Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

BusConnects Dublin - Bus Network Changes Discussion

1586588590591592

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,878 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    I think the bus cancellations site shows how many services were cancelled altogether or were partially cancelled. Meaning some stops were skipped.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,626 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It sometimes happens - there was clearly a glitch in the data feed from the NTA.

    It's back up and running now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,052 ✭✭✭tnegun


    I find it can be a bit off, services I know didn't operate don't show up as cancelled or partially cancelled. On at least one occasion, it was because the service operated almost 90 minutes late and on another, it went from the terminus to the depot but both never showed on Bus Cancellations. It almost feels like gaming the system logging the bus onto a trip to avoid it showing as cancelled.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 66 ✭✭Arhanedus


    The problem for the website here is that it uses the GTFS data provided by the NTA. The website, just like any public transport app, only shows a service as cancelled if the operators mark it as cancelled. As such, there are plenty of cases where a departure might not actually be operating, but the real-time feed still thinks that it is.

    Funnily enough, one time I actually had the opposite thing happen on the E1 - the bus was curtailed to depart from Parnell Square, but in reality it operated the full route from Northwood.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,052 ✭✭✭tnegun


    I had a look at their FAQ "This site only tracks buses which are confirmed as cancelled by the operator" so its self reported, no wonder it's inaccurate at times.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,052 ✭✭✭tnegun


    I guess this means the NTA have no idea what actually operated either if they're relying on self-reporting, no wonder the people handling complaints have such poor info.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    The main reason for this is the AVL system on the likes of Dublin Bus (which allows for the tracking) is woefully out of date. This system will finally be replaced starting this year, which will allow for much better tracking options.

    It will also be the one standard for all PSO services, so tracking etc. outside of Dublin should improve massively also once it's fully rolled out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,626 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    A controller has to decide whether to cancel or curtail a service, and they then input that into the AVLC system which drives the RTPI output.

    I’m not sure how else that can be done?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,052 ✭✭✭tnegun


    I was thinking in terms of the NTA monitoring service delivery, GA blatantly aren't entering all cancelled services, as in my experience, they show on the feeds but never appear. I understand for RTPI it will need manual input if a service is cancelled/curtailled. Does the NTA rely solely on the RTPI/operator to report on service delivery?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,443 ✭✭✭dublinman1990


    Go Ahead Ireland's five year north/south contract to run the ODMA bus routes was being discussed at a Public Accounts Committee hearing on Friday.

    They didn't get a good response from the committee chair, John Brady, about the contract being awarded to them by the NTA at the time as he said, in his words, it could have been illegal.

    Jennifer Whitmore highlighted issues of passengers being stranded on the L2 to the Taoiseach in the Dáil because of increased passenger demand on the route & increased pressure on it's drivers to bring the route back on time for passengers.

    The NTA have also said that the new AVL system will be rolled out on their buses in late 2026.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    I was under the impression that neither Dublin Bus nor Go Ahead stepped on each other's toes when it came to bidding for routes. Not suggesting that they have it carved up neatly between themselves, safe in the knowledge that no other operator is likely to enter the market any time soon…



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    The ownership of depots is a major block to new operators competing for licenses. In an ideal world the NTA would own all depots like how TII own the Luas depots and could then rent out their use to whoever won the contract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,626 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    They are free to compete for contracts, but I suspect that the current reality of the industry challenges of recruiting staff and the lack of resources such as depots meant that Dublin Bus didn’t bid for the latest ODMA contract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,878 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    Donnybrook and Ringsend depots are very well placed for housing. Do Dublin bus ever consider selling off this land and moving to cheaper locations further out of the city?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Tickityboo


    Source: The Irish Independent

    https://search.app/DBq42



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,857 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    They shouldn't be as they are strategically located close to termini to minimise dead mileage. Look at the madness that is Go-Ahead's Ballymount depot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,259 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    It seems as though they're choosing not to compete with each other.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 24,122 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Well Go Ahead certainly took routes from DB and BE over the years. Most recently the 73, former 123.

    in reality they both have plenty to do with the growth of BusConnects and I suspect the focus is currently on delivering that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,626 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    First of all, GAI couldn’t bid for the main Dublin Bus contract - that’s a direct award by the NTA.

    The only contract up for grabs was the ODMA contract, which includes service expansion as more BusConnects phases are implemented, including more radial routes being operated under the ODMA contract so that both contracts expand in a similar manner.

    I do really think that it has far more to do with the reality of four more phases of BusConnects to implement over the next couple of years, three of which each require upwards to 200 additional staff to be recruited. That’s a big ask for one company.

    I think that Dublin Bus simply took a decision to focus on that this time around and when the contract comes up next time around then maybe they will be in a better position to put in a bid for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,603 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    I noted recently that the 27B has switched over from a mixed bag of old buses to the new EW battery electric buses. Is this Harristown now fully or partially connected up to the charging network? Nice to see progress being made.

    What is the status of other depots?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,626 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    10 EWs have been added to the operational fleet. There will be more added to Harristown during the year, as the grid and charger installation permits.

    I wouldn’t expect any significant progression in other Dublin depots until later in 2027 due to the ongoing national grid power supply issues.

    There are still about 180 buses in storage that are destined for Dublin and Galway and that will increase again as more buses are in build currently at Wrights.

    This thread explains more



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,389 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    State of this

    https://www.irishtimes.com/transport/2026/03/02/ghost-bus-cancellations-increase-pressure-on-obrien-as-problems-persist-on-new-routes/

    Labour transport spokesman Ciarán Ahern said the new Dublin South-West F1 route was adding 20 to 30 minutes every morning to workers’ commutes from areas such as Tallaght, Knocklyon and Firhouse to the city centre.

    Such issues would continue until all the infrastructure was in place and the routes “perfectly link up” and he called for the NTA to re-implement the previous 49 route “to run alongside the F1 route in the interim while this is going on”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,626 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Bizarrely without any advance notice, route 161 has been extended to terminate at Balally LUAS from today, where a new stop is provided.

    It will operate via the Dundrum by-pass southbound and Dundrum Main Street northbound, but will no longer serve the terminus at Dundrum LUAS.

    There are minor changes to some departure times in both directions.

    https://www.goaheadireland.ie/services/7778021/161

    • Due to a route extension on the 161 we will now service stops 7781( Dundrum Luas) 7715,7716,7717 and 8374 from Rockbrook to Balally and stops 8374,2841,2865 and 2866 ( Dundrum Luas )from Balally to Rockbrook.
      Stop 2825 Dundrum Luas is no longer in service.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    Could this have anything to do with the Dundrum Bus Layover Scheme? I am not sure what the status of it is but it was meant to start construction last month.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,626 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    No it doesn’t, as that has no effect on the existing bus terminus for now.

    In any case, there has only been a consultation on the layover scheme which finished at the start of December - the results of that have not been published yet, so I don’t know how you’re working out that any construction work was due to have started.

    There will have to be a further consultation on the planned closure of the existing bus terminus and I expect there to be a lot of resistance to that.

    Any changes in Dundrum are not needed until the A Spine phase happens, and that won’t likely be until the second half of 2027.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    In any case, there has only been a consultation on the layover scheme which finished at the start of December - the results of that have not been published yet, so I don’t know how you’re working out that any construction work was due to have started.

    https://dlrcoco.citizenspace.com/transportation/dundrum-bus-layover-scheme/

    I got that from DLRCC, which gave a Feb 2026 start. My understanding is councils don't always publish results for minor schemes like this, they just do the PC (sometimes I think they are legally obligated to?) take the results and go ahead.

    There will have to be a further consultation on the planned closure of the existing bus terminus and I expect there to be a lot of resistance to that.

    Honestly it's hard for me to blame anyone for that. The current terminus is better located as a stop and an interchange. Sooner or later I think they will just need to build a proper bus Plaza like with LV, or like is planned with The Square and Blanch SC.

    Any changes in Dundrum are not needed until the A Spine phase happens, and that won’t likely be until the second half of 2027.

    In retrospect, that Feb 2026 date was probably given with the idea that the A-Spine was still happening this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,626 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    I still think that you would hear something from local councillors first and I've not seen anything about it yet.

    As for the terminus, the problem is that they are not planning for a proper bus plaza.

    The plan is to move the L25 (and likely 74) terminus further along the bypass, as part of the layover scheme, and the A2/A4 will have a first pick up on Taney Road, with the final set down on Dundrum Main Street. The existing terminus area is planned to become a civic plaza with a landmark building, potentially incorporating a new library.

    That's what the revised layover locations outside Fernbank apartments, and on the Upper Churchtown Road are designed to facilitate.

    So we will end up with a completely scattered set of bus stops with significant walks between some of the routes, with no proper facilities - as it is there are no bus shelters at any of the stops around Dundrum apart from the 14 terminus, the inbound stop outside Dundrum Church (hardly used) and the westbound stop on Upper Churchtown Road. That's just disgraceful considering the numbers using the stops.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Just so happened to be heading up to Dundrum this evening so went by the Balally terminus.

    Change was so silent, apparently even the signage lads didn't get a heads up!

    PXL_20260302_181436857.MP.jpg PXL_20260302_181622052.MP.jpg PXL_20260302_182012368.MP.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭PlatformNine


    I still think that you would hear something from local councillors first and I've not seen anything about it yet.

    That is a very good point.

    As for the terminus, the problem is that they are not planning for a proper bus plaza.

    I do understand that much and I also do understand what the new layout is meant to do, that's what I think the problem is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,830 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Drove past the Luas bus terminus in Dundrum on my way to work this morning and had a look over while stopped at the lights - no signs of any immediate works taking place in the area from what I could see.



Advertisement
Advertisement