Tesla Talk 2

Calling it for what it is.

Tesla's 'Robotaxi' expansion looks like another stock pump before earnings | Electrek https://share.google/z1ttpjMWZpby56gKg

The man does this pattern and rinses and repeats. Like every time. And folks run out to repeat the news with gusto.

Still not ready in Austin

The real tell is what Tesla is not doing. If the company was genuinely confident in its unsupervised driving technology, the logical move would be to scale up operations in Austin — where it has been operating for 10 months — by deploying more cars across the expanded 245-square-mile geofence. Instead, Austin still has only about a dozen unsupervised vehicles and still relies heavily on safety monitors in most rides.

Tesla has reported 15 crashes to NHTSA since launching in Austin — a crash rate roughly 4x worse than human drivers. Unlike every other autonomous vehicle company in the NHTSA database, Waymo, Zoox, Aurora, Nuro, and Tesla redact the detailed narratives explaining what happened in each crash.

Scam.

It's a scam because the numbers are absurdly tiny. The bookings are next to non existent. They won't publish data and refuse to share information.

The entire thing is a scam top to bottom because it's not a capable technology. After all this time I'm actually pretty shocked you thing robotaxi is a real concept and not just a scam on investors. Genuinely I am really shocked because you're pretty smart. (I'm not being sarcastic). How does this nonsense have a hold over your ability to read . 🤷‍♂️

Pure stock pump waffletech

I don't know why you want to get into this symantics, look at the data read the article.

Or don't bother and as usual fall for the gloss.

What is it about your posting that you actually don't address the key points I raised. You just move the goal post for a lol thanks ? I don't get it.

I'm suggesting it's a scam yes and the majority of this won't make the streets .

Are you suggesting Tesla don't have form in the department of building a vehicle that won't sell ?

I mean we have a massive glaring example…

If I was an investor I'd be concerned about building vast amounts of unsellable cybertrucks. Then selling a large volume of them to our other company to essentially cook the losses.

Then running into rolling out another vehicle based project which seems to have tiny volume usage , users can't book it and we get to see no data on, like the competition that we are up against in the space.

As someone who may not care about reality or data, then I suppose one wouldnt be concerned about any of that . Id just repeat the words of the numerous Tesla booster accounts for twitter.

Can you read the article there and maybe ponder some of the questions?

First journey in Dallas.

Tesla Robotaxi Passenger Said Car Tried to Pull Over on Highway - Business Insider https://share.google/TYzbsGF5P0Ptw8tjt

The point is they won't. It's all just nonsense.

Camera based driverless cars are a scam, I asked you to bookmark that previously like two weeks ago.

Will no one respond to the strange points made in the article . If this stuff was so bloody successful, why isn't it expanded in its test areas ? Why is it unavailable most of the week ? Why will they not provide accident information like their direct competitors?

Let's just gloss over all that