is 40 % of the ML teams being in the top eight in europe..... which is a record and one which the GP hasn't ever achieved.
    Even from the PC you can see that two of the welsh teams are in the top four of english and Welsh teams.

    The ML is in existence about 8 years and had nine welsh teams in it's inception. It's moved on immeasurably from that day and has gone from strenght to strenght year on year to be at the position it's in this year.

    Inversley the GP is on a downward spiral. I would rate it as the third best european league now. It can't afford to hold onto it's best players and with the continued devaluation of sterling I would expect this trend to continue .

    They'll probaly have to get rid of the salary cap and apportion more of the money from the RFU to teams with english national team rugby players . Either way it'll take a good bit of restructuring before it can improve.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,255 ✭✭✭anonymous_joe


    The English premiership will come back and bite everyone in the ass. ;)

    At the end of teh day, they're in financial trouble, they'll end up getting rid of relegation, dump the salary cap and spank the world again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,249 ✭✭✭Stev_o


    escobar wrote: »
    Good debate , enjoyed it! Think I've proven my point. There's alot of conjecture and canard posts that hold little weight.

    One of the funnier comments was that international competition is a bad way to judge how good the teams are in comparison to each other. I mean on what other basis can a teams status be judged , perhaps a dance off or a lively discussion between the players would suit better. Why have competitive rugby matches at all.:)


    Think we were more pointing out if you go down that route then you'll see that England p1ss all over the ML league host nations in terms of international competitiveness. They'v won a WC, been in another final while Scotland was the only team that has clubs playing in the ML that go through to the knock outs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,255 ✭✭✭anonymous_joe


    Stev_o wrote: »
    Think we were more pointing out if you go down that route then you'll see that England p1ss all over the ML league host nations in terms of international competitiveness. They'v won a WC, been in another final while Scotland was the only team that has clubs playing in the ML that go through to the knock outs.

    In 07 the mediocre English after 4 years of humiliation, often at our hands, made it to the final. And then there's us and Wales... :P

    So yeah, you're not entirely wrong. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    escobar wrote: »
    Good debate , enjoyed it! Think I've proven my point. There's alot of conjecture and canard posts that hold little weight.


    The only thing you've proven is your clueless.
    escobar wrote: »
    One of the funnier comments was that international competition is a bad way to judge how good the teams are in comparison to each other. I mean on what other basis can a teams status be judged , perhaps a dance off or a lively discussion between the players would suit better. Why have competitive rugby matches at all.:)


    How excactly does international competition prove which league is better? You do realise foregins play in both leagues and play vital roles in all the major ML & GP teams that do well in the HEC? :confused:

    Look at leinster, they'd have no OH if it wasnt for foreigners, a pretty crucial position in rugby, just like how a tight head is. Munster always struggled because they had no backs, bring in 3 imports and they have been doing excellent. Not to mention the foreign members of Wasps and Lecister.
    escobar wrote: »
    The performance of the ML teams in the HC is indisputable, that is 40 % of the ML teams being in the top eight in europe..... which is a record and one which the GP hasn't ever achieved.
    Even from the PC you can see that two of the welsh teams are in the top four of english and Welsh teams.

    So HC is the be all and end all of judging teams? English teams have won it more then ML, they've had more teams appear in semi-finals, they've beaten more ML teams this season already is the competition. whats the points in having 4 teams make it through the group stage if only 1 makes it any further? We'll find out how all the teams do soon enough.
    escobar wrote: »
    The ML is in existence about 8 years and had nine welsh teams in it's inception. It's moved on immeasurably from that day and has gone from strenght to strenght year on year to be at the position it's in this year.


    Based on? The ML have had 3 teams make it through the last 3 years to the 2nd round the same as the English but the English have had two make it to the semi's while ML has only had 1 team. They managed to make 4 go through this team thanks to frances poor performances.
    escobar wrote: »
    Inversley the GP is on a downward spiral. I would rate it as the third best european league now. It can't afford to hold onto it's best players and with the continued devaluation of sterling I would expect this trend to continue .

    How is GP on a downward spiral? According to your logic of juding teams on HEC cup qualifiers France are clearing the nation on a downward spiral with only having 1 team qualify, so which is? You really shouldnt use the HEC as a way to "prove" that the ML is the better league then completely ignore it to say the GP is worse then the Top 14 because it suits your points.
    escobar wrote: »
    They'll probaly have to get rid of the salary cap and apportion more of the money from the RFU to teams with english national team rugby players . Either way it'll take a good bit of restructuring before it can improve.


    Why does it need to improve? Yet again they had 3 teams qualify for the second round, something they have always done so I dont see how that is the sign of a disimprovement. You could argue how the salary cap will increase players leaving but I think nearly everyone will agree that when it comes to the international side the French will be the ones to suffer from an influx of foreign imports.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 182 ✭✭ScholesyIsGod


    escobar wrote: »
    Good debate , enjoyed it! Think I've proven my point. There's alot of conjecture and canard posts that hold little weight.

    One of the funnier comments was that international competition is a bad way to judge how good the teams are in comparison to each other. I mean on what other basis can a teams status be judged , perhaps a dance off or a lively discussion between the players would suit better. Why have competitive rugby matches at all.:)

    The performance of the ML teams in the HC is indisputable, that is 40 % of the ML teams being in the top eight in europe..... which is a record and one which the GP hasn't ever achieved.
    Even from the PC you can see that two of the welsh teams are in the top four of english and Welsh teams.

    The ML is in existence about 8 years and had nine welsh teams in it's inception. It's moved on immeasurably from that day and has gone from strenght to strenght year on year to be at the position it's in this year.

    Inversley the GP is on a downward spiral. I would rate it as the third best european league now. It can't afford to hold onto it's best players and with the continued devaluation of sterling I would expect this trend to continue .

    They'll probaly have to get rid of the salary cap and apportion more of the money from the RFU to teams with english national team rugby players . Either way it'll take a good bit of restructuring before it can improve.


    You keep going on about ML having 4 teams while not mentionong the Premiership has 3 which is an equally good counter arguement as to why it is a strong competion.

    And yes there HAVE been 4 English teams in the quarter finals before. 1997/1998.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,608 ✭✭✭themont85


    You keep going on about ML having 4 teams while not mentionong the Premiership has 3 which is an equally good counter arguement as to why it is a strong competion.

    And yes there HAVE been 4 English teams in the quarter finals before. 1997/1998.

    Before the Ml existed and the modern day Celtic professional structure existed. Back then the Celtic unions didn't have a clue where they were going.

    I can sit through both ML and GP and be equally as bored ****less.

    When you think about the money and overall control the GP clubs have had in the past imo its been a grossly overrated league in comparision to the ML. The GP has a 5 years headstart over the ML(at least and many more if you think that the English club structure and fan base has been in place for donkeys years in comparision to many ML teams; see Leicster as opposed to Glasgow).

    The only thing that has taken it over the Magners has been the threat of relegation and the play offs which make what would be irrelevant matches in the Magners important over there.

    Both leagues are fairly close now imo with the Magners on a upwards climb year on year, it wouldnt be suprising to see that supplant the GP in a couple of years. No patch on the Top 14 tho...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 182 ✭✭ScholesyIsGod


    Id more or less agree with that.

    Going back to the 4 teams reaching a quarter final, regardless of what the structures were like back then the Premiership has had 4 teams make the quarters and i feel obliged to point out that its not a fact that only the Magners League has ever achieved that when its being used as an invalid point in the discussion. Especially when other posts are being said to hold little weight.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    Id more or less agree with that.

    Going back to the 4 teams reaching a quarter final, regardless of what the structures were like back then the Premiership has had 4 teams make the quarters and i feel obliged to point out that its not a fact that only the Magners League has ever achieved that when its being used as an invalid point in the discussion. Especially when other posts are being said to hold little weight.

    The CL has only been in existence for eight years.

    This debate though is about which is the best league at present.
    My point about half of the teams in the knockout stages being from the CL was made to show how far the CL has come in the 8 years of it's existense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    You keep going on about ML having 4 teams while not mentionong the Premiership has 3 which is an equally good counter arguement as to why it is a strong competion.

    And yes there HAVE been 4 English teams in the quarter finals before. 1997/1998.

    The debate is about how good the leagues are now and the ML wasn't even in existense at that time.

    Interesting to look at though. There were only 5 groups at that stage with milan and caledonia competing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    Stev_o wrote: »
    Think we were more pointing out if you go down that route then you'll see that England p1ss all over the ML league host nations in terms of international competitiveness. They'v won a WC, been in another final while Scotland was the only team that has clubs playing in the ML that go through to the knock outs.

    The HC is an international club competition by the way. The debate is about which league is currently the best. But I'll indulge you, Not only did we beat england this year but we have beaten them in about 7 of the last eight years.

    I have also referred to the sucess of the Welsh and Irish teams in the 6 nations. The welsh have won it twice in the last three years and the welsh and irish will contest it this year. It's no coincidence that the ML found it's final structure about this time.....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    The only thing you've proven is your clueless.




    How excactly does international competition prove which league is better? You do realise foregins play in both leagues and play vital roles in all the major ML & GP teams that do well in the HEC? :confused:

    Look at leinster, they'd have no OH if it wasnt for foreigners, a pretty crucial position in rugby, just like how a tight head is. Munster always struggled because they had no backs, bring in 3 imports and they have been doing excellent. Not to mention the foreign members of Wasps and Lecister.



    So HC is the be all and end all of judging teams? English teams have won it more then ML, they've had more teams appear in semi-finals, they've beaten more ML teams this season already is the competition. whats the points in having 4 teams make it through the group stage if only 1 makes it any further? We'll find out how all the teams do soon enough.




    Based on? The ML have had 3 teams make it through the last 3 years to the 2nd round the same as the English but the English have had two make it to the semi's while ML has only had 1 team. They managed to make 4 go through this team thanks to frances poor performances.



    How is GP on a downward spiral? According to your logic of juding teams on HEC cup qualifiers France are clearing the nation on a downward spiral with only having 1 team qualify, so which is? You really shouldnt use the HEC as a way to "prove" that the ML is the better league then completely ignore it to say the GP is worse then the Top 14 because it suits your points.




    Why does it need to improve? Yet again they had 3 teams qualify for the second round, something they have always done so I dont see how that is the sign of a disimprovement. You could argue how the salary cap will increase players leaving but I think nearly everyone will agree that when it comes to the international side the French will be the ones to suffer from an influx of foreign imports.


    OOh chucky, ....your first comment was a bit harsh... I do have feelings you know.. :(

    THe HC is an international club competition by the way. The debate is about how good the leagues are relative to each other presently.

    I look forward to the quarter finals of the HC..... and competitive rugby between the relavant leagues is how I would compare them ...and yes...a dance off or lively debat just wouldn't cut it for me

    I would think that the CL will have al least 2 if not three teams in the semis....

    and having 40% of the CL in the top eight teams in europe is pretty exceptional...

    I'll cut and paste my comments regarding the demise of the GP, but you're really going to have to try to keep up ....
    I was commenting on the GP losing players which is a recent phenomenon and would't have affected the no. of teams the GP got into the knockout stages this year

    The GP is falling apart and as players contracts end they will leave the GP for greener pastures. This won't change unless the value of sterling does. The GP simply can't afford the better players. Martin Johnson is very worried about this prospect

    ''Martin Johnson sent out a veiled threat to England players eyeing a lucrative move to France that their international prospects would be less rosy if they were to follow the three Wasps players, James Haskell, Riki Flutey and Tom Palmer, across the Channel.''
    Players such as Geraghty, and even Wasps' Danny Cipriani, have yet to confirm their plans.

    It's as simple as that the fact that the GP can no longer afford the best players and more worringly for the GP they can't even hang onto their english national players even under threat of losing their english team paycheck..... so what does that say about players not getting payed a top up by the english rugby union??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,772 ✭✭✭toomevara


    Two absolutely dire/dour/catatonically boring ML games yesterday, business as usual then. Hopefully todays Wasps/LI encounter will provide some entertaining and vaguely watchable rugby....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,772 ✭✭✭toomevara


    escobar wrote: »
    Players such as Geraghty, and even Wasps' Danny Cipriani, have yet to confirm their plans.

    Cipriani has signed for Wasps...do keep up old boy...


  • Posts: 2,960 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    toomevara wrote: »
    Two absolutely dire/dour/catatonically boring ML games yesterday, business as usual then. Hopefully todays Wasps/LI encounter will provide some entertaining and vaguely watchable rugby....

    They were missing a rake of internationals


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,586 ✭✭✭sock puppet


    toomevara wrote: »
    Two absolutely dire/dour/catatonically boring ML games yesterday, business as usual then. Hopefully todays Wasps/LI encounter will provide some entertaining and vaguely watchable rugby....

    That's a load of crap and you know it. The Ulster game was in absolutely awful conditions. One of Humphreys kicks actually ended up being blown back behind him. Ulster have been very entertaining to watch this season normally. Munster did enough to win. That's all you'd expect when they're missing so many players.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    toomevara wrote: »
    Cipriani has signed for Wasps...do keep up old boy...

    Touche :D ...you're plagairising my comments again....

    That was a cut and paste of a comment made previously for chuckys benefit.

    At least the GP can hold onto some of the english national side .......or is cipriani getting a first team place these days....:eek:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 283 ✭✭escobar


    They were missing a rake of internationals


    Don't feed the troll... as if the GP is going to be exciting to watch....:pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    escobar wrote: »
    OOh chucky, ....your first comment was a bit harsh... I do have feelings you know.. :(

    THe HC is an international club competition by the way. The debate is about how good the leagues are relative to each other presently.

    I look forward to the quarter finals of the HC..... and competitive rugby between the relavant leagues is how I would compare them ...and yes...a dance off or lively debat just wouldn't cut it for me

    I would think that the CL will have al least 2 if not three teams in the semis....

    and having 40% of the CL in the top eight teams in europe is pretty exceptional...

    I'll cut and paste my comments regarding the demise of the GP, but you're really going to have to try to keep up ....
    I was commenting on the GP losing players which is a recent phenomenon and would't have affected the no. of teams the GP got into the knockout stages this year

    The GP is falling apart and as players contracts end they will leave the GP for greener pastures. This won't change unless the value of sterling does. The GP simply can't afford the better players. Martin Johnson is very worried about this prospect

    ''Martin Johnson sent out a veiled threat to England players eyeing a lucrative move to France that their international prospects would be less rosy if they were to follow the three Wasps players, James Haskell, Riki Flutey and Tom Palmer, across the Channel.''
    Players such as Geraghty, and even Wasps' Danny Cipriani, have yet to confirm their plans.

    It's as simple as that the fact that the GP can no longer afford the best players and more worringly for the GP they can't even hang onto their english national players even under threat of losing their english team paycheck..... so what does that say about players not getting payed a top up by the english rugby union??




    So is the GP better then the Top 14 because of the HEc results?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,341 ✭✭✭✭Chucky the tree


    Also, its great to see that in early march it's already looking like the ML is just going to be a two horse race. Oh the excitement!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,772 ✭✭✭toomevara


    escobar wrote: »
    Don't feed the troll... as if the GP is going to be exciting to watch....:pac:

    I hope you're not implying I'm trolling old chum, I'd get upset...lets keep it civil and remember that while ideas may contest men need not


Advertisement