Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Irish rail fleet and infrastructure plans

15860626364

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭orb123


    Disappointing that they appear to have quietly dropped plans for frequency off Gorey train 20mins in peak periods and half hourly off peak that was mentioned in their 2027 strategy document.

    It would be quite easy for them to at a minimum provide an hourly shuttle from Gorey to Wicklow after the DART is extended there.. Wouldn't even need additional track infrastructure to achieve.

    Meanwhile they are proposing an hourly all-day service to/from Nenagh..? maybe Gorey commuter was just omitted by mistake?

    Even more confused when they mention 1 hour 50 mins average journey time from Dublin to Wexford/Rosslare.. They must mean Wicklow to Rosslare, but then they say -30% journey time..

    image.png image.png
    Post edited by orb123 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79 ✭✭spark23


    Just looking at google maps there and Bray station( third south facing platform already there, is this not the better interchange for the proposed shuttle service to Rosslare, ideally a 30 mins frequency possibly even a 20 min in peak as tunnel section can handle 3 trains per hour. I know people from greystones/wicklow will have to change( maybe some Darts off peak can continue futher south), but i believe providing a service all the way down the south coast is more important with the numbers commuting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,592 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Rail2050 is indeed ambitious it needs a lot of money. Like a lot, more than was spent on the motorway network even. But if it was built as proposed itd be a real game changer for Ireland.

    One quite funny parts:

    Dublin to FIVE Regional Cities all having 90 minutes journeys, THEY ALWAYS forget that Derry exists in the headline figures. But yet they propose building a brand new dedicated Newry to Derry line. Thatd be transformational, imagine even a 2.5 hour rail journey from Dublin to Derry.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,435 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Perhaps selfishly, but the most important thing that I see in their plan is the death of Dart Underground as we knew it, with Cross Dublin City Tunnel taking it's place.

    It was called this (or similar, I can't remember) in the Rail Report, and we had a discussion on it back then, with a few of us (myself included) kinda disbelieving that they planned to include intercity services in the tunnel. In this document, they say that the DU plan will be reviewed to include intercity services, so I guess that's the confirmed plan for now.

    While it sounds like a great thing, it's going to kill the overall passenger capacity of the tunnel. Intercity services, even electric ones, have a much, much longer dwell time.

    Perhaps they have some plan to do it that doesn't affect capacity too badly, maybe they're going to have four platforms at the station that's intercity, or even do two tunnels with two tracks in each, but either way, the simplicity of DU is definitely out the window….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 117 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    If they want to go down the automation route with the DART, allowing IC services into the tunnel will complicate things. It was my assumption automated services would use the tunnel (and 4North) for a conflict-free Hazelhatch–Clongriffin service, while Heuston would become the centre for IC, with freight using the PPT for port access.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,435 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    That is the sensible solution (and why most here were kinda disbelieving that part of the review)…. but it's clearly not what they're looking for these days.

    They're planning so much to segregate the IC from Dart that it makes no sense unless there's four tunnels. They're literally stopping services before Bray Head to avoid IC trains sharing long distances with Dart services, and yet they plan on running some IC services into a multi billion euro tunnel. As I said, makes no sense, at least to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,592 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    I dont think there's any real need for Inter City Services through the Tunnel especially considering that they also plan to redirect Sligo services to Heuston via a new track and stop Rosslare Services at Bray.

    The case for through intercity Services via the tunnel would probably evaporate entirely.

    Granted Belfast/Derry to Dublin Services are then isolated from the rest of intercity Services but that would be much better addressed by moving Belfast/Derry Services to Heuston by converting the Phoenix Park Tunnel from DART to Intercity and adding a new Tunnel from liffey junction to the airport. Allowing all DART lines to be separate from intercity and giving intercity a single hub location at Heuston for the most efficient interchange.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    A lot of good and interesting things in this.

    However unfortunately for me this confirms that DART Underground is dead and that this new intercity tunnel will never happen in any of our lifetimes. It is completely unrealistic and makes no sense.

    I’d also be dubious about the DART spur to the airport, extending Metrolink to meet the Northern line would be much easier, cheaper and have other developmental benefits.

    I don’t want to say that neither of these will never ever happen, but I certainly don’t believe they will happen in this time frame at all.

    There are two issues with this idea, firstly most passengers want to go to Dublin City, not the airport. This would basically be of no benefit for the majority of city bound passengers coming into Heuston and it would be much less attractive for people coming from Belfast to Dublin City as now they end up in Heuston instead of Connolly!

    Also while I haven’t done the exact measurements, I believe such a tunnel would be roughly twice as long as a cross city tunnel, thus much more expensive.

    I don’t think the cross city tunnel will happen in any of our lifetimes, however it would make more sense then this idea. It is more of a case of how DART fits into this tunnel if at all!

    I think the idea that we need to link Belfast services to Heuston services is overdone, not many people actually make this trip. Hell even Aircoach don’t bother selling Cork to Belfast tickets, despite serving both cities from Dublin. DART+ will connect Connolly to Heuston services anyway.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    install battery charging facilities at Wicklow to facilitate DART extension

    This bit is new and interesting! This doesn’t appear to be extending DART to Wicklow, that is already mentioned in the 2030 section before it, this seems to be a possible extension beyond Wicklow between 2030 and 2050.

    Are they thinking of possibly extending it to Rathdrum, etc. ?!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,592 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    Obviously the line would continue overland to Drogheda and Belfast trains would go Drogheda to Heuston and not touch the DART network, that'd take away the need to quad track the existing coastal northern line. Yeah not many people travelling end to end Cork to Belfast, but that's not the point, the point is efficient interchange of all intercity services, one change at Heuston gets you from anywhere to anywhere basically including to/from from Dublin Airport.

    That's a distinct advantage in inter regional connections, but of course there isnt the foresight for such things, its likely neither will happen. If IÉ are still talking about mixing IC and DART in Dublin City Centre and selling off land around the 2 main stations for housing while planning massive increases in services then they're not really educated on the railway game. They still havent thought about where these extra services are going to fit with existing platform capacity.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭orb123


    Or maybe just copy/paste error? They’re already proposing to install chargers at Wicklow for when the DART is extended there, so I’m not sure why additional charging infrastructure would be needed?

    If I'm not mistaken, after DART+ is done, Greystones to Wicklow will be the only part of the DART network which will be using BEMUs since the rest will be electrified?

    Given DART Coastal North will electrify to Drogheda, I assume the BEMUs could operate via overhead wires from Drogheda to Greystones, and switch to battery mode to extend DART services south of Wicklow without requiring more charging infrastructure.

    Just thinking out loud, but maybe in the long term, they could run 1 DART per hour to Arklow/Gorey? so interchanging wouldn't be needed?

    Especially if Rosslare-Waterford was to reopen (I know it's a big if) and Wexford Town trains go to Heuston, you could arguably keep everybody happy. Then again maybe they won't want such long sections of single track on DART services…



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I get the proposal, but I don’t see how passengers from Belfast benefit from getting dumped in Heuston instead of the much more central Connolly now.

    And of course passengers from Cork, etc. continue to get dumped at Heuston.

    I just checked the distance, best case scenario you would be looking at 9km of tunnels, 13km if you need to go under Swords! Either way a significantly longer tunnel then a city center tunnel, thus much more expensive, for less benefit. And it then misses all the quad tracking work they seem to be planning to do to Malahide under project FourNorth.

    While I think it is unlikely to happen any time soon, at least a city center tunnel would allow Cork/Galway/Belfast passengers get off at a big new Stephen’s Green station (with ML just there) or Spencer Dock, rather then the further out Heuston station. It would be a popular option, just insanely expensive and I don’t see how it fits with DART Underground.

    Yeah, that is what I was thinking, while they wouldn’t want to impact the main Dart service, perhaps just one Dart BEMU per hour continuing south would be okay and help reduce some of the complaints about turning the Rosslare line into a shuttle. It is an interesting idea.

    BTW on the Drogheda side you are correct, but it might be interesting to extend one DART BEMU per hour to run Drogheda to Navan.

    Of course in addition to the new M3 line. I was glad to see the Navan to Drogheda line still presented in the Rail2050 map. I think it could be a useful resource in the future and shouldn’t be left to rot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,584 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    The tender for chargers at Wicklow is already out.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,592 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    I dont think any new lines will be built unless we radically shake up our legal and planning system, the state is currently paralysed in self-imposed red tape in terms of what's doable for linear infrastructure. One thing we cannot ever do is dig up all over Stephens green for a massive new central station, which isnt long enough anyway to provide the platforms required plus merge lengths of track.

    I dont think Dumped at Heuston is a fair term especially a future Heuston that has, luas, bus, bike sharing and DART services or possibly even DART Underground. The central stations in most cities tend not to be extremely central, they are just where legacy lines converge and have enough space to develop a station. We're not going to get a more central site than Heuston for an integrated inter-city station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,923 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Has a Planning easement been put in place in Kildare to allow the possabile Spur from the Sligo line to Heuston?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 117 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    Dublin doesn’t need a German-style 'Central' station anyways. Cities like London and Paris have plenty of termini and work fine, provided there are links between them. If any station should be kept it’d be Connolly, as it’s the most central of them, and should be able to be expanded using the carriage sidings if needed.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,360 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Just to be clear I’m not calling Heuston a dump, it is actually a nice station, certainly no Busáras and nicer then Connolly. And I agree it isn’t a million miles from the city, at just 2.4km from O’Connell Bridge. That certainly wouldn’t be at unusual as a termini for any big city.

    But having said that, in general the city has moved East, Connolly/Spencer Dock/Tara are now very much at the heart of Dublin’s business district. I feel that the majority of passengers from Belfast would VASTLY prefer to go to Connolly station, then being directed over to Heuston. It really doesn’t make any sense given how the city has developed.

    As an aside, now that you speak of stations, another issue with your plan is that if you used the PPT, you wouldn’t actually be stopping in Heuston anymore! What station becomes your primary intercity station.

    There is Heuston West, but that will be a DART+ station, so not suitable for intercity trains. I suppose you would have to build a big new intercity station West of Heuston before the PPT. But now you have pushed intercity services even further from the city center and further from the Luas line and other bus services at the front of Heuston!

    The more I think on this idea, the less sense it makes.

    I agree that trying to build a big new intercity station under Stephen’s Green would be crazy and face massive public resistance. You would have to close and dig up pretty much the whole Green! I have thought of an alternative idea, but I’ll discuss it over on the infrastructure forum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,004 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    no as far as i know, unless anyone else has heard anything?

    it won't get built anyway so it's probably a mute point TBH.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,041 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Yesterdays 12:00 Heuston-Cork, did it fail in Sallins or was it just short of the platform?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 264 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    Can't see them justifying a Maynooth to Adamstown new line for Sligo trains with its relatively low passenger levels as well as Sligo not in the 2040 plan with its already stagnant population growth.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,004 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    yes i agree we can forget about that adamstown link ever being built and likely the others often mentioned here as well.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 758 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    Honestly, I suspect the CBA for it will be more about its benefit to the DART than it will be for its benefit to Sligo-Enfield users. Separating IC services from DART services is good for the long term reliability and maxamising of capacity on the Maynooth and M3/Navan lines. It also will help remove terminating western line services from Connolly which can cause quite a bit of congestion.

    The alternative to the link is going to just be terminating Sligo and Longford services at Kilcock, which to be fair is more or less what they are planning with Wexford services at Greystones or Wicklow. The difference here though is that the Maynooth Adamstown link is a lot more feasible and offers a much greater benefit to the regional IC services than anything that can be done for the Wexford services.

    Though, one thing I will note is that the Sligo line services actually do have respectable patronage. Kilcock to Longford is making up the majority of traffic on the line, and that is also with the 115 helping as far as Mullingar too. The DART to Kilcock will help relieve some of that pressure, however the link will also help allow for more and better outer commuter services that could just fly into Heuston rather than crawl behind DARTs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 outlyer


    I’m not sure if it will count for much, but the Adamstown to Maynooth link could have some of its own internal benefits. Any line you pick linking the two locations will pass close to the M4 interchange at the back of Castletown House. This will provide a good park and ride site and make useful terminus for a dart+ service. It will have to be balanced with serving Hazelhatch, but it would make a decent point on the N4 in relation to avoiding congestion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 339 ✭✭OisinCooke


    If you’re seeing the Maynooth - Adamstown link as just being for Sligo services, you’re thinking the same as those who see the Metrolink as just for the airport.

    Its benefits are far more about separating DART and IC services and allowing Maynooth - Connolly to potentially become an automated metro-style service.

    The benefits for Sligo IC services are really only a small reduction in journey time overall, along with easier transfers to other intercity services.

    I also disagree with the idea of a DART P+R station off of the N4, or any DART use of this line, unless the link was to be quad-tracked (even just up until the point of a P+R station) or if the service level was only low enough not to even about clashing with the IC services. That being said though even a grade crossing from slow-line to slow-line to get the DART out onto the link from Adamstown, would have shocking effects the capacity from Adamstown to Hazelhatch with trains crossing each other like in Howth Jnxt currently. As a result I am not mad about the idea of using this link for DART services…


    On the general topic of the link, in the present climate of the DART extension to Kilcock, what do we think this link might look like?

    Branching off before Kilcock means you lose the connection with the DART services, and the connection with Maynooth, and with a lower frequency of services likely serving Kilcock than Maynooth, pathing shouldn’t be an issue.

    If the link only branched off from after Maynooth however, it would involve sharing tracks with the high frequency DART for just under a kilometre, which totally defeats the purpose of the link in the first place, as IC and DART services are then mixing.

    The small section of track-sharing could of course be quad-tracked. Maynooth station has lots of space to be 4-tracked (involving an extension into the northern car park and over a small portion of the canal basin which is wide enough in this area to afford to lose a piece anyway.

    The difficulty is the 750m or so between the station and open land where the link can branch off. 62 back gardens would need to be purchased, or a significant portion of the canal would need to be realigned to quad-track to the junction. Now the project is at the very best, 10 years away from planning, so IÉ could quietly start purchasing some of those houses between now and then…

    Any other thoughts on this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,851 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Even if the link didn't see regular dart service, it would allow for better flexibility in Darts getting to and from Dart+ SW and the depot, without needing to go up to Glasnevin/further along that line and turn around before heading back to Kilcock. Hopefully they would build the link with the ability to access it from either Hazelhatch or Adamstown/Heuston direction to allow for easy transfers between lines. This would require the tracks to be electrified, but intercity services will more than likely be electrified and utilising dual voltage within the Dart network by the time the link would realistically be built anyways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 264 ✭✭ArcadiaJunction


    I know a lot of people who use the Sligo line and I think they would prefer changing at Maynooth - once the Dart the there - than going to Hueston. Fair enough regarding the new line removing IC/Commute conflicts but it still seems like a tall order even so. Personally I like the idea of a four track station at Kilcock or Maynooth. A while back there was a bit of hysteria over the Rosslare trains terminating at Greystones but this kind of thing is common in other countries and it creates greater freq all round. So I can see doing the same with Sligo trains at Maynooth or Kilcock.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,270 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    No proposal for new stations between Ceannt and Athenry?

    Even though the city is clogged with traffic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 373 ✭✭rounders


    Wouldn't know Galway that well but a quick look at a map, from Oranmore to Athenry, it's all fields. From Oranmore to Ceannt, it's not really built up around the line and one side is green fields so unless there is a lot of development in the next few years there doesn't looks like there would be demand for a station around there?

    Best heavy rail solution would probably be improve the access to the Oranmore station from the N67 so it can serve as a proper P&R to Galway

    Did you actually having somewhere in mind for a station or just felt like Galway was being missed? From my understanding Galway needs the ring road to take traffic out of the centre and then a tram line to move people around plus a good bus service once somewhere for the thru traffic is provided for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,004 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    no, forcing people who have a well used direct service to the capital to change outside the city just to get into the city is not common in other countries, this is just a bespoke plan for the rosslare line to get out of actually investing in the line on any part even though in reality, eventually it's going to be unavoidable.
    it also doesn't lead to greater frequencies alround because the reality is they can increase the frequency of the direct service but are choosing not to do so as it would be used and have admitted to this.
    also they are not going to increase the frequency by turfing people off at greystones to the poor quality unreliable and slow dart especially as the current infrastructure south of greystones means a reliable service can't be provided without extending it to dublin and running a bit less and not to mention the large scale empty running to support it.
    yes, it's likely they will turf people off at maynooth from sligo trains but again just like wexford it will be about trying to bring down usage south of the interchange and try and avoid investment.
    you claim that some people using the sligo train would prefer to change at maynooth then go to heuston, that may be so, but in reality where rail really has to sell itself and there are alternatives that now become as good or better then the rail service, then in reality you are not going to get a lot of usage of a service that turfs people off at an interchange to continue their way on an overcrowded suburban service when they can just drive.
    die hards and rail enthusiasts and people who will put up with slop are not enough to keep a rail service going.
    ultimately, it comes down to do it properly or don't bother, as in run these services direct or don't bother and spend multiples more on extra road infrastructure which is not going to go down well.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,087 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    So they could have the choice then, Stay on the train to Hueston, or change a Maynooth to a DART that takes them to Connolly or beyond.



Advertisement
Advertisement