Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Cross-border review of rail network officially launched

1565759616264

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,655 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The loop won't 'double' capacity

    The Athenry Galway section already has a mid section signal so you can depart a train from Athenry to Galway as soon as the train ahead to Galway clears the level crossing in Oranmore, adding a loop helps but isn't going to 'double' capacity magically



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    That is absolutely not accurate. The "mid section signal" extends 600m outside of Galway station, and simply allows a platform to be cleared so an arriving train has somewhere to go. The entire line after this to Athenry is single track.

    The passing loop will double maximum capacity, and it will be much easier to operate the line closer to maximum capacity, once the loop is complete.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,633 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    @goingnowhere is 100% correct.

    You’re referring to Galway Station passing loop.

    That’s not what the mid-section signal is.

    @goingnowhere is referring to the split signal at Oranmore which allows a second train to follow another on the single track between Galway Loop and Athenry once the first train has passed the signal at Oranmore without having to wait for the first train to reach Athenry.

    The signal at Oranmore splits the single track section into two and facilitates the flighting of trains.

    The same applies in the opposite direction - a second train can follow another towards Galway from Athenry once the first has passed the signal at Oranmore.

    I explained this to you some considerable time ago.

    Post edited by LXFlyer on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Okay thanks for reminding, I do recall this now. This doesn't change my valid point that the Oranmore passing loop will double maximum capacity on the line.

    Looking at the timetable, it looks like only 2x trains utilize the mid-section during the morning: the 06.25 to Heuston leaves Galway 10 minutes after the 06.15 to Limerick, and the 09.05 to Heuston leaves Galway 13 minutes after the 08.52 to Athenry.

    When this mid-section is used, it delays trains coming from the other direction, so it does nothing for overall capacity. So in summary, the Oranmore passing loop will magically double maximum capacity



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 19,633 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Theoretical capacity is one thing, but being realistic it is very likely that there will still be a need need to flight trains particularly at peak times one after the other in one direction to deliver the services as and when the WRC service expands. That's reality.

    The loop will clearly facilitate capacity for additional services, but I genuinely don't see it necessarily being constantly one train in to Galway, one train out at peak times. Demand patterns will dictate service patterns.

    Medium term obviously Athenry-Galway will need to be doubled.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Yes, so we're agreed then? Theoretical maximum capacity will be doubled.

    Considering the line doesn't currently operate at maximum capacity, then clearly the upgraded line (with passing loop) will allow new services from Tuam / Claremorris / Westport without the prerequisite of doubling the entire section from Athenry.

    It should go without saying that double tracking is needed in the medium term.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 298 ✭✭Bsharp


    You've jumped from theoretical into 'clearly' a bit too hastily there. Transport planning of services is not the same as rail timetables. It's an integrated network riddled with single track around the area. theoretical won't cut it unfortunately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,603 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    It is not doubled, at best 50% increased.

    You can send two trains out 10 minutes behind and cross two in Athenry and then send two back in. Also cross at Galway loop which was used as well.

    Adding a loop where there was a mid section split, doesn’t double it.

    It will be useful, but Oranmore should always have been built with a loop. Even when it was being considered, the Galway line was chocker and suffered delays. Additional obvious loops help reduce some of the delays.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    So your conclusion is, by literally doubling maximum potential capacity, a significant increase in trains is not possible?

    Irish Rail currently manage to operate 12x trains in the morning before 10am (85% of the "theoretical" limit). After the passing loop is completed, if they operate the line to 70% of the maximum limit, 20x trains could run before 10am. That's 8x additional services despite reducing maximum used capacity to 70%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 298 ✭✭Bsharp


    yes. the capacity increase at one point in the network doesn't automatically address bottlenecks elsewhere. The trains need to be timetabled to pass on the passing loop at exactly the right time to get its benefits. The more trains you add, the less likely this is possible. And at this location, where the Galway to Dublin governed by Heuston not Ceannt, the flexibility of the train timetabling is constrained. so you end up with flighting and dwells as I mentioned.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Okay I can acknowledge your point.

    With the mid section split, you can either have 1 train every 40 minutes in each direction (1.5 tpdph), or have 2 trains within 10 minutes then a 50 minute gap (2tpdph).

    With the passing loop, you can have 1 train every 20 minutes in each direction (3tpdph). That's a 50% increase, not a doubling.

    However the reality is, the current set-up is extremely limiting and the line isn't used anywhere near maximum capacity. The passing loop will make that much easier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭gjim


    There is effectively no ceiling on how much you can spend on infrastructure so this argument just avoids the fundamental question whether spending money on providing a service like this makes any sense at all.

    I actually know someone who commutes from Limerick to Nenagh and you could rebuild the line as high speed twin track electrified service with a new fleet of luxury train sets with bars and restaurant cars running half hourly and he still wouldn’t use it even if it took 15 minutes by train. Because it’s not the train segment of the trip that’s the issue.

    He lives in Caherdavin so his options on a dark blustery cold winter morning are: hop in his car and drive to the door of the factory in 35 minutes while listening to the news. Or he could walk to an unsheltered bus stop, wait for a bus (or walk 25 minutes to Colbert), board a train and then face a 25 minutes walk the other end.

    The idea that a change of schedule would unlock a flood of demand for the service from office workers working in Nenagh who commute daily from limerick is fantasy.

    The train just has no useful role for anyone doing this trip particularly regularly or daily. The service should be abandoned and the resources dedicated to providing train services which people actually want to use. The world where a service like this could be a success doesn’t exist and hasn’t for nearly a century.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,681 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    People are forever coming on with stupid stories like this. It doesn't work for some so it won't work for anyone.

    Also loads of people living in Limerick and working in Nenagh is pure fantasy I agree. But there's loads of people doing it the other way around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭gjim


    It’s an anecdote based on the reality of the utility of this service not some rail for rail’s sake fantasy. I’m guessing you’ve never used this service nor would you ever use it regardless of schedules and timings.

    I’m describing the choice facing all potential passengers you imagine would flock to the service if we invested more in it. The timings are irrelevant - it’s the lack of catchment and demand.

    Colbert is poorly located and Nenagh station Is even worse. For the vast majority of people in Nenagh AND Limerick, this service is useless. Then if you consider the actual intersection of people living near one station and working near another, it’s no surprise that having less that 10 people on a train isn’t unusual.

    The service is trashed in terms of speed, catchment and frequency by bus never mind private cars.

    This is the reality of “regional” rail in Ireland - championed by people who won’t use it never mind residing in the catchment area. Nobody in limerick or Nenagh cares.

    We have train services in Ireland carrying crush loads but you want to continue wasting money running slow infrequent unwanted train services carrying 5 or 10 passengers per train. It’s madness and the sort of thinking that has resulted in prioritizing a Claremorris service over DART+SW.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,681 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The location of Colbert seems fine for all the Clare and Tipp commuters wo use it every day as well as all the coach users. It's 2 blocks from the cities main street.

    You described Johnny from Caherdavin not "all potential users".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭gjim


    Lol “all the Clare and Tipp commuters” - why not be honest here? You mean the 19 passengers per day at Birdhill, the 7 per day at Roscrea, the 11 per day at Cloghjordan, the 43 daily at castleconnell or the 58 at Nenagh? These are the actual number of daily boardings recorded in 2024. We’re running a train service where the entire daily passenger count could fit on not much more than a single double decker bus. It’s simply madness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,681 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The Clare and Tipp commuters are the ones on the train to Ennis and towards Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,922 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    just to be clear once again.
    athenry to claremorris is not being prioritised over dart+sw, it has absolutely nothing to do with the government deciding to put back that project and it would still be put back even if athenry to claremorris doesn't happen (which i believe it won't reopen) any time in the near future.
    you wouldn't get much capacity freed up by limerick to ballybroaphy no longer running, 2 2 car sets at most and the fleet down in limerick isn't exactly worked hard as it is.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭gjim


    The Clare and Tipp commuters are the ones on the train to Ennis and towards Dublin.

    I don’t know what that comment means in the context of the discussion? I was responding to your earlier point that “all Clare and Tipp passengers are fine with Colbert’s location”?

    This refusal to accept that there’s such a thing as an unviable rail service is why heavy rail is foobarred in Ireland. I’ve given you the numbers of actual measured patronage which are absolutely pitiful. I’ve explained to you why the service is useless for the vast majority of people in limerick or nenagh but you called my real world example stupid.

    If the 19 passengers per day using Birdhill, the 7 using Roscrea, the 11 that use Cloghjordan, the 43 using Castleconnell or the 58 at Nenagh constitute the base of a viable rail service with each passenger carried costing the state €550 euro subsidy per passenger trip, I’m dying to hear what your cut-off is? Cost per passenger trip of over €1000 per trip? Fewer than 10 passengers per train? Fewer than 5 daily users of a station?

    If trains make you horny, then admit it but don’t claim this has anything to do with useful public transport.

    “Rail is the always the appropriate solution” is just as silly as the counter claim that more roads and busses are always the solution.

    Post edited by gjim on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 892 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Perhaps the poor patronage is also due to only 2-3 daily services. Hardly one that encourages high usage. Better to maintain an existing alignment, with minimal service, than leave it to rot.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭gjim


    athenry to claremorris is not being prioritised over dart+sw

    The word “over” is just semantics. DART+SW is ready to go to tender but funding has been frozen for the project with only a “decision” promised in 2030. Claremorris is nowhere near “shovel ready” but if/when it gets through planning, the minister has promised that funds will be allocated. It doesn’t matter if the minister didn’t go “eeney meeny miney moe” between the two - this is where we’ve ended up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I agree: when the reason/justification given was "funding" then anything else getting funded first/instead is being "prioritised". We can all argue about exactly which euro was going to which project and when but overall DART+SW is not being funded while other projects are.

    And again to reiterate I have no horse in this race because I'll use neither line, both look like good projects but it looks to me like one of them would have yielded a large net benefit and the other one a modest net benefit. It looks like politics to me. Unfortunately



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,079 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Better ridership (bus & rail) could allow Colbert area to develop too. Just look at the area around Kent for instance. There's a lot of surface parking and low-rise dev near Colbert and it could be more dense and tall. I think inner-city transport in Limerick needs to improve a lot too though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭JohnDoe2025




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,681 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    There was a large scale rebuild of the "Colbert quarter" announced a few years back but talk of it has gone quiet so I don't know when it will ever actually get started.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,599 ✭✭✭gjim


    Have you looked at the alignment? It wasn’t even built for passengers - it was built to carry cattle and pigs for processing in Limerick so the stations are mostly in the countryside. I’m even surprised that 19 people per day (both directions) use a place like Birdhill - have a look at a google maps and tell me that offering a “commuter service” in an area like this (farms and forest as far as the eye can see) is anything but a joke. Roscrea has a manned station so that 7 people per day can get the train. 🙄

    This line wasn’t even viable as a passenger service back in the 1950s when car ownership was a luxury only afforded by a small segment of population. While today the entire route lies within a few km of a modern motorway. And most of the major trip generators in limerick like the factories of Raheen, the regional hospital or UL are near motorway exits and nowhere near Colbert which means after spending twice as long sitting on a train, you’re still 30 minutes from your destination. And with the isolated nature of the stations means you’re driving just to get the train anyway. Why would you bother?

    Can I ask, like I’ve asked breezy, is there ever a case for you where rail is NOT the appropriate public transport solution?

    At 1/50th of the budget you could offer an all-day twice-hourly bus/coach service, that would be twice as fast and could serve the likes of UL or Raheen as well as offering stops near where people actually live in places like Nenagh (instead of picking up people from a location chosen to suit 19th century cattle collection - deliberately distanced from the town center).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 322 ✭✭ohographite


    JuJust because the Limerick-Ballybrophy line isn't practical for everyone doesn't mean it's practical for no-one. If it had 8 trains a day and a timetable that allowed you to get into Limerick by the start of the working day and leave Limerick after the end of it, I bet you anything that the cost of operating the line per passenger would plummet to well below €550. Also, the stations in Nenagh, Castleconnel and Roscrea aren't in the worst locations. Some stations are 2km from the centres of the towns they serve, and people still use them by the way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 98 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    I think you’re understating the line’s historical importance. All Dublin-Limerick trains used the line until they were redirected via Limerick Junction in 1967. Not that that means it must be kept. There are valid arguments on both sides. While it is true that the line is heavily subsidised, once it’s closed it becomes quite hard to open it again. Had the Navan line not shut in 1963 we wouldn’t need to spend ~€3 billion to open it. The timetable isn’t great either: if I lived in Nenagh and worked a 9-5 in Limerick city centre, while the morning train would suit fine, I’d have 2 hours to spare before the train left back home, which is hardly ideal.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 13,467 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    More people might use a better timetabled service, but there no way it would lead to a massive increase in patronage or the subsidy plummeting.

    No matter what type of timetable is run, it won't change the fact that Colbert is nowhere near the major employment centers in Plassey/Annacotty or Raheen/Dooradoyle.

    These areas would be the main drivers of demand and both are located just off a motorway. People won't leave their 20-30 minute commute by car for a train journey that would require changing to a bus for a further 20-30 minutes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,681 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Nenagh is the same ride time as Ennis so why is the alignment a problem if it isn't for Ennis ?

    As for buses you are back to being stuck in all that traffic car drivers in Limerick spend their entire working week btching about and delayed unreliable buses that everyone btches about because of said traffic.



Advertisement
Advertisement