Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 12.02.26

1133213331335133713381616

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,474 ✭✭✭Quags


    Good shout this. AFCON lasts till 18th Jan If 2 outta 3 reach final and unsure if they actually get time off or just straight back into:

    Villa A - Newcastle H - Wolves H - Leeds A - Burnley A - Brighton H - City H

    MEN think this should be the team for those games

    image.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,532 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    I see the overall sentiment and I want to agree…

    However, there are a few glaring issues that RA seems to either ignore because he is getting what he wants from the player in other ways (Bruno) or maybe he just doesn't see them as a problem.

    The Everton game was also for me a massive worry. We played against 10 men mostly defending in a 441 setup for 80 min. I just can't wrap my head around why he didn't push more attackers onto the pitch or move players into more attacking roles to take advantage.

    We made it easy for them to defend really. They didn't do anything special, they defended in 2 banks of 4 and had a single outlet up top to chase clearances and try to get them up the pitch.

    Forrest, Spurs, Everton and West Ham - all silly dropped points in the last 6 games. We beat Palace (who are dropping points after European games with a small squad) and Wolves (one of the worst teams the league has seen).

    Sure we are better now than last season in some ways but that was a season where Utd finished 15th. There was no way but up from that. Or at least there shouldn't be.

    If I am being honest if RA was sacked right now I don't think I could point to much as a good reason to have kept him on. After a year in the job that is a very worrying statement to be making.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,210 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    League table since Lammens made his debut, now he hasn't been a superstar but Onana/Bayindir are just shocking!

    Screenshot_2025-12-11-10-38-09-129.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,386 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    No De Ligt, no Sesko, no Licha.

    Heaven in the centre. Zirks up top.

    That's ridiculous to be honest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,474 ✭✭✭Quags


    De Ligt was due back for Wolves and wasn't there & Amorim said he wasnt sure when he be back

    Sesko only back on the grass so could still be a few weeks away from STARTING a game

    Martinez could be come in quicker but after the major injury he had, Amorim might be slow to put in from the start



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,555 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,917 ✭✭✭Julez


    I'm no data expert, but there is a direct correlation between Lammens playing for us and Villa being incredible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,753 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    What are you referring to when you say he is ignoring issues? For instance, he has said that he needs a wingback on the left in similar mould to Amad. He has also more less told his via his actions that he considers midfield a problem area.

    The Everton game was a shambles but too much credence was given to the aspect of lack of attacking players etc. The players just played poorly and we genuinely struggle to play through low blocks at the moment.

    It's not fair to just say we finished 15th last season so the only way is up. We have gone from one of the poorest attacking teams to in some ways in the top 3 or 4 attacking sides. We are a threat at set pieces again when we have our first 11 on the pitch. We have become pretty hard to beat too.

    Of course there are major improvements needed but there is a foundation there now. Sack him and you tear that up in my opinion, There are examples of managers that were in a similar position to what we find ourselves in and fans of said clubs were calling for the axe but they were ultimately wrong. You have to give time to allow the fog to clear and at least 3 to 4 transfer windows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,532 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Ignoring issues :
    Playing Bruno in a 2 man center midfield.
    Playing Amad as a right wing back.
    Playing Dalot as a left wing back.
    Playing Zirkzee as a lone striker.

    Sticking to 2 center midfielders, 2 attacking midfielders (or 10s) and 1 striker when maybe we would be better setting up with 2 center midfielders, Bruno as the attacking midfielder and then 2 attackers who can drift wide in Cunha and Mbeumo.

    Casemiro - Mainoo
    ———-Bruno———
    Mbeumo — Cunha

    Looks far more solid to me than

    Casemiro — Bruno

    Mbeumo — Cunha

    ——-Zirkzee——-

    Re the Everton game :
    We were at home, against 10 men and a goal down. At that stage you take off a defender and put on an attacker to go for it. But for some reason his favourite sub is a defender for another defender.

    "Of course there are major improvements needed but there is a foundation there now. Sack him and you tear that up in my opinion"

    This is where I disagree really. I don't think you are tearing up much is the issue.
    I don't think the players on the pitch each week are being played in a position that gets the most out of them or gives them the best structure around them to succeed.

    You can have an overall philosophy on football but the formation under it must be flexible to fit the squad you have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,753 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    Ah ok so you mean change formation? If he changes formation he's a dead duck. It's not that I think he won't do in the future, it's just that this is his base and until he gets that to where he needs and wants then changing shape muddies the water and undermines his authority.

    I'd agree though that there are a lot of square pegs in round holes at the moment but it's need must. We had a good summer but it wasn't possible to fix everything. In saying that, I would not include Amad in that? He's been pretty good in my opinion and both he and Mbuemo have forged a pretty good partnership.

    Zirkzee has barely played and that was mainly due to the fact we were missing both Sesko and Cunha.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,532 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    It's not even necessarily a whole formation change. Just a tweak to get players into positions and roles that better suit them.

    I'd be happy enough to see that if 3 at the back is the main idea.

    Bruno our best player by a long shot, he is a 10. Will always be a 10. Plays his best football at 10 with players running off him for him to pick out. He's also a goal threat.

    What he isn't good at is being disciplined positionally, recycling the ball in possession. Tracking runners. Ball recovery. Cutting off passing lanes. Stopping teams on the counter.

    Not saying Mainoo is great at the above but there's a chance he can add that to his game.

    We have 1 striker at the club who is a rookie. Zirkzee looks better when he has a player ahead of him rather than being the man furthest forward. So not really a striker.

    But we have a couple of attacking players who can drift wide from those positions. So why instist on the current setup? Just tweak it slightly,

    Put those players in positions that will get better performances from them.

    To me, it's madness to play your best player out of position because you think that playing a certain formation is the only way to success.

    Regarding Amad. He has a decent relationship with Mbuemo alright but him being your right wing back for me is the definition of square peg in a round hole.

    On the attack it will look good because you have essentially 2 wingers out there. There's no balance to it though longer term.

    But wing backs options are terrible no matter what. So unless he's going to switch to full backs with wingers in front here we are.

    It's still puzzling to set up with it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭jayo44


    Bruno isn't been played out of position because of the formation. He is been played there because the manager doesn't see anyone better to play there.

    Maybe Mainoo could be if he got a run of games but the manager or club are not in a position too allow that. Idealy he should of went out on loan but I reckon they were hoping to give him some cup games but due to the second string(Mainoo included in that) fuking up against Grimsby that's not a luxury we have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,095 ✭✭✭Ashbourne hoop


    Lammens has been nothing more than solid, and that's all that's needed for now. Onana was the worst keeper I've seen at Utd. Replacing DeGea with him still mystifies me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,633 ✭✭✭BenK


    Add it to the long list of questionable tranfsers United have made in recent times. Ugarte another one that baffles me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,621 ✭✭✭The Big Easy


    I think Onana is probably the worst of the lot though. It's like he was scouted by a 11 year old who only watches the Champions League and likes wacky keepers.

    There were so many red flags and we had discussed them in here at the time. While there were rumblings of character issues with Sancho, there were multiple confirmed reports of character issues with Onana before you even get to the on the field ability.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,532 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    We played Bruno there last season as well.
    We have had a full summer windows since then.

    There is no excuse to be playing Bruno there now rather than his best position other than poor planning.
    You simply can't use the excuse that we have nobody else for that role so we need to move our best player there to plug a gap AFTER a summer window.

    We chose to go this route.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,532 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    De Gea needed replacing to be fair. He was on monster money and wasn't as good as he once was.
    He was making plenty of mistakes himself. Not renewing De Gea was the correct call.

    However, boy did we get it spectacularly wrong with Onana.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,793 ✭✭✭randd1


    4-2-3-1/4-3-3 formation. If everyone is fit;

    GK - Lammens

    RB - Dalot, Mazroui, Dorgu

    CB's - Yoro, De Ligt, Martinez, Maguire, Heaven

    LB - Shaw, Dorgu, Dalot (in a pinch)

    CM's - Casemiro, Mainoo, Ugarte, Bruno (in a pinch)

    LW - Cunha, Mount, Amad

    AM - Bruno, Cunha, Mount, Zirkzee (in a pinch)

    RW - Mbuemo, Amad, Mount

    CF - Sesko, Mbuemo, Zirkzee

    4-2-3-1 when playing weaker sides so we push up more on their defence and make them worry about us. 4-3-3 when playing the better sides with Bruno dropping a little deeper to get on the ball and make those killer passes, but still not relying on him to cover the middle.

    I know it's not everyone's favourite setup and there are still fundamental problems, but for me it's a far more balanced look to the side, and every position has options in case of injury/unavailability. Makes better use of our best talents, which is up from midfield. Granted, the CM area is a problem no matter what formation, but again, there's more cover there with three than two. And it would give him tactical flexibility in matches than what we see right now, which mostly amounts to make a change in defence.

    The current formation, it's just so all over the place, we're fitting people into positions that aren't their best, we expose the middle, the third CB is usually ineffective, and the WB's are set up with defence in mind, we isolate the CF. We don't have the specialist WB's and there's not too many of them around, never mind top quality, to make his formation work.

    A good manager should know his players after a year, and what will work to get the best out of them. Despite some very welcome results in the last two months (5W, 3D, 1L is very good form considering the sh!tshow we seen for a year beforehand), the performances have hardly been spectacular, and far too often the formation gets brutally exposed.

    There's no harm in starting out with a formation at the start that gets the best out of players and then make changes over time when new signings come in. Instead we started with a formation that simple doesn't suit the players available, persist with it through bad results and bad performances, with only an adequate improvement in results and a slight improvement in performances in recent times, with plenty of occasions where the football and structure was poor despite a positive result.

    After 13 months of this it's all a moot point in some ways talking about formations, but you'd have to ask why after 13 months is he persisting with a formation that clearly doesn't work or doesn't suit the players available, and if he is to stick with this formation, then why are the fundamentals that might help the formation work (such as fast high pressing, pushing up the CB's, hold up play for overlaps) so poorly coached.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,526 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Beware of red herrings, we all know Villa after top of the table for the last 9 games because it took Sancho the first 6 games to settle in.

    Don't be fooled by his lack of minutes, goals or assists. Just having him around the squad has them in league winning form.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭jayo44


    We did and we were never gonna fix everything in one summer. We are doing pretty well with goals and have a better keeper in not too bad a summer and hopefully we can continue to pick up points and stay around Europe for rest of season and build some more either in January or summer.

    Your unhappy thats cool but doesn't mean your right. We are alot better but could do even better.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭Robson99


    The next 4 league games will give us a decent indication of where we are. We should be aiming for 10 points. 3 Home games and Villa away. Very least winning our 3 home games. Anything less well then it's just same as we were



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,559 ✭✭✭Charlie69


    Do you think a draw at home to Bournemouth or Newcastle would be a bad result?

    I think eight points from those four games would be a very good return.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,532 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    I didn't ask to fix everything in one summer.

    I'm just suggesting that the team might perform better if our best player was deployed in a role that suits his skillset better. Along with a couple of other players.

    Tweaking the formation to suit the players instead of asking the players to fit into the formation.

    Maybe I am wrong, but most teams tend to get better results with their players playing to their strengths.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 599 ✭✭✭kyleman


    Totally agree. We have to beat Wolves but 1 other win and 2 draws would be a good return.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,526 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Roma sending Evan Ferguson back from his loan spell apparently!

    I know that's never a great sign, and his form has obviously dipped from those dizzy heights a few years ago, but I would just love us to take a gamble on him as a loan for the second half of the season.

    Don't come at me with logic or anything! My main logic is that we don't have a fit CF and… why not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,354 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Why do you say they are not in a position to allow that? Would giving Mainoo some games cost us a title?

    United are in exactly the position where they can afford to give one of Englands brightest young talents some game time. In a rebuild, not challenging for a title, supposed to be putting the building blocks in place for success later down the line, this is when you do it.

    Yorro, Mainoo, those are the players who should be starting now so as to be ready when the real challenge starts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,753 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    The writing is on the wall for Mainoo I reckon. I just don't think the manager fancies him. I like Mainoo and am disappointed he's not getting more game time but if I was to take a step back, he's hardly set the world alight when he has gotten his chance.

    I think he will be gone in the Summer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭Robson99


    Yes. All this talk about progress shou mean we are winning our home games bar maybe against the top 4 teams. But hey it's the might Bournemouth coming to town. Let's batten down the hatches and hopefully get something out of the game...progress



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,049 ✭✭✭Robson99


    He has got feck all chances. Crying out for a middle of the park player and one of the best young players sitting on the bench. Yup let's get rid of Mainoo, spend 100 mill on Wharton or Anderson only to find out they don't work in Amorims system. Then what



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,689 ✭✭✭xtal191




Advertisement
Advertisement