Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Legend or not?

13»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,252 ✭✭✭deisedevil


    MrJoeSoap wrote:
    I realise it has gone wayyyyyy off topic but I'm fascinated by Morningstars views so I hope it stays open for a while anyway. Apologies if we jacked your thread Deisedevil.

    Paul McGrath is a legend, mainly for the 90 minutes he played vs Italy in 1994. Amazing player. Then again, I call some of my mates legends every day. I overuse the word so much that it has no meaning any more, like a cliche.

    Ya agreed, morningstars views are fascinating and some have annoyed me too. thread wasn't jacked just went all over the place a bit, guilty of that myself.

    Paul McGrath v Italy 1994, i'll never forget that, what a performance.

    Where i'm from everyone uses it too way too much,lol. you could be called a legend for getting in the horrors,lol. but that's what i was wondering if in correct english could a famous person or remarkable person be referred to as a legend and was amazed to see myself that it is acceptable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    deisedevil wrote:
    This thread has gone on way to long and off topic all over the place. I started it to find out if a famous person can be referred to as a legend and we found out that indeed they can be. End of story. This thread should be closed.

    You can call anbody or thing what you like it still doesn't make it right. If you had paid attention initially you would have realised that. Legend can be used anyway you like but has an overblown use referring to any sports person. I can still say I dislike the use and call it incorrect as there are no rules one way or the other. Common use makes things acceptable doesn't mean I have to like it or that it can't be questioned. You can't take any form of criticism without going nuts and you don't understand when joke is being made is what you should have learned.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,117 ✭✭✭✭MrJoeSoap


    I can still say I dislike the use and call it incorrect as there are no rules one way or the other.

    If there are no rules surely it cannot be either correct or incorrect?

    Wahay, we're back on topic!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    MrJoeSoap wrote:
    I realise it has gone wayyyyyy off topic but I'm fascinated by Morningstars views so I hope it stays open for a while anyway. Apologies if we jacked your thread Deisedevil.

    What views fascinate you?
    People are rude to me so I am rude back?
    You can tell somebodies background from the way they speak?
    People react to you based on how you speak?
    I don't think they are anything to be bothered by or they make me a Nazi


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,117 ✭✭✭✭MrJoeSoap


    If its alright, I'll reply later. My mouse is broken and I have to go get it replaced.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,252 ✭✭✭deisedevil


    You can call anbody or thing what you like it still doesn't make it right. If you had paid attention initially you would have realised that. Legend can be used anyway you like but has an overblown use referring to any sports person. I can still say I dislike the use and call it incorrect as there are no rules one way or the other. Common use makes things acceptable doesn't mean I have to like it or that it can't be questioned. You can't take any form of criticism without going nuts and you don't understand when joke is being made is what you should have learned.

    To begin with you said that a sports person could not be reffered to as a legend and your wrong they can be! overused or whatever, that's got nothing to do with it.

    Where's the joke?

    Honestly i ain't going nuts and criticism from you is like water off a ducks back to me, i wouldn't have a very high opinion of a lot of what you have said.

    In fairness who's going nuts now? You can't take any criticism yourself. Hypocrite.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    MrJoeSoap wrote:
    If there are no rules surely it cannot be either correct or incorrect?

    Wahay, we're back on topic!
    Spoken english has different rules. Slang is perfectly acceptable in spoken English. In written English alway reverts back to classical form. As siad by Terry Dolan proffessor of Hiberna English

    The use of legend for sports personalities is slang and as such should not be used in written English.

    The rules of the English language are forever shifting and there is not set rule book, this still does not mean you can start calling an apple a bra and be correct. Formal and spoken languages are always diffferent.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,117 ✭✭✭✭MrJoeSoap


    Terry Dolan is a legend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,252 ✭✭✭deisedevil


    Spoken english has different rules. Slang is perfectly acceptable in spoken English. In written English alway reverts back to classical form. As siad by Terry Dolan proffessor of Hiberna English

    The use of legend for sports personalities is slang and as such should not be used in written English.

    The rules of the English language are forever shifting and there is not set rule book, this still does not mean you can start calling an apple a bra and be correct. Formal and spoken languages are always diffferent.

    APPLE AND A BRA?? Wats that got to do with anything. We are talking about what falls under legend. What language is used in boards? It ain't formal anyways.
    For someone who has given out about the opinions of people in afterhours and expressed the view that peoples opinions in afterhours aren't worth much you are spending an awful long time talking about our opinions? Why?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    deisedevil wrote:
    To begin with you said that a sports person could not be reffered to as a legend and your wrong they can be! overused or whatever, that's got nothing to do with it.

    Where's the joke?

    Honestly i ain't going nuts and criticism from you is like water off a ducks back to me, i wouldn't have a very high opinion of a lot of what you have said.

    In fairness who's going nuts now? You can't take any criticism yourself. Hypocrite.

    I implied "should not" never could not.

    You are always quick with the insults so you are the one acting like a nut.

    The joke was on the original thread about how stupid it is to refer to a sports person as a legend you took it to heart like a nut job.

    Most of this thread has been critical of me and I have taken it. Try not to be so quick with the insults and pay attention. I am defending my position if that's what you mean not taking criticism


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,252 ✭✭✭deisedevil


    I implied "should not" never could not.

    You are always quick with the insults so you are the one acting like a nut.

    The joke was on the original thread about how stupid it is to refer to a sports person as a legend you took it to heart like a nut job.

    Most of this thread has been critical of me and I have taken it. Try not to be so quick with the insults and pay attention. I am defending my position if that's what you mean not taking criticism

    Nope i didn't take it to heart and here is what you said:
    Note your website is american-english

    Common use can change the use of a word but it still doesn't make it correct. It's a colloquialism that easily enters the more simple writting of sports reporting . The English language has no guardians unlike French but either way it is not correct English at present! AT best you can say sporting legend indicating it doesn't make the person a legend.

    I was thinking that this might not be true so i started this thread to see what people thought and no you don't have to put sporting before it!
    I honestly just wanted to see where legend could be used and was thinking that it can be used for famous people and not just myths etc.
    What happened after was way off what i started this bloody thread for.

    Any chance you might answer my previous question?
    For someone who has given out about the opinions of people in afterhours and expressed the view that peoples opinions in afterhours aren't worth much you are spending an awful long time talking about our opinions? Why?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    deisedevil wrote:
    Any chance you might answer my previous question?
    For someone who has given out about the opinions of people in afterhours and expressed the view that peoples opinions in afterhours aren't worth much you are spending an awful long time talking about our opinions? Why?

    Yes and I already did but you weren't listening again! I am not going to keep repeat it because you don't know how to pay attention that's your problem.

    Plus I never said the views here weren't valid I don't think they are well rounded however. Hot heads like you who can't remain civil at the very least or even listen for that matter. You arr imamature and need the reassurance of your peers is the only reason you don't listen as far as I can tell. I don't know you but was it you who claimed to know the type of person I was?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    deisedevil wrote:
    I was thinking that this might not be true so i started this thread to see what people thought and no you don't have to put sporting before it!
    By the way you never did prove it you just got people to agree with you.

    It is a point of opinion and I do not believe you are correct in formal sense as the use of legend in the form you are happy with is slang.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,252 ✭✭✭deisedevil


    Yes and I already did but you weren't listening again! I am not going to keep repeat it because you don't know how to pay attention that's your problem.

    Plus I never said the views here weren't valid I don't think they are well rounded however. Hot heads like you who can't remain civil at the very least or even listen for that matter. You arr imamature and need the reassurance of your peers is the only reason you don't listen as far as I can tell. I don't know you but was it you who claimed to know the type of person I was?

    Your talking complete rubbish, you think i'm a hot head because i insulted you, lol. I have listened to everything you have said. I am not immature and i couldn't care less about reassurance. I never claimed to know what type of person you were,i did say you came across as arrogant, condecending and full of your own self importance but in the same line said that i couldn't be sure as i don't know you.I am basing it on what you have written and i'm not the only one to have expressed that view. Your arguements stink of contradictions and hypocrisy, you have changed your views and changed your statements where you have felt like it and you have lied on a number of occasions all trying to put me in a bad light.(trying to say i was making fun of your disability which you had never even mentioned before,lol.)
    I have said all i want to say about this and am sick of your attitude. don't bother to direct anymore posts at me they are pointless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,252 ✭✭✭deisedevil


    You said in a post: "Where is the myth to make a sportsmans achievements legendery? Maradonna might have had it by the myth of him handling the ball or not but as we know it is true it is no longer a myth and he is no longer legendary!"

    That's where it began, there doesn't have to be a myth.

    Mr. Nice Guy then posted:
    I have an Oxford English dictionary right here and one of the definitions for 'Legend' reads:

    Quote:a famous or remarkable person or event

    So there you go, my point proven. Go ahead and argue that the oxford dictionary isn't right if you want to.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    deisedevil wrote:

    So there you go, my point proven. Go ahead and argue that the oxford dictionary isn't right if you want to.

    What he failed to mention was the abbreivation coll beside it. In other words it is still slang. Like the use of the word minerals for soft drinks.

    You remain rude one way or the other and unable to communicate your point with out resorting to insults. You failed to notice any subtlty of language. My tounge was firmly in my cheek when I mentioned myth.

    You are no more or less arrogant than me but You most certainly are unable to keep your conversation civil. You are rude and just want to shout your views and insult those who would discuss the point. My crime of arrogance is not agreeing with you your opinion your arrogance comes from not paying attention and assuming views. I don't agree with your understanding of the English language and use of slang.
    As you are going to ignore this anyway what does it matter?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,117 ✭✭✭✭MrJoeSoap


    MorningStar, the following are the points that I find fascinating.
    . If you don't care you will find you may never be able to hold a conversation out of you scoil group where misuse is acceptable.

    If every second word out of a person mnoth is incorrect and/or a expletive I will look down on them as they show me and themselves no respect.

    Anybody who spends there working life basically acting like a walking advertisement is a bit pathetic.

    I think it is so silly that people spend a ton of money on team kits for the privledge to advertise the sponsor of the football club.

    If you want to speak using words incorrectly you just indicate education and social economic group. If you are happy than fine but people will think less of you and it is one of the reasons why scumbags are so violent.

    You may want to have a moral standards and claim that you judge people by the person they are but you are just lying to yourself or unaware of the sublties of interaction.

    You think I am even vaguely knocked down by the likes that frequent After Hours you are mistaken.

    ... the theory that we are all the same... is junk you just don't know it!

    What education have you done that tells you different? Is it just a view?

    I siad if somebody curses and uses words incorrectly I look down on them and the reason being it is disrespectfull to everyone

    I realise you have answered most replies and have given your opinion and stuck to it, you are certainly commited to your argument, which is admirable. I don't agree, however, with some of the condescending views in your argument.
    1. You don't believe that we are all equal.
    2. Swearing justifies being "looked down" upon
    3. Footballers wearing a jersey are merely walking advertisements. One club sponsor and one jersey maker is no more than the average t-shirt or jeans/tracksuit bottoms. Supporters generally wear replica jerseys to show support for their club.
    4. You criticise people who use After Hours... need I say any more...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    MrJoeSoap wrote:
    1. You don't believe that we are all equal.
    2. Swearing justifies being "looked down" upon
    3. Footballers wearing a jersey are merely walking advertisements. One club sponsor and one jersey maker is no more than the average t-shirt or jeans/tracksuit bottoms. Supporters generally wear replica jerseys to show support for their club.
    4. You criticise people who use After Hours... need I say any more...

    First off what makes my views condescending? How I express them maybe but I am coming from a defending differing view point.

    1) People are born with different natural skills or not equal in another way. We are aslo born into different social situations which are obviously not equal. So before you have walked a step or spoken a word you are not on equal footing with another person. It does not mean you should not have the same rights just you are not equal.
    2) Cursing is rude plain and simple. If somebody is rude I look down on them. I treat everybody with respect but if they don't respect me why should I respect them?
    3) If you buy a football jersey that has a logo of some mobile phone company blazed accross the front what is it other than adverstisement? My clothes don't have advertisement on them. They may have a makers logo but I don't think that is quite the same. Either way I am not advertising anything for free. What happens if your team gets a sponsor that is ethically questionable do you stop supporting the team or what? Either way the jerseys are overly expensive and brought out in a manner to milk the fans. I don't see the sense is advertising something at an expense to myself at rip off prices. Why support a sport/team that is actually ripping you off and has you advertising?
    4) The demographic of after hours is quite apparent. So onlya limited view is being expressed. If that view differs from mine I am not surprised because I am not in that demographic. Why should it bother me if they flame me or complain about my view. I never actually said anything bad just that their views wouldn't knock me down. So I was never critical of everybody in After Hours AFAIR some people just took it that way.

    I repeated many times I am no language purist but formal English remains different to spoken English use of legend in the sense spoken about is slang unless it is specified by an adjective. It's a point of opinion. It doesn't bother me that much but if you do nothing but speak in slang and such people will treat you a certain way. I am not some Nazi who goes around deciding who gets to live or die based on how they speak yet from comments made here you would think that's what I said. Not even close


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,633 ✭✭✭stormkeeper


    MrJoeSoap wrote:
    If there is anyone reading this thread who isn't posting could they please express some sort of opinion because I really can't believe what I'm hearing from MorningStar.

    I notice that s/he says that people who use slang are looked down upon, yet the funny thing is, everywhere you go, most people use slang as part of their local dialect. London, Kildare and Dublin for instance have their own definitions of words, as well as slang, which developed with the region, as well as the area they live in, and perhaps surrounding areas. If you look down upon someone who uses slang, there are very few people you can look on an equal level with. I myself use a fair bit of Irish slang, along with some Cockney slang, yet no one has ever brought it up as an issue...

    A lot of, if not, all dialects of Hiberno-English, and even British-English have their own slang words, due to local culture. It's very rare that you find a erson who doesn't use at least a handful of slang from the place they were brought up in...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    Kennett wrote:
    I notice that s/he says that people who use slang are looked down upon, yet the funny thing is, everywhere you go, most people use slang as part of their local dialect.

    I am pretty sure I mentioned it in conjuction with cursing. It was also clear I was talking about extreme use of both. The point being if you are inarticulate people think less of you. If you don't belive it talk in the same dialect as the traveling community for a day and see how people treat you. If you normally talk with lots of cursing and slang stop and talk more formally and your firends will treat you differnetly.
    I didn't create the situation it exists all on its own and to deny it is riddiculious. You can argue it shouldn't be the case but it won't change it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,633 ✭✭✭stormkeeper


    I am pretty sure I mentioned it in conjuction with cursing. It was also clear I was talking about extreme use of both. The point being if you are inarticulate people think less of you. If you don't belive it talk in the same dialect as the traveling community for a day and see how people treat you. If you normally talk with lots of cursing and slang stop and talk more formally and your firends will treat you differnetly.
    I didn't create the situation it exists all on its own and to deny it is riddiculious. You can argue it shouldn't be the case but it won't change it.

    To be honest, I was picked on more at secondary school for speaking properly (though I probably sounded very English to them too, heh), than I was for talking with slang, but then again, my speech is very well-spoken, and at some times pedantic, however I have a condition of which this is a symptom, among other things. At the end of the day though, everyone swears, though most do not excessively do it. I've really never been bothered with someone speaking using slang or a different English dialect to me, provided I understand them. I mean, for the most part, I will, but you have words that people from different regions use to describe something.

    Granted, the word "yoke" is accepted everywhere in Ireland as "thingy", but when you go to the UK, it's not accepted as a word, but if you've lived in Ireland a long time, it's a pretty acceptable word. Also, what we call a "skanger" over here is known as a "chav" in England or a "ned" in Scotland, so matter where you go, no matter how good someone can speak English, you'll always find that the peculiarities of their accent or dialect will show through in some form or another. For instance, the Hiberno-English issue of replacing "th" with just a "t" or "d", because the way this particular dialect involved was because the dialect is a combination of Irish and old English. In Irish, the "th" wasn't ever pronounced as "th", so it's usually said as "dis" for "this", or "t'in" for "thin" to quote two examples.

    Also, at least in parts Kildare, the t at the end of some words tends to be chopped off as well, ie "rah" for "rat", "mah" for "mat", and so on. It's not ideal, but everywhere you go, you'll find areas where slang is used, in addition to local colleqolisms (sp?). It's kind of difficult speaking properly if those around you don't do it either.

    Would you still take a person seriously if he or she spoke perfect English, yet you couldn't understand him or her because of their accent? It's hardly their fault after all that they can't be understood by other people outside their area if the majority of the population grew up in areas like that. I generally spoke properly at work, but at the same time, you need to also know the slang and local terms used as well, otherwise things get complicated, for something that's ingrained into you after so many years becomes second nature, and thus hard to explain.

    I've had to learn a variety of different English dialects to make sure I can understand what people say, and even then I've still got a lot to learn. American English is almost a different language itself in any cases, due to some of the changes made. I could probably go on like this for ages, seeing as beign too detailed is yet another symptom of what I have, but I'm going to leave it here, because it's too early to have a debate of linguistics at this time of day...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,031 ✭✭✭MorningStar


    Kennett wrote:
    To be honest, I was picked on more at secondary school for speaking properly (though I probably sounded very English to them too, heh), than I was for talking with slang, but then again, my speech is very well-spoken, and at some times pedantic, however I have a condition of which this is a symptom, among other things. At the end of the day though, everyone swears, though most do not excessively do it.

    That is my point you are treated differntly depending on what way you speak and where or whom you are talking.
    If you have a strong accent to an extent you are mostly only understandable to people around you indicates a few things. Namely you have only stayed in your local community which probably means you have a small world view.
    You can change your accent and where you are born doesn't mean you have to stay like that. You can choose how you speak. There are many ways of speaking and you can hold onto local accents without being incomprehensible.


Advertisement
Advertisement