Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

115231525152715281529

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Doak is in a strong spot to take up the mantle. A lot of Ulster's playmaking goes through him, so he's so capable in that role. If he continues to improve, he'll close that gap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 368 ✭✭letsbefair


    Interesting Matt Williams article in the IT. Have to agree with a lot of what he is saying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I mean, he's right purely in the context of the last two seasons, but the context he is missing is the fact that they've failed to get over the line in multiple European Cup Finals in the last 5 years.

    It's entirely possible that the time is just right for a fresh voice to try and bring things forward - we've seen this in the past as coaches don't always necessarily get to stick around for the accolades when they put in a lot of the groundwork: i.e. Eddie O'Sullivan with the 2009 Grand Slam etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Well, I genuinely appreciate that you've responded with some respect.

    It was a bloody appalling story, deeply unpleasant. It absolutely needed reporting on! But I work in broadcast media, and I do know that there have been accusations against Southern rugby players that the media would have loved to leverage for subscriptions and clicks, but couldn't. So when they could, there was a complete feeding frenzy.

    I wanted to point that out, and it could well have come across as "that's the only reason they reported it". I don't mean that. It belonged in the news; it should have been something every Ulster fan was aware of. It is a disgusting allegation.

    But one they were found not guilty of.

    The IRFU can say they were fired because of their WhatsApp messages. No-one believes that. As I mentioned, Gilroy messaged worse (revealed in the investigation) and the IRFU didn't care.

    If the IRFU is so concerned, and disgusting WhatsApp messages are a firing offence, has it instituted some kind of organisation-wide check to make sure no similar messages have been sent? (On player's personal phones?) No. It is only concerned when players' text messages are made public. It does not care that sexist, ugly messages are sent. It cares when the public is aware of those messages being sent. That, to me, means it is about Public Relations.

    I don't think the comparison was trite, but I'm perfectly happy to just say we disagree on that.

    Thanks, FtD



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Gone way off topic here but no-one (in an offical role) ever said Jackson and Olding were sacked because of text messages.

    As I mentioned, Gilroy messaged worse (revealed in the investigation) and the IRFU didn't care.

    Gilroy was suspended for a few weeks because of his texts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Right. Why weren't Jackson and Olding suspended for a few weeks, if that is the level of punishment?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Because they weren't fired over text messages, let's be realistic about that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Is that not exactly and precisely what I've been arguing?

    This is going to roll on and on. I don't mean that we're going to argue - I just mean that it's bloody endless, and a massively unpleasant story to revisit. And I don't have the energy for it.

    I think Spicer should be given the heave-ho, others don't; that's that. I don't think he will because it hasn't presented a PR problem, but I spent a long periods of my early twenties getting wazzed, and you know what? I never did anything like that, and I do judge Spicer, the same way I'd have judged a mate that did something like that. Let's leave it here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I agree with you, but you said: The IRFU can say they were fired because of their WhatsApp messages, I was just pointing out they never said that. There was deliberately vague language about IRFU values and inclusion etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Anyone else have a feeling they might start Ringrose at 12 for the final? There’s no way Lowe won’t start at 11 for this game. Which means Reiko likely either starts at 13 or benches. Neither Osborne or Henshaw have been playing well and they brought Ringrose on at 12 for Osborne in the semi. Wouldn’t be surprised if they go with that pairing from the start on Friday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Reiko should start at 13, he offers more than Ringrose. If anyone ought be starting at 12, it's Frawley



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,403 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    10 prendergast

    11 lowe

    12 Osbourne

    13 Reiko

    14 Jimmy (tob if fit)

    15 Hugo

    That's my starting back line



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,070 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I was mad for Osborne to get starts at 12 since the 6N. But he hasn't been as good as I had hoped. In hindsight Frawley should have gotten more time at 12.

    As For Friday night, it's hard to see them try a new approach with Ringrose or Frawley.

    Ringrose at 12 isn't as mad as it sounds, but not for the first time in a final. I wouldn't mind if they tried it next season though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,374 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    Can’t see Frawley being involved to be honest. Agree on Reiko.

    JGP Prendergast Osbourne Reiko Lowe TOB Keenan. McGrath Bryne Ringrose would be what I would guess they will go for as a backline 23. Although I would have JOB at 23 instead of Ringrose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,085 ✭✭✭50HX


    I assume there no possibility Lowe is not involved v the Bull, similar to Frawley post CC final.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 864 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    Hi Bingobango12,

    Some of that probably needs to be taken with a pinch of salt. Not that it is necessarily wrong but the slant on it is IRFU bad Leinster and Lowe good and really there isn't any bad here just normal pro contract negotiations.

    Lowe was on a Leinster contract with an irfu PONI top up.

    1+1 with an option for both parties on the +1. That was a bad contract for a player of Lowes age to sign imo.

    Someone, either IRFU or Leinster decided not to take up the 1 year option on the existing contract. A new offer was then made either by the IRFU or Leinster and Lowe has opted to seek better terms elsewhere.

    No bad guys, just business. Good business or bad business remains to be seen.

    Whats not in question is that Lowe has been a fantastic player for both Leinster and Ireland and will be very hard to replace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,070 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Lowe will be hard to replace in the short term. But he doesn't have a medium-term future in the sport because he's 34 next month and will be 35 at the time of the world cup. But the world cup take place in the short-term future so it is an issue.

    He would have to be replaced in the 2027-28 season either way. No amount of contracting or money could fix that. So they needed replacements either way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 301 ✭✭kig


    It's is still a sh***y way to treat a player who has been first choice, whenever he's fit, for Leinster and Ireland, and still is. And he has shown nothing but loyalty to club and country. And just before a world cup year, when no-one can predict who is going to be fit or not. I would think that AF is tearing his hair out at the IRFU. Shooting ourselves in the foot springs to mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    It's at odds with the IRFU's whole 'win today, win tomorrow' thing. Yes, he'll be 35 at the time of the next World Cup, but what about maximising performance in the 2027 6N? Lowe could be the difference between finishing 2nd and finishing 3rd in the table, say, with all the financial implications that has.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I don’t think we can reasonably say he still is first choice for Ireland.

    He was dropped in the first round of the 6 Nations this year.

    He came back in vs Italy and was excellent. But got injured in the first 20 mins with the score 3-0 vs England and we saw how good Baloucoune and TOB were from there on.

    And this is all at a time when Hansen is injured too.

    I’m sorry to see him go when I think he still had something to offer, and understand why Leinster fans in particular are annoyed about this.

    But given he wasn’t a guaranteed starter, and he’s not a good fit for the 23 jersey, I don’t think this is quite the loss it’s being painted by some Leinster fans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 841 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    I think by dropped you mean he wasn't fit. But that doesn't really suit the narrative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    A contact change like that should be signaled well in advance. Sounds as though this was dropped on him. I don't disagree with moving a player of his profile to an incentive based one, but why not do that from the off? Changing the nature of his contract halfway through like that is ****. Treating him so poorly is really ****, especially when you compare his appearance profile to a player like Furlong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I couldn’t give a rat’s how Lowe was treated, it’s professional sports and sometimes unpleasant decisions have to be made. They all sign up to this the day they sign their first contract.

    The problem is we have reduced our options of genuine test level wingers a year out from the RWC for the sake of a marginal saving.

    Maybe Lowe wouldn’t have been up to it come September 2027, maybe Hansen will get fit and turn out to be a very good left wing. But if he doesn’t, we have an issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Were there reports he wasn’t fit? As far as I remember, the reporting was that Stockdale got the nod and that he was selected on form.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And I wouldn’t disagree with very much of that. But it doesn’t contradict anything I’ve said above.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    No, I do think it's a poor business decision by the IRFU. Building distrust for future negotiations, and unnecessarily limiting options for the WC



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,548 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    Posted this in Ireland thread but seems more appropriate here:


    I think people will only realise the loss of Lowe when we end up with Osborne covering the wing like he did in the 6N game against France last season. 

    We seem to be banking on Baloucoune and TOB to stay fit or Stockdale to regain his 2018 form (and stay fit). Hansen is quality but has been injured for the guts of 3 seasons now (24 games since the NZ QF in 2023-Lowe has started 50 games in that time despite the narrative of an increasing injury profile) so seems rather optimistic to pen him in to the Irish 11 jersey this stage. Incredibly shortsighted to limit your potential options further for the sake of about €100k.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,085 ✭✭✭50HX


    Agree on limiting options for the WC.

    The irfu know full well that it will be a rare occurance that a top level integral irish player will jump ship to go abroad.

    They play the %'s as the Irish players are treated better than their counterparts abroad from a player welfare aspec.

    It may well lead to distrust but ultimately wont really matter in getting players signed down



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    We could really do with Kenny, Ward and Bolton making a leap next year to come into contention.



Advertisement
Advertisement