UKs youngest mother (11)

Dustaz · 12-05-2006 04:14PM

carbonkid wrote:

Yea but its happened now and it is better for the mother to be proud of her daughter for keeping it rather than getting an abortion.

Yes because 11 year olds getting pissed and getting up the stick is alright as long as they dont get SINFUL ABORTIONS. Hurray for religion.

drdre · 12-05-2006 04:24PM

thats just stupid.thats kids that have not been brought up right.and the government should do something about it.

N90user · 12-05-2006 04:37PM

Mushy wrote:

Smoking at 9, drinking at 10, pregnent at 11, collecting single mother allowence at 12...ya gotta love the world

lol what a life. Knackerfornia

ateam · 12-05-2006 04:39PM

drdre wrote:

thats just stupid.thats kids that have not been brought up right.and the government should do something about it.

What exactly could or should the government do? This is one teenager in Scotland, not Ireland, I do not think it's a fair refelction of society at large.

bonkey · 12-05-2006 04:41PM

The mother-to-be, who smokes up to 20 cigarettes a day according to the newspaper, said she hoped the baby would be a boy.

I'd prefer if she said she hoped it was healthy rather than worry about the gender, given the smoking habit.

PrettyInPunk · 12-05-2006 04:46PM

Thats disgusting.And exactly what lack of money and education spawns.

WhiteWashMan · 12-05-2006 04:54PM

PrettyInPunk wrote:

Thats disgusting.And exactly what lack of money and education spawns.

what an odd thing to say.

lack of education yes, but lack of money? i have yet to see a lack of money being directly related to stupidity to be honest.

and i have known people with lots of money get pregnant.

how odd.

Belle_Morte · 12-05-2006 04:55PM

With fags at about £6.70 a pack in the UK, how the hell does an 11 year old child manage to support a 20-a-day habit? That's nearly £50 a week!

Tar.Aldarion · 12-05-2006 05:08PM

Dustaz wrote:

Yes because 11 year olds getting pissed and getting up the stick is alright as long as they dont get SINFUL ABORTIONS. Hurray for religion.

Who said anything about religion?

Mimikyu · 12-05-2006 05:08PM

This post has been deleted.

Genghiz Cohen · 12-05-2006 05:12PM

WhiteWashMan wrote:

lack of education yes, but lack of money? i have yet to see a lack of money being directly related to stupidity to be honest.

hes right, look at paris hilton

Simple Life starlet and night-vision nymph Paris Hilton caused a bit of a headache at E3 for mobile games publisher Gameloft, racking up late for the launch of her first mobile game and then proudly announcing completely the wrong name.

"Thank you all for coming. Sorry I'm late," Hilton squeaked at the crowd, having utterly stressed out Gameloft's frantic PR reps who were left wondering whether or not the million-dollar baby was actually going to show up.

"I'm really excited to have my own game, Diamond Quest," she said confidently, which might have been a good start were it not for the fact that the game's actually called Paris Hilton's Jewel Jam.

The new mobile game, which forms part of a multi-year licensing agreement with Gameloft, is a colourful puzzle game that's essentially a variant of Bejeweled - where swapping coloured jewels to make lines of three or more is the order of the day. It's simple in concept and simple in name but not, apparently, simple enough for poor old Paris to remember. Oops.

fly_agaric · 12-05-2006 05:31PM

Solitaryman666 wrote:

This post has been deleted.

Looks like the full force of the law is coming down on the alleged "rapist"...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/4764417.stm

RoundyMooney · 12-05-2006 05:45PM

I wonder how much this feckless family have, and will cost the UK taxpayer over their respective lifetimes.

Another example of the prosperity of stupidity, and the failure of the welfare state model.

Mimikyu · 12-05-2006 05:47PM

This post has been deleted.

base2 · 12-05-2006 05:50PM

12 is young but nowhere near the record of 5 set by some peruvian girl!

Mimikyu · 12-05-2006 05:56PM

This post has been deleted.

RoundyMooney · 12-05-2006 06:01PM

Snopes

Solitaryman666 wrote:

Any evidence of your statement?

is your friend.

Dudess · 12-05-2006 06:01PM

Man, that is depressing. And it happened on a night out. A night out? She's 11. That poster who blamed a lack of money presumably meant abject poverty. But promiscuous behaviour at a ridiculously young age isn't limited to poor areas by any means. Remember the Old Wes scandal? Clocking up as many snogs as you can manage a night has now been replaced by blowjobs. As if those girls actually want to do it...

Hydroquinone · 12-05-2006 06:02PM

Solitaryman666 wrote:

This post has been deleted.

It's a pretty well known thing, I'm surprised it hasn't appeared before now in this thread, to be honest
Here's a link

dbnavan · 12-05-2006 06:09PM

jsb wrote:

dear christ, so do we have to teach sex education in primary school now

Not sure when you went to school but there has been since Sex Ed in fifth class since i was in it in 1989.

lawhec · 12-05-2006 06:10PM

Solitaryman666 wrote:

This post has been deleted.

In think in the UK having sex with someone under 13 is classed as statutory rape i.e. the law does not accept that the girl (or boy in a different case) can give her consent.

dbnavan · 12-05-2006 06:11PM

RoundyMooney wrote:

Snopes is your friend.

Wow, is that picture not bordering on child porn.

dbnavan · 12-05-2006 06:17PM

Solitaryman666 wrote:

This post has been deleted.

AFAIK and I am almost positive a bloke can be done for statoury rape at any age, if they are both under age the law sees the male at fault. Read it somewhere before will try find a source

Source http://everything2.com/index.pl?node=statutory%20rape
statutory rape: sexual intercourse with someone who, by legal statute, is defined as unqualified to give consent, usually because of being underage; the law applies even if the accused partner, a boy, is the younger of the pair, and was actually seduced by the girl.

Dudess · 12-05-2006 06:37PM

dbnavan wrote:

the law applies even if the accused partner, a boy, is the younger of the pair, and was actually seduced by the girl.

Wow. So if a 15-year-old girl seduces a 12-year-old boy, the boy is technically classed as the rapist in the incident. The mind boggles...

fly_agaric · 12-05-2006 06:42PM

I'm no legal expert so take with a grain of salt, but...

The age of criminal responsibility in the UK is 10 or something isn't it, so I suppose he can be tried for a crime (here, rape - girl too young to give informed consent) if he is > than that age.

They are both below the age of consent (16 or so???).

15 vs 11 is a large age/development gap and the boy is to blame, but trying him for rape seems over the top IMO. Even if he is a card-carrying memeber of the patriarchal oppressor-class!;)

zuma · 12-05-2006 06:46PM

dbnavan wrote:

Wow, is that picture not bordering on child porn.

????
So what are views on gynecologists?

Tar.Aldarion · 12-05-2006 06:46PM

Dudess wrote:

Wow. So if a 15-year-old girl seduces a 12-year-old boy, the boy is technically classed as the rapist in the incident. The mind boggles...

I know, it is ridiculous. Poor innocent girls and all guys are more responsible for it...

dbnavan · 12-05-2006 06:52PM

zuma wrote:

????
So what are views on gynecologists?

~Fails to see connection~

simu · 12-05-2006 06:58PM

ZOMG! It's the end of the world!

jester77 · 12-05-2006 07:07PM

bloody hell and this is as well...

9 year old charged with rape
http://news.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=708522006

Some people shouldn't be let have kids!

UKs youngest mother (11)

Comments