Suri pictures a fake?

homeOwner · 08-09-2006 8:20am #1

http://datelinehollywood.com/archives/2006/09/05/suri-cruise-photo-revealed-to-be-a-fake/

This looks like a piss take but you never know......

cournioni · 08-09-2006 8:30am

Who cares about celebrities and their babies? Honestly...

Femelade · 08-09-2006 8:34am

she has alot of hair..why do people than think that they are fake! some baby's are just like that!

cournioni · 08-09-2006 8:38am

I reckon there is some plastic surgery involved.

petes · 08-09-2006 8:40am

More hair than I have anyway. I wonder was Pat Mustard involved.

Oriel · 08-09-2006 8:47am

A lot of people don’t realize this, but most babies are total assholes.

Here here.

Tha Gopher · 08-09-2006 9:14am

“I’ve looked at both photos, and there’s no doubt in my mind that the Vanity Fair photo is bogus,” said Donald Reed, a photograph expert who worked on the Warren Commission Report on the JFK Assassination.

Did they REALLY get this guy to look at them? Alot of effort!

edit- after lookingat the other links on the page (E! To Count Down 101 Sexiest Celebrity Vaginas) i know its fake

08-09-2006 9:22am

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/entertainment/2006-09/07/content_683789.htm

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/entertainment/2006-09/07/content_683789_4.htm

Its not their baby! There is def something too weird about this whole charade

Terry · 08-09-2006 9:26am

you know what would be really funny?
if all those rumours about tom cruise's sexuality were true and there was a mix up with the sperm donors.

also, someone with photoshop skills needs to put L. Ron Hubbards head onto that baby.

gucci · 08-09-2006 9:27am

petes wrote:

More hair than I have anyway. I wonder was Pat Mustard involved.

hahaha the legend strikes again!!!:D

Hobbes · 08-09-2006 9:30am

I can't believe Dateline hollywood fell for such an obvious windup.

Comparing the two the vanity fair front cover picture is the original. The other is a mirror image and badly photoshopped. For example look at the colour of the chin area where they had to fill it in on the advert because its missing from front page.

Also the baby doesn't look asian at all.

Tha Gopher · 08-09-2006 9:37am

petes wrote:

More hair than I have anyway. I wonder was Pat Mustard involved.

LEGEND

Hobbes wrote:

I can't believe Dateline hollywood fell for such an obvious windup.

Comparing the two the vanity fair front cover picture is the original. The other is a mirror image and badly photoshopped. For example look at the colour of the chin area where they had to fill it in on the advert because its missing from front page.

Also the baby doesn't look asian at all.

Its some spoof website, look at the ludicrous links on the top right.

Anyway, where does anyone say the kid is Asian?

Mossy Monk · 08-09-2006 9:50am

PORNAPSTER wrote:

Who cares about celebrities and their babies? Honestly...

a question that will never be answered

you could also replace babies with lives

Princess Consuela Bananahammock · 08-09-2006 10:24am

Rooney gets into an argument in a pub, Pornapster gets banned for calling someone a pansy and not THE SURI PICTURES ARE FAKE...?:eek: :eek: :eek:

wHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO DO TO ME?

Mossy Monk · 08-09-2006 10:53am

what?

cournioni · 08-09-2006 10:55am

Ikky Poo2 wrote:

Rooney gets into an argument in a pub, Pornapster gets banned for calling someone a pansy and not THE SURI PICTURES ARE FAKE...?:eek: :eek: :eek:

wHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO DO TO ME?

Indeed... I thought I was just telling it like it was.

DonkeyStyle \o/ · 08-09-2006 12:19pm

PORNAPSTER wrote:

Who cares about celebrities and their babies? Honestly...

I certainly don't... I only opened this thread because I thought 'Suri' was some group of islamic extremists... that someone had photoshopped

So yeah, a bit fat f*cking 'who cares' from me too.

Terry · 08-09-2006 12:23pm

i'm still waiting to see L. Ron Hubbards head photoshopped onto the baby.

surely someone reading this has photoshop skills and the impetus to do it.

google images for hubbard.

Merrick · 08-09-2006 12:27pm

Why is this baby getting so much attention!? Does it really matter what the baby looks like, or if it exists *nods at celebrity conspiracy theorists* or how much hair it has? It's just a baby!!! It doesn't do anything interesting at all!!!!
</rant>

Dun laoire · 08-09-2006 12:28pm

coolsmileygirl wrote:

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/entertainment/2006-09/07/content_683789.htm

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/entertainment/2006-09/07/content_683789_4.htm

Its not their baby! There is def something too weird about this whole charade

Well tom Cruise was in that film The last samurai(sp?) maybe thats something to do with it?? I cant confirm that though

Dave! · 08-09-2006 12:34pm

julep wrote:

i'm still waiting to see L. Ron Hubbards head photoshopped onto the baby.

surely someone reading this has photoshop skills and the impetus to do it.

google images for hubbard.

Here ya go, my sub-par photoshop job. If only I could change the text....... [hands the reins to someone else]

Terry · 08-09-2006 12:49pm

brilliant. i bow to you and your skills.

very few things i see on the net actuall make me laugh out loud, but you have succeeded there.

prepare to recieve this in your inbox in a few days, when it has done the rounds.

Dave! · 08-09-2006 12:57pm

lol, deadly

hopefully someone can edit the text to "Yes, L. Ron Hubbard. He's our baby!"

Terry · 08-09-2006 1:21pm

DaveMcG wrote:

lol, deadly hopefully someone can edit the text to "Yes, L. Ron Hubbard. He's our baby!"

the e-mail has been sent and with the whole 6 degrees think, it will no doubt get back to you soon.
i credited you for the picture.

Ruu_Old · 08-09-2006 1:22pm

I heard a rumour that Tom Cruise done a course in Photoshop before the birth of Suri, hmm interesting.

Gordon · 08-09-2006 2:43pm

I was just talking with a guy in the States about buying this picture. It's an Annie Liebowitz image and anyone interested in it has to wait until Vanity Fair is off the shelves. Also the price for the image is around the price of the Pitt/Jolie images of Shilo. I don't know the price of those images but I would imagine they would be going into 5 digit dollars.

Guest · 08-09-2006 2:46pm

muppet.

Terry · 08-09-2006 3:00pm

pedobear, there are over 400 moderators on this site and a report post facility.
don't come back. you are wasting your time. you'll get about 2 minutes and be gone again.

bounty · 08-09-2006 3:11pm

cruise couldnt get it up for a girl, so he faked having a kid, for his macho image?

what a weird name... L. Ron ... whats the L for?

Terry · 08-09-2006 3:24pm

no idea, but i'm thinking of changing my name to T. James O'Dowd in honour of him and the great lord zenu.

Gordon · 08-09-2006 3:37pm

"Welcome to the First Church of Appliantology!"

oRlyYaRly · 08-09-2006 3:38pm

Ach. I don't understand this yearning to see picture's of celebs babies.

Britney Spears's baby was voted worst dressed in some poll of celeb babies. What is wrong with the universe? How could somebody pit babies against each other and decide which is the lesser one? :eek:

Ri_Nollaig · 08-09-2006 4:08pm

DaveMcG wrote:

Here ya go, my sub-par photoshop job. If only I could change the text....... [hands the reins to someone else]

my attempt

Cianos · 08-09-2006 5:45pm

I’m so disappointed because I, like the rest of the world, was anxiously waiting to see Suri. Now I know that baby’s head just came from some normal non-celebrity family.”

May as well flush it down the toilet so. Stupid non-celebrity baby head.

Terry · 08-09-2006 6:41pm

i love the jesus and mary pose they are striking.

Basq · 10-09-2006 10:41am

Did ye actually read that article...

Lowe says he remembered the photo session in 1998 because the baby was extremely difficult.

“I just couldn’t get that damn kid to smile,” said Loewy. “A lot of people don’t realize this, but most babies are total assholes.."

“I don’t know what to believe anymore,” said Emily McElroy, a Tom Cruise fan. “I’m shaken to the core. I haven’t felt this depressed since I watched a DVD of ‘Legend.’”

Complete and utter pisstake..!

Thought the baby was very odd-looking when i saw the cover for Vanity Fair but some more pictures inside the magazine (http://dlisted.blogspot.com/2006/09/last-suri-cruise-post-today-i-promise.html) make the child look actually quite cute.

Joseph · 10-09-2006 10:54am

petes wrote:

More hair than I have anyway. I wonder was Pat Mustard involved.

rofl

vibrant · 10-09-2006 4:53pm

This is from the Popbitch mailout of 18.8.06

>> Cruise control <<
Suri makes an awkward debut

A source from the Vanity Fair shoot of Suri
Cruise says the baby looks enough like Cruise
and Holmes for their parentage to be plausible,
but that it is a bit of a runt, and required
21 days of photography, plus three days
of digital touching-up, before the magazine and
celebrity parents had a cover image they liked.

koneko · 10-09-2006 5:09pm

Can't believe anyone would fall for that, the Sears pic is so obviously photoshopped.

Tom Cruise is a nutcase, can't stand him, but that baby is adorable. And the hair isn't odd, I had hair like that when I was a baby

Aoide · 10-09-2006 6:33pm

homeOwner wrote:

http://datelinehollywood.com/archives/2006/09/05/suri-cruise-photo-revealed-to-be-a-fake/

This looks like a piss take but you never know......

Yep, clearly a piss take. Anyway, it wouldn't make sense to pretend a baby, unless they said it died later on they would be expected to have a real child with them from now on.

abetarrush · 10-09-2006 7:11pm

I D I O T S

Man, that baby's wearin a frickin wig!

mel123 · 10-09-2006 7:54pm

I have never seen a baby with that much hair, so i think it is defo photoshopped. But are people saying the baby isnt theirs? She faked the pregnancy and adopted? They are pretending that the baby is theirs and then she will just disappear?? Sorry just not getting it

Ruu_Old · 10-09-2006 8:08pm

That ultrasound machine that Tom bought went to waste then.

11-09-2006 9:49am

I wonder if all that hair showed up on the ultrasound too..

muppetkiller · 11-09-2006 10:47am

Did any of you check the link to the right on this page ?
It talks about Bill Clinton was actually about to fly the planes into the twin towers on sept 11th ?
What is wrong with you people...!!!

Anyway Katie homes and Tom are not even together I've Katie tied up in my basement for weeks now...:D

Ickle Magoo · 11-09-2006 11:26am

koneko wrote:

Tom Cruise is a nutcase, can't stand him, but that baby is adorable. And the hair isn't odd, I had hair like that when I was a baby

Agree & my son was born with a full head of hair...:)

Terry · 11-09-2006 12:15pm

ok. before this thread goes any further, it needs to be said (again) that the link is to a humour site.

Stark · 13-09-2006 7:17pm

You can definitely see both parents' features in the baby. She looks eeringly like Tom in this photo:

Suri pictures a fake?

Comments