Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Leinster Team Talk Thread (Love you Furlong time)

1149915001502150415051529

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,018 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Lowe is clearly still first choice, 1 year out from a World Cup. Also think it’s pretty poor form not to accommodate him when he is still first choice winger from IRFU.

    Whatever about anything else, we certainly can't say that definitively.

    Ultimately, he was dropped for the first round of the 6 Nations. Came back in, did really well and got injured early in the England game, after 18 minutes with the score 3-0 to Ireland. But since then we saw how well we played with the pace of both Baloucoune and TOB on the wing.

    Add in that Hansen being injured too and it's not at all clear that Lowe is "clearly still first choice".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,549 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    Where was it rumoured to be a one year deal? I was under the impression it was more of a financial issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,855 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    42.ie said: "It's believed that Lowe is extremely disappointed about the process that has lead to his departure, as well as the offer that was put in front of him for a one year extension"

    No doubt he was unhappy with the financial terms but reading between the lines I think he wanted a longer deal too. Could be way off with that though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,327 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Lowe has been visibly in decline ever since the World Cup and is starting to pick up more injuries. Not surprising. He’s a 34 year old winger. It happens. This is not the loss it’s being made out to be. He’s a had a brilliant run. He’ll go down as one of our best ever wingers. He doesn’t owe Ireland a thing, but equally Ireland doesn’t owe him a thing. It’s just time to move on. We’re usually overly sentimental and way too slow to move guys on when the time comes so hopefully this is the beginning of us becoming better in that regard.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,444 ✭✭✭Jizique


    Why should he finish up on his own terms?????

    This is the real world, maybe he wanted a 3 year guarantee which is ridiculous. Nobody gets to define the terms of their departure (bar Jonny Sexton) but he had his day and can now take a big money contract elsewhere while dumping on the province and country that made him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,599 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you


    Sure Farrell will be the same next year when as his own contract expires and renewal discussions kick off.

    I think the coming years will be interesting to see how things develop. Irish players will be looking for far more money and the IRFU won't be able to compete. They can offer better conditions under their player management systems etc but players need to offset that against financial benefits. I made a decision in my own career to take a lower pay cheque for better work-life balance because I have my own priorities.

    I reckon players will be upping sticks and heading overseas more frequently. But it's hard to know what that looks like from an international perspective.

    We are now well and truly in a money-talks era.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    I expect Cullen to depart at the end of next season. It gives Leinster the chance to sound out potential successors who might be available post World Cup.

    10 years is a long time and I think at this stage his messaging to the players just doesn't have the affect it once did. In fairness to Cullen, he made the bold move bringing Nienaber in. The latter's CV is impeccable and the trophies won show what a serious coach he is. But it just hasn't worked out. That qualified failure is on Cullen as DoR.

    I do hope his more strident haters recognise the work he has done in bringing through a whole generation of Irish test players though. Matt O'Connor made such a mess of things that the entire link between academy and first team was frayed. Cullen re-established that pathway and we've borne the fruit of that as a test team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    If we're talking potential Leo successors, I would be over the moon if we snagged Contepomi. Fulfills the romantic/sentimental needs of a fan base, having a former player and coach taken over. Also meets the technical and tactical excellence requirement in that his Argentina side plays great rugby.

    It would definitely mean the end of Cullen however. I can't see any coach of the pedigree of Contepomi or Robertson agreeing to coach under somebody else. I think we got lucky that Lancaster was so burned out by his England experience that he was happy with the arrangement. Same with Nienaber. Think he was happy just to coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,058 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    if he was to be moved to Centre as suggested was a good idea by some to reflect his slowing pace on the wing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,599 ✭✭✭mr_edge_to_you


    Various articles saying it.

    A: I want 2 years @ €x per year.

    B: We are offering 1 year @ €(80% or 120% of x).

    So it's always financial.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I'd worry that if we wait until post WC to look for a new coach, we'll be competing with a load of teams, club and international, for the top talent. Contepomi has only been the Puma's head coach since 2024, seems unlikely he wouldn't stay around through another WC cycle.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,549 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    He’s never been particularly pacy even when he arrived at Leinster. His skills have always been more related to strength in contact and in his finishing, breaking tackles and getting offloads off. A skill set that could be utilised closer in if you have other options out wide. We’re quite skinny at 12 with Frawley off and Henshaw looking finished. Osborne is the obvious 1st choice but hasn’t been fully backed there and used quite often at 15. Tector is an option but beyond that we’re light considering it’s a quite attritional position.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,906 ✭✭✭Dave_The_Sheep


    Its not impeccable anymore.

    On the record for being against his (and Snymans) signing from the start.

    ... if only vindication didn't come with the obvious downside.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,549 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    If the money isn’t there to renew someone like Lowe, is the money there to pay off the coaching team early and hire a whole new set?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    That doesn't make Nienaber's appointment wrong at the time though. A shake up was needed as things had gotten stale under Lancaster despite what his hagiographers want us to believe. We blew multiple league and Champions Cup run ins and I'm glad he left when he did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,072 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    It sounds harsh, but I tend to agree. He'll always be a great player, but if money is tightening, then it's just fair enough. I hope it was done with handshakes and smiles, but I suspect it was probably a bit more acrimonious than I'd like it to be.

    Leinster can't afford to spend big money on a player who will probable play more for Ireland than leinster and will be a 34 year old winger.

    People want investment in players for the future and this is it. Investment means playing a younger player with potential but isn't as good as the older player they're replacing yet. If they were already as good or better, then it wouldn't be an investment, it would be playing your strongest team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭PMC83


    Oh calm down. I'm saying for him, its a shame he couldn't finish on his own terms as he clearly would have liked to stay. No one anywhere has claimed he was looking for a three year deal and he hasn't dumped on anyone. Nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,002 ✭✭✭RichieRich_89


    Yeah, I'd like to see all of Osborne, Tector, Cooney, Ciaran Mangan, and Jack Deegan step up a rung and get correspondingly more gametime. Maybe Connor Fahy too, but I'm not as familiar with him.

    It wouldn't be a surprise if they brought in yet another centre though. There was this in a 42.ie article a day or two ago:

    Two of Leinster’s current NIQs, Rieko Ioane and Rabah Slimani, are leaving at the end of this season, meaning that RG Snyman will be their only NIQ player for 2026/27 as things stand.

    However, Cullen hinted that this could change. 

    “Ongoing conversations is the way to put it,” he said. “Ongoing conversations, yeah.

    “We always love to add, but listen, everyone needs to understand that there’s another mandate here, isn’t there? As in, me as a Leinster coach who’s employed with the IRFU.

    “So make sure everyone understands that there are other factors at play there. It needs to fit with what the union needs to happen, so that’s always a challenge.

    “We’ll try to keep adding as best we possibly can, but it’s not like there’s a quick fix out there.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,226 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    I would have preferred Lancaster , over Nienaber , we have not improved under Nienaber, gone sideways, and the rugby is not a good watch, certainly in comparison to the glory days.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    I wouldn't. We were losers in the final Lancaster years and failed to convert dominant regular seasons into any trophies. Glory days they weren't. We at least won something again under Nienaber.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,087 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    And Lancaster left us to go to Racing where he was a disaster.

    This posthumous glorification of his reign is absolutely bizarre. We played some lovely rugby but we were no more successful than under Nienaber.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,072 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    There are reports that Shaun Edwards is leaving France with immediate effect. He's a defence coach looking for a job...

    Reports are from the less reputable sources at the moment. The ruck, Wales online.

    Doubt leinster is planning to fire Neinaber though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,256 ✭✭✭eire4


    In total agreement with you there. Leinster have not got better results wise and IMHO the entertainment value/quality of the rugby on view is significantly poorer under Nienaber as opposed to Lancaster's time with Leinster. Connacht IMHO really made out when they got Lancaster last year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    The France defence conceded 50 points to Scotland and 46 to England in successive Six Nations matches. There's a reason they're letting him go.

    If you don't want Nienaber at Leinster due an incompatible meshing of styles, you shouldn't want Edwards who may be an even bigger issue. His defence is failing.

    Post edited by Clegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,226 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    The glory days, were the O'Driscoll era, when the rugby was a way better watch than Nienaber ball, and we won some of the big games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,256 ✭✭✭eire4


    Lesinter did win one Champions Cup and 4 league titles when Lancaster was with Leinster and the rugby on view was IMHO much more enjoyable to watch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Agreed. There's a cohort of people who equate pretty patterns of play with good rugby. We threw all the shapes and patterns we wanted against Saracens and La Rochelle and kept losing. I've no love for Lancaster and his refusal to adapt to the opposition.

    Post edited by Clegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,256 ✭✭✭eire4


    The glory days were the years around those first 3 Champions Cup victories. But Leinster did win at least 1 Champions Cup and 4 league titles during Lancaster's time with Leinster and played some really attractive rugby while doing so. Lancaster's trophy count for his 7 years at Leinster at 5 in 7 years including a Champions Cup in there is very solid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,376 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    That completely ignores the balls up made of successive Champions Cup finals versus La Rochelle, including blowing a 17-3 lead in a home final. That's not mentioning the mess against Munster in the league semi final at home.

    Lancaster has tremendous PR for a guy that frequently failed with a stronger squad than we have at present. I'm very grateful to him for helping usher through a great generation of Leinster players. But he was the de facto man in charge for some of our worst defeats.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,256 ✭✭✭eire4


    I did not ignore anything. All I have pointed out in the series of above posts is that under Lancaster Lesinter had some success and the rugby was very attractive to watch. I never claimed Lancaster's time were the glory years. I clearly stated those were the years around Leinster's first 3 Champions Cup victories. I am simply making the point that IMHO Leinster had some success (5 trophies in 7 years is very solid) and the rugby was very enjoyable to watch. Whereas currently IMHO the entertainment value of the rugby under Nienaber is significantly worse and we will see how the rest of this season plays out in the URC but so far trophy wise he has not shown any indication that we will see any uptick in that regard.



Advertisement
Advertisement