Swallow, it's good for your health!

Turd Ferguson · 14-10-2008 05:42PM

nummnutts wrote: »

I read somewhere that it has negative calories; meaning "you use up more calories carrying out the acts of fellating and consuming than are actually in a load".

If only more ladies knew this.

+1 eh I mean -1

Nevyn · 14-10-2008 05:43PM

Statistics damn lies and statistics.

Turd Ferguson · 14-10-2008 05:44PM

Thaedydal wrote: »

Statistics damn lies and statistics.

Lol, yeah why do the facts keeps lying!!!

Rhyme · 14-10-2008 05:56PM

nummnutts wrote: »

I read somewhere that it has negative calories; meaning "you use up more calories carrying out the acts of fellating and consuming than are actually in a load".

Think of the workout you could get by blowing yourself?

You don't use those lower ribs anyway.

Havermeyer · 14-10-2008 06:00PM

Rhyme wrote: »

Think of the workout you could get by blowing yourself?

You don't use those lower ribs anyway.

There's always somebody around here that is prepared to lower the tone on an otherwise informative thread.

Capt'n Midnight · 14-10-2008 06:22PM

MooseJam wrote: »

how many calories are in a typical load, could you live on the stuff ?

http://listing-index.ebay.com/actors/Kim_Kelly_(actress).html

In 2002, the plump Kelly publicly attempted to lose weight by an all-semen diet. She lost 15 pounds on her "Man Juice Diet" by spending 30 days on a diet consisting of semen, banana smoothies and brocolli. Via fellatio, Kelly extracted about three to six teaspoons of semen per day. The average ejaculation is roughly 1 teaspoon and contains 15 calories. The semen portion of Kim Kelly's diet therefore only contributed 45 to 90 calories of her daily nutrition, a minor fraction of what is required by a normal adult. It is likely that the only aspect of her semen diet that differentiated it from a banana smoothie diet is the exercise she received while fellating her participants.

http://zaxya.blogspot.com/2007/05/man-juice-diet-part-2.html - interview

http://www.publicitywhore.com/pwblast27/graphics/fastfred.jpg

Turd Ferguson · 14-10-2008 06:25PM

Capt'n Midnight wrote: »

http://listing-index.ebay.com/actors/Kim_Kelly_(actress).html

http://zaxya.blogspot.com/2007/05/man-juice-diet-part-2.html - interview

http://www.publicitywhore.com/pwblast27/graphics/fastfred.jpg

Check out Linky Mac Link Link over there... :rolleyes:

Jemmy · 14-10-2008 06:35PM

Gran Hermano wrote: »

her face looking like a painters radio.

Lmfao

admiralofthefleet · 14-10-2008 07:03PM

ha ha, swallow or its going in your eye!

AckwelFoley · 14-10-2008 07:08PM

im printing thiss off now.

My ex owes me a big christmas present..

..mind you, so does her ma.... and their cat.

Kiera · 14-10-2008 07:11PM

I hear its good for facials too

AckwelFoley · 14-10-2008 07:13PM

Thaedydal wrote: »

Statistics damn lies and statistics.

STFU and swallow it!

Sorry had to say it

MJOR · 14-10-2008 07:14PM

Apparently Its full of protein too for glossy hair

brianthebard · 14-10-2008 07:15PM

MJOR wrote: »

Apparently Its full of protein too for glossy hair

I'll stick to avocado's thanks.

MJOR · 14-10-2008 07:41PM

brianthebard wrote: »

I'll stick to avocado's thanks.

lol!!! You guys have it easy!

tony1kenobi · 14-10-2008 08:05PM

Pauline Fowler must be gutted.

javaboy · 14-10-2008 08:08PM

tony1kenobi wrote: »

Pauline Fowler must be gutted.

I had that idea 5 or 6 years ago but nobody would sign my petition.

marknoonan1974 · 14-10-2008 08:08PM

jaysus, are you lot very bored?

nc13 · 14-10-2008 08:41PM

I just got a black eye for suggesting it!

brianthebard · 14-10-2008 09:49PM

MJOR wrote: »

lol!!! You guys have it easy!

How do you figure? Avocados are good for girls hair as well aren't they??

Phototoxin · 14-10-2008 09:57PM

swallowing also reduced the chance of preclampsya as well due to the womans body getting used to the males cells apparantly. Had a nice discussion about it with a med student chick i met once...

javaboy · 14-10-2008 10:17PM

Phototoxin wrote: »

swallowing also reduced the chance of preclampsya as well due to the womans body getting used to the males cells apparantly. Had a nice discussion about it with a med student chick i met once...

Discussion eh? All theory and no practice was it?

Ziggurat · 14-10-2008 10:22PM

javaboy wrote: »

Discussion eh? All theory and no practice was it?

I'd be a willing test subject.

I have the soft features of a woman, after all. And men can develop breast cancer so it never hurts to be sure.

Nevyn · 14-10-2008 10:25PM

There still is not enough info on the sample data and where they got it from.

javaboy · 14-10-2008 10:27PM

Thaedydal wrote: »

There still is not enough info on the sample data and where they got it from.

It's a pseudo-scientific "article" with very little statistical data to back it up and it mentions the big C and how to avoid it. And you're questioning it? What sort of woman are you?

I thought you wimmins lapped that kind of thing up?

:)

Havermeyer · 14-10-2008 10:52PM

Thaedydal wrote: »

There still is not enough info on the sample data and where they got it from.

This is the internet. Evidence and facts don't hold up round here.

Latchy · 14-10-2008 10:54PM

Ha Ha ,this reminds me of a true.....a very true story involving a camcorder

Insect Overlord · 14-10-2008 11:03PM

nummnutts wrote: »

This is the internet. Evidence and facts don't hold up round here.

74 per cent of statistics are made up on the spot.
A miniscule 13 per cent of people know this.

Nevyn · 14-10-2008 11:16PM

javaboy wrote: »

It's a pseudo-scientific "article" with very little statistical data to back it up and it mentions the big C and how to avoid it. And you're questioning it? What sort of woman are you?

One with a brain and who knows how easy it is to skew data about breast cancer starting with what women they asked.

javaboy wrote: »

I thought you wimmins lapped that kind of thing up? :)

Not yours for sure.

Thirdfox · 14-10-2008 11:52PM

In case the cleverly crafted names in the article do not make it obvious enough, this "report" is pure fiction. Early versions of this story were cleverly crafted to resemble an authentic CNN news story with ties to the Associated press and authentic graphics from and links to the CNN web site. It was created by North Carolina State University Junior Brandon Williamson and first hit the web in October, 2003. It was crafted as a bit of creative humor, intended only for a few of Williamson's friends. But, as often is the case with 'private' jokes, his work quickly became public, eventually landing him in a lot of hot water.

Fake 'CNN Health' VersionBy popular demand, he made his parody available using web space NCSU provides its students and, in no time at all, it was getting a million hits a day. Within a couple of days, the Associated Press threatened a trademark infringement suit against the school if they did not remove the page. Williamson responded quickly by removing any references to AP. To be safe, he also altered the CNN logo to be 'similar but different,' thinking that move would ward off future attacks. He was wrong.

Within a few more days, CNN was claiming intellectual property rights infringements. To appease the media giant, Williamson reverted to a "text-only version."

Finally, the school decided to deal its blow, informing Williamson that school officials felt the remaining language connecting the study to the school was defamatory and tarnished the institution's reputation. He responded by removing any NCSU references from the article and adding a disclaimer. The text above is from this 'final' version.

"What once made people laugh and chuckle, and even possibly made their day a little better, has now been kicked and prodded and threatened until there is nothing left but the bare bones," Williamson said of his stripped-down work. "I have given and given up on my creativity to appease those with complaints with only a feeling of silent anger towards the bully in the wake. 'Intellectual property rights'... 'Copyright infringement'... The article was parody. From the start the article was a parody and the only intention was to make people laugh. I'm only sorry you all didn't realize as such."

Break this chain by sending folks to Williamson's web site rather than forwarding the many less-legal versions.

from
http://www.breakthechain.org/exclusives/fellatio.html

Just in case anyone was silly enough to believe it.

edit: and oh this is such an old joke...2003 - I thought we would have moved on by now

Though I find it funny that boards.ie could be sued by AP and North Carolina State Uni for defamation/trademark infringement after this old joke cums back onto the scene again. (Yes that unfunny play on words is intentional).

Swallow, it's good for your health!

Comments