Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Dublin - Metrolink (Swords to Charlemont only)

1296297299301302315

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,672 ✭✭✭Busman Paddy Lasty


    For @tom1ie I hope the answer is buried in the Infrastructure Guidelines pdf booklets.

    As far as I know cabinet sign off happens at various milestones. There is likely another such milestone after tender submissions, in other words only then we'll know the actual price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,552 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    there'll be closure of the inbound lane for some time for sure. The bus connects corridor is starting construction in a matter of weeks so not sure how that will be coordinated. I only assume it wont be, other than a coordinated utility diversion. Bus connects will build the new bus and cycling corridor and metrolink will probably dig it up again and replace it.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 55,567 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Yeah, I'd assumed the same. Southbound lane(s) closed, I was thinking they might have to put both northbound and southbound traffic in the northbound side. And possibly only allow PT in there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,633 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Really?

    Pick a tram that starts at Sandyford rather than Brides Glen (they usually are the ones going to Broombridge) and you will always get on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,798 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It isn’t needed when there’s a N11 Luas and a more general Green Line update.

    We can see with the Green and Red lines as is that they can handle about 25 million passengers per year (who knows what the existing GL can get up to with any of the enhancements). In terms of ppdph, we’d basically have the same as what MetroLink can carry via those two lines. There will be some limits beyond Sandyford but there is scope to increase the number of peak hours trams out that way too.

    Of course this would cover a much larger geographic area with it being two lines and “covering” the South East of the country, but there’s also the DART too. I think it would quite easily fill the needs for the next few decades.

    I understand the reasons to upgrade to MetroLink all the way to Sandyford. It’s “low hanging” fruit in terms of cost, but I think the N11 is actually preferable when everything is tossed up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,798 ✭✭✭spillit67


    Not with a N11 Luas. Brian Caulfield has said the extension to Bray will only go ahead as part of this line. And that’s the one it looks like they are looking to move up with.

    There’s an irritation with not having ML to Sandyford that I completely get and operational sacrifices, but all things considered the N11 is just much better in the next 20 years. It avoids shut downs with mediocre alternatives, it connects more high demand/places of interest, it provides similar capacity and gives more benefits to the stretched bus system.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,821 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    The Cabinet approved the establishment of the dedicated delivery body in November and the legislation to give effect that that is currently being drafted. I would imagine it'll go before Cabinet for final approval when that legislation is published. I'm thinking final Cabinet approval which will be a big PR moment for the Government and they'll then ram the legislation through the Oireachtas on the back of that.

    The Spring 2026 legislative programme should be published in the next few weeks so hopefully that will give us a bit of a steer on the timing.

    You would hope that the legislation is now being prioritised by the Department given that the judicial review has fallen away.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,798 ✭✭✭spillit67


    I think it’s clear over the last 6 months that infrastructure has become one of the top government issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,552 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    So much so that they've postponed luas finglas, dart sw, dart north. Cancelled camera traffic enforcement (a death knell for bus connects)and cancelled further roll out of the busconnects network.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,237 ✭✭✭hold my beer




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 55,567 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,552 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    There won't be any further roll out of the busconnects network this year due to no funding. An increase of funding in 2027 might happen but we don't know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,552 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,633 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    There is a large increase in funding to the NTA in the budget for current spending in 2026.

    The problem is that the NTA have been spending more than their budget allocation in recent years and as such have had to apply for supplementary funding to keep services going for the last three or four months of the year.

    DPER have put their foot down now and are insisting that the NTA work within their budget - hence the large increase in budget allocation is to fund them for the entire year and not only 9 months.

    The reality is that regardless of funding, the huge staffing requirements for the next phases and the lack of progress with electrification of depots due mainly to national grid issues means that any additional phases were highly unlikely to happen until the very end of the year, if not next year in any case.

    The national grid power supply issues may also impact on when rail projects can be delivered - meaning that the deferral of certain projects from a funding perspective may be rather moot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,633 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    What they have cancelled is the interim rollout of a small number of cameras not the whole thing - it’s just been pushed back.

    You are getting a lot of this stuff wrong - the devil is in the detail as I’ve pointed out numerous times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,552 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    'cancelled' or 'pushed back indefinitely' is a matter of semantics. If you prefer pushed back indefinitely, fine, let's go with that. Luas Finglas is pushed back to a specific time i.e. 2029, the bus connects rollout is pushed back to an indefinite time. The camera based enforcement remains a nebulous concept after a decade of chat and has been further pushed back to some unknown time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,633 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    There is a big difference between the two.

    It is highly likely that BusConnects rollout will resume in 2027 - there is no basis for saying it’s an “indefinite” delay. You’re conveniently ignoring the staffing and electrification issues.

    Anyways that’s all for the BusConnects thread and is nothing to do with Metrolink.

    The reality is that the NTA have been spending money that they didn’t have - that’s no way to operate either.

    The budget allocation in 2026 is fixing that so that they are operating on a sound financial basis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,679 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    From the Irish Times article posted earlier.

    "The National Development Plan allocated funding for several Dublin public transport projects, including the Luas extension to Finglas, the Dart+ expansion programme and BusConnects. BusConnects projects are also being funded in Cork, Galway, Limerick and Waterford over the 2026-2030 term"

    You are just making up all this cancelled or indefinitely stuff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,552 ✭✭✭✭cgcsb


    busconnects cbcs are funded for sure, however the network review is not progressing because there is insufficient funds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,237 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    This is the Metrolink thread, can you post this nonsense elsewhere



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,798 ✭✭✭spillit67


    There is more money going in over the next five years than was in the 2021 NDP. There was never an intention to have all of these projects fully funded within 5 years.

    I know the Greens have pushed this narrative (and are doing it again with the Roderic FOI) but be serious, the amounts earmarked for DART+ we’re hopelessly out of date by 2021, it just so happens that MetroLink got the scrutiny cost wise.

    Simple reality is that in the last 6 months the Government have realised they can’t piss about with big ticket infrastructure anymore. The wasted period was the last 5 years when they allowed the planning system to trundle on and didn’t have the NTA driving on with projects through Covid. There is pressure coming from all sorts of sources on ML and most particularly international scrutiny, which matters to them. The fact they signed off on the Dartmouth Square CPO is a clear indicator they want this started ASAP now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 300 ✭✭OisinCooke


    I understand the reasons to upgrade to MetroLink all the way to Sandyford. It’s “low hanging” fruit in terms of cost, but I think the N11 is actually preferable when everything is tossed up.

    I’m not really clear at all what the point you’re actually trying to make here is…

    Are you suggesting that the metro be extended south down the N11 instead of down the Green Line alignment?

    Or are you saying that the N11 Luas line has to be built before the Green Line can be upgraded to Metro?

    If it’s the latter I absolutely agree with you. In an ideal world, we could theoretically have the N11 Luas open a year or two after the Metro, in which case construction can start very quickly around that time on the GL upgrade.

    In terms of your argument that both the N11 Luas and GL Metro-fication aren’t needed though, I would disagree. The N11 Luas will be jammed at rush from opening. You can’t get on an E bus from south of Stillorgan in as far as UCD most mornings. While a Luas offers way more capacity, I still think it’ll be very busy. Add in an extension to Bray and you it will easily get as busy as the Green Line in the mornings.

    This is why the metro upgrade is needed. If the existing Green Line is jammed as things stand, that will definitely improve, and while it will still be very busy with passengers from Sandyford northwards, there will be room on board.

    This is where the metro upgrade really comes into its own, as passengers from Fassaroe and Bray and northwards (which due to the likely street-running nature of a Bray extension, I can’t ever really see becoming a metro) and from Cherrywood can change to Metro at Sandyford. With a metro possible every 90 seconds during the peak, there will be comfortable capacity to pick this up, leaving room on the Luas for all the capacity that it will pick up on the N11 corridor.

    Metrolink between Swords and Charlemont will be a phenomenal service but ending in the city centre is always going to hamper capacity so a direct southern extension to Sandyford makes the most sense and achieves an otherwise impossible level of bang-for-buck. It is surely a no brainer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,604 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Dartmouth Square isn't a CPO though? It's a VPO at a very favourable price?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,798 ✭✭✭spillit67


    It isn’t guaranteed it will be rammed from day one. As it is, the E1 carries 7.5m along the whole route (both Luas lines are around 25 each). The E2 is fairly similar. Other buses on the corridor probably add up to one of those. Notionally a Luas line absorbs all of those passengers but it’s not the case that it reaches all of that catchment- it probably reaches barely 30% of those buses between them all.

    Luas Green Line (without an upgrade) plus Luas N11 is equal to MetroLink capacity.

    You might pull 4,000 at peak passengers off those buses plus 3,000-4,000 off the existing Green Line Luas south of Sandyford. You’ll still have extra capacity from day one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 987 ✭✭✭DumbBrunette


    Very good article from the Journal, very pro Metro, let's get it built ASAP, etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,798 ✭✭✭spillit67


    How does the Barcelona Metro work? It says 25% driverless?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,437 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Any chance someone could post the text of that article?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,213 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    It'll be entire lines being driverless, rather than say a driverless Line XX train being followed by one with a driver.

    It's easier to do on new lines, as you can design them to be completely segregated from the other lines, can build the platforms large enough to have platform doors etc. Doing it on older lines/stations can involve an expensive retro-fit that isn't justified by the (relatively) small saving of a couple of million a year on driver salaries.



Advertisement
Advertisement