Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Any cops out there?

12357

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,357 ✭✭✭Eru


    Based on the video evidence below, do you think that Robocop should be in a job?



    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELrPCKf-Ok4



    And, here he is hitting a woman.....
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5pjFhQr9pI&feature=related



    Only looking for a yes/no answer

    Sory you dont get away with a simple yes and no answer. Why do you think he shouldnt have kept his job considering a jury of 12 ordinary people, not Gardai, found him innocent. The jury and judge both accepted that he was acting in self defence and the defence of his colleagues.

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/picture.php?albumid=24&pictureid=96

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/picture.php?albumid=24&pictureid=97

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/picture.php?albumid=24&pictureid=98


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 777 ✭✭✭boogle


    I think it's great how people can criticise, mock and belittle a profession (and those who work in it) while having no knowledge of what's involved in said profession and it usually being a profession that they probably wouldn't be able to/want to do. I see people doing this all the time, and it's not just restricted to the Gardai. So I assume all these critics have the ultimate solution, and want to go out and "clean up the streets" themselves.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,427 ✭✭✭markpb


    boogle wrote: »
    I think it's great how people can criticise, mock and belittle a profession (and those who work in it) while having no knowledge of what's involved in said profession and it usually being a profession that they probably wouldn't be able to/want to do. I see people doing this all the time, and it's not just restricted to the Gardai. So I assume all these critics have the ultimate solution, and want to go out and "clean up the streets" themselves.

    Hi,

    Welcome to the internet, home of the serial know-all complainer. You must have missed the welcome packs at the door ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 777 ✭✭✭boogle


    markpb wrote: »
    Hi,

    Welcome to the internet, home of the serial know-all complainer. You must have missed the welcome packs at the door ;)

    Do you remember when you were a kid and your mother would tell you that watching television would give you square eyes? Nowadays we should warn people that the internet makes you stupid. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,629 ✭✭✭ART6


    boogle wrote: »
    Do you remember when you were a kid and your mother would tell you that watching television would give you square eyes? Nowadays we should warn people that the internet makes you stupid. ;)

    Yes, but she also warned me about such things as hair growth on the palms of the hands resulting from certain activities, and she told me that if I got a cut on the web between my thumb and forefinger I would die. She made me bathe in a tin bath with mustard added to it if I got wet, so that I wouldn't catch a cold. Can't trust them mothers at all. Nothing whatever to do with this thread but WTF:D


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,798 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    TheNog wrote: »
    The comparision is that both groups were destroying property and in both incidents seemed extremely hostile to the Gardai. Simple as.

    The Lansdowne Rd incident was an intended riot. I think everyone agrees with that.

    The May Day riot although a riot was not expected turned into one due to a misinterpretation on the part of the Gardai because of a failing by the event organisers.

    See I've read bits of the thread about riots, robocops and pay.

    I've lost all confidence in the Gardai simply because of an incident I witnessed and was lucky to avoid coming home from a match last month. A bus ambushed near O'Connell Street on a busy Friday night for the same reason for the 5th time at least and there were no Gardai to be found. Ambushed by 12-15 year olds.

    Simple public safety near our main thoroughfare. Failed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,087 ✭✭✭hunter164


    Tragedy wrote: »
    Guards regularly take confiscated drink home. So many stories. A friend was stopped by a guard because he had 4 cans of heineken, guard asked for ID and was really dissappointed when he found out he wasnt underage. Then offered to swap 8cans of dutch for the Heineken because he didnt like dutch gold.

    Sisters Ex is a guard, he used to give us fireworks at halloween. Go figure where he and his friends got them.

    Silly little things I know, but its rife.


    Did he take the 8 Dutch?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,357 ✭✭✭Eru


    dfx- wrote: »
    See I've read bits of the thread about riots, robocops and pay.

    I've lost all confidence in the Gardai simply because of an incident I witnessed and was lucky to avoid coming home from a match last month. A bus ambushed near O'Connell Street on a busy Friday night for the same reason for the 5th time at least and there were no Gardai to be found. Ambushed by 12-15 year olds.

    Simple public safety near our main thoroughfare. Failed.

    What your not saying is that it started and finished within 80 seconds and no one will give a statement which includes you evidently! BTW, they were arrested.

    You see the strange thing, people dont commit crime when the Gardai are around but unless you think its realistic to emply 1 million then your not going to have one every 1 hundred metres.

    Also, recently I was shot down by certain people for even suggesting that this happens in the first place because Ireland has absolutely no football hooligans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    dfx- wrote: »
    See I've read bits of the thread about riots, robocops and pay.

    I've lost all confidence in the Gardai simply because of an incident I witnessed and was lucky to avoid coming home from a match last month. A bus ambushed near O'Connell Street on a busy Friday night for the same reason for the 5th time at least and there were no Gardai to be found. Ambushed by 12-15 year olds.

    Simple public safety near our main thoroughfare. Failed.

    You have lost confidence because you witnessed a bus being damaged and there was no Gardai within sight. Failed on the AGS part I don't think so, definite failure by the parents of these mere kids, absolutely.

    Do you think we have a crystal ball to tell us something is about to happen on a street in a city at a particular time?

    If you were on the bus then how do you know that these kids were not arrested after the bus had passed. Did you or someone else call the Gardai? Is it possible that the Gardai were dealing with something a little more serious?

    Again as has been said there is approx 2500 uniformed Gardai on duty in the entire country so it is fair to say that we cannot be everywhere.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,153 ✭✭✭Johnny Utah


    Sory you dont get away with a simple yes and no answer. Why do you think he shouldnt have kept his job considering a jury of 12 ordinary people, not Gardai, found him innocent. The jury and judge both accepted that he was acting in self defence and the defence of his colleagues



    Was hoping to get an honest appraisal, but unfortunately that's too difficult for some. Also, I wasn't referring to any separate legal actions brought against him where the burden of proof would have been higher, but rather internal discipline procedures. If you look closely at the video, firstly you see a Guard in a yellow jacket beating a protestor. Then the guy in a blue shirt (commonly referred to as Robocop) running into the picture like a maniac, and forcibly beating the same protestor. He used a lot more force than the guard in the yellow jacket.

    In the second part, it shows guards beating protestors who were on the footpath. This seemed unnecessary. Also, Robocop is using excessive force here as well. If you look closely, it appears that the woman may have blood on her hands (though I could be mistaken as the picture quality is poor).

    Take a look at the video again, and tell me honestly if Robocop (guy in the blue shirt) is fit to wear the unifrom?


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELrPCKf-Ok4

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5pjFhQr9pI&feature=related






    Or what about this:
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=tSMF4GgnC_I&feature=related


    He goes a little red when he realises he's been caught on camera.:o


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭keen


    Being found not guilty doesn't always mean the accused is innocent, that robocop chap looks like a hot headed weirdo with some anger issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Then the guy in a blue shirt (commonly referred to as Robocop) running into the picture like a maniac, and forcibly beating the same protestor. He used a lot more force than the guard in the yellow jacket.




    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELrPCKf-Ok4

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5pjFhQr9pI&feature=related




    He was FORCIBLY beating the guy as opposed to just beating him? lol

    Seems like the gardai did some nice policing that day from that clip, reclaiming the streets so to speak


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 260 ✭✭chalad07


    Ah now, the guards in general cant be blamed for the actions of just a few officers in this case, and the links above show definite extremes. That guy just lost it,

    My main concerns would be more relating to systematic problems - recruitment, training, attitude, 'favors'. It's these types of things that influence public opinion much more than the isolated cases like the above,

    If i use the analogy of the Catholic Church (and before people jump down my throat I’m not making a comparison). While the public was disgusted by the actions of some, it was the church's reaction that most people had a really problem with,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    Was hoping to get an honest appraisal, but unfortunately that's too difficult for some. Also, I wasn't referring to any separate legal actions brought against him where the burden of proof would have been higher, but rather internal discipline procedures. If you look closely at the video, firstly you see a Guard in a yellow jacket beating a protestor. Then the guy in a blue shirt (commonly referred to as Robocop) running into the picture like a maniac, and forcibly beating the same protestor. He used a lot more force than the guard in the yellow jacket.

    Any legal action against this Gda Corcoran would have been assault at most whereas an internal discipline investigation I suppose would involve use of excessive force of a baton. I have looked closely all videos you have put forward but may I remind you these videos were edited to show the Gardai in a bad light. None of the videos show the sequence of events but, in video 1, show ordinary people dancing on the streets straight to cops beating them. It is typical Indymedia propaganda.
    In the second part, it shows guards beating protestors who were on the footpath. This seemed unnecessary. Also, Robocop is using excessive force here as well. If you look closely, it appears that the woman may have blood on her hands (though I could be mistaken as the picture quality is poor).

    Tbh I cannot see any blood on the woman. The footage is of poor quality and we can make out a guard in a blue shirt but not the face of the guard wearing it!!!!!!!!!!
    Take a look at the video again, and tell me honestly if Robocop (guy in the blue shirt) is fit to wear the unifrom?


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELrPCKf-Ok4

    18 seconds into the video we can see a guard wearing a hi-viz jacket using his baton on one man in a white shirt when another man in black runs towards the guard and then enter Gda Corcoran who takes down this man in black, hits him once when he is on the ground and then stops.

    I can see that the Gda Corcoran probably thought this man was attacking
    a member. Can you not see it?





    Or what about this:
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=tSMF4GgnC_I&feature=related


    He goes a little red when he realises he's been caught on camera.:o

    In fairness we could by any stretch of imagination believe that the guard asked this man several times to move off the road before having to be physically thrown. It would appear that unfortunately for both the guard and the man that the ditch was fairly deep.
    Seriously what would you expect from him. A smile, thumbs up at the camera?

    Have you ever had to use violence on a person in public? I mean by physically restraining a person or to tackle a person who does not want to be moved, caught or arrested?
    It is embarrasing for the guard as I have had to do it myseif. I don't like to use violence but have to when I'm forced to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    keen wrote: »
    Being found not guilty doesn't always mean the accused is innocent, that robocop chap looks like a hot headed weirdo with some anger issues.

    Innocent until proven guilty is the very basis of our democracy though I suppose you mean guilty by public opinion. When a person is accused of crime before a court and are found innocent they are no longer accused.

    I had a drunk driver who was leglessly drunk but I messed up his sample meaning he could not be prosecuted for it so he innocent
    or the 16yr old who is terrorising an elderly woman but I cannot prosecute because she is afraid to make a statement so he is also innocent.

    If it cannot be prosecuted in court they are innocent in the eyes of the law.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,153 ✭✭✭Johnny Utah


    TheNog wrote: »
    Any legal action against this Gda Corcoran would have been assault at most whereas an internal discipline investigation I suppose would involve use of excessive force of a baton. I have looked closely all videos you have put forward but may I remind you these videos were edited to show the Gardai in a bad light. None of the videos show the sequence of events but, in video 1, show ordinary people dancing on the streets straight to cops beating them. It is typical Indymedia propaganda.


    The videos are obviously poor quality, and badly edited, and I'm not condoning the illegal actions of the protestors. However, from reports/footage in the media, and footage here, there's no comparison to the Landsdowne Road riot at all. The videos show gardai in a bad light, because they acted in a bad light. It's quite clear that some members used excessive force that day.




    Tbh I cannot see any blood on the woman. The footage is of poor quality and we can make out a guard in a blue shirt but not the face of the guard wearing it!!!!!!!!!!

    I can't even see the ID numbers on his shoulders! ;)


    18 seconds into the video we can see a guard wearing a hi-viz jacket using his baton on one man in a white shirt when another man in black runs towards the guard and then enter Gda Corcoran who takes down this man in black, hits him once when he is on the ground and then stops.

    I can see that the Gda Corcoran probably thought this man was attacking
    a member. Can you not see it?


    Imo, the guy in the black is running towards the Guard probably to protect his friend who was being beaten at the time. Gda Corcoran could have grabbed this guy to prevent him reaching the Garda in the yellow jacket. The guy in black is quite small, possibly a minor.

    I think he hits him at least 4 or 5 times. And, why did he hit the guy on the ground?

    Then, a group of people enter the picture pleading with Gda Corcoran to stop hitting the man. Gda Corcoran raises his baton in a threatening manner towards these people.

    Admit it, he lost control and went beserk. He's a maniac and doesn't deserve to wear the uniform.








    In fairness we could by any stretch of imagination believe that the guard asked this man several times to move off the road before having to be physically thrown. It would appear that unfortunately for both the guard and the man that the ditch was fairly deep.
    Seriously what would you expect from him. A smile, thumbs up at the camera?

    Have you ever had to use violence on a person in public? I mean by physically restraining a person or to tackle a person who does not want to be moved, caught or arrested?
    It is embarrasing for the guard as I have had to do it myseif. I don't like to use violence but have to when I'm forced to.


    I have no doubt that he was asked to move, and refused, but why did he throw the man into a ditch. The deep fall makes it look a lot worse, but even if there wasn't a fall the man didn't deserve to be thrown into a ditch of nettles/branches. He didn't have to be physically thrown.

    Anyway, the guy in the video is quite small- the Guard could quite easily have used reasonable force to escort the man to the side of the road, without hurling him into the ditch. Look at the way the guy in the blue t-shirt does it. If the Guard wasn't strong enough to take the man off the road, he could have got a colleague to help him lift the protestor. At about 20 secs in the video there are plenty of Gardai present, so you can't say the Guard was on his own.

    Do you work for the garda press Office?
    Yourself and Karlito are constantly trying to defend the indefensible.



    ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,153 ✭✭✭Johnny Utah


    chalad07 wrote: »
    Ah now, the guards in general cant be blamed for the actions of just a few officers in this case, and the links above show definite extremes. That guy just lost it,

    I agree, but then why are the guards in general defending the maniac in this case. Surely if they wanted to gain public confidence they would get rid of the "few bad apples"...

    My main concerns would be more relating to systematic problems - recruitment, training, attitude, 'favors'. It's these types of things that influence public opinion much more than the isolated cases like the above,

    Agreed, but often guards will defend the above behaviour as well, just as they have done in the above examples.



    If i use the analogy of the Catholic Church (and before people jump down my throat I’m not making a comparison). While the public was disgusted by the actions of some, it was the church's reaction that most people had a really problem with,
    .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 987 ✭✭✭keen


    TheNog wrote: »
    Innocent until proven guilty is the very basis of our democracy though I suppose you mean guilty by public opinion. When a person is accused of crime before a court and are found innocent they are no longer accused.

    I had a drunk driver who was leglessly drunk but I messed up his sample meaning he could not be prosecuted for it so he innocent
    or the 16yr old who is terrorising an elderly woman but I cannot prosecute because she is afraid to make a statement so he is also innocent.

    If it cannot be prosecuted in court they are innocent in the eyes of the law.

    Yes in the eyes of the law they are innocent, but morally and in the eyes of everyone else their guilty.

    If someone killed a member of my family due to drink driving and got off due to a technicality I wouldn't say to myself well in the eyes of the law their innocent so that's good enough for me, I'd consider them guilty and be furious.

    I'm sure you'd keep an extra eye on the 16 year old scum even though he is innocent?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,798 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    What your not saying is that it started
    and finished within 80 seconds and no one will give a statement which
    includes you evidently! BTW, they were arrested.

    You see the strange thing, people dont commit crime when the Gardai are
    around but unless you think its realistic to emply 1 million then your not
    going to have one every 1 hundred metres.

    Also, recently I was shot down by certain people for even suggesting that
    this happens in the first place because Ireland has absolutely no football
    hooligans.

    I was on the bus behind - a no.3, the bus attacked was a 41C and crawled past it so close I know the registration. Even though the bus had its tyres slashed, all downstairs and some upstairs windows smashed and fights on it after they boarded it, still it managed to limp on two tyres to O'Connell Street from Dorset St, before any sirens were heard with Tolka Park and battalions of Gardai stationed there at an empty ground no more than a couple of minutes away.

    One Rovers fan mentioned it to an officer standing at the GPO and was met with a look like he had three heads! In fairness, a statement is only useful after the event - an event so predictable, it shouldn't be needed for a competent police force! If they were arrested, why were the same people again in the same place last Friday with again no police presence?:confused:
    TheNog wrote: »
    You have lost confidence because you witnessed a
    bus being damaged and there was no Gardai within sight. Failed on the AGS
    part I don't think so, definite failure by the parents of these mere kids,
    absolutely.

    Do you think we have a crystal ball to tell us something is about to
    happen on a street in a city at a particular time?

    If you were on the bus then how do you know that these kids were not
    arrested after the bus had passed. Did you or someone else call the
    Gardai? Is it possible that the Gardai were dealing with something a
    little more serious?

    Again as has been said there is approx 2500 uniformed Gardai on duty in
    the entire country so it is fair to say that we cannot be
    everywhere.

    It has happened about six or seven times in the last year in the same place, by the same people, for the same reason. The 16A is usually ambushed, just not this time - for example, last season on a Monday night, a 16A was smashed before the game between UCD and Rovers..in exactly the same place - so why the need for a crystal ball?! :mad: They wait to see what bus the Rovers fans get home and pick on it turning off Dorset St. This time it was the 41C, it's usually the 16A - how hard can it be to work it out what will happen? :confused:

    They know it happens because after the UCD game, such that there was a van that rolled up Dorset St after the games and nothing happened last season..then suddenly no more and it has started again. They know it happens because a game three weeks ago after this latest event - two buses were given patrol car escorts to the ground. Yet still, they were all there waiting again last Friday and no Garda presence. They know it happens, they know where it happens, they should know why it happens and they should know who is doing it and they do nothing.

    Parents are refusing to let Rovers fans get the bus to the games now because there's no guarantee they'll be back safe and if the Gardai can't control it, who can blame them?

    Time and time again it has happened and so if there's nobody that can put the two and two together that Dorset St is a flashpoint, the Gardai either are incompetent or blatantly ignore it "for something more important". Try telling there was something more important to the terrified innocent passengers or the people walking up O'Connell Street who ran back to get away. Why should anyone believe that now that it has happened yet again, that there will be Gardai the next time? They have failed every other time it has happened, so logically..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    The comparision between the incidents were that the gardai believed that both were riot situations. I have already outlined why gardai believed the May Day protesters were rioting. Granted the AGS got it wrong and in the aftermath everyone could see the reaction ws wrong. But we have spent the last few years picking apart the whole incident with the aid of eye witnesses and video footage where a decision or believe could only take a few minutes on the scene.
    Again the force used was excessive because as it turned out the protesters were not rioting but on that day Gardai did not realise. If the protesters were rioting the force used would not have been considered excessive.

    Gda Corcoran was not wearing his numbers because he wasn't officially on duty. I believed he had just finished duty when the call for assistance went out. Some members even got to the scene in their own private cars.It was believed the situation was that serious.

    Gda Corcoran was seen hitting the man 4-5 times with once on the ground but can you not believe that he may have thought his colleague was about to be attacked?
    To restrain a person who doesn't want to be restrained, whether they are small or big and can take up to five strong men. I was faced with having to arrest a man about 5ft 8 and it took 5 of us to do it and I'm not a small or weak fella.

    His raising of the baton is standard. That is how we are trained. The baton is only used is a member feels he/she is about to be attacked or overpowered. It is an aggressive stance but only used in an aggressive situation, again as this incident was believed to be.


    No I don't work in the Press Office but I think that alot of people don't realise how alot of people are so aggressive through drink, drugs or mental health problems.

    I have already said the AGS are partly to blame for the May Day protests along with protesters themselves. I am not trying to defend the indefensible here, I am merely trying to show you how members reacted.

    Might I also add that I realise that law of averages state there are bad apples in the AGS, most members would agree. I don't know any myself but I fully support the Ombudsman to route out those bad apples. I do my very best to be polite and professional at all times ( sometimes difficult ) and it is very discourgaing to hear members abusing their position. It takes away from my hard work to gain people's trust.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    dfx- wrote: »
    battalions of Gardai stationed there at an empty ground no more than a couple of minutes away.

    an event so predictable,
    happened about six or seven times in the last year in the same place, by the same people, for the same reason.
    how hard can it be to work it out what will happen? :confused:


    no Garda presence.

    now that it has happened yet again, that there will be Gardai the next time? They have failed every other time it has happened, so logically..

    Seems like a mismanagement of resources to me. Have you or the club sent a letter to the Super in charge of the event highlighting the problems?


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,798 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    Mismanagement would be the very least I'd use. I'd be much more likely to use ignorance or indifference to the problem.

    The chairman has said he has brought this up continuously and nothing has obviously been done.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,357 ✭✭✭Eru


    dfx- wrote: »
    Mismanagement would be the very least I'd use. I'd be much more likely to use ignorance or indifference to the problem.

    The chairman has said he has brought this up continuously and nothing has obviously been done.

    Hang on a second, before you go any further I dedicated and entire thread to this very subject. You will see that I was shot down by your fellow fans for even suggesting that this takes place and while your saying that the chairman has raised this issue, 2 rovers fans claimed that the chairman and the Super get on like a house on fire and as no such incidents take place whats there to raise?


    Its A or B, I know it happens, you know it happens, many many deny it but lets remember they are juveniles and custody/bail is not upto the Gardai. Dont blame the Gardai because criminals are still on the streets anymore than blaming a mechanic for a car crash.

    It just seems a shame that when I asked for meaningful input on this subject and how to police football you werent around to offer an insight. Perhaps you would care to know?

    Jonny,
    why are you simple quoting entire posts without saying anything?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Dont blame the Gardai because criminals are still on the streets anymore than blaming a mechanic for a car crash.

    And the winner for this years utterly innacurate analogy is.....


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,798 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    I have no idea about past threads, but it is irrelevant to this thread because this isn't to do with hooliganism or policing football - this is public order on the streets - something I would expect the Gardai to be charged with controlling.

    The bunch of teenagers at the Dorset St. Flats are not football fans. They like to affiliate themselves to Bohemians, but they're nothing to do with them. They are a bunch of 'yobs' who see the opportunity to cause some more damage on our streets and are given the free will to do so unchallenged again and again and again.

    Hooligans? They're 12-15 year olds who boast about it on bebo, ffs. :D Are you trying to tell me the police of this country cannot control or even second-guess thirty 12-15 year olds who do the same thing every single week in the same place for the same reason and they'll be there for every Rovers home match for the rest of the season - I'd invite you to come see for yourself if you like. As a result, I have no confidence in the Gardai's capacity to control public order.

    If I was to go to O'Connell Bridge and stab someone at the same time once a day for the next week, how many times would I get away with it so before the Gardai would cop on to what's happening and be there waiting to arrest me? :confused: This lot have got away with it for 18 months. Or would there still be something more important?

    Already a Shelbourne fan either nearly did or did lose his eye on the opening day of the season with these teenagers. Will it take someone to die before the Gardai take this seriously?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,357 ✭✭✭Eru


    dfx- wrote: »
    I have no idea about past threads, but it is irrelevant to this thread because this isn't to do with hooliganism or policing football - this is public order on the streets - something I would expect the Gardai to be charged with controlling.

    The bunch of teenagers at the Dorset St. Flats are not football fans. They like to affiliate themselves to Bohemians, but they're nothing to do with them. They are a bunch of 'yobs' who see the opportunity to cause some more damage on our streets and are given the free will to do so unchallenged again and again and again.

    Hooligans? They're 12-15 year olds who boast about it on bebo, ffs. :D Are you trying to tell me the police of this country cannot control or even second-guess thirty 12-15 year olds who do the same thing every single week in the same place for the same reason and they'll be there for every Rovers home match for the rest of the season - I'd invite you to come see for yourself if you like. As a result, I have no confidence in the Gardai's capacity to control public order.

    If I was to go to O'Connell Bridge and stab someone at the same time once a day for the next week, how many times would I get away with it so before the Gardai would cop on to what's happening and be there waiting to arrest me? :confused: This lot have got away with it for 18 months. Or would there still be something more important?

    Already a Shelbourne fan either nearly did or did lose his eye on the opening day of the season with these teenagers. Will it take someone to die before the Gardai take this seriously?

    Your inability or willingness to discuss a solution shows you have the complaint but not the solution.

    well allow me to outline the issue properly for you;

    they are juveniles, cant be charged on arrest without a file to the JLO and DPP which means they are always released without charge. when you get permission to charge they are given bail by the judges until after about a year they finally get sentenced. If by some miracle they get custody theres no room to detain them as can be seen in the news today.

    I say again, Gardai arrest criminals and investigate crime but its judges that sentence them and grant bail. Its the prison and education services that detain them and its the government that dictates resources to all all this.

    As for being in the same place, its not the same place because its only happened twice in my district in the past 3 years and both times they were on camera and arrested.

    they were also get escorted home by the public order unit after matches (which they do attend by the way for Bohs and Shamrock rovers) but people said thats not a good use of garda time and manpower so it was stopped.

    You want an immediate responce but guess what? Theres only about 20 Gardai on duty in Dublin city centre and the crime you witnesses wasnt the only one being commited!
    Bambi wrote: »
    And the winner for this years utterly innacurate analogy is.....

    10 pages and this is your input to the subject?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    go back and read the 100 pages so, you might find the answer to your questions.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,798 Mod ✭✭✭✭dfx-


    The solution is so simple, a competent police force wouldn't need it outlined. Put 5 Gardai - maybe use some of the plentiful Gardai wasted on an empty Tolka Park up the road or the tooled up riot squad used at Dalymount to pen Rovers fans into a stand that should be condemned - on that corner and the kids will run. Prevention, not arrest. If the Gardai can't manage that, for whatever reason/excuse, then they have failed to do their job in my opinion, namely to keep public order. Failed every single person on that bus, failed every fan running the gauntlet home every week, who have to be advised to not show your club colours walking back to the city centre. 20 Gardai is an inadequate, incompetent number.

    Since when is preventing an obvious public order flashpoint a waste of resources?:eek:

    Incidentally if a mechanic left a wheel loose or didn't replace the brake fluid, then yes I would blame them for their incompetence after a car crash. It's much more likely to happen, as are public order offences when the Gardai let something build up for 18 months.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    dfx- wrote: »
    The solution is so simple, a competent police force wouldn't need it outlined. Put 5 Gardai - maybe use some of the plentiful Gardai wasted on an empty Tolka Park up the road or the tooled up riot squad used at Dalymount to pen Rovers fans into a stand that should be condemned - on that corner and the kids will run. Prevention, not arrest.

    Any Gardai in or around Tolka park would have been there only when fans were present. As soon as everyone is gone from the park and streets nearby, members are given a stand order so those that are still working go back to their station/district and those working just for the match go home.

    Why in gods name do you think that Gardai would be standing around an empty park??
    dfx- wrote: »
    If the Gardai can't manage that, for whatever reason/excuse, then they have failed to do their job in my opinion, namely to keep public order. Failed every single person on that bus, failed every fan running the gauntlet home every week, who have to be advised to not show your club colours walking back to the city centre. 20 Gardai is an inadequate, incompetent number.

    20 Gardai in the city centre is not a Garda problem!!!!! We do not have the resources to be everywhere even though we would love to be. Think of it this way - we have approx 14,000 members in the country for nearly 5 million people, New York has approx 40,000 members for 8 million people. The Irish Government is unwilling to increase our numbers.
    dfx- wrote: »
    Since when is preventing an obvious public order flashpoint a waste of resources?:eek:

    It is never a waste of resources but honestly public order incidents are cropping up everywhere that again we cannot be right there on scene.
    dfx- wrote: »
    Incidentally if a mechanic left a wheel loose or didn't replace the brake fluid, then yes I would blame them for their incompetence after a car crash. It's much more likely to happen, as are public order offences when the Gardai let something build up for 18 months.

    Once again we cannot be everywhere at once. And why are you blaming all this on the Gardai? Due to incompetent parenting ( which you still haven't mentioned) and an even more incompetent HSE/Government we are trying to keep a lid on out of control kids/teenagers but it is ultimately the victims who pay with us stuck in the middle.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,160 ✭✭✭TheNog


    chalad07 wrote: »
    Think we need to start targeting a different standard of people in the recruitment process.[/FONT][/COLOR]
    chalad07 wrote: »
    From what i can see the cops dont make much efforts trying to recruit a better standard of people - graduates etc. This type of thing would attract better recruits,
    chalad07 wrote: »
    theres not many cops with masters degrees, or any non related degrees. Its people like your daughter that the guards need to concentrate on recruiting

    Chalad,

    Your posts above have a brilliant point and have been ignored throughout this thread so far. You are right the recruitment process needs to be changed but i don't agree that graduates or any type of college qualification should be a requirement. Just because a person has any qualification does not mean they would make a good cop. They said to us time and again in the college that 95% of our job is common sense and 5% of actually applying the law which is true.

    Currently the age requirements are from 18-35 yr old which I think is crazy. Most people at 18 to 21 are too immature to take on a job of such responsibility. If the AGS increased the age limit from 23 to 35 yr olds then we would attract people of more maturity and common sense. I joined when I was 30 yrs old, I was a supervisor in my last job so I feel I had more cop on than those just out of school or even those out of college. Some people I went to college never had a full time job before joining the AGS!!!!!! and tbh this job is full time even when you are off.


Advertisement