Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

1151415151517151915201529

Comments

  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,495 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    They've lost twice this calendar year, unbeaten since the end of March, stomped all over the Challenge Cup, beat Bordeaux, Castres, Lyon, Clermont and La Rochelle away. I'd fancy them to win the Top14 and beat Leinster at home, on neutral ground or in a final. Their scrum is one of the best in the world, their maul is lethal. We might see next year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,457 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, I'm not denying they're a good side and on a good run of form, with some parts of their game exceptionally strong, but that still doesn't make Leinster "so far off" them.

    Montpellier have a lot of internationals in their wider squad, but not many who are current - i.e. they didn't lose a huge amount of players to the 6 Nations or anything like that.

    Stomping all over the Challenge Cup doesn't carry a lot of weight for me tbh.

    Leinster have lost 4 times this calendar year, but the defeats to Cardiff & Glasgow were 6 Nations vintage losses with shadow teams out.

    Leinster haven't played great rugby this year, but the full strength team have lost 3 games all season (Munster, Benetton & Bordeaux).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    stomped all over the Challenge Cup

    Not sure how boards.ie would react if Leinster had to cling on for a narrow win in a European semi-final, at home, against the Dragons. Connacht gave them a decent rattle too.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,945 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I don't think there is any team that Leinster is "far off" from.

    I do think that vastly more often then not when we face a team near our level we lose though, and that is a significant problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Leinster might not be “far off”. But the gap has seemed to widen.

    I think it’s fair to say, based on performances, they look further off than they have in a long time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,457 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Leinster are still, by any metric, one of the two or three best teams in European rugby (which includes the South African sides).

    We lost the European Cup Final to a team of exceptional quality who also got virtually every conceivable bounce of a ball or decision they could have gotten, especially in the first 40 mins.

    Since then - the team have responded by going out and winning two knock out games to get back to the final of the URC again.

    When all is said and done, even if they come undone in the URC Final, there still won't be too many teams out there who can claim to be outperforming them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,880 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    Leinster's post-group run to the final was very handy in my opinion. I think it papered over a few cracks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,457 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, but it wasn't the result of a lottery or anything - they earned that path by topping their group and going undefeated in the pool stages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,539 ✭✭✭visatorro


    Bit like us now Clermont had a 10 who didn't hit the heights when needed.

    Unrelated but I googled the 2012 starting teams from the semi final, madigan didn't come off the bench but neither did devin toner or Nathan white which seems strange given the pressure leinster where under in that game. Dont see unused subs now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,457 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Just to elaborate on this point -

    This is the third time in the past decade Leinster have managed to get to the final of both the league and Europe - in 2018/19 we won the league final (over Glasgow) and lost the European Cup Final (to Saracens), in 2017/18 we won the league final (over Scarlets) and the European Cup Final (over Racing).

    Over the past 10 years, Leinster have made the final of the URC on 6 occasions and the semi final on the other four occasions.

    Over the same period, we've also made 6 European Cup Finals, the semi finals on 3 occasions and the Quarter Final once.

    It's a frankly remarkable period of consistency and record of winning knock out games.

    If you look at the games we lost over that period too - we've arguably lost in comprehensive fashion (where we were indisputably second best) on four occasions:

    • this year's European Cup Final v Bordeaux (22 point loss)
    • 2020/21 Semi Final v La Rochelle (9 point loss, but very much second best)
    • 2018/19 European Cup Final v Saracens (10 point loss, we had some chances but felt second best on the day)
    • 2016/17 Pro12 semi-final v Scarlets (12 point loss, very poor flat performance)

    In 10 years, we've lost the sum total of 13 knock out games, by an average of 6.8 points. 7 of those losses were by a single score.

    Over the same period - we've won 37 knock out games (74% of all knock out games), by an average of 19.7 points. 27 of our 37 wins were by double digit points (or more).

    This year, we've played 5 knock games, won 4 of them (by an average of 22 points), and lost one (by 22 points), with one more still to come.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    Your consistency point is apt and it's why I'm hesitant about the whole "should Leo go" comments

    One side of the coin is freshening up anything isn't necessarily a bad thing.

    The more pragmatic side of the coin points to an excellent coach who has maintained an unprecedented level of success over a long period of time.

    There are many examples of clubs parting ways with successful leaders and never hitting those highs again.

    If Leo were to leave tomorrow. Who comes in? Most everyone who would be considered has their affairs in order at this point in the season.

    I have my doubts about the succession too. I don't see a scenario where we get a new coach in tomorrow and having the same level of success next season. Not close to it.

    And the same people calling for Leos head will still be frustrated



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,945 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Depends how you define success though really doesn't it?

    For a great many teams reaching the final would be success, I do not think that counts as success - and nor should it - for Leinster. I can live with a few losses, it is sport. But the second it becomes a contest we seem to lose every time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,085 ✭✭✭50HX


    From a fans perspective something has to change as its just not getting the teams over the big final hurdle

    From an irfu perspective he stays where he is as he has overseen the bulk supply to the national team for a considerable period of time, box ticked

    The above post by ftdv2 illustrates the fatigue fans must be experiencing with attending all these games to the last day of the season & not having the bigger trophy to show for it.

    Its reflected in the attendances even accounting for the capacity of Aviva...open to correction on that...just a feeling from watching.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    But the second it becomes a contest we seem to lose every time.

    Is a semi-final not a contest? We win plenty of those. We got to the URC final last year and won, was that not a contest?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,945 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Is a semi-final not a contest?

    It depends? I think my point was pretty clear and common usage of language - when the game is a tight one from the outset we vastly more often then not lost. A lot of our knock out games are never really contests.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    It's why I'm not totally against the thought of freshening up the coaching staff. But I do wrestle with it.

    I think Leinster has been a successful club over the last decade and I don't think there's a club in world rugby who would turn their nose up at it if offered



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Ah I get you. Ok I misunderstood and now agree with you.

    I think we have a serious deficit of on-field leadership that when the sh1t hits the fan that we can’t steady ourselves.

    Even against Bordeaux, we came flying out of the blocks, scored a lovely try, but when they got on top of us, we lost our heads completely.

    FWIW I don't believe a change in coach will do anything for that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,457 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    We've won some tight ones:

    • Toulon - 2025/26 Champions Cup - 4 point win
    • Northampton - 2023/24 Champions Cup - 3 point win
    • Ulster - 2018/19 Champions Cup - 3 point win
    • Racing - 2017/18 Champions Cup Final - 3 point win
    • Glasgow - 2018/19 URC Final - 3 point win
    • Munster - 2017/18 URC - 1 point win

    But I think your suggestion that more often than not we blow teams away when we win would be a fair one; i.e. we've faced Toulouse 4 times in this data set - hammering them in three semi finals (average winning margin of 20 points) and losing once in extra time in the final.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    Not sure how anyone could claim getting to the finals of the two competitions leinster are in is not a success

    I do think leo is right and this is driven by the media. The only reason Leinster are in this position is because of the excellent work done by Leo and others in bringing players from underage to full time Leinster players. Something which other countries have struggled with

    The french don't have that issue as they just buy up all the good young players if they have enough money

    It was interesting to hear the latest RTE podcast which is so anti Leinster and always has been, more or less saying that leinster should never compare themselves to the other provinces because of the advantages they have. The other provinces have been handed millions for years to develop players and failed, Leinster didn't and so they shouldn't be compared to the others because they failed?

    The spin is no matter what Leo or Leinster do that is good should not be counted as been good and they should just be hammered for any little mistake they make. Meanwhile making constant excuses for mismanagement for years across the other provinces. I would discount Connacht in that comment because to be honest with the money they have received they have gone above and beyond what most would expect.

    In the same podcast the same people singing the praises of Ulster, who failed to get into the top 8 and lost a final as well. Now I do think Ulster had a great season and Murphy has done a great job but how can you claim they are doing great and then hammer Leinster for losing a final?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,457 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I think Leo does a phenomenal job at keeping the squad in a really strong place. His talent identification, minutes given to young players and management of the wider squad to keep guys getting sufficient gametime and happy to stay has been top class over the period.

    When you assess the coaches below him though I think there is definitely scope for improvement.

    I didn't hate the decision to bring in Jacques Nienaber, I thought it was a worthwhile punt at the time, albeit I think the decision to completely overhaul our defensive system was unnecessary, ill-advised and a waste of training minutes/resources. It doesn't really suit our playing squad (or the way the ruck is now being refereed), and I'd personally welcome Nienaber moving on.

    Tyler Bleyendaal probably gets off too lightly too - granted, to be fair, we have a lot of turmoil and turnover in playing squad on a week to week basis, but our core attack looks a lot more stuttering and stilted this season.

    Sean O'Brien is another one who, for me, deserves closer scrutiny. Our contact skills were always a big strength, but on the biggest days I feel this is a clear area where we lose games.

    Robin McBryde - ironically for a guy who previously got a lot of flack, is probably doing the best job of our coaching group. Our set piece has been really good and reliable this season. We've had a disastrous season with prop injuries (especially at LHP), but even against some of the biggest scrummaging club sides in world rugby our scrum has generally held up and done well, and in the URC, the only scrums that have won more penalties than us this season are the Bulls (45 pens won) and the Stormers (64 pens won), with Leinster winning 39 penalties there (other Irish provinces: Ulster 11, Connacht 15, Munster 17).

    The issue is though, I think if you were to try and bring in someone like Scott Robertson or Felipe Contempomi (post RWC) that neither would be satisfied with just having Nienaber's job, they'd likely want some combination of Cullen & Nienaber's role and have more absolute control.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,945 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I rarely consume Irish media so the idea my view is driven by then is absurd. On a more general level leinster have been treated exceedingly kindly by media - when you make a point of one competition defining you, which Leinster have done repeatedly, then fail to win it for 8 years then you are bound to eventually get questions. Cullen and leinster are blessed they didn't come earlier.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,408 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Emmett Farrell get a free pass??

    his performance analysis is probably top of the class and im sure he would be in high demand in that role in any club, but does his "specialist kicking" role need to be critiqued?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,945 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ok but the first two on your list are games we ran into massive leads in then let slip. I'm not sure they really counter the point.

    (On a phone so can't check the rest but also ages ago)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    If you're looking for a DOR type who knows the Irish system what about Nucifora?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,945 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think there is a chance it doesn't but at this stage we are well past the point of not giving it a go. Whether it is the players or the coach we seem incapable of taking the next step. And the players aren't as replaceable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,138 ✭✭✭arsebiscuits1


    That would be a thrilling appointment and I'd be onboard with it.

    But it would never happen.

    Also - who do you put as head coach?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I don't know why Nucifora was so against Leo being titled as DoR when Lancaster came in. Having Leo in a GM role makes sense, and re moving the ambiguity surrounding his role with respect to the actual coach would be beneficial. I think the Province needs better clarity about what our rugby culture aspires to be. The current iteration under Nienbar isn't it. The Leinstertainment memes have a grain of truth to them, our ethos should be built around attacking rugby, and the SA style was always a poor fit imo.

    We'd be crazy to not pursue Robertson if he's available at the moment. One of the best club coaches of all time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Yeah, hard to see it happening.

    But hypothetically if there was a head coach under Nucifora I'd like if it was a backs/attack specialist to go back to Leinster's historical identity of being a dangerous team with cutting edge in attack. Ex-second row Cullen's been there a long time now and development of forwards has been better than backs. Even Lancaster was a hooker and flanker during his playing days if I'm not wrong, so it's been quite a while since a backs specialist had the most prominent coaching role. Stephen Jones and Jared Payne spring to mind as possibilities. Wales played some irresistible attacking rugby when Jones was the attack coach under Pivac, and he's since coached in NZ with Moana Pacifika.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    If you watch Leinster then you consume the media. Jackman is all over the place and it doesn't matter what Leinster do and he is critical

    Just listening to the 42 as Jackman spends the first few minutes going on about how great the Stormers are and how great the long term plan the Stormers have, it gets to the point that Murray has to jump in and remind him how the Stormers lost

    That is just a little snap shot of the total bullshit from the media

    In terms of Cullen and Leinster been asked questions? well this has happened for year, people like to forget when Lancaster was coaching the same questions came up because it didn't matter what leinster did unless they won the Champions Cup it was a failure. Even when they won it, it wasn't a great achievement for Leo, it was Lancaster who won it.

    The only reason Ireland is so successful for the last few years is because of the work Leinster and Cullen have done at the academy level etc. Yet that should be forgotten



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 263 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    He is working in Scotland, his wages would be mental as well and with the IRFU new model of hitting Leinster to prop up the rest they would have zero chance of signing him. Even if he wanted to go from International rugby back into club

    Also remember he is the guy who wouldn't let Leinster call Leo a DOR. So it would look strange if he came back into a DOR role into Leinster when he blocked it when working for IRFU

    I also doubt Humphreys would allow it, when you see what he has done to the 7s program and to all the good work Nucifora had done since he took over, he would block it straight away because it would show how incompetent he is



Advertisement
Advertisement