Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

1151615171519152115221529

Comments

  • Administrators Posts: 56,565 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    There are no fee paying schools in Ulster any more. No longer permitted by the government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 179 ✭✭The Parish King


    Not to fully derail the discussion, but setting aside any financial advantages or disadvantages, what is it about the Blackrock culture which makes them more likely to produce professional players, win Senior Cups etc.?

    From my memory and (very dated!), experience I often found that other schools might have star players who are more athletic but they could never push back their Blackrock counterparts with Leinster underage teams. Just curious as to what you think the differences are which give the Rock guys an edge?

    My fear is that they are just better coached and have better habits, which I guess ultimately flows up in to the discussion that we don’t naturally produce a James Lowe/Mack Hansen type.

    I’m also aware that this is a sweeping generalisation, and doesn’t include club products such as Jamie Osborne (who seems to be falling in to that overly systematic bracket now as well).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    There were 52 players across the other three provincial squads this season (senior squads and academies) who were produced via Leinster pathways (predominantly the schools system). That's bigger than a full provincial squad essentially.

    This has always been the thing - realistically we're barely scratching the surface in terms of where we develop players from, and there is so much more scope out there to improve it.

    The idea that there is some monopoly on talented athletes in South Dublin capable of being developed into pro rugby players makes no sense, but equally, for me, the argument that it's just a question of money is a lazy cop out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus




  • Administrators Posts: 56,565 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    Ah. I know that Inst, Methody etc aren't fee-paying anyway, and have no boarders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I went to Blackrock, and for me, a lot of it is numbers and a really deep rugby culture that runs through families for generations. It's a big school (over 1,000 pupils), all male, and a huge percentage of people who go to the school play rugby and love rugby as their #1 sport. Competition to make teams is really intense at all levels.

    Absolutely, the facilities are excellent, and the coaching has always been very good as far as I know, but it's also almost always been provided by teachers.

    I have two boys now, who will likely both go to school there, and my 3-year-old has been going to Rugby Tots for around 12 months now etc. It's that kind of thing that is extremely prevalent in the school, and to me is more of a factor than just money. I'd draw a comparison to somewhere like St Kieran's in Kilkenny, which just seems to have a really deep hurling culture, and have equally dominated the Dr Croke Cup winner's table.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,344 ✭✭✭✭Heroditas


    Some of the schools are pumping € 000s into their rugby programmes. Not all schools can afford it. For example, CBC is a fee-paying school but they don't have the funds to really throw at rugby because the school is quite small and they don't have the past-pupil network that throws money at them.

    Andrews and Gerards were successful because a tonne of money was pumped into their schools but looks at Andrews. The money dried up and no more Porters or Larmours have appeared since. Pres Bray had money pumped in and they're seeing the benefit.

    Rock and Michaels are relatively large schools and the alumni all fit (broadly) the stereotype of industry leaders, wealthy professionals and the schools benefit from large donations. That all helps pay for gyms, facilities, S&C coaches, additional coaching help. They're effectively professional academies. CBC etc don't have that luxury so a player making the Leinster academy from a school like CBC or CUS is the exception rather than the norm. Success breeds success



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,057 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    Michaels is about half the size of Rock, so proportionally representation is the same. The common part of the equation is effort & a culture around rugby excellence which thankfully is now spreading to more schools in what is a very competitive environment both inside the school itself and for the cup. Money is not the saviour as witnessed by England who have far deeper talent in the rugby schools and an annual fee which is a multiple of private schools in Ireland with a wealth depth which is many more multiples above that again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,070 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Methodist College Senior School is not a fee paying school these days. Entrance is by examination, not the size of someone's wallet. Also it's contribution to schools rugby has diminished remarkably recently.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,880 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    "The facilities are excellent".

    What are the facilities like in St Kieran's?

    I think you stumbled onto something there, most secondary schools down the country can only dream of the sorts of facilities a place like Blackrock has. My old school had a halla that leaked due to visible holes in the ceiling and we had no pitch, no gym. We ran our training drills in the park.

    There was an amalgamation of two schools that led to a brand new school being built, and the facilities they have are unreal. Indoor and outdoor pitches/courts, astros for different sports. So much so that entire new sports teams have started, some at inter-county level now, junior FAI level… that simply didn't exist before.

    Money isn't the be all and end all, good coaching is key obviouslt… but it sure does help. Like when Terenure decided to bring Carlos Spencer over on a 3-year contract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    There's lots of this talk about "large donations", "pumping in money" etc - but once again, very little elaboration on what this money is spent on, why it's materially different from most schools, or why it reduces in such a disproportional level of player production.

    I haven't looked at it too closely of late, but as recently as Oct '24, this was the coaching team at Blackrock:

    • Justin Vanstone - Head Coach - teaches maths, science & PE at the school for over 20 years
    • Seamus Toomey - Forwards Coach - Physiotherapist employed by the school for long time period
    • Shane Murray - Defence Coach - teacher in the school
    • John Creighton - Director of Rugby - teacher in the school

    At that time, the school also had John McKee (Leinster player) getting some coaching experience with them, alongside a recent past-pupil (Michael Moloney).

    The S&C was managed by Dan Moore - an S&C coach who has worked in the school since 2013.

    The bulk of these people's wages are paid for by the Dept of Education (in their capacity as teacher's first and foremost), and the rights and wrongs of that for private schools is a separate debate.

    What about the above coaching team is totally beyond the reach of the vast majority of rugby schools?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,070 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    It has an unusual set up. The -normal- secondary school portion is mostly non fee paying. That is a tax payer funded school like all others. There are fees charged for boarding but not for admission.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Terenure College (the rugby club) brought Carlos Spencer over, not the school. You get that, right?

    I've no idea what the facilities are like in St Kieran's, but that speaks to my point more than anything. Did they win 26 Dr Croke Cups because they've got better facilities or is it because they have a deeper hurling culture, a place where hurling is practically a religion, and a more competitive environment to make schools teams better etc?

    Are you seriously suggesting the Munster schools for example don't have good facilities?

    As I've posted previously, PBC and CBC in Cork have broadly similar student numbers (and broadly equivalent excellent facilities) as Blackrock & St Michael's. The produce a fraction of the level of international calibre rugby players though in recent times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,374 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    My comment wasn't in relation to private or public schools. You said Mammy and Daddys and wealthy past pupils are propping up Dublin schools rugby programmes. The exact same thing is happening up North no doubt.

    I just went on the 3 schools I mentioned websites. Methody fees are £140, RBAI £1,824 or @ £7,080/7,560 for preparatory department to include tuition fee, insurance and pupil specific resources (not too sure what that actually means or is), while Campbell fees are £4,290 for day students and £26,070 for boarding. Now you know more than me about Ulster school rules and governance but if this no longer permitted, RBAI and Campbell are certainly charging day students for something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,070 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Lowe's departure and signing with Suntori Sungoliath has been confirmed on RTE.

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/rugby/2026/0609/1577536-lowes-departure-confirmed-with-winger-set-for-japan-move/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Not sure where to start with this. The fact that Leinster don't play in the World Cup seems like an obvious one.

    They make up the majority of the national team who do

    The underlying assertion here is that any teams Leinster have beaten are, by definition, rubbish, and any team that Leinster haven't played would obviously hammer us. 

    No it’s not. Stop making things up

    You're sh1tting all over Leinster for getting to the CC final via a "handy draw" as though it was drawn out of a hat, but ignoring the fact that Montpelier got the same handy route to the final in the second-tier competition, huffed and puffed to beat Connacht, fell over the line against Dragons before beating a seriously depleted Ulster. But yeah, they'd have hammered us

    You did watch that final right? You saw how bad Leinster were? Montpellier would absolutely have done a job on Leinster. Any Top14 team would have beaten Leinster bar maybe Montabaun. They were genuinely that bad.

    Literally got to the final, with another final coming up next week. By this definition, there can only be one "serious" contender every year

    Nope. You’re making things up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,379 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    "The exact same thing is happening up North no doubt."

    No doubt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭Knowall1


    Apologies . Yes. By the way the La Rochelle fans were amazing that day. Loud and colourful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, Montpellier beat the Dragons (15th in the URC) 18-12 but they'd definitely have "done a job" on Leinster.

    "Any Top14 team would have beaten Leinster" - do you actually read this tripe before you click post comment?!

    You should pull a Simon Zebo on it and claim your kids had your phone or something to stop embarrassing yourself with this nonsense.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Any Top14 team would have beaten Leinster bar maybe Montabaun. They were genuinely that bad.

    Just a reminder that Leinster played four matches against Top 14 opposition this season, and won three of them, none of which were against Montauban. Three matches against the superstars of the PREM, three wins. Now awaiting the final of the URC.

    This assertion that we're crap and would be beaten by anyone half-decent is somewhat undermined by, well, reality.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,403 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Lonely brain cells rage with hyperbole



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭ironingbored


    In a time in which Leinster are struggling to put bums on seats, the decision to not offer JL a competitive deal could be viewed as very short-sighted. One of the few players with an infectious demeanour that energizes teammates and crowd alike. Have a feeling he'll score in the URC final and IRFU/Leinster (to a lesser extent) will be left with egg on their faces. Is this the last of Leinster signing top quality additions in areas we are short on talent?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,374 ✭✭✭bingobango12




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,355 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    Would think a lot depends on what now happens with Snyman………



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    things went downhill when Ryan got injured. We were smashing them physically and winning the turnover battle. I hate repeating, but it's another game where any 1 of a number things go differently and we win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I could just as easily bring up Leinster losing to Cardiff or Benneton, or getting hockeyed by Munster, or struggling badly against Bayonne. l stand by what I said 100%. Montpellier would absolutely have done a job on Leinster in a final. Look at what the 8th placed team in the Top14 did to them. I don’t think it’s that out there to say the 2nd placed team would beat them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    If James Ryan going off, causes you to blow a 17 point lead at home, you have some pretty big problems



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,344 ✭✭✭✭Heroditas


    All secondary schools have a pupil to teacher ratio and are provided with the teachers based on that ratio. The fee-paying schools have the advantage insofar as the fees allow them to hire additional teachers which is why they can offer more subjects for example. Or in this case, hire extra teachers for "PE", i.e. rugby and sports.

    I would be stunned if those lads mentioned above spend more than a couple of hours a week in the classroom. There's no way those guys are spending all week in the classroom and then running a rugby programme in the school on top of that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    What about Montpellier losing to Toulon (twice) or Bayonne (both of whom Leinster beat)? Or losing to Clermont, or drawing with Montauban (the only Top14 team Leinster could apparently beat, except, of course, the three we did beat this season), or losing to Racing, or Stade Francais, or was it their mighty 11 point win over Black Lion of Georgia that really convinced you Leinster couldn't live with them?



Advertisement
Advertisement