Suri pictures a fake?

homeOwner · 08-09-2006 09:20AM #1

http://datelinehollywood.com/archives/2006/09/05/suri-cruise-photo-revealed-to-be-a-fake/

This looks like a piss take but you never know......

cournioni · 08-09-2006 09:30AM

Who cares about celebrities and their babies? Honestly...

Femelade · 08-09-2006 09:34AM

she has alot of hair..why do people than think that they are fake! some baby's are just like that!

cournioni · 08-09-2006 09:38AM

I reckon there is some plastic surgery involved.

petes · 08-09-2006 09:40AM

More hair than I have anyway. I wonder was Pat Mustard involved.

Oriel · 08-09-2006 09:47AM

A lot of people don’t realize this, but most babies are total assholes.

Here here.

Tha Gopher · 08-09-2006 10:14AM

“I’ve looked at both photos, and there’s no doubt in my mind that the Vanity Fair photo is bogus,” said Donald Reed, a photograph expert who worked on the Warren Commission Report on the JFK Assassination.

Did they REALLY get this guy to look at them? Alot of effort!

edit- after lookingat the other links on the page (E! To Count Down 101 Sexiest Celebrity Vaginas) i know its fake

08-09-2006 10:22AM

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/entertainment/2006-09/07/content_683789.htm

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/entertainment/2006-09/07/content_683789_4.htm

Its not their baby! There is def something too weird about this whole charade

Terry · 08-09-2006 10:26AM

you know what would be really funny?
if all those rumours about tom cruise's sexuality were true and there was a mix up with the sperm donors.

also, someone with photoshop skills needs to put L. Ron Hubbards head onto that baby.

gucci · 08-09-2006 10:27AM

petes wrote:

More hair than I have anyway. I wonder was Pat Mustard involved.

hahaha the legend strikes again!!!:D

Hobbes · 08-09-2006 10:30AM

I can't believe Dateline hollywood fell for such an obvious windup.

Comparing the two the vanity fair front cover picture is the original. The other is a mirror image and badly photoshopped. For example look at the colour of the chin area where they had to fill it in on the advert because its missing from front page.

Also the baby doesn't look asian at all.

Tha Gopher · 08-09-2006 10:37AM

petes wrote:

More hair than I have anyway. I wonder was Pat Mustard involved.

LEGEND

Hobbes wrote:

I can't believe Dateline hollywood fell for such an obvious windup.

Comparing the two the vanity fair front cover picture is the original. The other is a mirror image and badly photoshopped. For example look at the colour of the chin area where they had to fill it in on the advert because its missing from front page.

Also the baby doesn't look asian at all.

Its some spoof website, look at the ludicrous links on the top right.

Anyway, where does anyone say the kid is Asian?

Mossy Monk · 08-09-2006 10:50AM

PORNAPSTER wrote:

Who cares about celebrities and their babies? Honestly...

a question that will never be answered

you could also replace babies with lives

Princess Consuela Bananahammock · 08-09-2006 11:24AM

Rooney gets into an argument in a pub, Pornapster gets banned for calling someone a pansy and not THE SURI PICTURES ARE FAKE...?:eek: :eek: :eek:

wHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO DO TO ME?

Mossy Monk · 08-09-2006 11:53AM

what?

cournioni · 08-09-2006 11:55AM

Ikky Poo2 wrote:

Rooney gets into an argument in a pub, Pornapster gets banned for calling someone a pansy and not THE SURI PICTURES ARE FAKE...?:eek: :eek: :eek:

wHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO DO TO ME?

Indeed... I thought I was just telling it like it was.

DonkeyStyle \o/ · 08-09-2006 01:19PM

PORNAPSTER wrote:

Who cares about celebrities and their babies? Honestly...

I certainly don't... I only opened this thread because I thought 'Suri' was some group of islamic extremists... that someone had photoshopped

So yeah, a bit fat f*cking 'who cares' from me too.

Terry · 08-09-2006 01:23PM

i'm still waiting to see L. Ron Hubbards head photoshopped onto the baby.

surely someone reading this has photoshop skills and the impetus to do it.

google images for hubbard.

Merrick · 08-09-2006 01:27PM

Why is this baby getting so much attention!? Does it really matter what the baby looks like, or if it exists *nods at celebrity conspiracy theorists* or how much hair it has? It's just a baby!!! It doesn't do anything interesting at all!!!!
</rant>

Dun laoire · 08-09-2006 01:28PM

coolsmileygirl wrote:

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/entertainment/2006-09/07/content_683789.htm

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/entertainment/2006-09/07/content_683789_4.htm

Its not their baby! There is def something too weird about this whole charade

Well tom Cruise was in that film The last samurai(sp?) maybe thats something to do with it?? I cant confirm that though

Dave! · 08-09-2006 01:34PM

julep wrote:

i'm still waiting to see L. Ron Hubbards head photoshopped onto the baby.

surely someone reading this has photoshop skills and the impetus to do it.

google images for hubbard.

Here ya go, my sub-par photoshop job. If only I could change the text....... [hands the reins to someone else]

Terry · 08-09-2006 01:49PM

brilliant. i bow to you and your skills.

very few things i see on the net actuall make me laugh out loud, but you have succeeded there.

prepare to recieve this in your inbox in a few days, when it has done the rounds.

Dave! · 08-09-2006 01:57PM

lol, deadly

hopefully someone can edit the text to "Yes, L. Ron Hubbard. He's our baby!"

Terry · 08-09-2006 02:21PM

DaveMcG wrote:

lol, deadly hopefully someone can edit the text to "Yes, L. Ron Hubbard. He's our baby!"

the e-mail has been sent and with the whole 6 degrees think, it will no doubt get back to you soon.
i credited you for the picture.

Ruu_Old · 08-09-2006 02:22PM

I heard a rumour that Tom Cruise done a course in Photoshop before the birth of Suri, hmm interesting.

Gordon · 08-09-2006 03:43PM

I was just talking with a guy in the States about buying this picture. It's an Annie Liebowitz image and anyone interested in it has to wait until Vanity Fair is off the shelves. Also the price for the image is around the price of the Pitt/Jolie images of Shilo. I don't know the price of those images but I would imagine they would be going into 5 digit dollars.

Guest · 08-09-2006 03:46PM

muppet.

Terry · 08-09-2006 04:00PM

pedobear, there are over 400 moderators on this site and a report post facility.
don't come back. you are wasting your time. you'll get about 2 minutes and be gone again.

bounty · 08-09-2006 04:11PM

cruise couldnt get it up for a girl, so he faked having a kid, for his macho image?

what a weird name... L. Ron ... whats the L for?

Terry · 08-09-2006 04:24PM

no idea, but i'm thinking of changing my name to T. James O'Dowd in honour of him and the great lord zenu.

Gordon · 08-09-2006 04:37PM

"Welcome to the First Church of Appliantology!"

Suri pictures a fake?

Comments