Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

A global recession is on the horizon - please read OP for mod warning

1363364366368369372

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,419 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    it certainly will be interesting to see how such a stooge will (dis)function in such an institution alright, its gonna be a right mess, and you can be damn sure, it aint gonna benefit the average american!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,209 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    To be fair many Irish people would have a sense of loyalty to the USA.

    My sense is that China are miles ahead strategically and have been planning their economic dominance of the world for quite some time whereas the USA are desperately trying to stop/slow the crumbling of an empire.

    Take rare earth minerals for example. China mines 60-70% of rare earth materials. More importantly China processes 90% of the worlds rare earth. They have the refining monopoly already. China were doing mining deals for critical minerals with all those African countries when the rest of the western world were asleep.

    The Greenland stupidity woke Europe up and made things worse for USA - it started a capital flight and the planned reduction of the dependence on USA.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    The global deDollarisation is baked in now. Bloomberg analysts back in May last year reckoned that if the tariff frictions continued it will be down to $1.3/Euro by the end of 2026.

    I anticipate it's a long bleed in confidence as anyone offloading doesn't want to cause a stampede.

    Funds don't even have to offload US bonds, they just stop renewing them for the USD to decline.

    Post edited by yagan on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 812 ✭✭✭engineerws




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 812 ✭✭✭engineerws


    It might be that he's angry that Chinese will have living standards similar to us in the future?

    Post edited by engineerws on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,599 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    I would say that one should not get distracted by the noise. And the noise is the us government. They can be as incompetent as you like, and they are, and yet despite this, the us economic engine will continue to dominate the world. The large public companies that basically run the US are not so incompetent. The clown show , for the peasantry is not reality. The demise of the US has been talked about for 20 years, chinese gdp will not surpass them any time soon, I mean they still control their currency, there is no transparency there, their demographics are spiraling, their real estate is crumbling and global companies are divesting because they dont provide the legal business protections nor do investors trust the reporting of chinese listed stock. We can see this in the long term underperformance of chinese equity.

    To marvel at infrastructure is nice but they will not be the place to do business anytime soon.

    Donald trump could take a sh*t on his desk on live TV and it wont change the reality that the us will be the economic superpower for the next 20 years at least, as it has been.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,653 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    US infrastructure funding isn't stalled because of human rights. The last administration was literally pushing for a massive infrastructure overhaul.

    In relation to greenhouse gases,, China's output of greenhouse gases have been a mix of flat and even dropping for the last 21 months. By the year 2030, they're expected to maintain a downward trend.

    Meanwhile Trump seems intent on increasing the US pollution numbers. Research and investment around green technologies has literally disappeared. I'm not deluded enough to view China particularly positively but climate change wise, they're gonna be less and less of a problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,236 ✭✭✭wassie


    Yagan was replying to my post directly above which stated 2011-2013.

    Try to keep up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    Your mistake is thinking that China's primary goal is to emulate the US metrics of success.

    Success for China is a non repeat of the century of shame.

    China actually doesn't even need to grow anymore to become the largest economy in the world as the US will shrink under Trump's insane MAGA agenda.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭greenfield21


    How can anyone seriously compare the U.S. economy with China. China’s growth is now built on exports, a response to its property meltdown. selling goods abroad and it’s propping up subsidized companies and maintaining a weak yuan because its domestic market is weak. That model is unsustainable. For China to run massive surpluses, the rest of the world has to run deficits. Countries won’t tolerate that indefinitely, we see pushback in the U.S., and Europe will have to follow if it wants to survive economically. We see it everywhere, and we will be left with nothing. China has created huge imbalances in the global economy. Once Trump leaves, expect even greater coordination against Chinese trade practices, they dont play fair and their whole model is based on intervention. The U.S. still has capital markets, reserve currency, world leading tech firms etc etc. And A weaker dollar would actually help the U.S., but a deliberately weak yuan is a much bigger systemic risk but no one is allowed talk about that because America bad.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    If there's imbalance there weren't created solely by China.

    The largest trade bloc in the world now is the RCEP which seeks to reduce tariffs between members at a time when the USA is putting up trade frictions.

    The economic centre of gravity is heading back east.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭greenfield21


    Yes, the imbalances were overwhelmingly driven by China. No other country comes close.If RCEP is the new centre of global trade gravity, then in theory China should be able to rely primarily on that bloc. But they still rely heavily on Western demand, particularly from the US and Europe to absorb its industrial output

    China’s export growth over the past years, especially to developed markets, has outpaced overall global trade growth. As i said that means very large trade surpluses on China’s side with structural deficits elsewhere. For the west this is politically and economically unsustainable over the long term. And before anyone says it, this wasnt just competition, more so large scale state intervention, industrial subsidies, state-owned banks providing credit, targeted industrial policy, and driven down weak currency. These policies made Chinese manufacturing structurally more competitive than it otherwise would have been under fully market conditions, essentially unfair trade practices. years of discussion about rebalancing toward domestic consumption, yet its growth is still export led.

    What still amazes me how everyone hates on the US all the time, yet China is the biggest problem by miles and miles for global trade. America dosent come even close. You only have to look at the Merz visit this week to China where the theme is fair competition...whilst they are getting absolutely wrecked economically by China.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    @greenfield21

    Did China force Apple to get Foxcomm to assemble their parts and phones in China?

    Integrated circuit manufacturing has been an offshored industry going back to Hong Kong in the 1960s, and then Singapore and later Japan, Taiwan and S Korea.

    After WWII Japan and later joined by S Korea ended up dominating deep water container shipping. The US Jones Act protected US ship builders so they never competed in that space and fell way behind.

    Now China's bet on renewables is paying off, coal usage has plateaued as the growth in solar power continues. Meanwhile the USA is doubling down on coal, cancelling alternative energy grants etc..

    Biden slapping a 100% tariff on Chinese EVs only isolates the US producers from competition and they'll go the way of US ship builders, to irrelevance.

    It does make you wonder how much of what's measured as US productivity is actually facadism, while the real work happens elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,599 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    @yagan

    So yes, you are obsessed with turning a thread on global recession into a "China is better than America" propaganda thread.

    They can be discussed in isolation they are not diametrically opposed.

    The US administration is neither the cause of nor at fault for us economic performance, you can hate them all you like and I agree they are wretched but it won't destroy the US economically. It functions despite the government



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,778 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Just reading an online article this morning - 320,000 people are behind in their electricity bills- this is an increase of 20% on last year.

    For me it’s a significant statistic and increase- it’s showing that more and more people are falling into a poverty trap. If you believe that AI will bring more job losses over the coming few years (which it is likely to do)- this situation will only get worse. And that’s before we start looking at personal debts such as loans credit cards and indeed the big beast-mortgages.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,778 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Glue- a popular Australian store is closing its 16 branches- reason? Higher wage costs due to increases in minimum wages and reduction in consumer discretionary spending due to higher inflation
    I can’t see Ireland being any different - I’ve greatly cut back on discretionary spending and I wouldn’t class myself as “poor”- but saving for the unforeseen and uncertain future is my priority right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,419 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    rapidly rising costs of housing and rent, must also be playing a part in austraila



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,778 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    They are- so again very similar to Ireland as a result - completely unsustainable



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,286 ✭✭✭jackboy


    The vast vast majority of retail will be wiped out anyway with moves to online. Typical street shops will not be viable in the future, regardless of recession or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,778 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    well most small Irish towns already have decimated main streets devoid of quality retail life- betting shops, takeaways, dubious barbers and vape shops pretty much sum up rural retail offerings - but considering many of those outlets are a front for money laundering, there’s even less legitimate retail than even this offering. UK is ahead of us slightly on this but unfortunately we’re catching up fast- and forget good restaurants taking over- more are closing than they are opening - all costs have gone too high to make any sort of living from it.

    Online shopping has of course decimated retail for a long time now but many were still “surviving”- it’s just impossible to do even that now



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭bored65




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 390 ✭✭Bocadilloo


    Would be nice to be moving away from US dependence but this stuff is a real race to the bottom..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 924 ✭✭✭bored65




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,642 ✭✭✭✭893bet


    even when it’s a positive it’s a negative …..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,419 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    ah tis true though, by maintaining a very strong requirement of external sources of investment, we remain extremely vulnerable, extremely susceptible to economic shocks outside of our control



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    EV and solar the bigger winner from this war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,419 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    maybe, id say some fossil fueled based businesses are doing just fine also!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭yagan


    Short term yes, but driving more to alternatives will have a long term drag.

    I'm just glad I topped up the heating oil in December and with rising temps less need of it now.

    Definitely getting solar when the funds are replenished.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 10,642 ✭✭✭✭893bet


    As a small open economy that’s the way it has to be be. We don’t have natural resources to sell to enrich the country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,419 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    i think we ve managed to convince ours it has to be such as way, im not convinced, i think theres a serious lack of ambition and belief in ourselves, particularly with our policy makers, our reliance on fdi has done wonders for us, but its time to pivot



Advertisement
Advertisement