Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Naval Service General Discussion - Fleet, Manpower, Policy

11718202223

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,177 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    If you're unable to manage your own affairs others will do it for you particularly when it affects them.

    This state is left defenceless and that's the position we are in. Our neighbours are now having to plug that gap.

    Cathal Berry was on an RTE podcast earlier reacting to this and I think articulated the reality of the situation and his own embarrassment with it very well. He took apart the argument from the government about "co-operation". It's co-operation in the same way a mouse might co-operate with an elephant. The elephant doesn't see it as "co-operation" like the mouse does.

    Any proposed arrangement to allow foreign navies patrol our waters at will is also almost certain to be challenged as unconstitutional.

    If we had been doing the bare minimum the last 30 years we wouldn't be in this mess and that's the most frustrating thing about this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    Garda will do on land support with foreign paramilitary agencies in support (or under direction of) to get around foreign military laws

    The cavalry will sit 12 miles out

    Air Corps and Navy will do some visibility ops, but mostly for show.

    C-UAS system will be Baldonnell only, with anything else being supplied and in use by foreign agencies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,177 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Agree with those assertions. Our shortcomings are exposed for the presidency and it's too late to fix that. We need a lot of assistance.

    Most important thing is that we learn from this and start taking things more seriously going forward. Do I think that's likely? Hopefully but can't help thinking once the presidency is out of the way urgency will wane and normal service will resume.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 589 ✭✭✭Grassy Knoll


    It goes without stating security and defence matters are now a 'big deal' at the EU level. Obviously the omnipresent Russian threat, the row-back of the US backstop from European security etc has fundamentally changed the threat and policy landscape. As a knock-on defence spending is now big big business - (cue the French now becoming our best of friends!!) I detect those at the senior levels in government etc are acutely aware that the tide has turned. Indeed, at the level of the informed citizen here the level of understanding and acceptance for increased spending has increased .

    At the EU level tolerance for a wealthy free-loading country that 'lacks the capability to conduct a meaningful defence of the State' is narrowing esp when for others it is the old 'guns vs butter' trade-off. Indeed the potential threat for some is even existential. Taoiseach, Ministers, officials see this playing out before them. IMHO the shibboleth around neutrality (a load of cod if there was ever one) stymies our ability to have a fuller, more mature, rational discussion on these matters, especially in relation to being linked into a wider security arrangements. Instead it gets immediately bogged down in warmongering, imperialism, my son or daughter being sent to die etc …. pick your pike … The direction of travel for the European security framework is clear either via NATO or some EU arrangement. Where we fit in remains to be clarified - maybe via intermediate arrangements like the JET+ etc.

    Personally I think we should join NATO or an EU equivalent, but I realise the emotional attachment to our ill defined, iterative, one-side neutrality, built on the widespread assumption that the Brits or the US etc would come to our assistance, of an era when we had scant economic or strategic interest, apart of being anti Brit (yes the same ones who would come to our assistance) - will be hard to dislodge people from.

    For a combination of our own self interest, but also a desire to retain some relevance at the EU adults table means we will need to stay the course in our (modest) military investment. However, I do feel the expectations in terms of where we will end up may be higher outside the country that here. So to sum up, we will improve on where we are with some genuine game changers - primary radar etc to come on stream. However, whether the current intensity continues and if LoA 3 is the actual goal with money behind it will largely depend on the external security situation and I suppose a calculation of the risk / reward trade -off. So far to get LoA 2 up and running is taking time in the 4 years since its publication.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    Nah, nothing will change with any sense of urgency. They will milk these acquisitions the next 10 years. Will end up overspending and under delivering, an we'll be having the same conversations about the same plans in a decade's time.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,880 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Are you familiar with the adopted report of the Commission on the Defence Forces?

    Are you familiar with the detailed implementation plan for same?

    Are you familiar with the recent and pending acquisitions of a national coverage air and sea military radar system, radar and sonar systems for the P60 ships, 2 x C295 MSAs, 4 x light strike H145M helicopters, and a billion quids worth of armour and artillery?

    Because though you speak about 'normal service', you don't seem to understand what that now means, compared to what it used to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Pending being the most important word in all of that. The vast chunk of that spending is still “talking about talking” stage with nothing signed with penalty clauses. Until that happens anyone familiar with Irish defence would be insane to act like they are guaranteed purchases. Not too mention the fact that the funding isn’t there, or that it’s still a glacially slow pace of laughable proportions, or that it still doesn’t start closing any of our enforcement gaps.

    But other than that, it’s so far not in the bin like every other suggested spend in the last 100 years, now to see if the Government lasts long enough to actually commit to anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Update on the East Coast Base:

    The Deputy may wish to note that the Department is at an advanced stage of concluding the licensing arrangements with the County Council in relation to the use of Carlisle Pier for the purposes of berthing the two Inshore Patrol Vessels, as their primary function will be to patrol the East Coast.

    The proposed licence will grant use of Carlisle Pier for a period of 11 months and will be renewed on a yearly basis. It will allow for the installation of security fencing, with a 20-foot container on the licensed area for the sum of €130,000 plus VAT. The primary advantage of entering into formal legal arrangements is that it provides the Naval Service with certainty as to the availability of berthage and therefore assists in planning for operational activities.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,916 ✭✭✭Alkers


    Well there's nothing impressive there; that it has taken this long to not even get that agreed, a single container and a bit of fencing (is that pier not already fenced off?), far cry from a "naval base".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,053 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Denmark is an example as a country of roughly the same population as Ireland of how a small country can still be fairly strong militarily.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,130 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Twin props and 600hp bow thruster ,, looks like a stern thruster will be in future boats.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 16,029 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    Somebody better tell the Elder Brethren in Irish Lights that they'll have to shift up in the bed to let a little one in! That's the home berth of the ILV Granuaille and she spends plenty of time alongside for operations and crew shortages…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,177 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/02/27/ireland-freeloading-royal-navy-defence-spending-disgrace/

    Ireland’s freeloading on the Royal Navy has plumbed new depths. It must stop

    We don’t have enough resources to look after ourselves properly – let alone carry the Irish

    ...Yet Dublin’s stance remains a study in dangerous ambiguity: neutral in name, reliant on others in practice, and doing nothing to address the building threat.This week’s announcement that Ireland will allow Royal Navy patrols in its waters, alongside deeper cooperation with Britain and France, does at least acknowledge this reality. But we don’t have enough resources to carry the Irish freeloaders, or even to look after ourselves properly. For the next few years we are going to have just two or three frigates and two destroyers available for operations. 

    ...

    Ireland’s Naval Service – soon to be rebranded the “Irish Navy” – currently has eight vessels, lightly armed patrol boats not really suitable for anything other than fisheries protection. Expansion plans for 12 hulls, new bases, towed-array sonar and a multi-role combat vessel with anti-submarine capability have been trumpeted under a €1.7bn five-year defence package. So far, these are paper promises against a backdrop of historically minimal spending that remains among the lowest in Europe. In conversation, it is clear that the Irish military understands the threat; too many Irish politicians still do not. The Irish “armed forces” are really no more than lightly armed constabulary. Calling it the “Irish Navy” will not make it a real navy.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,703 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Two obvious questions.

    1. Is she out of service for a bit pending repairs? If so, what does that do to the current "at sea" coverage?

    1b. Is a ship named "Samuel" actually a 'she'?

    1. I have a feeling if it were a US ship, the captain would be fired (The CO of Truxton was relieved this week due to last week's fender-bender with a tanker). What career ramifications, if any, will there be?

    (Note: I don't believe a mistake should be necessarily a firing offense, unless there was more than just understandable error, but in this case, that seems unlikely?)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    if she is one of the other 60s can be brought online with her crew, not ideal but manageable if needed I would think. Also good god do I hate the naming convention for the 60s. As to the career, I’d hope not, frankly the USN seems far too quick to fire for accidents (thought that fender bender was due to a mechanical fault as she came up along side?), it’s not the first bump the NS hulls have had though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Not really wrong, though listing the sonar systems in as paper promises is off, since we know they are being built.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,057 ✭✭✭thomil


    Just on 1b, yes even a ship named after a male is considered to be female. There’s centuries of tradition to that effect, not to mention an equal amount of superstition. Referring to a ship as male is considered to be a bringer of bad luck, something sailors of any rank are keen to avoid given that they’re operating in an environment that can kill them at a moment’s notice.

    In more general terms, this seems little more than a “fender bender” in naval terms. RTE Reports that she’s suffered “slight damage” and will need minor repairs:

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2026/0227/1560781-le-samuel-beckett/

    They’ll probably have to send divers down to check out the props and the rudder, but unless the props hit something hard in the riverbed, I don’t think that they’ll be affected. It’s worth remembering that both the screws and the rudder are inboard quite a bit. My suspicion is that the only damage is that bit of messed up plating on the stern. Interestingly, Samuel Beckett does not show up on the Port of Cork shipping scheduled, which she normally would if she were heading into dry dock, but it does look like George Bernard Shaw is going to start moving on Monday.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Its Grand just a bit of Tec 7, a sledge and a lick of paint needed!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,141 ✭✭✭✭10-10-20


    Better widen the berthing and navigation areas in this new East Coast base for the J-turns that we're still trying to master.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    1. At sea coverage is most likely not impacted. It's the weekend.

    1b. It's Sammy at the weekend

    2. Probably a bumper car shaped medal, and forever be reminded on a daily basis of the video, while keeping post, as there is no one to replace them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 988 ✭✭✭vswr


    Did LE Niamh make it back to sea after her (an actual her) mishap, last year?

    Would be funny if it was the same captain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Taken from the journal. Oh Ireland we are some outfit

    Sources have said that there is no intention at present for Ireland to begin seizing ships as has happened elsewhere. It is understood the issue would be that the State has no where to store the ships long term. 



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,213 ✭✭✭sparky42


    To be fair, that’s not a concern just for us in Europe, even a handful of large tankers seized and you have berthing problems, short of us all deciding to do sinkex’s….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,820 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Well MV Matthew has only cost the state €13 Million so far. Maybe a sinkex leaving aside the Enviromental damage might be cheaper.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,057 ✭✭✭thomil


    I’m not sure a vessel the size of MV Matthew would be a good choice for a SinkEx, at least for Ireland. You’d need to pump quite a number of 76mm shells into that ship to cause enough damage for it to sink, especially once it’s been properly prepared for such an operation. To borrow a quote from Drachinifel, you don’t sink a ship by letting air in the top, you sink it by letting water into the bottom.

    Now, if Ireland had any anti ship missiles or torpedoes, that would be a different story, but given that the 76mm OTO Melara is the heaviest weapon the Irish Naval Service has, the MV Matthew would simply be a “shell sponge”.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,880 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    It would make a good exercise for training Maritime Special Forces demolitions men.



Advertisement
Advertisement