Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

"Friendly Game" - United Fans V Liverpool fans

1235

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,346 ✭✭✭✭homerjay2005


    when the dust settles on the premiership game, i will set this up from a united side. already im getting PMS, so thanks lads.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    when the dust settles on the premiership game, i will set this up from a united side. already im getting PMS, so thanks lads.
    You're getting PMS? :confused:
    Are you a bird? Are birds allow to play in this match?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,399 ✭✭✭✭Thanx 4 The Fish


    Homer has been banned from soccer permanently and has now said that he will not be helping out on the Man U v liverpool game, does anybody else want to take over on the Man U side ?

    And as for "birds" being allowed to play, that will I suppose be up to the organisers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    Homer has been banned from soccer permanently and has now said that he will not be helping out on the Man U v liverpool game, does anybody else want to take over on the Man U side ?

    And as for "birds" being allowed to play, that will I suppose be up to the organisers.
    WTF?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,399 ✭✭✭✭Thanx 4 The Fish


    About the banning or the women playing ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    Both


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 41,926 ✭✭✭✭_blank_


    Homer has been banned from soccer permanently
    lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,399 ✭✭✭✭Thanx 4 The Fish


    Third strike BaZmo. Just passing on his message which was ""im not going to do it unless im part of the forum""

    And as for women in the game, it is nothing to do with me. Trained ladies teams before and I know that some of the were hard as nails and while not always physically as strong, still have some decent skillz.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,149 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    Homer has been banned from soccer permanently

    :confused: To do with this thread or something else?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,228 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    so anyone from the united side willing to organise their team?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,433 Mod ✭✭✭✭lordgoat


    Xavi6 wrote: »
    :confused: To do with this thread or something else?

    Something else apparently, in the form of a pm to T4TF.

    Seemed kinda harmless to me but i don't know the whole story and who (apart from Masch) doesn't know you can't mess with the Steve Bennetts.

    I don't have the time to organise the game this week or next, anyone else able to help?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,149 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    lordgoat wrote: »
    Something else apparently, in the form of a pm to T4TF.

    Seemed kinda harmless to me but i don't know the whole story and who (apart from Masch) doesn't know you can't mess with the Steve Bennetts.

    I don't have the time to organise the game this week or next, anyone else able to help?

    For a PM? That seems a bit ridiculous. I'm sure the contents were relating to either this thread or the game yesterday so can't imagine it was anything serious. If he did say something better he say it over PM rather than on a public forum.

    Obviousy we don't know all the facts but it must have been something really bad to justify a third and final ban.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,399 ✭✭✭✭Thanx 4 The Fish


    Interesting you should say that lord considering that you thought that the ref was well within his rights yesterday to send off Masch after warning him.
    I agree but the ref told him he was goign to book him unless he shut up in a previous incident. And Torred was booked for the same offence he was a complete idiot and can not be defended in the case.

    And you made a very similar post on the Grand Slam thread yesterday too IIRC Xavi.

    Is there anything else or would ye rather go back to discussing the topic at hand ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,149 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    Interesting you should say that lord considering that you thought that the ref was well within his rights yesterday to send off Masch after warning him.



    And you made a very similar post on the Grand Slam thread yesterday too IIRC Xavi.

    Is there anything else or would ye rather go back to discussing the topic at hand ?

    Well we all know what Mascherano did so can we find out what the banned user did? Maybe we'll agree with you.

    Anyway, Mascherano spoke to the referee during the public event that was the game. The user didn't speak to you in the public event that is the thread. To use your analogy, he did the equivalent of Mascherano speaking to Bennett after the game instead of during. Right protocol tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    Third strike BaZmo. Just passing on his message which was ""im not going to do it unless im part of the forum""
    Third strike maybe, but I'm still bleeding lost!!

    And as for women in the game, it is nothing to do with me. Trained ladies teams before and I know that some of the were hard as nails and while not always physically as strong, still have some decent skillz.
    And as for women playing, that was a joke to do with Homer saying he was getting PMS (PM's)......geddit?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,399 ✭✭✭✭Thanx 4 The Fish


    I understand the joke, BaZ but still cannot see why women should not be allowed play should they so choose.

    And xavi, while I imagine that homer has filled you in on the occurrences already, if he has not then perhaps he does not want to. He did tell me that he was going to be pming people about the his banning.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,149 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    I understand the joke, BaZ but still cannot see why women should not be allowed play should they so choose.

    And xavi, while I imagine that homer has filled you in on the occurrences already, if he has not then perhaps he does not want to. He did tell me that he was going to be pming people about the his banning.

    I know that it's between you guys and no one here really has a place to say anything but in general I just don't agree with someone being banned over something said via PM. Whatever was said was between the two of you and should be kept that way. By using the mod power it brings the issue to public attention.

    EDIT: What I'm saying is that if he said something to me via PM I'd just have to deal with it as I don't have the power of the ban stick in this forum.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,399 ✭✭✭✭Thanx 4 The Fish


    But you do, you can have anybody banned if they decided to be a troll via pm or on the forum. You report the pm, send it on and they can either be banned from the forum, or as in numerous cases be banned from the site all together.

    And just FYI the ban was a decision that was taken under consultation with other mods of the forum, I did not take the action lightly as it was his third ban and meant a perm. Regardless of what people think, we do not like having to ban people, or perm ban them for that matter, it means a whole heap of hassle dealing with inevitable feedback threads (keep your eyes peeled for the latest entry) and pming back and forward explaining bans ad infinitum to the offender, and anybody else that they have pm'd to try and say how unjustified their ban was.

    Anyways, that is neither here nor there. This is about the footy game, has anybody agreed to take on the Man U organisation or will anybody ?


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,433 Mod ✭✭✭✭lordgoat


    Interesting you should say that lord considering that you thought that the ref was well within his rights yesterday to send off Masch after warning him.


    Is there anything else or would ye rather go back to discussing the topic at hand ?


    I don't see how the two events are comparable. I'll admit if he said something wrong and you had continually warned him fair enough he deserved it. I don't know all the facts and have pretty much kept my peace about alof of things. I also am not 'friends' with anyone on this board and have no sides but i have to agree with Xavi if he was banned from something in a PM (unless it was abusive) it seems a harsh.

    By removing the person organising the game it affects the topic ergo...


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 11,433 Mod ✭✭✭✭lordgoat


    But you do, you can have anybody banned if they decided to be a troll via pm or on the forum. You report the pm, send it on and they can either be banned from the forum, or as in numerous cases be banned from the site all together.

    And just FYI the ban was a decision that was taken under consultation with other mods of the forum, I did not take the action lightly as it was his third ban and meant a perm. Regardless of what people think, we do not like having to ban people, or perm ban them for that matter, it means a whole heap of hassle dealing with inevitable feedback threads (keep your eyes peeled for the latest entry) and pming back and forward explaining bans ad infinitum to the offender, and anybody else that they have pm'd to try and say how unjustified their ban was.

    Anyways, that is neither here nor there. This is about the footy game, has anybody agreed to take on the Man U organisation or will anybody ?

    Thanks for clearing it up, seems more reasonable now


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,399 ✭✭✭✭Thanx 4 The Fish


    He was warned about his behaviour prior to this via pm.

    The decision to ban him is no longer up for discussion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,149 ✭✭✭✭Xavi6


    Fair enough. I do have a question around this issue but I'll take it to the appropriate sticky.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,658 ✭✭✭✭Peyton Manning


    I was in favour of this (dependent upon the dates) but I dont think so anymore. Thanks T4TF - party pooper ;)


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,263 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dub13


    Archimedes wrote: »
    I was in favour of this (dependent upon the dates) but I dont think so anymore. Thanks T4TF - party pooper ;)

    How can you blame T4TF,all he was doing was upholding the rules as set out in the charter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,658 ✭✭✭✭Peyton Manning


    Dub13 wrote: »
    How can you blame T4TF,all he was doing was upholding the rules as set out in the charter.

    I was joking mate.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 21,263 Mod ✭✭✭✭Dub13


    Archimedes wrote: »
    I was joking mate.

    Sorry but sometimes its hard to tell on the soccer forum if someone is joking.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,658 ✭✭✭✭Peyton Manning


    Dub13 wrote: »
    Sorry but sometimes its hard to tell on the soccer forum if someone is joking.

    Lets take this to the off-topic thread so :D

    Seriously though, who is now in charge of the United team, if this is still going ahead?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,399 ✭✭✭✭Thanx 4 The Fish


    That is the question that we are trying to get an answer to young Archi...


  • Moderators, Regional North East Moderators Posts: 12,742 Mod ✭✭✭✭cournioni


    I'll not be playing.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,228 ✭✭✭Chardee MacDennis


    ffs is everyone bailing due to this banning, ghey.....

    i still think this is a good idea, even if it comes down to a 5 a side, i'd be happy to get involved with organising (well not the united side!).


Advertisement
Advertisement