tramco

poobum · 21-08-2005 01:32PM #1

tramco!! i was there last nite and its ment to be in free before 12 i was there at 11:40 but whne i went up to get my ticket the guy charged me a fiver which i paid thinking i had the time wrong or my watch stopped but after looking at the ticket i realised the ticket said 12:20 as the time of purchase i went up to the pay counter(it was still before 12) and said this to him thinking this must of been a mistake but no! it turns out they do this alot(according to my mates)! after i said its not right the pay guy told the bouncers he didnt like my attitude(for not wanting to be ripped of unfairly) so i got thrown out! i hadnt shouted at him or anything i just didnt want to be charged wrongly!!

sei046 · 21-08-2005 01:33PM

hate that

Gazza22 · 21-08-2005 01:38PM

Typical case of the power mad nightclub personnel that just over react with any given chance...

Ah sure leave them alone, they get their €7.65 an hour and all the power that goes alone with it :rolleyes:

The_B_Man · 21-08-2005 01:40PM

is there anything we can actually do about these things?

Sparky · 21-08-2005 01:49PM

whats tramco like now, since its been done up, i havnt been there in 2 yrs

coolhandluke · 21-08-2005 01:49PM

Ring the manager monday morning,tell him the disgraceful way you were treated.U want an apology and the price of your ticket refunded or your going to report them to the director of consumer affairs(do it anyway,that's a blatent rip off,as bad as putting one price outside the pub and charging a different price inside).Or do what most irish people do,nothing !.

Gazza22 · 21-08-2005 02:02PM

coolhandluke wrote:

Ring the manager monday morning,tell him the disgraceful way you were treated.U want an apology and the price of your ticket refunded or your going to report them to the director of consumer affairs

Good advice, that will work

seamus · 21-08-2005 02:02PM

Ring up and complain. There's not a whole lot you can do unless a few of you make the same complaint to the relevant authority. If you try and follow it up yourself it'll go like this;

1. You complain that they forced you to pay in at 23.40 (by your watch).
2. You provide evidence of a receipt, time stamped at 00.20.
3. They tell the authority that you were hammered, and caused a scene when you complained.
4. You admit that you'd had a few drinks, but weren't hammered, and were understandably irate when the issue arised.
5. Your case gets thrown out.

Tramco is a shithole anyway. Vote with your feet.

madramor · 21-08-2005 02:44PM

management are probably the one who are doing this so don't bother
trying to complain to them.

government bodies are totally powerless + you have no evidence

your only way would be to send eddie hobbs and his team in
undercover

wes · 21-08-2005 02:56PM

Don't bother going there again. The only way to make it hurt is as people say is vote with your feet. Anytime mates suggest going there try to convince them otherwise. If thats how they treat a patron, hardly worth waisting your time with them.

Sparky · 21-08-2005 03:06PM

looks like ill avoid the place then

kstanl · 21-08-2005 03:09PM

As far as your mates are concerned, you're barred from there for life.

That way they won't even consider going there in your company. Like the rest say, vote with your feet and your wallet. Don't give them another penny of your money and slander them as much as possible to people that might consider going there. Make up some rubbish like you got a hiding off the doormen and the place is really dangerous. Be aggressive. Be malicious. I would.

wes · 21-08-2005 03:11PM

I never really liked the place (not been there in like 3 years), but after hearing this story, don't reckon I will be back here anytime soon (never would be more accuarate).

seamus · 21-08-2005 03:12PM

Don't give them another penny of your money and slander them as much as possible to people that might consider going there. Make up some rubbish like you got a hiding off the doormen and the place is really dangerous. Be aggressive. Be malicious. I would.

Em. Probably *not* the best idea. You can indeed be sued for slander, regardless of how unlikely it is that someone will find out you said it. Just tell people the actual truth, and they'll avoid it anyway. It's a creche for rugby schools.

pwd · 21-08-2005 03:19PM

Bouncers get a *lot* more than 7.65 an hour.
Tramco changed at some point in the last number of years. It used to be "where the tramps go" and generally had quite a young crowd. I went there once about a year ago and the door staff had become a lot more discerning and they were obviously aiming for a different section of the market.

kstanl · 21-08-2005 04:36PM

seamus wrote:

Em. Probably *not* the best idea. You can indeed be sued for slander, regardless of how unlikely it is that someone will find out you said it.

Doubtful.

Lump · 21-08-2005 04:47PM

Petrol Bomb the place.... I mean, drink elsewhere.

John

poobum · 22-08-2005 01:09AM

pwd wrote:

Bouncers get a *lot* more than 7.65 an hour.
Tramco changed at some point in the last number of years. It used to be "where the tramps go" and generally had quite a young crowd. I went there once about a year ago and the door staff had become a lot more discerning and they were obviously aiming for a different section of the market.

the whole place is just full of like 17-19 year old people lately! but as for someone said its full of rugby school pp well im a rugby school lad and that was my first time there! i never even made it inside! but i only know 2 other people from school who have been der! but like i was watching people go in and there was literally a 4 girl to every1 guy ratio! and most of them were like 16 or 17!! just feel like shouting at the bouncers "dosent matter how many young girls yous all let in at the end of the night you are going to end up going home on your own you big ulgy f**k" because the stares they were giving the girls even as they were going in! like that was why it was only fellas getting refused! they let my mate go in ahead of me without paying!(girl) yet im ment to pay because they want to rip me off and im a fella they asked no girls to pay but asked the fellas to pay!

StupidLikeAFox · 22-08-2005 01:18AM

bleeding hearts of the world unite.

You should go on dr.phil, or jus get over it, big deal

120_Minutes · 22-08-2005 04:28AM

poobum wrote:

they let my mate go in ahead of me without paying!(girl) yet im ment to pay because they want to rip me off and im a fella they asked no girls to pay but asked the fellas to pay!

maybe it was ladies free before 12 o'clock?

read the fine print, and theres no need to use exclamation marks at the end of every sentence either.

karlh · 22-08-2005 09:24AM

i'm with lump.

Lump · 22-08-2005 06:03PM

Not Literally.... like we're not shacked up together. HONEST!

John

pwd · 22-08-2005 06:41PM

Well the time I went last year they were turning away nice-looking girls because they were under 21 (19 or 20 I think). Turned away more people than they let in really and the place was not full at all - easy enough to get seats even. Didn't notice an unusal boy : girl ratio myself, although there might have been. I was rather distracted that night. This was a year ago mind. [Five years ago anyone would get in and the place was crammed.]

Lilly81 · 22-08-2005 07:28PM

that's annoying! :mad:

beanyb · 22-08-2005 07:44PM

I'm 19 and used to go there when I was 16 or so and never had any trouble getting in. Then they did it up and when they re-opened they changed it to over 21's only. They wouldnt let ANYBODY in that was under 21. So I was 18 and couldnt get in to a place I got in when I was under-age.

But about 3 or 4 months ago they got rid of the over 21 thing, and now it's full of 16 year olds again.

Sparky · 22-08-2005 08:00PM

i hate places that do that over 21 crap, were not fcking americian.

pwd · 22-08-2005 08:13PM

I think it's sensible. People go to clubs to meet potential sex partners. [Not the only reason to go but probably the most popular]. An over-21s rule just eliminates people who are too young for the target market.

kstanl · 22-08-2005 08:17PM

Sparky_S wrote:

i hate places that do that over 21 crap, were not fcking americian.

Unless it's clearly posted outside the premises that it's over 21's, then it is illegal to refuse entry to anyone over 18.

Seaneh · 22-08-2005 08:19PM

120_Minutes wrote:

maybe it was ladies free before 12 o'clock?

read the fine print, and theres no need to use exclamation marks at the end of every sentence either.

That is also illeagle.
Sexual discrimination.

Sparky · 22-08-2005 09:43PM

kstanl wrote:

Unless it's clearly posted outside the premises that it's over 21's, then it is illegal to refuse entry to anyone over 18.

I didnt see a over 21's sign in the palace in navan where my cousins birthday party was, and i was refused, i had no choice but to go and get a taxi back to the house.

they even let in 17 yr old who were having a fight in the line.
****.

kstanl · 22-08-2005 09:48PM

Sparky_S wrote:

I didnt see a over 21's sign in the palace in navan where my cousins birthday party was, and i was refused

Like I said, if you're over 18 and you have valid ID then you can't be refused on the grounds that the establishment is for over 21's only. If there isn't a sign in clear view that says that the establishment is over 21's, then you are perfectly within your rights to sue under the Equal Status Act. And, despite what people tell you, you'll probably win.

tramco

Comments