Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

How many of us think that unification is no longer a priority and don't really want unification ?

1303133353640

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I think it's a case of how you view the world versus how I do.

    That's just how it is.
    Nothing to do with 'Irish interest' btw.
    A BP will be called in the GB's interests.

    And a UI now suits GB's pursuit of sovereignty. Partition royally came back to bite them. That penny is still dropping.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,951 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    And a UI now suits GB's pursuit of sovereignty

    No it doesn't. Absolutely nobody but niche political elements support it. Do you follow UK politics at all?

    And all signs still point to a BP failing quite badly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I do follow it somewhat and analysed why GB threw NI (Unionism) under a bus so callously and easily when it came to their own selfish interests.
    Partition had come back to bite them and restricted their sovereignty. That was not lost on them. Unionists have to hope that GB will not seek further divergence from the EU you would think but like moths to a flame they are pushing for it, one strategic blunder after another.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    No point in discussing any further, you have clearly explained your opinion, flawed as it is in not understanding the principles behind judicial reviews.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    There is the wider geopolitics to consider as well - the threat from Russia. That alters the internal UK view of what should happen to Northern Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You claimed the McCord Case legal principles will have no effect in any Judicial Review and you are posturing as some kind of expert.
    Whatever.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 6,004 Mod ✭✭✭✭irish_goat


    I think you are underestimating what a change in government could mean if the next lot decide they want to privatize the NHS some more and start introducing prescription and water charges.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,951 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    And at no point whatsoever during the whole sordid mess of Brexit did the idea of offloading NI even come close to being mentioned. If anything the exact opposite.

    Labour are not looking for divergence from the EU but the opposite, the Tories won't rock the boat as they showed when in power and Reform would sooner just breach the GFA than give NI any say in the matter.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,951 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The UK (like every other country in Europe) already has water charges and the NHS NI is already by many metrics worse than the HSE.

    I mean if the argument is that the UK could become so much worse that the appeal for a UI grows I don't, on the surface, disagree. But they have been doing their best for the last 10 years to advance that cause and it hasn't helped that much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Well, not like me to give GB much credit for handling Ireland and NI but that was wise.

    Imagine the complications they'd have caused had they officially suggested that.

    Whtever makes you think that Lab and the Tories will maintain power, I'm not sure, only that it is guesswork.
    And anyone predicting what Reform might do or what they might cause is also guessing.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    So the whole idea of there being a border poll is just wild guesswork then?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 6,004 Mod ✭✭✭✭irish_goat


    NI doesn't have water charges yet, but they are on the way. NHS NI is definitely worse than the HSE, but whilst it remains "free" it will be hard to convince anyone that there is a better alternative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Of course it is guesswork. Just as ruling one out is.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,951 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Huh, I didn't realise that. How bizarre.

    I agree, but I also am far from convinced it is going to be a game changer. But if the argument is that successive UK governments might slowly drive NI away I am ok with that, but it will still take decades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    There won't be a 'single game changer'. It will for be an on-balance or future prospects decision, for the 'game changing' undecided's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,071 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Just for sh*ts and giggles, here are SF's "proposals" on a UI, if you notice that every proposal is a proposal for a proposal, you're not incorrect, there doesn't seem to be a single policy in place other than a plan for a policy.

    No wonder the SF members are afraid to open their mouths here. Please link if they have something firmer rather than have the level of the debate pathetically being "google it".

    Plan for a green plan, it does involve establishing another ministry however, remembering the previous howling on the same subject:

    A-United-Ireland-A-Plan-For-Reunification.pdf

    From 2025 (standard of the PDF is quite poor, content is middling but again no policy or details):

    GreenPaperOnIrishUnity

    No news since January and less than a years' worth so far, obviously not a priority (or the intern left after 11 months)

    Uniting Ireland News - Sinn Féin

    Again, they've tried nothing and are all out of ideas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You seem to think inveterate anti-UIers and active partitionists are owed a debate. You aren't.
    You are not the target audience of the stuff you posted. Why would anyone waste time and effort with the closed mind you display? Would be a bit like asking Jamie Bryson to engage positively.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,071 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    Engage positively so (beyond warm feelings), I'm pro-UI, but I don't see it happening with parties like the DUP and SF involved in the process, one will stifle everything and the other is too afraid to put forward realistic proposals in case it threatens their hardcore element that they'll never be able to drive it.

    The alluded to documents that is now made real above and not asking for Google use have nothing of substance to them that would advance the case for a UI and more importantly, if they were serious, barring a ministers position, there is nothing stopping them beginning the processes while in power in NI and out of power in ROI if that non plan is truly their plan.

    Blaming the current government while having no plan or policy (or that plan or policy) to discuss is truly pathetic.

    I will also add that, while not surprised, that I am kind of shocked at how little substance there actually was and can understand the reticence to discuss the policies and hide by telling people to use Google, it truly is that vapid. I was kind of hoping for a gotcha with some details, but alas.

    This is a discussion site, it's for debate, if that is not happening, what is the purpose other than deflections in bad faith. Accusing others of having a closed mind is hilarious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,858 ✭✭✭standardg60


    The Green Paper one is from 2005, but one could be forgiven for thinking it's from last year, as it's the exact same thing as they (and Francie) say today. 20 years and not a single idea or suggestion, plenty of tricolours mind so that seems to be off the table anyway.

    'The creation of a united Ireland is the primary political objective of Sinn Féin.
    We are working to make this a reality in our time. There is an onus on all those
    who advocate national reunification, especially the Irish Government, to plan
    and take steps to achieve it.'

    'Sinn Féin is setting out our roadmap to Irish unity and we believe
    that others should do the same.'

    Who knew that SF had charged themselves with planning and taking steps to achieve a UI 20 years ago? Still setting out that roadmap i guess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    'Nothing to stop them' only the belief expressed by MLMD that UI policy proposals cannot be made until all stakeholders are together in the proper forum convened by an Irish government.



    You either think it's a consultative process or you don't.
    You prove magnificently what happens Astro when even ideas are vaguely outlined. Tramp them down as the devil's work, don't allow them air. It's futile as belligerent Unionism found out, things will move on regardless.

    As a (genuine) 'pro-UIer I am delighted to see ideas and outlines from different people at the Shared Island Unit, Ireland's Future and the All Party Committee etc The SDLP are also talking about it (Matthew O'Toole today) and it's possibilities and are not spelling out UI policy either., just what they'd like to see as policy themselves and they are prepared to take part in forums to discuss and debate.

    Nobody can set policy in stone at this consultative phase.
    Unfair to say that is all the work they have done too. Just one link giving their policy position which is missing from your list, there are more:

    Sinn Féin Policy Documents - Sinn Féin



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,858 ✭✭✭standardg60


    And there we have it in black and white. You think a UI should be based on nothing more than a sectarian headcount, everyone else can fcuk off. Remind me of why you consider NI to be a failed state again? Surely it wasn't because it was based on a sectarian headcount which told anyone else to fcuk off?

    Engage positively? Pot and kettle sir!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I didn't tell anyone to 'fcuk off'.

    I responded to someone who was intent on telling those who want a UI to 'fcuk off'.

    Nobody is going to waste time trying to convince inveterate anti UIers, no matter what they claim they are.

    I have made my point and illustrated it with links for someone who seems to have missed them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,858 ✭✭✭standardg60


    All is forgiven, there is a plan, though it would seem that SF are far more open to debate with 'belligerents' than you are.

    Some more than conciliatory proposals being suggested here, most importantly that they be resolved PRIOR to reunification. Have to say I agree with it, why isn't it front and centre of SF policy?

    @downcow it's worth a read.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    'debate' with 'belligerents' is a contradiction in terms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,858 ✭✭✭standardg60


    'The agreement of a significant section of
    people who are now described as unionists is
    required for the building of a united Ireland.'

    Matt Carthy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Yes, no problem engaging with moderate Unionism. Belligerents of any flag/ideology, nope.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,858 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Pre-eminent dismissal of engagement with the likes of Jamie Bryson is not my idea of a 'united' Ireland. Anyone who thinks it is, is as responsible for the perpetitude of 'partition' as they are imo.

    You constantly accuse others of being partitionist based on a now imaginary border, yet partition people who live on this island simply because they don't agree with you.

    Which is the more rational view?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,062 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I dont accuse. If you constantly dismiss discussion points in a UI conversation, constantly dismiss calls for a Plan to be made or try to spin tge constitution then for that moment in time you are partitionist i.e. you want partition to persist

    You can become somone who is no longer partitionist, just as you can reject republicanism nationalism, Unionism ir loyalism.
    No point telling me you are proUI if you are constantly espousing partitionism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,858 ✭✭✭standardg60


    Ah you do.

    Anyway the author of the SF plan is a genius, pretty much covers everything, no idea why it seems to have been 'disappeared'.

    This could involve:
    ▶ Weighted parliamentary majorities in
    relation to legislation on fundamental
    issues, where such fundamental issues
    are identified and agreed in advance
    of reunification;
    ▶ A guaranteed minimum number
    of parliamentary seats for unionist
    representatives in the upper house of
    a united Ireland;
    ▶ Other arrangements.

    This could involve:
    ▶ A new constitution for a new, united
    Ireland;
    ▶ A Bill of Rights for all citizens and an
    all-Ireland charter of fundamental
    rights;
    ▶ New symbols and emblems to reflect
    an inclusive, agreed Ireland;
    ▶ People who hold British citizenship
    continuing to hold such citizenship
    and having the right to pass this on
    to their children without prejudice to
    Irish citizenship;
    Irish reunification will mean new and better
    relationships within Ireland, between Ireland and
    Britain, and between Ireland, mainland Europe and the
    rest of the world.
    A new and unified Ireland will be pluralist, inclusive
    and accommodating to all our people in all their
    diversity.
    The Orange tradition is an Irish tradition and
    the British identity of many people in the North
    must be accommodated in an agreed, united
    Ireland.
    ▶ Irish language and culture being
    supported and encouraged by the
    state and made more accessible to all
    citizens, likewise with Ulster Scots;
    ▶ Constitutional recognition of
    the unique identity of Northern
    unionists and the British cultural
    identity of a significant number of
    people in the North of Ireland;
    ▶ Expression being given to the
    relationship between unionists and
    the British monarchy;
    ▶ A constitutional guarantee of a
    pluralist education system that
    reflects the two main traditions on the
    island and those other cultures and
    ethnicities which have come to our
    shores in recent years;
    ▶ Recognition of the place of the loyal
    institutions (including the Orange
    Order) in the cultural life of the nation;
    ▶ Changes to the Irish Constitution to
    remove the overt influence of any one
    church or faith

    This could mean:
    ▶ Continued devolution to Stormont
    and a power-sharing Executive in the
    North within an all-Ireland structure;
    “It is the firm will of the Irish nation, in harmony and
    friendship, to unite all the people who share the territory
    of the island of Ireland, in all the diversity of their
    identities and traditions, recognising that a united Ireland
    shall be brought about only by peaceful means with
    the consent of a majority of the people, democratically
    expressed, in both jurisdictions in the island.”– From Article 3 of the Irish Constitution, as
    amended in 1998 and endorsed by 94% of
    voters in the South of Ireland
    influence – as opposed to being a tiny minority largely
    ignored within the British parliamentary system.
    All of this creates an opportunity for a more
    open, imaginative and accommodating approach to
    reunification.
    New accommodations and political arrangements
    could serve to transcend old communal, cultural and
    sectarian divisions.
    All of us who wish to see a united Ireland need to be
    open to considering transitional arrangements.
    ▶ A federal or confederal arrangement;
    ▶ A unitary state;
    ▶ Other arrangements

    Any opinion about any of this?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,071 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    At least it wasn't asking others to Google it again.

    You can't really call yourself pro UI if you can't enunciate why and how, you've had that chance and fairweathered it.

    Nobody has "tramped it down" because nothing has been presented, fear of discussion of policy positions shows no faith in the policies, to consult will mean to give opinions and plans, again, 0 stopping that consultation being setup other than fear of having to take an unpopular position and defend it. Within SF there will be internal disagreements, they'll have to allow that to occur without penalty.



Advertisement
Advertisement