Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Navan Rail Line

13031333536

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,361 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Or €750m per station. Clearly absurd and not going to happen. This 'plan' on paper is just a cheap distraction they can promise for the next 30 years with some consultations and changes thrown in to keep stretching it beyond any horizon.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    A few interesting bits of info from the Options Report. Capex of 1.4 to 1.6 Billion. The cost of serving Dunshauglin seems to be a reasonable 100m more. CBA of 0.85 (0.82 to 0.90).

    They are modelling a train every 15 minutes.

    The cost seems reasonable to me to open up 34km worth of land for future Transport Oriented Development. I believe the CBA is based on the existing towns, not potential new TOD towns and stations which could be built on the line in future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,640 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 758 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    Good to see some progress on the Navan Line. I am glad they have finally had some reason compared to the last report. Higher frequency, electrification, and an alignment that gets into Dunshaughlin.

    I am disappointed with the proposed station access though. As @cgcsb mentions it looks bad at first glance. Hopefully, as the design is refined for PC2 there will be some improvements. I wonder if the current proposal is just testing the waters to see how people feel about the stations in the first place. There is unfortunately many people who believe better active travel access means crime (the N3 bus priority scheme is a good recent example), so this may just be them trying to avoid problems from those groups.

    Also, something interesting I noticed reading through the options selection report, is that one of the reasons for the west Dunshaughlin station is that they believe it will much better support future densification of the town. Now it wasn't the only problem with the east alignment, there were some potential problems with water/flooding as well as a gas main. However, I thought it was an interesting argument for the west alignment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,836 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    The route looks to try and reuse large parts of the old railline, with the exception of the swing in closer to dunshaughlin. The old kilmessan station is a hotel, and there are a lot of houses built directly on the line and the line repurposed as access roads. Probably be bogged down for ages on issues with those…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,615 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    It is great to see this move a step further. As a country we need to be aspirational when it comes to public transport projects. We have the motorways built for the most part. They are done, we don't need to build them again. Everyone can see the benefits of having them.

    Now we need to realise that Dublin and the GDA is continuing to grow a pace. Ask anyone who uses the seriously over subscribed buses from Navan and Meath towns, how poor that service is. They are crying out for improvements. The M3 just becomes a slam into a wall of traffic as you cross the County bound into Dublin. It is anyone's guess how long it could take you (at various times of the day / week, not just AM peak).

    People look at the "cost" of these things. We are investing in capital assets. This is not a cost, but rather an economic driver, an investment and a state asset. These are exactly the projects we should be getting behind. There is huge scope for these towns to help balance the housing situation in this country.

    Having a rail line that will connect into other DART services to Maynooth and IC services to Mullingar, Longford and Sligo, DART into Blanchardstown, the luas green line to city centre, Finglas, Dundrum and Cherrywood, the Metro, bus connects at Glasnevin and right into the CBD of our capital city, will unlock huge potential for this corridor.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I think the Dunshaughlin station is actually perfectly placed. It is in the middle of fields with the M3 to the West and town to the East. It it a prefect location for a nice dense tall apartment buildings built around the station. It would be natural for the town to develop towards the M3 anyway.

    The town center is just 1km from the station (as the bird flies) and the entire town is within a 1.5km radius of the station. With proper planning of a TOD and roads to the station, it should work well.

    They also mention a high frequency local bus service linking Ratoath to Dunshaughlin and onto the rail station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    It may take the Maynooth/Adamstown link to make the Navan line feasible from a financial point of view, as the reduction in inter-city can increase the frequency of suburban.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 264 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    Yes, but this line has more development pontential than seagulls and fish on one side of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,299 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Absolutely. But when will we see that development?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,435 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Honestly, was incredibly surprised that they chose to move Dunshaughlin station, I am on the record multiple times here saying that they'd never move it and would stick as close as possible to the route in the last report, so I am pleasantly surprised.

    Wouldn't be surprised to see Strategic Development zones being announced along side the final route, both at Dunshaughlin and Kilmessan.

    The CBA on this would definitely improve if it was announced as a TOD corridor, with a whole new town at Kilmessan being planned.

    I don't realistically see this as something that'll happen in the next 20 years, but then again, I didn't see them changing the route either….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 758 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    I agree! I really hope that Dunshaughlin can densify, and especially if it can slow down the insane growth of more car centric towns likes Ashbourne. However, I am a bit concerned at the moment that pedestrian/cyclist accessibility to the station might be a bit bad.

    I am really hoping that when the more finalised designs are announced (likely for PC2) that they will be better designed for active travel access. Additionally, I am hoping that there would be a proper bus interchange designed for it with a Rotoath/Dunshaughlin bus service, something similar to Bray.

    I am a bit concerned this station is going to end up a bit like Skerries station, which while a great travel option for the town, isn't well integrated to the town or its bus services. I just want to see a Dunshaughlin station with good pedestrian/cyclist permeability and a good bus interchange.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Well Dunshaughlin population has already tripled in the last 25 years, though for a low starting point that is a remarkable growth. Of course Navan has seen big growth too.

    I suspect Meath County Council will be delighted with this and will very quickly develop SDZ’s around these stations. It would be a big money maker for them. They, land owners and developers will be very enthusiastic about this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,222 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    Kilmessan is also about 10km from Trim, which already has a 5000+ population.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,725 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I think people are getting carried away this SDZs and huge development. Firstly, the population and economy aren't going to keep growing indefinitely. The rail line would be the tip of the iceberg in terms of the infrastructure needed, there would be billions to be invested to add thousands of people to a town like Kilmessan. That would have to be factored in to any Business Case which includes the extra population and would most likely destroy the case.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I think you maybe underestimating the scale of predicted population growth! They are predicting the GDA to grow by as many as an extra 550,000 people over the next 20 years.

    All the areas along new DART+ stations (and Metrolink) are going to end up seeing massive population growth. Those 550,000 extra people need to go somewhere.

    Dunshaughlin‘s population tripled in the last 25 years, I wouldn’t be surprised if it hits 20k in the next 20. Navan’s population is expected to double from 33k to 60k by 2050.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,833 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    People are thick. They learned absolutely nothing from the likes of Blanchardstown and are pretending you can build rail lines after all the houses go up and there is no room left and the place is full of NIMBYs.

    To begrudge a town of 33k close to the capital a train station is shocking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 339 ✭✭OisinCooke


    ”Begrudge” Navan with a high frequency, high capacity rail service straight to Dublin City Centre with some of the best public transport connections available in the country on the way???

    Are you just never happy…??

    You are also just making up numbers with no research, to suit your narrative. You just pulled a figure out of the air and decided that’s how much the project will cost!


    Lads it’s negativity like this that’s almost as bad as all the NIMBYs that object to these things - have a little bit of faith and maybe be grateful that we are finally seeing a series of rolling projects coming on stream all of which will increase the amount of cars that we take off the roads.

    This really might be the golden age of rail resurgence - be happy and have a bit of faith!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,568 ✭✭✭alias no.9


    Good to see some momentum behind this and great to see a proper Dunshaughlin station. I get the potential of a station between Dunshaughlin and Rathoath and a route east of the M3 but that may leave access to Navan more difficult, looping around onto the viaduct.

    Slightly off topic but it's been mentioned already as an enabler for this, creating a path for Sligo trains into Heuston, Adamstown to Maynooth seems a strange link, I don't think there's a viable route east of Celbridge so linking in just west of Hazelhatch where the current 4 tracking terminated would seem the obvious choice.

    Anyway, these things are all crayon routes until there are bulldozers on the ground.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 339 ✭✭OisinCooke


    I had a look through the indicative plans and the interactive GIS map (a nice touch) and I’m not sure I can fully see where people are coming from with regard to the stations having no throughput… Dunshaughlin certainly looks like there’ll be entrances on both sides like CACR, with the P&R to the M3 side and the village to the other…

    Are we also 100% certain that the line will be doubled the whole way? I mean surely right…? The route boundary gets a good bit narrower after it crosses the Navan Link Road and rejoins the original alignment (see first image), and even narrower again when it joins the Drogheda Line and heads north along the old Kingscourt Line (see second image).

    IMG_0438.jpeg

    IMG_0439.jpeg

    Is this maybe just because there is less work needed due to the alignments being existing/preexisting? I’d like to hope they aren’t considering building nearly all of it double track only to single the final home stretch…

    Post edited by OisinCooke on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,299 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    There is no town in this thread with that population close to Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,177 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Agreed. Not to mention they should be looking to increase the populations of dunshaughlin and Navan. This is important infrastructure for future population growth. Hopefully someday they'll extend to kells.

    I'm on the verge of a site ban. Please don't rage bait me, I'm easily triggered especially late at night!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,640 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    They are already building lots of new housing on this line, with access to both Dunboyne and M3 Parkway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 117 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    I'd presume the railway up to Navan Central will be double-tracked but considering the listed bridge over the Blackwater is only wide enough for one track that part probably won't be double-tracked.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,299 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3




  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Dunshaughlin’s population has tripled and Navan almost doubled in the past 25 years!

    But @Citizen Six actually brings up a great point, currently M3 Parkway has a train only twice an hour peak time and on a Sunday it drops to once an hour with the first train not until 9:40.

    With the Navan extension it will increase to a train every 15 minutes. That will make Dunboyne and Hansfield even more attractive places to live and drive population growth. Dunboyne on its own likely wouldn’t justify a 15 minute service, but add in Navan etc. and Navan likely to grow to 60k population and suddenly it makes higher frequency justifiable and the entire line more attractive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,725 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Population growth is a prediction based on assumed conditions, it is not a guarantee of what will happen. There's a good chance that the next 100 years do not follow the previous 100 years (for many reasons which would be OT) so past performance is probably of limited relevance to future performance. Some of the assumptions which current predictions are based on are changing before our eyes.

    But I wasn't saying don't build a rail line to Navan (which seems to be the standard assumption from posters here when anybody doesn't immediately concur with their fantasies of future developments). My point was that people can't claim population growth will automatically cover the cost of a certain piece of infrastructure (in this case the rail line) without also considering the cost of all the other infrastructure which that same population growth will also require.

    A village like Kilmessan won't and shouldn't become a new Cherrywood just because of a rail line. Dunshaughlin and Navan were established reasonably sized towns and had a certain level of infrastructure which was obviously expanded to facilitate their growth. Kilmessan is starting from a much lower base and would need enormous investment (over and above this rail line) to facilitate similar levels of growth to that experienced by Dunshaughlin and Navan. I know it'll burst a few people's bubbles here but throwing up lots of apartment blocks in Kilmessan wouldn't be sustainable development.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76,149 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    I was always convinced the line was double track the entire way, but it wasn't, so there will likely be a good bit of widening of the alignment needed

    Looking at Geohive, it was double track to Drumree only.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Of course, it is a prediction, non of us can guarantee the future, hell we could all be wiped out by a meteorite tomorrow.

    However I will point out that if anything all our previous predictions and modelling have significantly under estimated the real growth levels! Every piece of infrastructure we build in Dublin has ended up rammed on day one and predictions turned out to be on the too low side. Luas, M50, Dart, etc. all rammed.

    This railway line once built, will likely still be there and in use 150 years from now. So let’s say the population doesn’t increase by 550k over the next 20 years, it “only” grows by 300k instead, maybe it takes 30 years to reach 550k instead, so what, that is still a massive numbers of new homes either way.

    It isn’t like it will be any cheaper to build 20 years from now!

    I would agree with you that I wouldn’t start with Kilmessan as the first place to build out. Navan is the obvious starting point, followed by Dunshaughlin and of course the continued development of Hansfield and Dunboyne.

    However I would hope that Meath County Council start putting a long term plan in place now for Kilmessan, properly zone land next to the station so farmers don’t start building low density houses next to it. Start planning for that infrastructure that will be needed in future.

    This line is a golden opportunity for the future growth of the city.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,833 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Ireland in 2026.

    "Wahwahwah rural Ireland is DEAD. The goberment have abandoned us".

    Infrastructure announced to make rural areas sustainable.

    "Wahwahwah rural Ireland is too small for Infrastructure development"



Advertisement
Advertisement