Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Boards.ie Lotto Syndicate Via Paypal ?

245

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,693 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    From experience of a largish syndicate which won mostly minimum number prizes your figures are quite close to the results we got, a bit conservative if anything.

    Would suggest you have a series of separate syndicates, money up front, for a fixed time (like 1 month) with no carry-over of people or money from one to another then you won't have people who were in in July then dropped out, claiming to be part of the syndicate when you win in September.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    looksee wrote:
    From experience of a largish syndicate which won mostly minimum number prizes your figures are quite close to the results we got, a bit conservative if anything.

    Would suggest you have a series of separate syndicates, money up front, for a fixed time (like 1 month) with no carry-over of people or money from one to another then you won't have people who were in in July then dropped out, claiming to be part of the syndicate when you win in September.
    That's actually a very good idea.
    Give people a certain amount of time to sign up and if they don't meet the deadline, then it should be made clear that they have no claim on anything won that month.

    Shortly after the lotto first began, I was part of a 50 something person syndicate. for the 6 months I was in it, we never won anything.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,905 ✭✭✭User45701


    my lotto luck is all over the place i wont win anything for a year and then in the space of one month (this time last year actually) i won 13 times in one month (2 euro millions, 11 national lotto wins) in 4 weeks.

    ok so lets hope noone wins the lotto today then let it roll over so we can get this orginised and win it as a syndicate


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,984 ✭✭✭✭Lump


    So who looks after the tickets?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,808 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    I'd go with looksee's plan (standalone, one month syndicates). If you're in, you're in. If you're not, you're not! No debate, no discussion, no problems.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,691 CMod ✭✭✭✭faceman


    ive arranged some large syndicates before. Best of luck to the organiser here, its a nightmare. Just make sureyou get a document drafted outlinin the rules and make sure everyone signs it. Emails or posts on boards confirming agreement wont do!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    Flukey wrote:
    Wrong. You have to buy a minimum of 2 lines, so it is half that, unless you were stupid enough to have the same numbers on both lines.
    Nope. It's not half of 8.5m if you do 2 lines. The odds remain essentially the same.

    I can never understand when people do more than the minimum amount of lines when playing the Lotto. Doing more lines (the average 4 or 5 extra) only increases your odds of winning by a minuscule amount. The way I see it, if it's time for you to win you will win.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,930 ✭✭✭Raiser


    cooperguy wrote:
    Raiser you are talking about it as if its a gauranteed win its still far more likely that your going to get raped by a rabid turtle. Which is why returning winnings is a much better idea. Throwing an extra €50 per person into a draw will not reduce the odds by a huge amount its much better to get some return.

    I'm happy to proceed in whatever direction proves to be the most popular & you make a good point - if folks are handing over cash and getting none back in return while we wait patiently to win big, then human nature will probably cause people to lose enthusiasm over time - We need to have some nice regular payoffs to keep people happy and committed while we wait for our Jackpot day to arrive.
    looksee wrote:
    From experience of a largish syndicate which won mostly minimum number prizes your figures are quite close to the results we got, a bit conservative if anything.

    Would suggest you have a series of separate syndicates, money up front, for a fixed time (like 1 month) with no carry-over of people or money from one to another then you won't have people who were in in July then dropped out, claiming to be part of the syndicate when you win in September.

    Yeah - that seems like being the way forward......elegance in simplicity and eliminates a lot of the problems from the start - thanks for the suggestion.


    - Also could anyone thats interested in joing please copy & paste the below into your own sig. in User CP [You'll need to change the x to a U] - we need a bit of advertising to build our numbers a small bit

    [xRL="http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055124848"]untitled2zx0.jpg[/URL]

    * Edit to include updated cool Sig. Graphic - Courtesy of Duggy747 over at Digital Art and Design - Thanks again !!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    The good folk here will throw out a few logos for you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭i71jskz5xu42pb


    BaZmO* wrote:
    I can never understand when people do more than the minimum amount of lines when playing the Lotto. Doing more lines (the average 4 or 5 extra) only increases your odds of winning by a minuscule amount.

    If you do twice as many lines you have increased your odds of winning by 100%, no? Since when was a 100% increase considered "a minuscule amount."

    Granted the odds are still way out there but it's still a 100% increase in your chances. Unless I misreading you?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    Two seperate lines both have the same chance of winning.
    I don't know how to do the maths on it, but you would only increas your chances of a jackpot win by very little. It would go from 8,555,444 in one to 8,555,443 in one or something to that effect.

    On the other hand, you do increase your odds of a small win by a fair bit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭i71jskz5xu42pb


    I don't know if you are agreeing with me or not :confused:
    Terry wrote:
    Two seperate lines both have the same chance of winning.
    Agreed
    Terry wrote:
    I don't know how to do the maths on it
    Here's how I'd do it

    Let's say there are 8,555,444 permutations (I have not worked out the exact number)
    With one line you have 1 in 8,555,444 chance of winning
    With two lines you have 2 in 8,555,444 chance of winning
    So you've doubled you (admittedly small) odds


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭cooperguy


    Terry wrote:
    That's actually a very good idea.
    Give people a certain amount of time to sign up and if they don't meet the deadline, then it should be made clear that they have no claim on anything won that month.

    Shortly after the lotto first began, I was part of a 50 something person syndicate. for the 6 months I was in it, we never won anything.
    Seconded


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,073 ✭✭✭✭Terry


    PaschalNee wrote:
    I don't know if you are agreeing with me or not :confused:


    Agreed


    Here's how I'd do it

    Let's say there are 8,555,444 permutations (I have not worked out the exact number)
    With one line you have 1 in 8,555,444 chance of winning
    With two lines you have 2 in 8,555,444 chance of winning
    So you've doubled you (admittedly small) odds
    You don't post here much.
    I don't know if you read much, but I'll just tell you now that I don't have a clue what I'm talking about. Ever.

    Your point about the odds does make sense though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    PaschalNee wrote:
    If you do twice as many lines you have increased your odds of winning by 100%, no? Since when was a 100% increase considered "a minuscule amount."

    Granted the odds are still way out there but it's still a 100% increase in your chances. Unless I misreading you?
    You don't increase you chances to win by 100%. All you do is have 2 chances to win at 8.5million to 1.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭i71jskz5xu42pb


    BaZmO* wrote:
    You don't increase you chances to win by 100%. All you do is have 2 chances to win at 8.5million to 1.
    And 2 chances are how many times bigger than 1 chance? Anyone, anyone - yes 100% bigger. ;)
    By your logic if you bought all the tickets your odds would not increase. You would just have 8.5million chances to win at 8.5million to 1 even though you'd be guaranteed to win.

    If I'm wrong (it's been known to happen) here I'd love to see some mathematical explanation why.

    (Obviously we're not taking about odds on a outright win as you need to factor in the number of other participants for that)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    The exact odds for winning the Lotto with 1 line is 8,145,060/1

    How you work it out is as follows:

    Starting from the highest number 45 work back six numbers multiplying by each other.....

    45 x 44 x 43 x 42 x 41 x 40 = 5,864,443,200

    Then you need to do the same for the amount of numbers you can pick, which is six....

    1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 = 720

    You then divide the 720 into 5,864,443,200 which gives you 8,145,060

    So I'm guessing that if you do two lines the odds of winning (matching 6 numbers) becomes 8,145,059/1?


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,119 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tar.Aldarion


    It may have increased your chances by '100%' but the change is so miniscule it is not worth it.
    So I'm guessing that if you do two lines the odds of winning (matching 6 numbers) becomes 8,145,059/1?
    No, that's not how it works.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,638 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    BaZmO* wrote:

    So I'm guessing that if you do two lines the odds of winning (matching 6 numbers) becomes 8,145,059/1?

    as far as i know you are right up to this point.

    one line = 1-8,000,000

    two lines = 2-8,000,00 = 1-4,000,000

    you do not change the 8mill figure when you add another line because the 8 mill figure is the possible number of permutations of 6 numbers....that number does not change no matter how many lines you pick as there are always the same number of possible outcomes for the draw. what does change is how many of those outcomes you have chosen. increasing the numbers of lines you do is the only time you double your chances of winning though. if you have 3 lines the odds are 3-8,000,000 = 1-2,666,666(roughly)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    PeakOutput wrote:
    as far as i know you are right up to this point.

    one line = 1-8,000,000

    two lines = 2-8,000,00 = 1-4,000,000
    Yeah you're right. We just had a discussion here in work as to how the odds are worked out when you increase the amount of lines that you do.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,013 ✭✭✭✭eirebhoy


    Doing it your way, you could buy 4 million tickets and still have about a 4m/1 chance of winning it. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    eirebhoy wrote:
    Doing it your way, you could buy 4 million tickets and still have about a 4m/1 chance of winning it. ;)
    ?

    If you bought 4m tickets your odds would be 2/1

    4,000,000/8,145,060 = 2.036/1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55,808 ✭✭✭✭Mr E


    Thats an expensive coin toss!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,638 ✭✭✭PeakOutput


    BaZmO* wrote:
    ?

    If you bought 4m tickets your odds would be 2/1

    4,000,000/8,145,060 = 2.036/1

    i think he meant your first way


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,678 ✭✭✭jjbrien


    Get me the back to the future car and I will go forward to tonight and watch the draw then return to now with the numbers for the boards syndicate. :D

    If only. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,625 ✭✭✭✭BaZmO*


    PeakOutput wrote:
    i think he meant your first way
    :o Yeah just realised that.

    As has been said many times before, "The Lotto is for people that can't do maths!"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,460 ✭✭✭Ishmael


    Odds of matching the following:

    Match 6: 8,145,060/1
    Match 5 + Bonus: 1,357,510/1
    Match 5: 35,724/1
    Match 4 + Bonus: 14,290/1
    Match 4: 772/1
    Match 3 + Bonus: 579/1
    Match 3: 48/1

    If we staked a total of €1,800 in each draw (200 * €9).

    Thats a total of...
    €187,200 spent per year
    and
    124,800 lines per year

    How many times a year we'll get the following on average (excluding Jackpot and 5+bonus):

    Match 5: 3.5 times per year (or 7 times every 2 years)
    Match 4 + Bonus: 8
    Match 4: 161
    Match 3 + Bonus: 215
    Match 3: 2,600

    Estimated winnings on each per year (excluding Jackpot and 5+bonus):

    Match 5: 3.5 * €1,500 = €5250
    Match 4 + Bonus: 8 * €150 = €1200
    Match 4: 161 * €50 = €8,050
    Match 3 + Bonus: 215 * €25 = €5,375
    Match 3: 2,600 * €5 = €13,000

    Total winnings on the 'smaller' amounts:
    €32,875

    Which is 17.5% of the total stake.

    If we all spent €936 a year we'd get back on average €164 each. I think it'd be best to give everyone their winnings at the end of the year but it's a lot harder to do.

    Anyway, that's going by the way I explained in my previous post which required 200 committed people. We won't get anywhere near that amount. It just makes it a lot easier to work the calculations that way

    Heh looking at those numbers make less inclined to join a syndicate

    You're spending 936 a year on the odds of 65/1 that you'll get a return of maybe 5k-50k(1-10million jackpot) possibly + the average return of 164 euro

    so effectively its a bet of 772 @ 65/1 where the return if you actually win can quite possibly and more than likely to be less than 51k which is close to the return you would get from a bookie with a bet like that.

    You'd be better off in the grand national :)

    Also two lines gives you a 2 in 8,145,060 chance of winning not a 1 in 8,145,059. The number of tickets you buy does not reduce the number of combinations that can be drawn, it only increases the number of combinations you have.

    odds of 1 line winning is 1/8145060 = 1.227738e-7
    odds of 2 lines winning is 1/8145060 + 1/8145060 = 2/8145060(assuming both lines are not the same.) = 2.45547e-7 so it doubles your chances of winning.

    The easiest way to think about it is that you only have one combination not 6 numbers. If it were 1 number drawn from 5, what are the odds if you have 2 numbers.

    2/5 = 40%
    3 would give you 60%

    Same applies here only you have 8145060 Combinations so each extra line you have increases your probability of winning by 1.2277e-5% EDIT: provided that no line is duplicated


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭cooperguy


    Ok simply what is being said is that doubling the number of lines you do (and therefore the number of chances you have to win aswell as the amount you spend) is not worth it for the simple reason that you are paying too much to only slightly increase your chances. The difference between 1 chance in 8 million and 2 chances in 8 million is not worth the extra money as your overall odds of winning are still tiny and not far off your original odds. This is definatly true.

    Does everybody agree? Can we get back on topic?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,478 ✭✭✭GoneShootin


    tba wrote:
    even better idea!!!!

    Lets pool our our money into a long term savings scheme with a guaranteed rate of return!

    excellent idea...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭cooperguy


    excellent idea...
    Except for the fact that you could do that by urself and get the same return!! Unless of coarse there is a scheme that gives you a higher rate of interest for a larger amount of money. In that case that wouldnt actually be a bad idea. Tho that would take organising!!!


Advertisement
Advertisement