Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Cross-border review of rail network officially launched

16162636567

Comments

  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,435 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Yes, plenty of ways I can think of to shave costs on a tunnel….. all of which are just fundamentally incompatible with shoving intercity trains down it.

    The only way that I can square the circle in my head is with two tunnels of four tracks…. but there's so many questions even on something like that. Every time I try to work my head around a cost benefit analysis of this CDCT, I am just stumped as to how this is even getting any consideration.

    At this point, I'm starting to become convinced that it's a political choice, with people that don't know any better forcing IR to look into this.

    Firmly believe that when the CBA on it comes out, it'll get shitcanned.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭Bsharp


    agree with the sentiment it's a choice to keep the tunnel in discussion. The general population/politicians don't understand the operational challenges of mixing services in a tunnel, they do like the notion of an intercity train straight into the city centre or to the airport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,831 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I think Heuston being "way out of the cente" is very over exaggerated when it comes to inter city. It's not a complaint I ever here from people in Limerick. In terms of all the problems the network has this should be way down the list.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    That is basically what the NTA said about DU in the video I watched, they said they weren’t currently proceeding with DU because the number of extra passengers it would bring into the city was relatively tiny versus the massive cost of it, however they could see why operationally it may be needed eventually and thus were keeping it in the long term plans and reviews. Just that it wasn't a priority.

    Though I don’t see any evidence this is being pushed from the outside by politicians, I think politicians have zero interest in it. I suspect it is more likely that it is being pushed by some elements inside Irish Rail.

    IR has a history of trying to push ideas opposite to what government wants. Like famously how they denied for years how the PPT couldn’t be used until suddenly it could be or how they kept trying to push the idea of the Airport spur as a “cheap” alternative to Metrolink in an apparent attempt to kill ML, even though we all knew that was nonsense and that the government had already looked at it and dismissed it.

    I’m totally speculating here, but I wonder if there are different groups within IR with different ideas. Possibly an older group who can’t let go of the idea of some sort of cross city tunnel and another perhaps younger group who have been developing alternative ideas like Dart+ and the line connecting the two lines West of Dublin, which all delay the need for such a tunnel by decades. Again purely speculation on my part.

    Post edited by bk on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The PPT story isn’t that straightforward. Irish Rail never said it could not be used - they were, after all, running services through it occasionally. What they said was that it could not be used for high-frequency services using the then-current diesel trains, because there is inadequate ventilation. Most definitely, it could not be used as a replacement for DART Underground, as it lacks the capacity, and brings more trains into the Gordian Knot of Connolly.

    I hope there’s no dissent from the idea that Dublin needs an east-west underground railway in the city centre. There are three possible ways to deliver this: a second metro, tunnelling the city parts of Luas Red Line, or DART Underground. Of those three, DU is the middle option in terms of cost, but has the biggest payback, as it will create a continuous commuter line from Drogheda to Hazelhatch.

    I really don’t understand the idea of a non-DART connector, though. My own thoughts on inter-city services would be to fix Connolly by basically bypassing it for IC traffic: Route Belfast and further Northern IC services to terminate at Spencer Dock (the four platforms at the DART+ surface station), move Western line services to terminate in Heuston via the Maynooth-Hazelhatch IC link in this plan. This frees up Maynooth-Connolly-Loop Line-Bray for dedicated DART use. DART Underground does the same for Hazelhatch-Drogheda, and DU would also serve both Heuston and Spencer Dock, allowing connections between the two IC stations. If operational reasons required, it would still be possible to run IC trains through the tunnel, as all IC stock would be electric this far in the future, but there could never be a stop in the tunnel, because this would be prohibitively expensive to build to the required capacity.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I'll be honest, I'm doubtful we will see a cross city tunnel in our lifetime. I suspect they will find inventive ways to increase capacity without building the tunnel for the foreseeable future. But I'll never say never to it.

    As you say routing Sligo services to Heuston will free up capacity for more DART services.

    Could we keep Docklands station and perhaps even expand it, you would easily fit 4 if not 6 terminating platforms there, would help increase capacity.

    Then there is the option of following Copenhagens example of fully automated trains, could we have DARTs running over the Loop line Bridge every 2 minutes or even 90 seconds? Not that South of Dublin really needs that capacity, but just to help avoid the bottleneck at Connolly.

    Of course that is all just speculation on my part, first and foremost we just need to get DART+ done. That will add a massive amount of East - West Capacity. Once that is in place, we will have a better idea to see how it is going and what can be done to grow capacity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I do feel that when DART+ services begin, the need for both the tunnel and the West-Southwest line link will become apparent very quickly. People on Western services will of course complain about not ending their journeys in Connolly, but in terms of time spent, I suspect there won’t be much in the difference between travelling to Connolly versus Heuston+Luas, once DART frequency increases on the canal lines.

    Good idea to add platforms at Docklands and combine it with Spencer Dock into a single station: a walkway from the entrance of Docklands to the Spencer Dock ticket hall would be less than 300 metres long, which isn’t exactly “next door”, but it is only half the distance from Heuston West to the main Heuston station building. Of course, a platform-to-platform interchange would be a lot shorter as the northern ends of the Spencer Dock platforms overlap with the southern end of the Docklands ones.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Great idea! I just took a look at the Spencer Dock station plans, there is an secondary entrance at the back of the station onto Sheriff Street, it is just 150m between it and the entrance to Docklands Station!

    But even better the platforms of Spencer Dock station extend under the arches and right next to the area East of Docklands Station. If you were to renovate Docklands station, build a couple of extra platforms there, with a walkway above all those platforms, you could then continue the walkway so it would also cross over the back of the Spencer Dock platforms and it would make it quick and trivial to cross between the platforms of the two stations. Just go up the stairs from one platform walk across the walkway and down the stairs to another platform. It looks like it would be a maximum 160m walk between platforms of both stations!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,304 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    Well it is. Connolly is walkable from O'Connell, Heuston is not. Compare it to Galway, where the train arrives in Eyre Sq



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,831 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Im just speaking from the experiences of myself and anyone I know from Limerick, Cork and Ennis. Never heard any complaints about Heuston being too far from O'Connell St.

    It's a quick Luas or fully bus lanes trip down the quays. It's a non issue from what I can see when it comes to intercity.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Well I’ll admit that part of the reason I’m happy to take Citylink from Cork over the trains, is the fact that it drops me near OCS and thus negates the time difference with the train and is certainly more convenient.

    Having said that the N2 now negates some of that difference and sometimes we jump out of the Citylink coach at Heuston to get the N2. Just a pity it isn’t more frequent.

    So I’m not saying it is a big deal, more just the importance of getting the connectivity to it right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,831 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I assume if you are getting the N2 you are doing what would be an unusual trip which wouldn't be the basis for large infrastructure especially when you consider that as you say there is a coach that does that job already.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,304 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    But what if you were going Cork-Belfast via train arriving at dublin rush hour 8am? Citylink to Quays, then walk to Connolly train?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,299 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Who is doing Cork to Belfast or the reverse?


    If there was demand there, somebody would be running it as a bus route, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,004 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    not necessarily, no.

    i suspect it would be quite the journey on a bus hense even with demand, alternatives such as going via existing rail options or going up the day before may still win out.

    it's not a service of big deal really, if it was to be introduced great i certainly won't be against it, but if not so be it it's not the end of the world.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 339 ✭✭OisinCooke


    With regard to the CDCT, I know a lot of people are saying it’s ignorance and stupidity that are fuelling the ‘intercity’ idea, but I wonder (to give them the benefit of the doubt…) is it a clever ploy from IÉ to make the idea of the tunnel, FourNorth, and the airport link more attractive…?

    It can all be billed as one project which has the “potential” to connect the rest of the intercity network to the airport (a concept people seem to obsess over so much it seems) but then once built, only ends up being used for DART trains, which run at such a high frequency from the get-go that it becomes “impossible to fit intercity trains in.”

    There may also be the possibility that they are taking about building a four-track tunnel under Dublin, with fast lines with no stations, and slow lines with stations, which definitely seems like complete and utter overkill, would still be better that the option we’re thinking.

    I know it’s a stretch, but maybe is there a way that IÉ know well what a bad idea pathing intercity trains through a tunnel that’s running a high frequency DART service. I mean they are focussing so much on segregating intercity and DARTs at the moment with DART+ and FourNorth - and even in places where it’s arguably overkill, like adding four tracks all the way to Portarlington - that it would seem totally bipolar to suggest running intercity trains and DARTs through a two-track tunnel.

    Maybe, just maybe, Iarnród Éireann are finally realising how to get the public, government, and rural politicians sold on these national critical infrastructure projects that seem Dublin-centric…



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Get off the Citylink at Heuston (it stops there) and get the Luas across to Connolly, same as if you arrived in by train from Cork.

    Though you could also stay on the Citylink until Dublin Airport and grab a Dublin Express or Aircoach from there to Belfast. Interestingly Google Maps shows the coach options to be about the same speed as the train options. Some faster some slower depending on your departure time.

    Either way you are looking at about 5hours 40min or about that, I honestly don’t think this is a journey many people would be doing.

    BTW if you want to be in Belfast as early as possible, the coach is your only option, can be there by 9:20 if you leave Cork at 3:30 on the coach. No such train services. Also that trip has the fastest journey time of 5h 20min.

    For me, the fact that Aircoach doesn’t bother to run a direct Cork to Belfast service skipping Dublin, despite having depots at both ends and doesn’t bother to even sell through tickets, shows that there is ver little demand.

    Of course, more just giving it as an example of how connectivity can be improved to and from Heuston by other means.

    I see a lot of college students getting the N2 from Heuston on a Sunday evening too I assume student accommodation around DCU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,851 ✭✭✭p_haugh



    For me, the fact that Aircoach doesn’t bother to run a direct Cork to Belfast service skipping Dublin, despite having depots at both ends and doesn’t bother to even sell through tickets, shows that there is ver little demand.

    I actually had this thought earlier today, but in my case it would be getting the 700/702 from South Dublin and switching to the 705x in Dublin Airport. Its around the same time for me compared to the typical dart/bus & train combo, but would technically be more convenient door to door. You would have to hope the bus timings line up for an easy interchange, however. Looking at pricing, it would be 30 euro with Aircoach in total, so same price as the 1st class on the enterprise pretty much.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Maybe, but once people see the cost of all that, I think it would very quickly die.

    I think some people who are “transport nerds” which of course includes myself, obsesses about it. However I see non of my family and friends down in Cork care one bit about intercity trains to Dublin Airport.

    Honestly most of them would rather see Cork Airport improved, or the M20 built, at a stretch they might be interested in CACR or Cork Luas.

    This would all be viewed as just more Dublin extravagance. Dublin Airport already getting an expensive Metro and now you want to spend 10 billion+ to bring Intercity trains to Dublin Airport, it would certainly raise eyebrows.

    If anything I think IR would be better off keeping their heads down, focus on getting DART+ done. Make that a big success, then gradually work towards it with “smaller” projects like FourNorth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    What I keep coming back to in all of this discussion is Spencer Dock. The sub-par plans for the new surface Dart station will be regretted for decades. In my opinion, the poor forward planning here (perhaps intentional, since the issues were well flagged in pre-planning reports) was the nail in the coffin for a rail tunnel.

    • No provisions for supporting a future tunnel. It has been made clear that mining a station later will not be possible, without provisions put in now. Adding one (at least directly under the proposed station) will require the station to be rebuilt.

    • The current plans include sufficient foundations to support a landmark OSD (over-station development), so I don't see a re-build ever happening. Also, once that station is open and acts as a new terminus station, it will be extremely challenging to consider closing it temporarily (3-5yrs..)

    • Only 4 platforms to be built at the new Spencer Dock station. This is extremely short sighted. The available space is wider than Heuston, which supports 8 platforms. Even in the absence of a tunnel, a larger station would be much better placed than Connolly to connect multiple services

    • Only a single track connection to the Northern line. Granted, this is an easier "fix", but clearly they have no intention of enabling Dart, Commuter or IC trains from the Northern line to terminate at Spencer Dock



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,611 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    If there was only one stop - Tara Street - to interchange with Metro, and inter-city services stopped there also, wouldn't that work, no fast or slow trains?



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The issue is people tend to take a lot longer to get on and off intercity trains then commuter type services. Think people carrying lots of luggage, lots of people not use to taking trains, etc.

    It would simply cause significant delays to the DART services trying to use the same platform. It wouldn’t be best practice to mix different type of services like this and I’m not sure it could even work!

    Yes I noticed the space marked for development over Spencer Dock! If that would happen, it would really put an end to the original DU plan, though perhaps an alternative way could be found.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 213 ✭✭VeryOwl


    Well said. It's been a while since I looked at the plans. Is there any potential to add further platforms down the line or is that a non-starter?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 264 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    Does anyone have a link to the Spencer Dock plans/illustrations? Thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 117 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    It’ll certainly look ridiculous if the tunnel has to be an extra 2.5 km long (assuming it surfaces at Clontarf) just because the planners couldn’t be arsed leaving provisions for it now.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 264 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    thanks, not only does it need twice the number of platforms, but there is ample room for it. Just stinks of low ambition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,517 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The SD station design doesn't prohibit a tunnel, but it does make it a station at that site much more expensive to build. Mining a new station was always possible, and remains so now and in future. The rejected option for SD station, with the void underneath, was one that would avoid having to mine such a station: instead a box was to be constructed three stories below ground, in which the station could be built at a later date. This was rejected on cost, and the inability to find any use except car parking (a complete no-go given the traffic plans for Docklands) for the intervening floors that had to be built. But it also created a problem.

    Building the box restricted the final route of the DU tunnel: it would have to be parallel to SD station, and it would have to be level for the length of it. The problem with this is that the SD surface station is quite close to the river, and so ensuring the station runs straight through the pre-built box underneath it would impose a curvature limit on the route of the DU tunnel, which must also pass close to Pearse Station. There’s a lesser issue of gradients: to cross under the Liffey, the tracks must be about 23 m below sea level. but they need to be 6 m above see level to cross the Tolka on the existing bridge. That's all doable in the available distance, but staying flat under the station means there's a steeper ascent northwards out of it than if you’d gradually risen under the surface station.

    Here’s where you could still put the SD deep station, without needing the pre-built station box, and it would sit well with @bk’s idea of building more platforms at Docklands, and mine of making SD and Docklands into a single station complex. Basically this would be a couple of platforms at a level below the Docklands/SD complex of platforms. This station could be at a much shallower depth, perhaps only one stairway below the surface (the planned one was three stairways below)

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 904 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    This wouldn't work as you're suggesting. The base of the approved Dart station foundations extend to -6m. A station box under that would need platforms at least another 6-8m deeper, possibly more. The Northern line at Ossary road is at +8m.

    So you'd need a tunnel to go from -12m to +8m in a short space. The only way to do this would result in severing freight access to the port and also severing the link from SD to Drumcondra.

    This has been done to death a number of times. I think it has been broadly accepted here that a workable solution isn't possible, without rebuilding the current proposed station.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 509 ✭✭✭Judge


    It’s worth bearing in mind that when DART Underground (DART-U) was first mooted, there were no plans to reopen the Phoenix Park Tunnel (PPT). The PPT is now a major part of the proposed DART+ network and I do wonder how that has affected the business case for DART-U. 

     As we know, DART+ will deliver three DART lines:

    • Drogheda – Bray/Wicklow (w. shuttle service to Howth from Howth Junction)
    • Maynooth – Connolly/Docklands
    • Hazelhatch – Docklands/Heuston

    Metrolink also added for illustrative purposes:

    DART+.png

    If one now adds the DART-U line into this, you get the two criss-crossing DART lines as originally planned (I’m assuming a southern extension of Metrolink to Sandyford will also be built during this time, along with a DART 1 branch from Clongriffin to the Airport):

    DART Underground.png
    • DART 1: Drogheda – Hazelhatch (via DART-U)
    • DART 2: Maynooth – Bray/Wicklow

    However, you are also left with a third line (DART 3) going through the PPT. This service is left somewhat stranded by the construction of DART-U. One possibility could be to alternate services between DART-U and PPT. But if you do that, you are not maximising the use of the (very expensive) DART-U tunnel. Possibly one way of “sweating the asset” might be to provide for Intercity or Regional services in the DART-U tunnel?

    Personally, I much prefer reconfiguring the lines so that DART-U and PPT create a high frequency Circle Line (with alternating Drogheda-Hazelhatch and Circle Line services using the DART-U tunnel), including an additional station at the mouth of the PPT for the Phoenix Park and the Zoo:

    DART Circle.png

    As an aside, I also suggest a second Metrolink line from Tallaght to Howth Junction (and possibly onwards to Howth using the DART line, thus eliminating the Howth Shuttle and restoring a direct Howth – City Centre link) along with extending Metrolink 1 from Swords to Rush:

    DART - Metrolink.png

    If money was no object, you could have a quad-tracked DART-U line, with one line for DART and one for Intercity and Regional Services:

    DART & Intercity_Regional.png

    This would open up the possibility of creating a faster Regional service for much of the Leinster commuter belt with access to the west, south and northern districts of the city centre for all services:

    Regional Express Network.png

    Just my 2c.



Advertisement
Advertisement