Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

1151515161518152015211529

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    I think his role with Scotland is set to conclude soon enough.

    But yeah, I can't see it happening for some of the other reasons you list. He's also 64, and I think spent quite a lot of time in Australia even when he was IRFU Performance Director, so I'm guessing it wouldn't be for him at this stage of his life.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,942 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I dont watch leinster on irish media. This is an absolutely absurd angle to take. My opinions are my own and I've expressed them for years at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Toulouse would have absolutely hammered Leinster in that final, as would Montpellier. Northampton would have beaten them, as would Bath. Any half decent team would have fancied a cut off them in a final, because this team wilts on the biggest occasion. We see it in the Champions Cup and we see it at World Cups. Their performances currently are so far off being that of a serious European contender. They got to the final because of a handy draw, and even at that, laboured to wins against Edinburgh and Toulon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭PMC83


    Murray Kinsella reporting Lowe is off to Suntory Sungoliath on a two year deal, seems like that's that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,856 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Some bizarre takes that both Cullen and Leinster's achievements over the last few years have been a success imo.

    We are talking about a squad of players who have mostly been responsible for propelling the national team to no.1 in the world for a time and winning international championships and tours.

    They should have been walking club competitions by any objective measure, one since 2018 is failure. That can only be down to mindset, and that is a coaching failure.

    Cullen has never been tested elsewhere, there is no separate CV on which to judge him, all we have is his first season, how did that go? I honestly have no idea why anyone thinks he's in anyway directly responsible for Leinster's 'success' in producing players yet not responsible for the lack of it, ie. winning competitions.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Massive cock up all around. Lowe is still Leinster's most dangerous back and could have played a big role in the World Cup too.

    I still think there's no guarantee that the extra money going to player development pathways at other provinces will actually see an improvement in developing academy prospects. They've been so poor at it for so long.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,374 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    Disappointing and will definitely be a big miss for Ireland come World Cup. A big loss for Leinster also which is what I personally care about more.

    Appears he is replacing Cheslin Kolbe who was reportedly on £930,000 per year. If Lowe has agreed to join for even half of that it’s a great payday for him for 2 years. And well deserved. Will go down as one of the best imports into Ireland ever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,599 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you


    There's no way either Leinster or the IRFU could come up with anything near that level. As you say......even at 50%.

    It's just business.

    Wish Lowe nothing but the best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,070 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I think calling them chokers only works inbrhe retelling. I don't think leinster choked in the finals. They were soundly beaten this year, but I don't believe they choked. They didn't choke against La Rochelle or Toulouse. They were just beaten.

    Likewise, Ireland didn't choke in the past world cup. They played great against NZ and lost. You can only call it choking when you string it all together like a conspiracy theory.

    A couple of underperformances, sure. But when Leinster plays well, they often cause opposition to underperform and we don't notice it. It happens when one team gets on top.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,757 ✭✭✭ersatz


    I don't disagree that you have to hand it to Leo and Leinster, basically being at the top table consistently for the guts of 20 years is an incredible achievement for any club, and Im not sure there is a comparison in world rugby, maybe Toulouse but very few others. But you can also recognise that Leinster schools bestow an incredible advantage to Leinster over the other provinces. True, Leinster have refined an extremely successful alignment between school prospects, the academy, the province, the coaching, training camps, etc., but they have a bounty of players year after year to do it with. You can also look at the job other provinces have done in supporting their own schools and clubs so as to develop players, and it compares unfavourably to Leinster honestly. Still though, they get a lot of players falling into their lap.

    On the question of player performances in the biggest games, they're getting to finals which says a lot. But I've always felt like Leinster miss some of those big back row/2nf row stars that had in their pops, Hynes, torn, etc. Not just on the field but also around the team, absolute animals who would die for a win. BOD was like that too, and Leo was as a player. There aren't many in the current crop who are total bastards.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,495 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Leinster were 19 points up at home to La Rochelle in a final and still contrived to lose it. They were 19 points up against Toulon and cling on at the end. Whatever is happening, even games they're winning well become tight games fairly often. It's damn hard to stay fully switched on for 80 minutes against a determined opponent who knows your weakness.

    It's not fair to berate Leinster for both winning and losing these kind of games, and they are held to way too high a standard but there's a lack of consistency of performance over an entire match that used not be there previously



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    They were soundly beaten this year, but I don't believe they choked. They didn't choke against La Rochelle or Toulouse. They were just beaten.

    Ok they’re not chokers. They just always get beaten. So maybe they’re just not very good?

    This is my issue with Leinster fans wanting to have it both ways. They want the players to all be “generational” superstars. But then have no questions asked of them when they consistently fall short.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I'm genuinely curious as to what it is about the schools that has people attributing this almost mythical level of superlatives to them whenever they come up for description?

    Over the past 5 years, Leinster have added c. 41 players to their academy, from 11 different schools (plus another 5 players from a youths background).

    Of the schools represented, one player came from CUS, which is no one's definition of a rugby school. 2 players came from Pres Bray - a non-fee paying voluntary school, 2 came from Kilkenny College - a school that is now non-fee paying for day students (fee paying for boarders).

    1 came from Gonzaga, 2 from Belvedere, 1 from Roscrea, 1 from Mary's and 1 from Terenure.

    6 players came from Newbridge College - a school that has been good at producing players in recent times but hardly some sort of historical schools rugby powerhouse (3 Schools Cups in their history, with 2 of those before 1971).

    The two real outliers are St Michael's College - 8 players over the period, and Blackrock College - 11 players over the period.

    I think when people talk about Leinster Schools they imagine 10 or 12 schools producing players at the level Rock and Michaels are, but it's not the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,070 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Bordeaux peaked for the champions cup and were mid-table in their league. They couldn't do it on both fronts. If leinster won the champions cup and didn't make the URC knock outs, I think your criticism would be at the same level, but the focus would have changed.

    Leinster doesn't tend to have peaks and troughs. They're very good and they've been very good consistently for the guts of 20 years, but a team who is excellent can beat them. Bordeaux were excellent in the final and got on top of leinster.

    I would love if leinster had peaked and won those games. But as a larger package of work over years, I love following them winning most games. The finals have been disappointing but I enjoy supporting them in finals all the same.

    I doubt you'd actually have more respect for them if they followed Saracens trajectory of winning champions cups and then falling way down the ranks ever since. As with most things in life, you can't have your cake and eat it too. I deal with the disappointments as a leinster fan, why can't you deal with it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,070 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    You don't get the hype about the schools system and then go on to lost all the schools that produced the players. They have lots of schools producing players. Most producing a few players, some producing a lot of players. That sounds brilliant. I don't get your complaint.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,594 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Your point re Sarries is correct but remember that team cheated to gain entry into the Champions Cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I'm not saying it's a complaint, I'm saying what is it exactly that people think is so different about these schools that they are doing such a better job than schools in the rest of the country?

    Realistically - of the 12 schools I mentioned, 9 are just producing the odd player over a decade or so, hardly noteworthy.

    Too much of the focus is on the money - when the reality is that it's a cultural thing in Rock in particular.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Not sure where to start with this. The fact that Leinster don't play in the World Cup seems like an obvious one.

    The underlying assertion here is that any teams Leinster have beaten are, by definition, rubbish, and any team that Leinster haven't played would obviously hammer us.

    You're sh1tting all over Leinster for getting to the CC final via a "handy draw" as though it was drawn out of a hat, but ignoring the fact that Montpelier got the same handy route to the final in the second-tier competition, huffed and puffed to beat Connacht, fell over the line against Dragons before beating a seriously depleted Ulster. But yeah, they'd have hammered us.

    so far off being that of a serious European contender. 

    Literally got to the final, with another final coming up next week. By this definition, there can only be one "serious" contender every year.

    What the point is of posts like this is beyond me. So little insight, just pure rage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    If they are "not very good" they wouldn't get to the final in the first place

    You do understand that getting to finals is hard, most teams never get close to finals yet when Leinster manage to do it consistently its written off with any number of excuses for why they got to the final. Even a semi final is seen as a terrible result and yet other teams manage to even get to knock outs and its celebrated

    Not sure what fans you talk to and want all the players to be "generational" superstars because its not any I know



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    big Joe has the makings of been a "total bastard" but gets hammered then by fans for giving away penalties. James Ryan is also such a huge influence on that team, most of the big losses down the years coincide with him not been in the team or having to come off.

    In terms of the schools, its a handy excuse fired out to play down what Leo has done, the schools have existed for how long? other provinces also have schools but dont come close. Other countries have a bigger and better schools system and don't come close to what has been achieved. It's easier to write off the achievement than give praise. When Leo went for the job the reason he got it was because he presented on how to use the schools system and the academy to bring Leinster to the next level. I don't know who else was interviewed but nobody else at the time presented that model. So writing it off now as nothing special is not correct. If Leinster didnt hire Leo would they have promoted so many players into the team and then make Ireland such a force in World Rugby?

    Again I refer back to the media which pushes a story that Leo and Leinster should receive zero praise for the good things they have done and just get hammered for anything bad. Jackman is the best example, after the loss to France he went onto every podcast telling everyone Irish rugby was f**ked, England was the shining example and look how great they are. Then a few weeks later we are all supposed to forget as England was a mess and Ireland played well to finish second

    Same rubbish now, on 42 podcast going on about how great French rugby is and SA rugby and how terrible Irish rugby is and IRFU. People eat this **** up and just fire it out as if it is fact, its not. Jackman is a clown at this stage, as the Molecast guys said the new version of Hook. But thats what people listen to and just repeat what he says.

    Like he never says a bad word about SA rugby and to the point of hammering Leo and then praising Nienaber. Ridiculous stuff



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 56,565 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    other provinces also have schools but dont come close.

    No other province has anything like the few elite Dublin schools that prop up Leinster's conveyor belt. The money just isn't there.

    Pretending like Leinster are just like everyone else and that it's just Leo Cullen's hard work and genius that sets them apart is a fairly hilarious take on things.

    The fact of the matter is the Leinster underage system benefits enormously from the socio-economic advantages of Dublin, particularly wealthy Dublin, where mammys and daddys and past pupils of these elite schools are willing to (and able to) pump significant money into school sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 89 ✭✭Knowall1


    Re. choking. They didn't choke against La Rochelle in croker but there was a feeling of inevitably once they began out muscling us. But there was no one on the team that could change the narrative. But this year's final was a complete physical an d mental choke. Watching it I felt after 15 minutes they were done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,374 ✭✭✭bingobango12


    Whatever about Munster and Connacht. Let's not pretend there aren't a lot of wealthy parents up north sending their kids to RBAI, Campbell, Methodist College who no doubt contribute to rugby programmes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Exactly this. The suggestions often come up that the difference isn’t money… as Michael’s and Blackrock are pointed to as the outliers?

    Occam’s Razor…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    You really think it’s just cultural? And the money isn’t in any way a factor?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    Are you talking about the final we played La Rochelle in the Aviva?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,070 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Fine, Take La Rochelle as an example. They won a couple of tournaments over a few years and fell away to also rans.

    Rerun the same idea with La Rochelle or Clermont instead. Both had a peak and fell away. Leinster is the only one that hasn't fallen away. That's great in my view.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Genuinely - can you please elaborate how the "socio-economic advantages" and the money being pumped in makes these schools so much better than other schools at producing pro-calibre rugby players?

    What do you think the money is being spent on?

    And, why isn't it all of the wealthy schools in Dublin then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,456 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    There is lots of money being spent on rugby programmes in lots of schools all over the country, and comparable levels being spent in some Dublin schools who produce negligible levels of pro players.

    Same question I just asked @awec; genuinely what do you think the money is being spent on and why is it such a significant factor in producing pro rugby players?

    In Blackrock - now, and for as long as I can recall, the primary coaches are teachers. The facilities are very good, but lots of schools all over the country have good facilities.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,070 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I wonder what would happen if you broaden the search a bit. Look at all the sources of players in the four provinces and see where they came from. A lot of the players in the other provinces came from leinster schools.

    Then try filtering for quality (i acknowledge its a finger in the air metric). But then you ll capture all the players who came through leinster schools playing in Munster and connachy and a few in Ulster (Munster tends to produce its own players).

    Leinster tends to get the pick of the players because that's where they're already based and they're already on the radar.

    Roscrea for example has produced the Wycherleys, Izuchukwu, Milne and Cahir. Not a bad return for Irish rugby without being extraordinary.

    You need pathways producing good players from all angles. I saw an article on the leinster website yesterday about Páidí Farrell being one of 4/11 new academy players who came from clubs rather than schools. That's great that clubs are producing high quality players and it's great that leinster is signing them. It sounds like a good, well run system



Advertisement
Advertisement