Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland vs Israel - To play or not to play, that is the question Read OP for Mod Warning

1333436383972

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen



    UEFA/FIFA bend and yield to political pressure, we know this because they have admitted to this.

    More political pressure can and will be applied between now and these fixtures in the Autumn.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    The "administrators" are those democratically put in charge of managing the organisations. I've no issue with us putting pressure on them through lobbying or motions, but if those actions fail, self-flagellating our own soccer team is not the way forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,793 ✭✭✭csirl


    The FAI raised concerns through the correct channels and are respecting the outcome.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    Who’s talking about self flagellating.

    Democratically elected football administrators yield to political pressure. They don’t naturally do the right things unfortunately. Sometimes pressure is needed to get them to do what’s right and what’s right here is to ban Israel from international football competitions. There is no question about that whatsoever.

    Israel due to the illegal actions of their current government and due to their failure to abide by UEFA’s regulations should be banned. That much is indisputable. All we asking is that UEFA abide by their own regulations. Pressure will be applied.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,959 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    I never said the games would pass off with a "nothing to see here" attitude.

    Please stop posting stuff about me that you are making up in your own head.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    The fixtures are happening this Autumn. All avenues to apply more political pressure will be debated and explored. Enjoy your summer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,959 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Have you any evidence of that or have you just invented that idea?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    Fair enough if you never said that. I was referring to a kind of attitude from some quarters where debate around this issue is couched in terms that the matter is closed. It isn’t, the fixtures happen in the Autumn and there will be plenty more debate and more water under the bridge between now and then.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    It is your opinion that Israel have failed to abide by UEFA's regulations and should be banned. It is the opinion to date of those democratically in charge of those regulations that Israel have not failed to abide by UEFA's regulations and should not be banned. While we should continue to lobby if we hold a different opinion, we still have to respect the democratic outcome and play the matches.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    I think we both know that the political debate around these fixtures hasn’t even begun yet.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    It’s a fact, not an opinion that Israel are in contravention of UEFA’s regulations and that UEFA don’t always enforce their own regulations, sometimes they only enforce their regulations under political pressure. They have admitted to that fact themselves.

    I think we should be doing everything possible to make the right thing happen here, don’t you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,959 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Yes and if UEFA ban Israel the fixtures get canned and the FAI dont get punished and the FAI can seek a friendly to plug the gap against another nation who may be able to play. But then options are limited in terms of who is available from UEFA as its the nations league.

    Beyond that, everything we know right now says the games are going ahead. The FAI have said so, the govt have said so. The home game In Dublin. The away game depends on the situation in the middle east.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,959 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    And who do those in position to apply enough said pressure support? Oh look, Israel.

    Now maybe other associations didnt put their hand up before the world cup to prevent issues in the USA (because Trump is a vindictive dangerous idiot) this summer and may change post world cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    That’s right. However things may change over the coming months, the debate hasn’t even really started at all yet. Chat soon Paddy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,959 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    And the FAI tried. And failed to garner any support.

    So why do you think that is? I would say self interest from the other associations was the main factor. Not biting the hand that feeds them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    I am sorry, but when it comes to interpretation of regulations, there are only opinions until the relevant third party has ruled on the differing opinions. In this case, the relevant third party are those who are elected to run UEFA, and they consider the opinions and determine the facts.

    If regulations were facts, we wouldn't need lawyers and judges.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    I never said regulations are facts. I said it’s a fact that Israel FA are in contravention of UEFA’s regulations and that UEFA are failing to apply their own regulations by banning Israel from international competitions.

    This is a cut and dried case but we know that UEFA are weak on these matters and tend to take the easy road as opposed to the principled approach and respond to political pressure. They have told us this.

    So can we apply the right amount of pressure to get them to do the right thing and abide by their own regulations. Let the debate begin, this hasn’t even started yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,793 ✭✭✭csirl


    UEFA/FIFA rules are voted on by the member organisations. However, once rules are in place, the application is not a democratic decision i.e. countries dont vote on whether someone has broken the rules. Whether or not rules are broken is determined by the disciplinary processes which are legal/quasi-judicial.

    And if someone doesnt agree with the outcome, there is the option to make a complaint to CAS and the CAS decision is independent and binding.

    CAS is very legalistic. They are blind to moral arguments. All that matters is identifying the rule that is broken and providing evidence it was broken.

    I take it that after making their complaint to UEFA, the FAI could not establish any rules were broken and so did not have a viable case to refer to CAS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,360 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025


    Exactly. And as democratic members of the organisation, we have to accept that ruling if we are to remain part of the club. You can't just go around saying the club is wrong, but I still want to be member of the club.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,959 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    I think we should be doing everything possible to make the right thing happen here, don’t you?

    No. We shouldn't jeopardise our own football association or the livelihoods of its employees for virtue signalling reasons.

    The FAI have done the right thing. It got no support.

    Unless there is a dramatic shift in stance FROM UEFA, the FAI have no choice but to fulfil their contractual obligations and fixtures.

    Thats not my opinion. That's the decision made by the FAI and relayed to the public via the CEO Dave Courell who was quite matter of fact about the situation. He had made no suggestion the games wont be fulfilled via an FAI determined decision.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    Well that's a bit of a summation on your part. It hasn't been said that the FAI even looked into appealing the decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    Exactly what? No one has said we haven't accepted their decision, that doesn't mean we can't challenge it further. It is the wrong decision. UEFA by their own regulations should have banned Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    I disagree strongly Paddy and I doubt I'm alone in that and I'm not talking about "jeopardising" anyone's livelihood. I do think as a country we should be trying to do the right thing here and holding UEFA's feet to the fire where possible in an attempt to pressure them into abiding by their own regulations.

    Some effort on here from a few posters to find ways of not doing the right thing here and meekly accepting the UEFA cowardly decision in failing to abide by and enforce their own regulations in this matter. Out there in the real world of Irish soccer there was overwhelming support to call for a ban on Israel. 74 votes for 7 against a landslide vote for the motion calling for a ban on Israel participation in international football. Seems to be forgotten on here by a few posters on this site for some odd reason?

    The motion was rejected by UEFA in a cowardly fashion failing to implement their own regulations but then came a Nations League draw which pitted us against Israel.

    That has put the issue back into the public frame. If UEFA were smart they would have found a way to keep us and Israel apart. They may live to regret that decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,793 ✭✭✭csirl


    The facts are that no appeal was ever filed with CAS.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,793 ✭✭✭csirl


    P.S. CAS has a 21 day deadline for appeals. That deadline passed a long time ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,183 ✭✭✭✭TheCitizen


    So what, if the FAI didn't appeal the decision? They accepted it, probably thought it wasn't likely to be overturned on appeal.

    It's back in the news now because we were drawn to actually play against Israel. So, because we are actually playing them it provides an opportunity to again raise political pressure around Israel and that they should be banned from participating in international football.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,959 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    74 votes to 7 but more importantly However Only 1 association out of 55 raised it with UEFA. Nobody else stuck their hand up. So by your logic there was an overwhelming landslide of support to not ban Israel from the UEFA affiliated football associations.

    https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1230674111873701&vanity=offtheball

    And i wonder why that was? Maybe because UEFA pay the bills. It all comes back to the reality of money. UEFA have it, the football associations do not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,220 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    But in principle, per the post I replied to, you stated that a sports body is not responsible for the actions of its govt. Therefore your logic is that Russia are in the same position as Israel - neither of their governing bodies is responsible for what their govt. did.

    You seem to be giving a murderous regime (Israel) a free pass but not the murderous regime that is Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,046 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    No to the above.

    But I don't understand the point of the questions.

    When placings sanctions on Russia for example, AerCap was left about €700 million worse off. Some Finnish companies suffered especially badly - Nokian Tyres shed about 700 jobs. It's no secret that sanctions or other actions against injustice can cost money and jobs. Those costs don't make it the wrong thing to do.

    Would it be horrible for FAI employees if some lost their jobs? Absolutely.

    Would that alone make it the wrong action to take? No.

    To put it another way, if some billionaire such as Denis O Brien announced that he'd cover every cent lost as a result of refusing to play the games, would you then change your mind?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,765 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    No I wouldn't change my mind because not playing the games does nothing but harm Irish football and does nothing to benefit the people of Palestine.

    I am an Irish football fan and I don't want to harm our football team so some people can feel good about themselves.

    We play the games, strongly protest peacefully and do our talking on the pitch by beating them.

    That is the best thing we can do to stick two fingers up at them.



Advertisement
Advertisement