Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1764765767769770859

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,619 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    I've said it before: if Trump had even a smidgen of strategic, political common sense, he'd realise that he could earn genuine (albeit grudging) respect from many millions of people by siding completely with Zelenskyy and coming down hard, really hard, on Putin, Xi and Modi. He has it within his power to have a ceasefire in place for Christmas and a tolerable, lasting truce in operation on January 1st.

    But he's so consumed by his (unrequited) love for the Big Man in Moscow, and so greedy for Russia's imaginary riches, he can't see the golden opportunity that slips through his fingers every single day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭wildgreen


    What about them Belgians, not handing over the Russian loot, 3rd division?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 241 ✭✭Repo101


    You’re assuming he’s motivated by statesmanship or legacy. He isn’t. His only consistent priorities are self-enrichment and the approval of a narrow slice of the American public that flatters his ego. Broader respect, historical judgment, or geopolitical stability simply don’t factor in. And even that public approval matters less than it once did. Once this term is over, he can’t be reelected, so there’s no real electoral cost to indulging his instincts. From his perspective, there’s no incentive to confront Putin, no upside in moral clarity, and no reason to seize a “golden opportunity” when personal loyalty, grievance, and transactional fantasy are what actually drive his decisions.

    Obviously the US can't be trusted going forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Senator Rand Paul (R-Kentucky) blocks Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC)'s bill designating Russia a state sponsor of terrorism.

    Rand Paul often pulls this stunt of putting a "hold" on a bill to prevent a vote. A hold can be overturned by 60 votes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,502 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Can anyone pin point when the Republicans in America were properly infiltrated by the Kremlin?


    This administration will be a case study for many years to come.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I think it has a few elements:

    • Legacy of good US-Russian relations under Yeltsin and until Putin's Munich Speech criticising the US in 2007. Some have not processed the new reality.
    • Legacy of US-Russia trade and investment since the 1990s. Some do not find it financially convenient to accept the new reality of a hostile Russia. Exxon Mobil exports Kazakh oil from the Russian port of Novorossiysk and the Biden administration even behind the scenes asked Ukraine to stop bombing that port. Caterpillar also has a huge presence in Western Russia or did when the war started.
    • The lax campaign-finance laws since the 2010 Citizens United Case has removed limits on spending by SuperPACs. Russian oligarchs take advantage to buy influence.
    • Trump's business deals with Russia at least before all these wars.
    • Christian Right networks between the US and Russia. Some like Putin's crackdown on LGBT people, feminism etc. However, some also turn a blind eye to Putin's repression of religions other than Russian Orthodox, such as the Yarovaya Law which criminalises missionary activity - including in private houses. Here again we see the revival of Soviet repression against missionaries, except this time its more selective.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,218 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Did Russia never have an opportunity to use its Shkval torpedoes in this war? Some years ago there was great interest in them. I’m pleased they haven’t been useful.

    Post edited by Ardillaun on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,218 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    For years, high-end builders in the likes of London, New York and Miami have depended on mysterious characters wandering in from dodgy places and buying prestige properties. In essence, the West has participated in the looting of poorer parts of the world. There was always going to be a price to be paid for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,153 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Going off topic here, but with rampant consumerism at a time of apparent cost of living crisis, we’re all partly complicit by our addiction to the likes of Amazon and Temu etc. Can only imagine the human cost of such mass production at such low cost on the other side of the world. Propping up China, who props up Russia and has sought to destabilise the West for a couple of decades now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    In the 1990s there was a theory that democracy and capitalism went together. We now know this is not necessarily the case. The idea that they went together was strengthened by the Communism being both authoritarian and not capitalist. However China's economic reforms under Deng Xiaoping blurred the lines. Perestroika in the Gorbachev era was too cautious, not allowing foreign ownership of corporations until 1990, and continuing to fix prices and require state orders (especially for the military) to be met first. In China, the reforms started in 1979. State orders had to be met at fixed prices, but they didn't necessarily have to be met first, and surpluses could be sold privately at market prices.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,070 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    New law allows Kremlin installed administrations in occupied Ukrainian regions to seize apartments, houses and even individual rooms if they are labelled “ownerless”.

    “Ownerless” conveniently means the owner escaped shelling, filtration camps, torture basements, or deportation.

    .....

    The law also allows these confiscated homes to be rented out or allocated under so called “social tenancy” schemes until at least 2030, suggesting the marauders have no plans to leave.

    The insult does not end there. If a homeowner later reappears, compensation may be offered but only if they are Russian citizens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,153 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    And presumably, if JD Vance has any input, if they say please and thank you numerous times.

    Scumbags tend to stick together, it's no wonder TACO, Vance and Hegseth are comfortable doing Putin's bidding without a hint of embarrassment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,876 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Trump was recruited in the 80's as Krasnov. It's likely he isn't the only Republican in receipt of Orc money to finance their lifestyles, political campaigns and to bail them out of bankruptcies. Americans worship money, it's their religion, any thoughts of national interest or patriotism come well behind for many. Almost every member of Congress or the Senate is a millionaire. They like their money.

    Krasnov team ties to Russia.jpg

    Think about the term 'business interests' and what it likely really means. It's a catchall for turning bribes and 30 pieces of silver into clean money. It's likely a lot of Republican politicians do 'consultancy' work for Orcs.

    I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of Republican politicians have been given access to ready stuffed bank accounts in places like Switzerland and that not all their funds are declared on their tax returns either. Putrid just has to reveal all the details to Inland Revenue and even politicians might end up doing time, just like Wesley Snipes.

    Putrid has lots of them them by the gonads, I suspect. There's probably a few Dems he's bought and owns, as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,384 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    There's probably a few Dems he's bought and owns, as well.

    25+ years in power, there is no doubt that Putin has ownership on both sides…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,876 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I have been giving the issue more thought, and I suspect one of the keys is likely bankruptcies as an easy identifier of targets to recruit. Can anyone think of any Irish politicians who went bankrupt and now bat for Putrid?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,611 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Financially bankrupt or morally bankrupt?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 780 ✭✭✭Bitcoin


    orcs again claiming to be in control of Kupiansk despite the fact Zelensky was photographed inside it just days ago 😂

    This is the depth of the corruption and lies that you're dealing with when it comes to the ruzzians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,384 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Pink Shirt himself…

    Though in fairness, wash any white/light shirt with some blood and they'll all end up pink!

    though as someone posted an AI answer a while back, he's more like a useful idiot to them…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,611 ✭✭✭✭josip




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 780 ✭✭✭Bitcoin


    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2e64lr3zeo

    Why are they even asking him.

    Just take the money - give it to Ukraine now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Anyone know where this is? They used to do this in Bakhmut.

    Here's another building occupied by Russians, partially demolished.

    20251217_132000.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,496 ✭✭✭✭Jelle1880


    About 20km west of Pokrovsk according to Reddit.

    Likely they had it rigged, waiting for Russians to enter and then big kaboom.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,384 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    I don’t know what they are singing in that music, but it goes so well with that footage…

    Once again the Ukrainian musical director playing an absolute blinder…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    Screenshot_2025-12-17-14-32-08-430_com.android.chrome-edit.jpg Screenshot_2025-12-17-14-32-40-615_com.android.chrome-edit.jpg

    Darth on point as always



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,876 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Orcs were showing off photos of their Kilo sub that they claimed was undamaged, very carefully picking their angles for the photos so they didn't show the side that was hit.

    Oh dear, the truth will out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,835 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    Won't compromise on their 5 regions. I don't believe the rest of Kherson for example has been discussed too widely. Just shows that even if getting the rest of Donbas, they ain't stopping. Trump will tie himself up in knots to blame Zelensky for the next peace talks collapse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,384 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    Just when it looks like Russia is about to get rewarded… they go for the jugular and demand even more than what's essentially been discussed for the last few weeks/months…..

    RU:"We Want Everything"

    'ok, here's everything'

    RU:"Not Good Enough! We Want Even More NOW"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭aidanodr




Advertisement
Advertisement