Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dee Forbes banging the RTE TV licence drum again 60m uncollected fee *poll not working - pl ignore*

1496497498499501

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Is public service broadcasting worthy of public money?

    Irish people continue to trust RTE news whether on radio/TV or online.

    "When asked which platform is "your main source of news", 31% of Irish respondents said television, with the same percentage citing online (excluding social media).

    For offline brands accessed by users, RTÉ TV news and RTÉ radio news held steady with 2025 figures, standing at 44% and radio news at 29% respectively. Sky News was next for TV users (27%).

    For users of digital news sources, when asked which of the following brands "you have used to access news online in the traditional media", RTÉ News Online (37%) is the most accessed, a one point increase on 2025.

    The Journal.ie was next, at 29%, a three point increase on 2025, and 23% cited the Irish Independent online."

    Trust in major brands but news avoidance grows - report

    But this doesn't measure how much Irish people are willing to pay to retain RTE as a source of cultural content including sport and the Irish language.

    I don't have to have a TV licence but I'd be willing to pay a levy on my LPT to replace a licence that many avoid having to pay, for whatever reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,633 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    France has a levy on streaming services, as do at least a dozen other European countries.

    The latest Radio Times has a focus on the future of the licence fee in UK.

    The current UK government rejected the concept even though it was proposed by parliamentary committee.
    The BBC makes a lot of co-productions with streamers so there could be a specific concern there.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ckg22d99v7qo

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    But that's not about replacing the TV licence fee. it's about a levy to support the British film industry including high quality TV drama.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,633 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    It wouldn't replace licence fee but I imagine it is used instead of an increase in licence fee or direct state funding.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    Simply put, An Post could enforce the collection properly, but it seems to have taken it easy after all 10m, per year along with the social welfare payments help the company. An Post may struggle without their government funding, including the government savings accounts.

    I have mention that TG4 have direct exchequer funding however such funding is not, and will never be, ringfenced by a government. Successive governments could easily change that policy, indeed as the great Pat Rabbitte once said "in the heat of an election campaign…", so even the parties agreeing to such ringfencing could easily change their minds.

    In 2011 the decision was made that TG4 would be partly funded by the License fee and the exchequer, the government cut funding to TG4 and replaced it with a portion of the licence fee. This policy was introduced by a Green minister (Ryan) and his Labour successors (Rabitte and White) continued the policy until it was ended in 2018 by a FG minister (Richard Bruton).

    TG4 has since seen increases in its direct funding however its not ringfenced, should Ireland ever see a recession the first thing any government will cut is funding to broadcasting (public service media) and the Arts, its either that or public services like health, welfare and infrastructure.

    This idea of replacing the licence fee with Direct Exchequer funding to me seems unworkable.

    S4C had similar problems in the UK AFAIK they now take a portion of the licence fee, I never understood why the Welsh government didn't directly fund S4C after devolution considering the vast majority of their members would agree with such ringfencing, but it would be a hard decision to reverse and as you point out politicians like to get elected, leave those hard decision to the Tories and then be vocal on their bad decisions. Same goes for the Scottish government, if you want national public service broadcasting / media perhaps pay for it out of the Scottish parliament instead of out of the licence fee.

    So what do you think?

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    It could be but that still wouldn't address the problem with the licence that it's increasingly only being paid by the compliant and ignored by people who don't believe in paying for anything if it's avoidable. A PBS is IMO a basic necessity for a democracy and needs to be funded directly by the general public rather than by levies that will get passed on to customers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    in your opinion (which given the evidence of your never ending praise of RTÉ and a certain talent agent and his band of mystery men and women and a failure to ever criticise anything any of the above do suggests you have a vested interest).

    As per my previous post (I am not alone in this) i would propose an alternative view where there would be no licence fee at all and RTÉ would be left to survive on merit.

    Yes, the salary is enormous, I understand that, but that doesn't affect my soul.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 113 ✭✭hibble


    I can't understand what your idea of adding the cost of yet another service I don't avail of to my LPT. Bad enough that I am forced to pay this when my nearest street lamp is nearly five miles away and the potholes I have pointed out to prospective candidates for the last three council elections remain unrepaired.

    How many people who are currently evading the license fee do you think are actually obliged to pay LPT?

    At least with the ESB standing charge and my refuse collection I'm paying to ensure my electricity supply continues to be delivered to me and my bin men are taking newly accumulated rubbish. All RTE appear to offer are the same old repeats RITY, KILLINASCULLY etc. garbage American imports and the dire Today show.

    Their soon to be part time news service often appears to act as PR agency for two of the main political parties, and the dedicated news channel is useless.

    If KB thinks RTE are doing such a good job then let them go subscription and see how they get on.

    As for Mr. T. ........ the least said about him the better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    What are they not compliant? The vast majority of people used to pay their licence fee every year, in the last 3 years it has plummeted, you have to ask yourself why is this the case? I wonder what the elephant in the room is.

    When you consider all new smart TV continue to include a tuner of of some kind, this means less and less people are just using smart devices with a monitor and/or a projector, and even when this was popular it was a tiny percentage of people doing it.

    The over 70s all get a free licence, but with the rise in the number of households even more and more people are not paying that fee, why? what happen? is there anything that could have persuaded them to decide to stop paying? I wonder what that might have been?

    PBS maybe a part of democracy, but you still fail to show why it should come from direct funding and how that will be administered and by whom.

    RTÉ who are the main company that administer the licence fee have wasted it over the years, why should direct public funding be used any differently to the current licence fee. You seem to forget that TG4 is already directly funding and as I have pointed to you it has inherent political problems.

    I would disagree with RTÉ going it alone, but I also disagree with RTÉ being kept with the same structures that have failed in the past.

    Again in my view PSB or PSM should be divided like so : -

    1. Screen Ireland takes control of TV (with RTÉ one and 2 becoming, Fís 1 and Fís 2)
    2. TG4 takes control of Irish language programming and children's (TG4, CULA4 with RTÉjr and RTÉ RnaG becoming 4KIDS and RAIDIO4)
    3. NCH (national concert hall) takes over the concert orchestra and Lyric FM (they've all ready taken control of RTÉ NSO and Choirs).
    4. 2RN the networks company takes control of RTÉ Radio (Radio 1, 2FM and GOLD) and the studio at Montrose
    5. What remains in News and Current Affairs stays with RTÉ but rebranded to Media News / Nuacht na Meán, providing news for the above broadcasters, with agreements to utilizes reports on indpenendent radio and TV.

    This saves on the idea that we have to set up new companies as all of the above currently exists.

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    "I can't understand what your idea of adding the cost of yet another service I don't avail of to my LPT."

    There are lots of things I don't avail of that I'm happy to pay for in my taxes, I consider it a civic duty. Some of them undoubtedly relate to rural Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    The poster you replied to (who won’t reply to any of my posts intriguingly) doesn’t care where the money comes from as long as the RTE gravy train and the stars of NKM continue to be funded by the taxpayer.

    The collection method is largely irrelevant but note he’s moving from a voluntary payment method to a one that’s more difficult to evade. Next he’ll be advocating for a “deducted at source” levy in your taxes. It could be called the RTÉ Tax, or the NKM Tax depending on how one views it.


    For anyone interested, I do actually have a tv licence btw.

    Yes, the salary is enormous, I understand that, but that doesn't affect my soul.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    ideally a bailout and increases in salaries and fees.

    Yes, the salary is enormous, I understand that, but that doesn't affect my soul.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 113 ✭✭hibble


    Well I'm very pleased that you're happy paying for folk with no talent having their pockets lined. You pay for it, I don't want to.

    Did you have a number in your head for the amount of licence fee defaulters who don't pay property tax?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 113 ✭✭hibble


    I'm well aware of who is and his tactics, I've followed this thread and others for a long, long time. Long enough to know that if the likes of Tubs and Raymond had actually done a proper day's work, that they would thnnk themselves lucky that they had what they did and stop wingeing about how hard done by they were.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    Let put it this way did you think RTÉ civil duty is to run the national broadcaster correctly?

    Last year a total of 768,657 households paid their licence fee, this is a drop of 179,267 since 2022, the year before we found out that the management had no civic duty.

    This year I estimate it to be at 751,348 by the end of they year, in the first 5 months of the year 14,022 extra spongers refused to pay, They have to increase payments on average by 2,000 for the next 7 months to reach their final 2025 figure! in 2025 those seven months averaged 1,800 additional spongers.

    For anyone interested I do not have a TV licence.

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Gen.Zhukov


    Irish people continue to trust RTE news whether on radio/TV or online.

    If the Irish people knew about the lack of reporting on issues that aren't favourable to Fine Gael, they mightn't have so much trust - Y'know, like the FG cllrs robbing nurses and that unfortunate Mater Hospital affair with Jennifer Carroll MacNeill when her mask hit the ground

    Shocking stuff

    Still, I suppose €725m of exchequer cash buys you a lot of clout



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,573 ✭✭✭badabing106


    Like it or not Dee Forbes gamed the system perfectly

    By completely removing herself from the public eye and avoiding the media crossfire for two full years, she protected her peace, stonewalled the State, and fundamentally exposed the complete lack of any actual powers held by parliamentary inquiries. She left behind a masterclass in the power of saying absolutely nothing at all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,878 ✭✭✭Dublin Calling


    It is the oldest trick in the book. Say nothing. Used by tax evaders to IRA members when questioned, pick a spot on the wall, stare at it and say nothing at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    Yes, the salary is enormous, I understand that, but that doesn't affect my soul.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    I see you’re continuing your well established tactic of asking questions of others then either refusing to contribute yourself or just ignoring questions put to you. A very disingenuous way to engage on a forum like this.

    Yes, the salary is enormous, I understand that, but that doesn't affect my soul.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Well she wasn't under arrest, she was 'invited to attend' but sent a sick note instead. As I've posted before a couple of times this was a smart move on her part given that others who attended, gave evidence both documentary and oral as well as answering questions get little credit and their evidence is largely ignored except to be scoffed at.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    Awh! they didn't just help to destroy the national public service broadcaster. How would she had defended her role in the whole thing?

    Do you think the D4bes has any civic duty?

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    You mean the part where Mr. Kelly provided invoices from CMS for RTÉ but made out to Astus UK as part of a concerted effort to hide the transactions?

    No, I noted that. Meticulously.

    What credit do you feel he should get for that?


    The Toyman and Mr. Kelly were far from fully earnest in their appearance. They came of their own volition not with the aim of aiding the enquiry but in a callous and utterly transparent attempt to spin the story into a narrative sympathetic to them, despite being complicit in the attempted deception (again, Mr. Kelly supplied the invoices).


    From submitting their dossier an hour before the hearing started in a deliberate attempt to obfuscate to spinning a “woe is me, I’m just a simple lad who doesn’t understand numbers” narrative from The Toyman to Me. Kelly’s “we were just following orders” to both Mr. Kelly and The Toyman both being addressed on multiple occasions as to their forthrightness to the wonderful and memorable hubris-filled soundbytes both gave us, their appearance was a crash course in how not to do it.

    It made for delicious viewing.

    Post edited by Peter Dragon on

    Yes, the salary is enormous, I understand that, but that doesn't affect my soul.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,303 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    I rest my case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,145 ✭✭✭RoTelly


    What case is this? That people have an opinion on those who appear before the committee?

    I look at someone like Breada O'Keeffe, who explained how wonderful she was as CFO … then only to be found out that she taken a voluntary redundancy which she shouldn't have been given… and then tried to text the Deputy DG to explain her position after she refused to attend the committee.

    I wonder did D4bres ever have any civic duty, or did any of the members of the executive board during her time as DG have any civic duty?

    ______

    In the end they were just greedy, they all knew one another and knew what to expect more money for no return, it was a secure cash flow, but in fairness they looked for what they wanted and fair dues to them for that, and wouldn't you be doing the same!

    Just one more thing .... when did they return that car

    Yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    Please show me one factual error in the post you’re refereeing to?

    Did Mr. Kelly provide invoices from CMS for RTÉ but made out to Astus UK as part of a concerted effort to hide the transactions?

    The answer is yes.

    Unlike you, I’m willing to engage and discuss the matter.

    Yes, the salary is enormous, I understand that, but that doesn't affect my soul.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    Their “evidence” was ignored and scoffed at because it didn’t stand up to scrutiny because of their grandstanding and the attempted hagiographic positioning of The Toyman by Mr. Kelly and by the man himself.


    I wonder do either of them regret saying things like:

    “Ryan Tubridy is the most trusted man in Ireland”

    or

    "If that work is not called upon to be done, of course the money goes back." - and then taking almost 2.5 years to repay it without any interest of course.

    or

    “Yes, the salary is enormous, I understand that, but that doesn't affect my soul.”

    or

    "I have become the face of a national scandal, accused of being complicit, deceitful and dishonest."

    The last one screams loudest. I’d remove two words though in hindsight.


    The salary quote even made Laura Slattery’s QOTY in the paper of record. I think it’s safe to say she’s not on the puff piece press release mailing list….

    IMG_7118.jpeg

    Yes, the salary is enormous, I understand that, but that doesn't affect my soul.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,135 ✭✭✭Peter Dragon


    You should know by now he doesn’t reply to awkward questions.

    Post edited by Peter Dragon on

    Yes, the salary is enormous, I understand that, but that doesn't affect my soul.



Advertisement
Advertisement