Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1167116721674167616771838

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,985 ✭✭✭almostover


    Selection will depend on who's fit really, my guess is as follows.

    1. Boyle
    2. Sheehan
    3. Clarkson
    4. McCarthy
    5. Ryan
    6. Beirne
    7. VdF
    8. Doris
    9. JGP
    10. Sam P
    11. Lowe
    12. McCloskey
    13. Ringrose
    14. TOB
    15. Keenan (if fit). If not, Osborne. It should be Stockdale but I can't see Farrell picking him.
    16. Kelleher
    17. Loughman
    18. Bealham
    19. Edogbo
    20. Conan
    21. Casey
    22. Byrne
    23. Crowley/Aki. Hoping for the former but betting on the latter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,944 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    In the first half, Japan contested exactly 1 lineout. We had a 57% completion at half-time.

    At that point, it's way more an execution issue than a calling issue, imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 601 ✭✭✭thamus doku


    My own thoughts is for the French game Farrell should pick not for the future but what he believes is his strongest 23.
    than, win or lose, review all players performances and where a player did not perform to the minimum required standard, replace them for the following game.
    and so on.

    If Farrell does that the players and fans will get behind it, don’t do that and continue to pick underperforming players then he is going to have a few problems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    anyone able to hazard a guess as to when Ringrose last made a line break?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,723 ✭✭✭ersatz


    we don’t disagree about much here, honestly. IIRC my original response was to say we had a lot more than 10 tests to go before the WC, and time enough to prepare a squad. Selections for 6N don’t indicate that Farrell is worried in the way a lot of us are. I guess I feel we have real problems at FR, SH and in the centres. There are alternatives available if he develops them. As I said earlier, my biggest worry is playing style. Other than Keenan and maybe Hansen I’m not convinced we have any kind of aerial game to deal with how the game is being played by the likes of SA and England.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,029 ✭✭✭50HX


    We'll have to see the French team first, its a big call dropping Fickou & Aldriit

    If Jalibert doesnt get the nod at 10 & given the relationship between him & coach then it will be v interesting.

    Its the perfect game to catch them rather than say game 4 or 5.

    I think all the pressure is on France...sure we have all the injuries😁.

    Penaud apparently has said he now wants the record for most assists in the Champions Cup as he has the try record....he's really old school french



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,285 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Well he's barely played for Leinster all season, but he scored a try in Europe against Quins back in December (his last game before last weekend).

    His form hasn't been good since the Lions tour, where he was playing great rugby (he played 4 games, scored 3 tries and would have been the test 13 if he hadn't withdrawn himself with injury).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,300 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Probably around the last time he made a decent defensive read



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,013 ✭✭✭antfin


    Probably his second last game when he scored a try against Quins in December and had another line break. Not sure if he had any line breaks against Bayonne but he had a hell of a lot of carries so I can only definitely say his second last game was his last line break.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,040 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I banged on about perspective at great length last week but again, you can look at this squad in terms of how many new or inexperienced faces have been called up, or you can look at it in terms of who hasn’t been dropped that you wanted rid of because you don’t like them.

    And again, your perspective probably depends on your pre-existing opinion of Farrell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 835 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    Well if you really want to know he has 2 in the Champions Cup and none in the URC but he has only played 219 minutes of rugby this season.

    His competition for the 13 jersey being Tom Farrell and James Hume have 4 and 6 respectively but that is across 655 and 758 minutes. So on a per minute basis as a 13 Garry has the best line break stats.

    He was also phenomenal in the Lions series until he got his HIA.

    Ringrose seems to get lumped in with Aki and Henshaw as being over the hill. His demise is greatly over blown. He is far and away the best 13 in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 835 ✭✭✭MangleBadger


    Pre existing opinion of Farrell being the key point. Back in November nobody wanted Iain Henderson in the squad. Now he has been dropped it is apparently because he spoke out about the number of Ulster players and not because he has been replaced by Edogbo as he should have been. Andy really can't win with some people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,723 ✭✭✭ersatz


    The idea that ppls problems with the pace of squad development is to do with underlying ‘feelings’ about Farrell is based on just as little as any made up assumptions about the coach. Ireland have been on a downward trajectory since the WC. Chicago was emblematic of it and the following games in Nov did little to persuade anyone that Chicago was a hiccup. There are real problems in the squad and in the game plan!



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,299 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    If Ireland were playing fantastic at this stage posters would be saying we're peaking too soon, as we tend to do mid cycles.

    This 6 nations is going to be the swan song for the likes of lowe and aki. Henderson is already gone. We lost Murray, POM and healy last season.

    The squad IS changing and progressing. It's just that Ireland simply do not have the player pool or depth to do it on a rapid basis.

    What we're doing re the emerging Ireland and XV squad is fantastic. The coaches are getting to see the best part of 60% of the available options for the first squad.

    I dare say no other nation is looking at players at that rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    He may well be getting lumped in with the others
    But he is 2026 Ringrose not 2020 Ringrose. He is in the autumn of his career no doubt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,944 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    In Tom Farrell's case, I'd wager that is because he is often the player that gives the offload to the linebreak.

    Farrell's been good this season; not quite as good as his stellar 24/25, but I honestly think if he was in the same form as last season, there'd be a real argument for him to be ahead of Ringrose for this 6 Nations.

    With Hansen out, I think if Farrell was hitting the heights of last season, I'd have him starting for the extra creativity, that typically Farrell seems to look for in his wingers.

    Having said that, as a bit of a curve-ball, I think there's a non-zero chance that Farrell starts Crowley at 15 at some stage during 5the 6 Nations, what with Hansen's injury.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    i agree the squad is changing but disagree that it is progressing.

    Looking at the 6N squad I don’t think anymore than 20 of they are at a competitive level for the business end of the RWC.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,944 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I'm more upbeat, in terms of the squad, than I was at the start this season to be fair to Farrell, as there has been some decenty change, but I'm still off the belief last season (and the AI's in particular) was a missed opportunity.

    I still think there are some key positions that need to start seeing more gametime e.g. Casey at 9, Boyle at LH, someone other than Lowe on the wing and Aki at centre, a real alternative to VdF, even if that is Doris.

    We'll at least see some of that this 6 Nations, it feels like, whether thru injury or otherwise.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,299 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,534 ✭✭✭clsmooth


    Which players are at a competitive level for the business end of the RWC?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 593 ✭✭✭exiledawaynothere


    I think we arw very much in transition this year and could be hitting our bottom in terms of results. What we need to see is the green shoots that things are on the up and that investments in certain players start to pay off. This is not make or break, but moving in the right direction with some new talent is probably the best to hope for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    The thing with a campaign like a WC is you need to work for a few years in advance of it to be ready.

    Something Irish rugby has never embraced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    let’s be honest here on the squad.

    The only really change to this squad on form / development that isn’t injury related is the omission of Henderson for Edogbo, and Henderson has not been an impactful international level player for a few seasons now.

    the question is how much opportunity Edogbo will be to become one in this 6 nations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    Of the current squad, with their form this season and taking into account their age at the next RWC I would say if we were playing a RWC semi final tommorow outside of these 15 players I don’t think anyone is experienced enough or good enough to be considered at that level.

    • Finlay Bealham (Corinthians/Connacht)
    • Tadhg Beirne (Lansdowne/Munster
    • Jack Conan (Old Belvedere/Leinster)
    • Caelan Doris (St. Mary's College/Leinster)(captain
    • Tadhg Furlong (Clontarf/Leinster)
    • Rónan Kelleher (Lansdowne/Leinster)
    • Joe McCarthy (Dublin University/Leinster
    • James Ryan (UCD/Leinster)
    • Dan Sheehan (Lansdowne/Leinster)
    • Josh van der Flier (UCD/Leinster
    • Craig Casey (Shannon/Munster
    • Jamison Gibson-Park (Leinster)
    • Hugo Keenan (UCD/Leinster)
    • Stuart McCloskey (Bangor/Ulster)
    • Garry Ringrose (UCD/Leinster)

    There are a few others Frawley, OBrien Osbourne that could be if they had more experience but none of them have more than 10 caps. Osbourne has 2 starts against top level opposition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,040 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Osbourne has 2 starts against top level opposition.

    Not sure where you're getting this from. Osborne has eight starts: South Africa x 2, France, New Zealand, Wales, Japan, Georgia and Fiji, and bench appearances against Argentina and NZ.

    Osborne is exactly what people here claim to want. When Keenan got injured for the SA tour, a 'conservative' coach could have picked Frawley or JOB at full-back, and famously, people here were up in arms that Mike Haley didn't get the nod. Farrell saw something in a guy with zero caps who'd played most of his club rugby in the centre and threw him in, he got hammered for it here, but it worked out great.

    Tommy O'Brien has six caps, all of which have come in the last six tests. I'm not sure Farrell could have done much else to accelerate him into the team given his injury profile prior to last year.

    There's two players who've come from a long way back and absolutely will be options at the RWC. At this remove from the last RWC, four of the 23 who lined out against NZ in the QF had not even been capped. There is no panic.

    Again, people only want to focus on who hasn't been cast aside rather than look at who actually is coming through.

    And at some point, people just have to accept that a lot of our wider group simply isn't good enough for top-tier rugby and no amount of games will change that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,944 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    This works both ways tho, FFF.

    There are examples where Farrell hasn't been conservative. There are also plenty of examples where he has.

    You say famously people were up in arms about Mike Haley. I could equally retort about your famous Jean Kleyn post.

    The point being, there are legitimate criticisms in amongst everything here that you are also prepared to hand wave away.

    It was the exact same last week, when you were claiming that JVG would've seen the light, and you certainly wished Crowley had gotten an opportunity sooner. But that wasn't at all your position at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,691 ✭✭✭MayoSalmon


    What's happening at 10?

    Had that debate been settled?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,090 ✭✭✭✭Pudsy33


    I'd be shocked if it's not Prendergast, he's been outperforming the other albeit not by much.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 11,398 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    If Farrell thinks the same as Leinster management, then the answer will be a combination of both.

    What order all three tens come in is more interesting than who gets picked to start, I'm my view.



Advertisement
Advertisement