Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

M11/N11 - M50 (J4) to Coyne's Cross (J14) [options published]

13839404143

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,584 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    if they're returning to a full upgrade, but post-2030 then that means no improvements probably for another 10 years.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,361 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Full upgrade is needed. Spending money on a bus lane is total waste of money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,363 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Bus lane with revised junctions, minor rd access closures and off line link roads would go a long way to reducing the strains on the smooth running of the road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,043 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Yes, but every one of those changes will be resisted more than a metro terminus in Ranelagh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,725 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    A "full upgrade" of the road would require all those things plus more upheaval and disruption so the objections to that are going to be even greater in terms of quantity and ferocity.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 463 ✭✭Ireland trains


    Any update on the Fassaroe P&R? Curious to see what’s planned for the bus service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,363 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Well if they keep building at the rate they are, and if the sea keeps taking the Murrough at the rate iit is, then its a matter of when, not if, a full upgrade is needed, no matter how much pain it causes during the duration of the project.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54 ✭✭orb123


    Not surprising to see the scheme watered down to accommodate the nimbys.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    The elements removed are:

    J6-J7 southbound service lane and closure of Herbert road junction. This dangerous hairpin on a steep incline will be retained.
    J8-J9 all side access treatments both sides.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 381 ✭✭Reuben1210


    What a joke.

    Ireland is so dysfunctional - ruled by the noisy minority.

    This in no way serves the societal greater good, and this process of agreeing an upgrade to this stretch of road has been going on decades now with no action.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,584 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    it seems the bus lane will now only go as far as J6. When the project was announced there was much discussion of how they would build buslanes through Glen of the Downs, now they're barely taking the lanes over the Wicklow border.

    This current govt is not particularly interested in funding public transport projects when there are roads waiting to built down the country.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Macy0161


    Personally I'd be blaming local politicians of all persuations for the clusterf*ck this has become. Every proposal has been compromised by Nimbyism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 463 ✭✭Ireland trains


    Watered down to no end and not a hope of completion this side of 2030, what an absolute joke.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,043 ✭✭✭✭josip


    No improvement in my lifetime so. I'll be more likely to see the Bray to Greystones line dual tracked first and Luas extended to Bray.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,363 ✭✭✭prunudo


    According to the Danny Alvey cllr. on the local Kilpedder Facebook page, there are plans in motion to close the n11 nb access to Kilpedder at the Kilpedder Inn to all traffic except buses and cyclists. Also in the plan is is to close the n11 access at Drummin completely and to remove the one way road from Glen of the Downs back up to Willow Grove. The proposals also include new cycle route from Kilpedder Inn to the Glen of the Downs, utilising the discontinued one way road, therefore making a safer route for cyclists and allowing them avoid the busy jn11 and Barry's bridge slips.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,584 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    They need to provide an offline cycle lane from J12 (Newtown) to Kilpedder as well, there's plenty of space and it would not be a big project. There is a back road but it's super hilly and very narrow.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,363 ✭✭✭prunudo


    A joint walking and cycle path would be a great addition.

    But really what is needed, is more offline link roads to remove local traffic from joining and leaving the n11 after one junction. Baby steps and all that though.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Those local link roads were originally part of this project but seem to have been descoped.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Macy0161


    Descoped after massive local opposition, taken up by politicians of all hues.

    Without enforcement, bus access will still mean junction surfing. Plenty of "no lefts" & "local access only" routinely ignored northbound.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,584 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    details of the proposed changes here:

    https://www.wicklow.ie/Living/Services/Online-Consultation-Hub/PART-8-NOTICE-OF-PROPOSED-DEVELOPMENT-N11-KILPEDDER-RAT-RUN-ROAD-SAFETY-IMPROVEMENT-SCHEME

    the "active travel" element is poorly thought out IMO - I use that road a lot to cycle up to Willow Grove from Delgany, now I'll have to use the N11 and go up to J11 which is longer and more dangerous. Why not have a 2-way cycle lane? It's likely people will use it as a 2-way route regardless of what the paint on the surface says.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,822 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Doesn't go far enough. The extremely tight junction offramp at J10 here needs expanding to widen the radius, and the left-in-left-out on the east side of the road here isn't needed as you can use J11.

    I don't know what happened when J11 was built in the last 15 years, but all these changes should have been made then. I assume they tried to and bandwagon-jumping local councillors kicked up a fuss.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13 lego base


    Agree this doesn't go far enough. For J10, it's inside the Glen of the Downs SAC, and I'm guessing any plan that expands/extends the surface of the road would trigger the need for an EIAR and all the beaurocracy that comes with it. J11 though, doesn't have this excuse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,363 ✭✭✭prunudo


    the main reason for the two junctions you mentions is to give access to Delgany particularly for the L1 bus. One of the last shelved plans proposed a fly over at Drummin to allow east West travel and a link rroad back to jn11 allowing the closure of jn10 and those tight slips you mention . This was shelved thanks in part to Simon Harris getting involved on behalf of local residents.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,584 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    IIRC there was no plan to close the misc accesses when J11 was built, that was only proposed later.

    J10 is a bit of a cobbled together afterthought as well, the tight exit northbound was added in the last 15 years but buses didn't start using it until BusConnects changed the routes - the old 184 used to go up to the Glenview junction to turn around and use the southbound exit.

    I'd guess WCC are doing this off their own bat as it's pretty cheap - a few signs and bollards, no real disruption to the N11.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 MCW2026


    I think Kilpedder thing in it's current format is extremely shortsighted, as solving any rat run issues on that side of the N11 is going compound issues, which are arguably more dangerous on the other side, particularly around that left in, left out J10.5ish junction.

    It's not ideal if you're coming straight out of there and planning to come off again immediately at J11 to get to Kilpedder, as can be hairy getting up to speed to join the traffic and then slowing down again to exit, particularly when traffic exiting the Glen is intending to turn at J11.

    Closing the one way option above Barry's bridge is now going to funnel all the traffic from Delgany heading to Kilpedder out that dodgy junction making it even more dangerous.

    There was an old proposal pre 2010, well before the flyover chat, of extending the R762 via Drummin Lane to meet the Southern access road. They should take another look at that to fix these issues once and for all rather than playing whack a mole.

    Junction 10 through 11 is a shitshow, extending r762 would enable them to close once and for all J10.5, improve or eliminate J10 southbound, eliminate the lethal J10 northbound, and improve or eliminate J11 southbound. And also eliminate the jump on/jump off local traffic between 10 and 11.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 MCW2026


    By way of illustration here is what I am talking about, the dodgy left in left out junction is X:

    R762 (1).jpg

    Close X, and extend the R762 along the coloured lines to meet the roundabout on the Southern Access Road. From there traffic can head to Kilpedder under the bridge or southbound N11 via J11.

    The most controversial bit of land required is the red line, and it is only about 180m. The white lines border land that is zoned commercial/employment so presumably an adjoining R road would be welcome.The orange lines belong to one property that sold recently, local rumour has it as an investment to a property developer so he might also be amenable to having his back scratched.

    The red line is a single track lane that serves three houses who presumably would prefer the current level of privacy. But inconveniencing three households is not a huge ask given the benefits for the greater good in a potential long term solution for the problems on J10, 10.5* and 11.

    If it really was too controversial they could divert away from the houses along the dotted line. Just seems more intuitive to widen an existing roadway that is already an established right of way.

    It seems like there are a fair few local posters who know the road on here. What am I missing? What are the downsides to this idea apart from any hyper local opposition?

    Post edited by MCW2026 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,584 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    that road is super-narrow, and currently has a gate across the middle of it though you can walk it as it's a right-of-way.

    the long term plan for Drummin is to build a flyover across the N11 to connect to Kilpedder (you used to be able to drive across the N11 there).

    They'll also need to build service roads to connect Kilpedder to J12 to facilitate Newtown-Kilpedder journeys; and the top of Kilquade Rd to either J12 or J11 so they can close that LILO. There's already a plan to connect J12 to the Newtown-Kilcoole road

    image.png

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,363 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Everyone on here knows it makes sense, we just need to convince the locals that this is the way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5 MCW2026


    I live reasonably near by and have walked that lane a number of times so am familiar with width and gate etc. Obviously the proposal I am suggesting involves widening it and removing the gate - hence why the red bit is problematic, that is most difficult point to widen given the impact of residents who face on to it.

    Also familiar with the flyover plan which is essentially the alternative solution to solve exactly the same problem widening this lane does - close of J10 north and south, closure of J10.5 at Drummin and improved safety at J11 south.

    Problem I see with the flyover is it is a big in your face solution that will only ever be considered as a small part of a massive project eg J6 - J14 widening to motorway status. All evidence to date given the reaction when they did that consultation and route selection process is that it will never get off the ground. Residents in Delgany will mobilise en masse against it, give Simon Harris a pain in his hole, and he'll kick it to touch. This is exactly what happened last time.

    Over and above the local residents worried about journey times, the big project and the flyover will attract objections from further afield given the visual impact etc, partlcularly so close to the Glen. The views from the top of the Glen southbound are supposed to be protected for example.

    The direct impact is also higher as they will still need to CPO a fair bit of land on both the Drummin and Willow Grove sides of the N11 to accommodate the flyover, and that's likely to be significantly more confrontational than the smaller amount of land required for the proposal above.

    I just think it will never happen, even if in the unlikely event eventually the combined ministers, TDs and councillors have the balls to try to push it through it will get bogged down in objections and legals for years.

    If the end goal is to improve safety and traffic on the N11 by closing J10 north and south, closure of J10.5 at Drummin and improved safety at J11 south, the quickest way of doing it is via extending the R762 via Drummin Lane and introduce the end goal incrementally.

    If they start off from the position that they're doing it simply to close J10.5 they will face very little local opposition, other than those directly affected by CPOs and the road alteration - i.e 3 - 6 households.

    Once the road is in place and J10.5 is closed which immediately improves safety and J11 southbound, and people have used both sides of it and realised that it is actually safer coming off at J11 northbound to access Delgany rather than J10 and it might add 45 seconds to their journey, they can close J10 northbound to very little opposition. Once J10 northbound is shut the old Downs Road/Barrys bridge route can be used as a two way local road connecting Delgany and Kilpedder.

    Once people are used to accessing Delgany from the south via J11 northbound instead of J10 northbound, they can shut J10 southbound and people will simply accept they have to add 90 seconds or so to their journey by using J11 southbound. Again there would be very little opposition.

    All of the above could be acheived within 5 years - or to put it another way it could be in place by now if they taken this approach back in 2020 when they shelved the big j6 - J14 project.

    If people are pinning their hopes on the flyover being the solution to these problems we'll having the same conversations in 15 years time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,043 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Lads, I don't want to burst any bubbles, but none of it will ever happen.

    The Irish voting system of proportional representation means that local issues will always have a disproportionate influence on politicians over matters of regional/national importance.

    North Wicklow people have a veto over any changes to their road infrastructure. You'd be better off focusing your efforts on twin tracking the railway line and waiting for flying cars to solve the traffic mess that is the N11.



Advertisement
Advertisement