Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

1151315141516151815191529

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,005 ✭✭✭almostover


    Is it me or does Sam's place kicking seem much improved? He seems to be putting a far better strike on the ball. Did he change something of late? He had some major issues earlier in the season and in the 6N with his place kicking. But today it appeared that it was back to where it used to be. I do remember that being a key strength for him when he first appeared on the scene, especially from distance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    He changed his kicking tee to a more elevated one. Ian Madigan mentioned it a few months before Prendergast actually made the change. He was speculating on why his place kicking had deteriorated and suggested the switch to the elevated tee.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Informative graphic from Brett Igoe as to where Leinster are struggling. Territory, possession and post contact metres are all very good. 12 entries into the Stormers 22 suggests we're doing really well to get into scoring positions.

    But 1.6 points per entry is pretty crap really. We've a lot of issues with that aspect of our game. Was the same problem against Bordeaux. Once we got into the 22 our carries were double teamed and we couldn't get enough quick ball. And our attempts at disguising our back okay were too easily read.

    Post edited by Clegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,701 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Our back play is pretty disgusting alright 😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,071 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    I've been ruminating on the apparent decline in Leinster's fortunes. There has been much back and forth about this coach and that coach, who has been good and who has been a failure. Well, 'failure ' is relative I suppose. The CC finals losses are described by many as Leinster 'choking' which in my view is bollocks. 3 of those final losses could easily have gone Leinster's way. Bad luck, injuries, the bounce of a ball, one poor decision by a player, bad refereeing etc combined to lose those games. Last year's semi loss to N'Hampton was at least partially down to 2 things. Not taking a penalty kick that could have levelled the game and led to extra time when Leinster were battering Saints who were out on their feet. The second and most egregious mistake was the ref not awarding a penalty try near the death. He yellow carded a player on the line for preventing a try being scored. I really think that the changes in Leinster's play, successes and style are all partially down to top players getting older and by small increments, being less and less effective. Porter, Furlong, Ryan, V.D.F., Conan, Henshaw, Ringrose, Lowe, Byrne, Larmour, Prendergast have all been a fraction less effective than historically. Often not by much and not in every game but the sum total of the decline is what happens to every team. Up to now, Leinster have been able to replace ageing stars with fresh ones from within. Sexton is still missed, Henshaw was IMO a vital pivot in the backs in both attack and defence. Furlong has earned his place in the pantheon of Ireland greats but it is clear that his best days are behind him. Perhaps the players are simply in need of a proper rest after almost 2 seasons of almost non-stop high level rugby. Every now and then we see the swagger of old so all is not lost, just the consistency. And, I should finish by saying I wish Ulster had the same level of 'failure'. WE can only wish.

    Post edited by jacothelad on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Prendergast in decline because he's getting too old is a new one!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Is there prejudice against coaches who weren't high level players at Leinster? Imagine having McNamara - one of the best attack coaches in the world - in their system and letting him go. Does a coach who wasn't a high level player have to have coached at Test level (Lancaster, Nienaber) before they'd be considered good enough for Leinster?

    Look at the coaching staff - Cullen: one year as forwards coach before he became the supremo; Sean O'Brien: high level player who got his first coaching job with Leinster; Bleyendaal: good ex-player with not much coaching experience before coming on board; McBryde was a high level player who admittedly was also an assistant coach for Wales for a long time.

    Playing and coaching are two different things, so to conflate playing ability with coaching ability when choosing a coach doesn't make sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,071 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Not in his case but he certainly was not playing as well as he did / could. Sorry to confuse you.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,410 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    He left Leinster 13 years ago. I mean currently.

    Edit: or, more accurately than "currently", in the timeframe the current decision makers have been in place



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Jacques Nienaber was never a pro player

    Utterly tiresome



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,410 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Of all the things to bitch about the current coaching crop (and I have lots of issues) they're own playing careers is zero on the list.

    Coaching experience is an issue yes, but that's got nothing to do with their playing careers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭ironingbored


    When Sean O'Brien was coming to the end we produced Leavy & Van der Flier, Jordan. Heaslip by Conan, Doris. Kearney by Keenan. BOD by Ringrose. Darce by Robbie (via Connacht). Nugget by Sheehan & Kelleher. Mike Ross by Furlong. Porter post Healy/Jack McGrath. Ryan by Dev. I know there's some overlap.

    Just seems we're not producing quite as high-level replacements for our ageing players as before perhaps apart from LHP.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 71 ✭✭shinana abu


    Think o'neill and Michael Smyth are top class back row..mcniece in 2nd row...numerous front row options...deegan outside centre..others there as well..…hopefully they fulfil their potential



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    A small point, but just for the sake of accuracy, both Nugget and Mike Ross were via Munster.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭ironingbored


    Yes, I didn't mean to infer they were home grown but rather established first teamers who were replaced by homegrown of same or better calibre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,459 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Leinster didn’t release Noel McNamara or let him go either - he was offered and accepted a role with the Sharks; Leinster were frustrated to lose him as academy manager.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    So the unbeatable Bordeaux, who Leinster supposedly never stood a chance against, just finished in the bottom half of the Top14.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Indeed, Leinster are much closer to the top of the pile than a lot of people think or would like, well observed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,009 ✭✭✭Ben Bailey


    Just goes to show how difficult it is to compete in Europe and in a highly competitive league. No doubt UBB also provide a large number of players to the France national squad too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Incredible that that’s the conclusion you’ve come to



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    it’s the only rational conclusion

    You told us yesterday that Leinster “are so far off the best teams” but it’s increasingly unclear who these best teams are.

    None of the English teams anyway. URC? Well, we’re reigning champions and odds-on to win another one, so none there.

    That leaves France. UBB did very well in Europe and finished eighth in France. Fair play, they picked their battles but not making the playoffs is a bit of a black mark, no? None of the teams in places two through seven are better than us.

    So that leaves Toulouse, who lost more pool games in Europe this year than we have in the previous eight and also couldn’t get past UBB “when it mattered”.

    So you tell me, who all these best teams that we’re so far off?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,072 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    I'm Happy to see Usanov getting gametime. I don't think k he had a big impact on the last 2 games but that's part of the process for young props. Holding your own in a semi final is fine for a 20 year old prop with 10 caps.

    Feel a bit sorry for Cahir but also appreciate this isn't a time to be sentimental. Looking forward to seeing how Usanov developes. I'll also support Cahir next year at Connacht. Its a charming story going from semi-pro to Leinster and holding his own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    It doesn’t matter how “close” Leinster are to the best teams if they sh*t the bed year after year after year. There’s no point being up there with the best teams if you don’t occasionally show up and beat one of them in a final. If Leinster are on par with Bordeaux like you say, but then show up to the one game need to deliver in and get thrashed like they did, it proves my point.

    Way too much of the postmortem after the final was “ah sure Bordeaux are class, we were just beaten by a better team”. But the opposition is irrelevant. It might have been Toulouse in that final, it might have been Bath, it might have been Northampton. Whoever Leinster came up against in that final, they would have lost. I know the word “choke” has become abit of a taboo around here, but that’s what we see it time and time again from this group of players. Bordeaux finishing bottom half of the Top14 proves that they aren’t the unbeatable team that they were made out to be.

    The point I’m trying to make is, maybe you’re right and Leinster are actually just as good as Bordeaux or Toulouse, or La Rochelle or Saracens in previous years. But in 15/20 years time, people will look back at this period and see that those teams won in Europe and Leinster didn’t. There’s a group of Leinster players in their early 30s who are at serious risk of their legacy being underachievement.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,410 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    So....

    The takeaway is.....

    .. Bordeaux are chokers



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,757 ✭✭✭ersatz


    the obvious takeaway is that very good teams/coaches find a way to beat Leinster, and French teams figure that out more easily than how to beat their French counterparts. More to it obviously but that’s a clear conclusion from the last 5 years in Europe. That Clermont team that Leinster had a great rivalry with in their European heyday faced a similar conundrum, they won the Bouclier in 2010 but came up agonisingly short against Leinster again and again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Way too much of the postmortem after the final was “ah sure Bordeaux are class, we were just beaten by a better team”. 

    Bordeaux are class and we were beaten by the better team. That is not the same as people saying we never had a chance which was your initial claim.

    However, Bordeaux's inability to fight on two fronts must surely raise questions about whether they're really that far ahead of us. Northampton finished top of the premiership and couldn't get past the QFs of Europe, conceding 84 points in their two knockout games. Toulouse are favourites to retain their domestic crown (like us) but also couldn't get past UBB in Europe (like us) and crashed out at the semis last year (like us).

    So the question remains, who are all these top teams that are so far ahead of us?

    It is, as always, cherry-picking the positives of other teams and cherry-picking the negatives of Leinster, just to have a rant.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,495 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    in all honestly, Montpellier at the current moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,459 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Nah, I'm not having that. They've been good this season, but they've looked ordinary at times too. They're a really good side, and I wouldn't be hugely confident facing them, but I certainly wouldn't agree Leinster are "so far off" them.

    I'd have them as on a similar level to the likes of Bulls or Stormers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,003 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Bernard Laporte is a really good coach.



Advertisement
Advertisement