Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

PI Special - Desperate Biogiocal Clock Ticking Whore

13

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    Do you have to learn them?
    Either way it spells doom for the males of the human species once women figure out they can just have an octopus about the house to open things.



    They also close the jar after them too :pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,005 ✭✭✭✭Toto Wolfcastle


    kearnsr wrote: »
    I never thought for one minute this thread had any truth to it but can you just imagine it was true

    While the PI thread might not be true, I'd well believe that there are women out there who would do this. They're psychos of course.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,587 ✭✭✭✭Frisbee


    Scary...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭wasabi


    janeybabe wrote: »
    While the PI thread might not be true, I'd well believe that there are women out there who would do this. They're psychos of course.

    Aha but I'm pretty sure there are men who would as well, known a couple of guys with savage biological clocks in my time...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,005 ✭✭✭✭Toto Wolfcastle


    wasabi wrote: »
    Aha but I'm pretty sure there are men who would as well, known a couple of guys with savage biological clocks in my time...

    Of course....again, psychos!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Im surprised this hasnt been locked yet. Now who laughs when they locked the Overheal For Mod thread?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,537 ✭✭✭Gyalist


    janeybabe wrote: »
    While the PI thread might not be true, I'd well believe that there are women out there who would do this. They're psychos of course.

    I've heard of women who have used the contents of discarded condoms. Probably apocryphal, but I've heard it more than once.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,207 ✭✭✭meditraitor


    Gyalist wrote: »
    I've heard of women who have used the contents of discarded condoms. Probably apocryphal, but I've heard it more than once.

    For anyone else who didnt have a clue what this was (or am I just stoopid:p)

    1. of doubtful authorship or authenticity.
    2. Ecclesiastical. a. (initial capital letter) of or pertaining to the Apocrypha.
    b. of doubtful sanction; uncanonical.

    3. false; spurious: He told an apocryphal story about the sword, but the truth was later revealed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭wasabi


    WindSock wrote: »
    They also close the jar after them too :pac:

    Not only that, but they don't leave the toilet seat up after them.

    A bit serious for AH but a good read:

    http://www.supportguidelines.com/articles/art199903.html
    "After the baby was born, Mr. Wallis sued Ms. Smith for breach of contract (for failing to take the pill when she promised to use birth control), fraud (for supposedly lying about taking the pill; Ms. Smith states the pregnancy was accidental), and conversion, for "intentionally acquiring and misusing" his genetic material, to wit, his sperm, for the purpose of becoming pregnant without Mr. Smith's consent. Mr. Wallis claimed that even though Ms. Smith had not sued Mr. Wallis for child support (she sued only for a declaration of paternity), he was nonetheless damaged because he had become a father without his consent and had to see his daughter born into a "broken home," a situation that "broke his heart," according to one interview. Ms. Smith claimed that the sperm should be considered a gift, because Mr. Wallis "surrendered any right of possession to his semen when he transferred it during voluntary sexual intercourse."


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,005 ✭✭✭✭Toto Wolfcastle


    For anyone else who didnt have a clue what this was (or am I just stoopid:p)

    1. of doubtful authorship or authenticity.
    2. Ecclesiastical. a. (initial capital letter) of or pertaining to the Apocrypha.
    b. of doubtful sanction; uncanonical.

    3. false; spurious: He told an apocryphal story about the sword, but the truth was later revealed.

    I knew what it meant! I must tell my mother that I actually remembered something from college. She'll be so proud.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,043 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    Tauren wrote: »
    It is not an active PI thread - it is locked, thus inactive.

    Don't care it sets a dodgy precedent and undermines the PI forum.

    IF the OP had of talked out the topic with out linking to the thread or copy and pasting that would have been a different matter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭wasabi


    Gyalist wrote: »
    I've heard of women who have used the contents of discarded condoms. Probably apocryphal, but I've heard it more than once.

    Nope, apparently true:

    In State of Louisiana v. Frisard, 694 So. 2d 1032 (La. Ct. App. 1997), the mother and father of the child for whom support was sought met in a hospital while the father was visiting an ill relative. The mother was a nurse's aid who has access to a variety of medical equipment. The mother offered to perform oral sex on the father, and, in the words of the father, "as ... any male would, I did not refuse[.]" 694 So. 2d at 1035. The mother had the father wear a condom. The mother then removed the condom for the father, and unknown to the father, she inseminated herself with the father's sperm using a syringe.

    The Louisiana court, noting that the probability of paternity was 99.9994%, held the father's testimony that he "had some sort of sexual contact with the plaintiff around the time frame of alleged conception, although he denied that they had sexual intercourse" was sufficient to prove paternity. 694 So. 2d at 1036. This fact of paternity obliges a father to support his child. 694 So. 2d at 1034. In essence, because the father intentionally engaged in a sexual act resulting in his deposit of sperm with the mother, he is liable for child support.


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 10,661 ✭✭✭✭John Mason


    wasabi wrote: »
    http://www.supportguidelines.com/articles/art199903.html
    "After the baby was born, Mr. Wallis sued Ms. Smith for breach of contract (for failing to take the pill when she promised to use birth control), fraud (for supposedly lying about taking the pill; Ms. Smith states the pregnancy was accidental), and conversion, for "intentionally acquiring and misusing" his genetic material, to wit, his sperm, for the purpose of becoming pregnant without Mr. Smith's consent. Mr. Wallis claimed that even though Ms. Smith had not sued Mr. Wallis for child support (she sued only for a declaration of paternity), he was nonetheless damaged because he had become a father without his consent and had to see his daughter born into a "broken home," a situation that "broke his heart," according to one interview. Ms. Smith claimed that the sperm should be considered a gift, because Mr. Wallis "surrendered any right of possession to his semen when he transferred it during voluntary sexual intercourse."

    makes you think though, i think more men should sue :D


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,289 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    Thaedydal wrote: »

    Don't care it sets a dodgy precedent and undermines the PI forum.


    If it was a genuine thread then yeah of course your right but the fact that it was locked straight away would suggest that it wasnt.
    Thaedydal wrote: »

    IF the OP had of talked out the topic with out linking to the thread or copy and pasting that would have been a different matter.

    So it would be ok talking about the thread but not providing the information that any one can access in about 2 clicks?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 Stez Styx


    wasabi wrote: »
    Not only that, but they don't leave the toilet seat up after them.

    A bit serious for AH but a good read:

    http://www.supportguidelines.com/articles/art199903.html
    "After the baby was born, Mr. Wallis sued Ms. Smith for breach of contract (for failing to take the pill when she promised to use birth control), fraud (for supposedly lying about taking the pill; Ms. Smith states the pregnancy was accidental), and conversion, for "intentionally acquiring and misusing" his genetic material, to wit, his sperm, for the purpose of becoming pregnant without Mr. Smith's consent. Mr. Wallis claimed that even though Ms. Smith had not sued Mr. Wallis for child support (she sued only for a declaration of paternity), he was nonetheless damaged because he had become a father without his consent and had to see his daughter born into a "broken home," a situation that "broke his heart," according to one interview. Ms. Smith claimed that the sperm should be considered a gift, because Mr. Wallis "surrendered any right of possession to his semen when he transferred it during voluntary sexual intercourse."

    Think that's bad? Look what this crazy bitch got up to. At least she got what was coming to her

    http://www.oldbaileyonline.org/browse.jsp?id=t16770711-1-off4&div=t16770711-1#highlight

    Reference Number: t16770711-1
    Offence: Sexual Offences > sodomy
    Verdict: Guilty
    Punishment: Death

    A married woman lately living without Cripplegate , that appeared to be between 30 and 40 years of age, was arrigned, For that she having not the fear of God before her eyes, nor regarding the order of Nature, on the 23. of June last, to the disgrace of all womankind, did commit Buggery with a certain Mungril Dog, and wickedly, divellishly, and against nature had venerial and Carnal copulation with him, &c. It was was proved that the Prisoner was a person of a lewd conversation, and lodging in a Room into which there were several holes to look in at from the next house, they had often seen her in the very acts of uncleanness with Villains that followed her; but one day one of the Witnesses (a young woman) happening to cast her eye in, saw her use such actions with a Dog as are not fit here to be recited: At which being amazed, she called up another woman, and after that a man, who all saw her several times practising this beastliness, and fully evidenced the same in Court, where the Dog was likewise brought, add being set on the Bar before the Prisoner, owned her by wagging his tail, and making motions as it were to kiss her, which 'twas sworn she did do when she made that horrid use of him. For her self she had nothing to say, but denying the fact, alleadging it was mallice in the Witnesses, whichher Husband, who appeared in her behalf likewise suggested, but could not make out any quarrel or occasion of any such malice in the least; whereupon after full consideration of all circumstances she was brought in guilty .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,263 ✭✭✭Varkov


    cjt156 wrote: »
    Wouldn't it be gas if he had AIDS? Oh, how we'd laugh...

    And then the baby would have aids! :pac:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,178 ✭✭✭dade


    wasabi wrote: »
    Nope, apparently true:

    In State of Louisiana v. Frisard, 694 So. 2d 1032 (La. Ct. App. 1997), the mother and father of the child for whom support was sought met in a hospital while the father was visiting an ill relative. The mother was a nurse's aid who has access to a variety of medical equipment. The mother offered to perform oral sex on the father, and, in the words of the father, "as ... any male would, I did not refuse[.]" 694 So. 2d at 1035. The mother had the father wear a condom. The mother then removed the condom for the father, and unknown to the father, she inseminated herself with the father's sperm using a syringe.

    The Louisiana court, noting that the probability of paternity was 99.9994%, held the father's testimony that he "had some sort of sexual contact with the plaintiff around the time frame of alleged conception, although he denied that they had sexual intercourse" was sufficient to prove paternity. 694 So. 2d at 1036. This fact of paternity obliges a father to support his child. 694 So. 2d at 1034. In essence, because the father intentionally engaged in a sexual act resulting in his deposit of sperm with the mother, he is liable for child support.


    didn't boris becker try to claim that's what happened to him in that broom closet


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 Stez Styx


    Dudess wrote: »
    You've called me dubes a few times. Nah, I'm not in my mid 30s or single... and I don't drink beer :)

    Do you wear Dubes? I bet it's oxblood Doc Martens and a pint of snakebite.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭tribulus


    Wasabi where the f*ck have you been!?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 43,043 ✭✭✭✭Nevyn


    kearnsr wrote: »
    If it was a genuine thread then yeah of course your right but the fact that it was locked straight away would suggest that it wasnt.



    So it would be ok talking about the thread but not providing the information that any one can access in about 2 clicks?

    Seriously your just lucky Berutiel is on holidays.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,289 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    Varkov wrote: »
    And then the baby would have aids! :pac:

    I think there are drugs to reduce the chances of this happening


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    Stez Styx wrote: »
    Do you wear Dubes? I bet it's oxblood Doc Martens and a pint of snakebite.
    When I was 17, yeah... :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 17 Stez Styx


    kearnsr wrote: »
    I think there are drugs to reduce the chances of this happening

    If I was that guy, I would turn up at the birth and then flush the baby down the toilet.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,497 ✭✭✭✭Dragan


    Dudess wrote: »
    When I was 17, yeah... :)

    you drank some very good beer?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 37,214 ✭✭✭✭Dudess


    LOL :D
    Well cider (if indeed there is such a thing as "very good cider") but that doesn't translate into song as well as "beer" does...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭wasabi


    tribulus wrote: »
    Wasabi where the f*ck have you been!?

    Where I've always been :D
    Where have YOU been? :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Anyone? Anybody? Nobody? OK... :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,635 ✭✭✭tribulus


    wasabi wrote: »
    Where I've always been :D
    Where have YOU been? :P

    Touche, I meant internet land!


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 23,289 Mod ✭✭✭✭godtabh


    Overheal wrote: »
    Anyone? Anybody? Nobody? OK... :(

    I'd vote for you but it would cost you


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    pass.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement