Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Housing bubble starting to pop?

13839404143

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,665 ✭✭✭✭Supercell


    Some of the section 23 properties were incentived to be built in areas where none would ordinarily be built.

    In a downturning market, some of these properties would be spectacularily bad buys.
    In 5+years we may be 5 years into a 5-8 year downturn in the property market, section 23 stuff will just be unsellable like most other properties with the exeption perhaps of some Co Dublin (Dalkey,Killiney,Howth) and some D4/6 properties.

    Have a weather station?, why not join the Ireland Weather Network - http://irelandweather.eu/



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5 jreddington


    Longfield wrote:
    Some of the section 23 properties were incentived to be built in areas where none would ordinarily be built.

    I think this is a very important comment. Like most tax incentives, Section 23 encourages people to do what they wouldn't do depending on the basic economics. However, it is a very broad brush. In some areas, the resulting construction could be the spark that revives a neglected area. However, in other areas it could result in overbuilding and push future housing price drops.

    One area I can think of is Kenmare. I'm AMAZED at the amount of Section 23 construction going on. This is an area that had pretty healthy tourism, holiday home, and retirement (many from the UK) growth before Section 23. The new construction going on now plus the planned "new town" by the river is changing the character of the area. It's becoming more like Kilarney. Not knocking Killarney per se, but maybe only one "tourism center" city per region is really needed.

    Now what happens when people try to cash in on their Section 23 investment? Will it lead to an even greater drop in prices than would otherwise happen? If so, it may be a benefit for me since that's when I may see myself getting into the market.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭D'Peoples Voice


    Reyman wrote:
    Good post EC ! A lot of wisdom there for those interested.

    My recollection for the 1970s and 1980s was that the accepted correct value of the house you finally finished up in (i.e. after one or two trade ups) was four times your personal salary (i.e. a single salary)

    Anyone like to hazard a guess on what it is now?
    Mortgages of seven times incomes offered
    Despite ongoing interest rate rises, borrowers are taking out mortgages that cost as much as 55 per cent of their monthly take-home pay, according to Michael Dowling, president of mortgage brokers, the Independent Mortgage Advisers’ Federation.
    http://www.sbpost.ie/post/pages/p/story.aspx-qqqt=NEWS-qqqs=news-qqqid=21592-qqqx=1.asp

    How high will this rate go do people think, excluding the expected rate rises in March, June and September of this year?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5 jreddington


    Sounds like the lending frenzy that has started to severely affect the market here in the U.S.

    As housing prices climb away from the affordability of "standard" mortages many companies became creative. This included financing up to 100% of the value of the home, sometimes with a complicated double mortgage with 80% in one mortgage and 20% in the other.

    Other loans with negative amortization, meaning your monthy payments are less than the interest, meaning the amount of money you owe in the loan increases instead of decreases. Assumption was you either sold the house at a profit, or refinanced futher down the road since your house would then have more value.

    Other mortgages where there is a teaser fixed rate for 1-5 years, then goes to market adjustable rates. Some folks are seeing nearly a doubling of their payment once the teaser runs out.

    Then there's the "no documentation" loans where you just state your income. Don't have to prove it. This sounds very similar to the article noted where they calculate renting a room as income whether you do it or not. Also loaning at 55% of income is asking for trouble.

    All this stuff ends up working only in a fast rising market. The market goes down and you can't refinance even if rates go down since the loan amount can end up higher than the value of the house.

    This is especially the case in the "sub-prime" market where folks with worse credit ratings pay higher interest rates. My girlfriend's daughter worked for brokers for these types of loans. She's been laid off twice as each company went under.

    Predictably, with a softening real estate market here in the U.S. forclosures are rapidly ramping up, further depressing the market. I see the same thing happening in Ireland as people get to the point where they can't support their mortgages.

    Used to be in the U.S., the majority of mortgages had fixed interest rates which held payments steady. Adjustables have become an increasing share of the market. In Europe with even more ajustable rate mortages, the recent rate hikes could really trigger a rapid decline.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭daveirl


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭D'Peoples Voice


    Is there a way of downloading this thread into a Word doc, some of the comments are definitely worth keeping, like the following
    ongarite wrote:
    Oct 2006, Was just listening to the business show in Newstalk and they had 2 financial analyst on and they were talking about how you shouldn't fix your mortgage interest rate now as rates have reached the ceiling.
    Are they still employed as pundits by Newstalk?
    Sept 2006, The two pillars of the housing bubble, interest rates and market sentiment, are both starting to fall away. What with reversing trends in economies, China running the risk of overheating, and the general German terror of inflation, I can see mortage rates going as high as 6%, the Fed be damned, which would double the interest portion of mortgage repayments for anyone that has them.

    An article like that in a widely read national paper is going to seriously damage market sentiment; those thinking of buying are going to pull out, and those in danger will be trying to sell, which floods the market with even more properties, creating a snowball effect. This is going to get messy. So much for the nouveau riche who really weren't and the amateur investor who thinks he's a professional.
    Sept 2006, Must admit, I don't see interest rates going quite so high. The ECB seems to lumber its way through decisionmaking and as it is purely driven by the concerns of the French and German economies, I wouldn't be surprised to see interest rates peak by the end of the year and drop back a little in the first quarter of 2007. Too late to mitigate the damage to sentiment though...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 krille


    Hi Board,

    We are all too focussed and concerned about houseprices.

    During the dotcom bubble...I recal myself, checking the value of my shares at least 5 times a day and placing buy and sell orders at least once a week. I made and lost some money during that period, but most of all I learned a lesson.

    I kept some of my shares in my portfolio and invested my remaining funds in property. Yes that gave me peace of mind till recently. In recent years we bought, renovated and sold a few properties...but now it seems prices are getting far too high to make sense. Too much hesitation about where the market is heading.

    My lessons learnt from playing on the stock exchange during the dotcom era? Sell all whilst prices are high and so I did?

    So what now: let me reassure you immediately....I don't intend to keep it in under the mattress, or worse in a bank account.....nonono

    It looks like the highest returns on the property market are made by developers, no matter how the property prices move. Property development allows for controllable, predictable and sizeable returns on investment.

    If on top of that the property development project is based in an emerging market (where capital gains are between 15% and 25% a year) the returns are mind blowing.

    I am now looking for like minded co-investors / partners to get involved in a new property development project in Morocco.

    If you think this type of investment might be of interest to you contact me on: info@prolan-invest.com or visit: www.prolan-invest.com

    Regards,
    Krille


  • Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    http://www.rte.ie/business/2007/0314/jobs.html


    500 Jobs gone, house market slowing down which will result in more job losses,
    the economy is in trouble if you ask me. Whats the best way to deal with this - what should the Govt be doing ? Whats the best way for an individual to ride out the storm!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 14,483 ✭✭✭✭daveirl


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭D'Peoples Voice


    Gurgle wrote:
    Heres a prediction for ya:
    House prices will continue to rise for the next few years, then slow down and in some places decrease a bit, though probably not as far as today's prices.
    Check out DAFT.ie, and the number of houses for sale per county.
    Ok, Dublin as expected with the country's biggest population has over 4,459 properties for sale.
    But check out the other counties
      Cork 3,465 (78% of Dublin's stock)
      Kerry 2,262 (51% of Dublin's stock)
        Galway 2,233 (50% of Dublin's stock)
        Mayo 2,147 (48% of Dublin's stock)
          Waterford 1,558 (35% of Dublin's stock)
            Wexford 1,393 (31% of Dublin's stock)

            If the Dublin property market is stagnating, and there are only 4,500 properties for sale, then what is happening to prices in the rest of the country?
            Mayo having almost half as many houses for sale as Dublin, that's not right surely!


          • Advertisement
          • Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


            http://irishpropertywatch.5gbfree.com/ipw_daft_report1_200307.html

            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

            FOUR HUNDRED AND TWENTY TWO PRICE DROPS


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 697 ✭✭✭mambo


            Listen to an estate agent try to explain that the seller offering to pay the buyer's mortgage for the first 6 months is not really a discount on the property, and does not affect the "value" of the property :eek:

            Click on "Live free for six months?" at
            http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/0320/drivetime.html


          • Closed Accounts Posts: 49 gerrydublin


            mambo wrote:
            Listen to an estate agent try to explain that the seller offering to pay the buyer's mortgage for the first 6 months is not really a discount on the property, and does not affect the "value" of the property :eek:

            Click on "Live free for six months?" at
            http://www.rte.ie/news/2007/0320/drivetime.html
            Thats hilarious, but the EA has a point, it's not the same as a discount on the property

            From the buyers prospective
              they still have to get loan approval for 245K, more difficult than getting it for 239K
              the additional interest cost of servicing the additional 6K will be a lot more than the 6K the buyer receives from the seller

            From the sellers prospective
              the figure used for "sales proceeds" in any capital gains calculation will be 6K higher, that is 245K is the sale proceeds not 239K
              the seller must disclose the fact that they have gifted 6K to someone, because although the 6K is below the CAT exemptions threshold, it must be added to other gifts received by the buyer since 1988.
              although
            not valid in case, stamp duty would be higher for the buyer in a similar case involving a house price over 317K

            From the estate agent's point of view
              Commission is higher on 245K than 239K


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭whizzbang


            From the estate agent's point of view
              Commission is higher on 245K than 239K

            Wow, very good point! had not thought of that!


          • Closed Accounts Posts: 619 ✭✭✭Afuera


            From the estate agent's point of view
              Commission is higher on 245K than 239K
            True... but not by very much.

            A typical EA fee might be about 1% of the selling price which would mean there's only 60 euro difference for them between selling it for 245k and 239k.


          • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


            The Building Industry delivered a thumping endorsement to the housing market which was reported today.

            Planning Permissions in Q4 06 were 20% down on Q4 05 and of course planning permissions are not weather dependent like the separately reported starts figures ( due soon) ....which would have been affected by the mad storm season .

            If the planning permissions dropped 20% and if the 06 figures were 90k units built in 06 that indicates a fall to 72k new units this year and not the 80k plus predicted.

            stats

            http://www.cso.ie/releasespublications/documents/construction/current/planperm.pdf

            commencement stats will appear here

            http://www.environ.ie/DOEI/DOEIPub.nsf/wvNavView/RegularPublications?OpenDocument&Lang=en#I2

            due in April but given the odd delay on the sept 06 stats it may be out just after the election , strange that eh :p

            Not a good time to hold certain shares methinks.


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭randomname2005


            House prices have fallen in the 1st quarter of the year, and faster in dublin than elsewhere in the country:

            http://www.rte.ie/business/2007/0402/houses.html
            Sponge Bob wrote:
            Not a good time to hold certain shares methinks.

            http://www.breakingnews.ie/business/?jp=MHAUEYQLOJMH

            R


          • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


            House prices have fallen in the 1st quarter of the year, and faster in dublin than elsewhere in the country:

            from your article

            The figures show prices rose by 0.2% in the quarter when Dublin was excluded.

            not making any points, just getting the facts straight..housing prices only fell in dublin..they rose everywhere else...not by much though


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,083 ✭✭✭randomname2005


            mossym wrote:
            from your article

            The figures show prices rose by 0.2% in the quarter when Dublin was excluded.

            not making any points, just getting the facts straight..housing prices only fell in dublin..they rose everywhere else...not by much though

            In real terms that is a fall! :)

            Ok, so I will change what I said (I don't want mossy getting annoyed at me :D ):

            Sherry FitzGerald, Ireland's largest estate agents announced today that the average price of a second-hand property in Ireland eased back moderately by 1.1% during the first three months of 2007.


          • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 8,766 Mod ✭✭✭✭mossym


            In real terms that is a fall! :)

            Ok, so I will change what I said (I don't want mossy getting annoyed at me :D ):

            Sherry FitzGerald, Ireland's largest estate agents announced today that the average price of a second-hand property in Ireland eased back moderately by 1.1% during the first three months of 2007.


            me? annoyed? never..:D

            just keeping things on the straight and narrow..


          • Advertisement
          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭soma


            Sherry FitzGerald, Ireland's largest estate agents announced today that the average price of a second-hand property in Ireland eased back moderately by 1.1% during the first three months of 2007.

            In fairness though, they do use an odd definitely-not-scientific methodology involving a 'basket' of properties to generate their figures. Still it's interesting to see them report a fall, and even more hilarious to hear them use the phrase "eased back" rather than 'fall' :-)


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭whizzbang


            soma wrote:
            In fairness though, they do use an odd definitely-not-scientific methodology involving a 'basket' of properties to generate their figures. Still it's interesting to see them report a fall, and even more hilarious to hear them use the phrase "eased back" rather than 'fall' :-)

            on other news, there is a Sherry Fitz sponsored re-issue of a popular 1990s movie coming out soon...

            easingdowndf6.jpg

            *edit* yay 1000 posts!


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭D'Peoples Voice


            whizzbang wrote:
            on other news, there is a Sherry Fitz sponsored re-issue of a popular 1990s movie coming out soon...
            Excellent picture:D .

            So Sherry Fitz are only seeing an easing,
            others seem to be faring worse!
              Gunne Acutioneers are apparantly letting off staff if Newstalk this morning are to be believed
              CBRE claims that buying activity in Ireland has essentially halved in recent months due to 'unfounded negative commentary in the media' and recent political interference.
            http://www.businessworld.ie/livenews.htm?a=1696074;s=rollingnews.htm
              Ulster Bank report published in April, says the residential house building sector recorded its sharpest decline in March, for five years.
            http://www.finfacts.com/irelandbusinessnews/publish/article_10009764.shtml
              the central bank are seeing a reduction in mortgage growth every month since last July

            It's difficult to know who to believe!
            It will be good to see how the 'time to sell' statistic is faring on the next DAFT report, that will tell us a lot. If inventories continue to build up, prices can only go one way unless construction rates fall back substantially!


          • Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


            If inventories continue to build up, prices can only go one way unless construction rates fall back substantially!

            That would relate to job losses - its a catch 22, there is nothing to do to stop a crash maybe a chance of a small dead cat bounce but thats all.

            The country is in serious trouble and at an election time not many politicians seem to be grasping this


          • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


            I feel I rrrrrrrrrrrreally must post this national empty homes figure from last years census again

            The big problem is that we have far too many empty properties which have appreciated in price despite 'doing nothing' .

            vacancies.jpg


            Now they must be liquidated. They are no longer going up in price.


          • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,058 ✭✭✭Gurgle


            Sponge Bob wrote:
            I feel I rrrrrrrrrrrreally must post this national empty homes figure from last years census again

            The big problem is that we have far too many empty properties which have appreciated in price despite 'doing nothing' .

            vacancies.jpg


            Now they must be liquidated. They are no longer going up in price.
            If I see that graph one more time, I'll have no option but to print it out in full 3D, take the longest spike off it and....


          • Posts: 5,082 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


            Actually one thing about the graph is the number of empties in 1971 would consist of houses left behind from the people emigrating when we had a declining population. Now we have no excuse with an increasing population and waaaaay more empties! Theses empties arent abandoned old farmhouses in the countryside either.


          • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 8,483 ✭✭✭miju


            Gurgle wrote:
            If I see that graph one more time, I'll have no option but to print it out in full 3D, take the longest spike off it and....

            why whats wrong with that graph it is correct afterall :D:p:)


          • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,817 ✭✭✭antoinolachtnai


            Well, some of them are holiday homes, no?

            What do you propose to deal with this? A property tax?

            antoin.


          • Advertisement
          • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


            Well, some of them are holiday homes, no?

            Irrespective of what they are , the graph shows that there has been an UNNATURAL increase in the number of empty properties and ONLY in the last 5 years.

            Furthermore these are not abandoned cottages and farmhouses as they were in the 1960s and 1970s .

            Were we trending towards our average we would have about 11% of the housing stock empty today . These would be substandard/unmodernised homes and holiday homes . Yet we have about 16% or more empty.

            It is safe to say that we will bring this 5% differential back into use but as 5% of our housing stock=90000=last years building it will take a full year of building nothing at all to so do.


          Advertisement