Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Getting around Galway

15859606163

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,421 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    The virtual footpaths are working as designed post works!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,421 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Plan proposes one-way traffic on Dominick Street


    https://connachttribune.ie/plan-proposes-one-way-traffic-on-dominick-street/

    If done correctly - it could work. Would need contra-flow cycling baked into it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,951 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    In which direction though? From Monroes to Mill Street or the other way round.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 741 ✭✭✭GBXI


    This needs to happen all around the city. Footpaths widened in all areas and on-street parking reduced. It's so bad for pedestrians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,643 ✭✭✭Laviski


    that is such a wide sweeping statement…. not every footpath needs to be widened not every on street parking to be removed. Roll out the bubble wrap while were at it. can't protect those that lack personal responsibility and cop-on.

    want to remove car dependency, then PT needs to be on a 10 minute schedule or at least 15 minute and must be consistently reliable along with city direct booted out. Then yes remove the on street parking on bus routes and replace with bus lanes. bus connects for galway is eventually coming but that is not enough.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,421 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    True many zebra crossings need to go in as well.

    Would start incremental repurpose 1 car parking space per street per year over next 3-5 years to be removed and one to be converted to BLUE badge. Places though like the Small Crane and Raven Terrace could get proper makeovers tomorrow



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 580 ✭✭✭CuriousCucumber


    I'd love to see an independent group brought in, to do analysis on the real causes of traffic issues across the city.

    I understand locals frustrations about people using their roads as rat runs, but we really need to tackle the true causes of the traffic on the main routes.

    "Too many cars" - yes, this is an issue, but we're not in a position to reduce car numbers currently.

    If you think of Renmore, traffic going from GMIT, as far as Renmore Park is always blocked up. Why? Once you get passed Renmore Park, traffic starts moving faster

    Similarly, driving along Lough Atalia, you're almost always guaranteed to be stuck in traffic until you cross the Wolfe Tone bridge. Then it frees up

    Coming along the Quincentennial Bridge until you get to Rahoon Road going to the cemetery. The same thing

    What is it on these three sections that cause backlogs? Do we have too many junctions/traffic lights on these roads?

    There are improvements out there, without building new roads, or public transports. We just need the right people doing the analysis, and their ideas implemented.

    If it was up to me, for those three sections, I'd immediately look at the following junctions for improvements

    Come up with a plan for cars coming from, or going to Renmore Road, from the Dublin Road.

    Do anything to stop the late merging along as you come up to the Spanish Arch from the Docks

    The road coming from Shantalla to Rahoon



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,858 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Would need contra-flow cycling baked into it

    Why is this NEEDED? I know its wanted - but its awfully dangerous for pedestrians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,083 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    Why not have a bendy bus done as a trial…

    Honestly I think we should take Connolly suggestion and run with it… She wanted 4 times the amount of busses in Galway to solve traffic… I would suggest 60 day trial, anytime but the summer…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,083 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    I think they have a motto… Make it worse and worse for cars and then they eventually go to a crap PT….

    They don't seem to want to make PT better… PT doesn't have the space and needs the bypass… That comes from the guys who proposed PT on Salmon Weir bridge… That wasn't supposed to happen until after bypass…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭phelixoflaherty


    If they would nail that one in Merlin woods near the castle



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,083 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    Well in the report it will say:

    4 times as many cars in Galway since the last bridge was built

    Rental prices in the city have got so high that coming in from the hinterland is far more economical for Workers and Students… since they have next to no Public Transport, that is going to be by car…

    Park and Ride is none existent and the trust and knowledge of it is poor…

    Only major city in Ireland without a Bypass… Home were built beside the water (i.e. Sea) because people like to live by the Sea and Employment was built beside infrastructure (i.e. Motorway)… On top of that about 80,000 people live on the other side of the city or Connemara who need to access to the rest of the country… Public Transport seems push everything through the center of town… Public Transport takes about 3 times longer than private car to most destinations especially locally. This is just basically unacceptable to most people.

    Objectors have take advantage in an incompetent City Corporation and objected to a by pass which could relive the city to place in infrastructure for PT and Pedestrians.. I will point out the Irish Architects and Civil Engineers have both said bypass is needed… Look at Cork & Limerick, bypass has vastly increased the quality of life in cities,,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,083 ✭✭✭CowboyTed


    My first suggestion…

    Stop them using Predestrian Traffic Lights…

    Raised Zebra crossing with a sensor for turning on the light, like at Sherdians… (by the way, get rid of the stupid law that states they should be always flashing, let them come on when the sense someone is waiting..

    The Pedestrian Traffic lights at Blackrock are a death trap just waiting for someone to miss them in the low sun… they won't slow down at all (because no raise in the road)… They could plough through…

    Also Roundabout are safer and better than traffic lights, why are these idiots allowed to remove roundabouts for traffic lights… Yes I know they are clueless on how to design cycle friendly ones but those intersections have been proven to be more dangerous..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,421 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    There is one Kissing Gate in Ballinfoyle and its installed with no purpose at all - is it like that one?
    https://maps.app.goo.gl/Br48DjtsqN5ZYgCE7



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,552 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    They do get independent reports done on the traffic but then decide they'll ignore them and press on with poor ideas (looking at you ring road).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,864 ✭✭✭✭zell12




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,973 ✭✭✭?Cee?view


    Nail on the head. The “campaigners” equate their want with need. Of course it’s not needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,973 ✭✭✭?Cee?view




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭rustyfrog


    Really poorly configured light sequencing across the city is a major contribution too. Every evening I watch the traffic going west from westside being held for a long sequence for an empty Rahoon Road.

    We need to use the big fancy control centre that we apparently have, and staff it 7.30am to 7.30pm, not the normal 9.30am to 4.30pm council shift.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,643 ✭✭✭Laviski


    from the council it is not staffed. when the person trained left he wasn't replaced. Never have i seen the camera's at junctions moved.

    as for lights, if people understood the colours at traffic lights would be a great help. green means go red means stop etc. many times the lights are green and nothing happens until someone beeps, then when red cars still keep going.

    avoiding the phone while stopped too.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭phelixoflaherty


    No. Its a complete working one.

    Akward as hell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,858 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Why? What would that achieve, except making life really miserable for the people living upstairs in all the buildings there. Not because of the lack of cars (most of them don't have cars), but because pedestrian streets attract anti-social behaviour, especially after the entertainment venues close. There are already families living in the IPAS centre there, they don't need more noise.

    With the on-going content of a shrinking retail footprint due to the move online, and change of retail units to residential or experience-based use (eg the art /music studios), the last thing we need is more pedestrianisation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,552 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    Agree completely. Impossible to time lights with how badly people drive. Most seem to be fairly synched when you drive the speed limit etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,552 ✭✭✭xckjoo


    Or pedestrianisation will improve the living conditions and retail prospects of the area like it does everywhere else in the world. But hard to have hysterical fears about that



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional West Moderators Posts: 62,440 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gremlinertia


    There will never be a complete consensus but from just even a council perspective there seems to be very little communication/crossover from the groups working on what should be a whole network level of thinking - if joe public perceives things as bus v car and walking v cycling for instance that thinking can only really come from them and the NTA to a degree



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭Unrealistic


    @Mrs OBumble

    Would need contra-flow cycling baked into it

    Why is this NEEDED? I know its wanted - but its awfully dangerous for pedestrians.

    Compare and contrast….

    @Mrs OBumble

    the last thing we need is more pedestrianisation

    Does the distinction between 'need' and 'want' only apply to other people's views?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,421 ✭✭✭what_traffic


    Oh I don't bother any more with OBumble any more - they always ignore what the real killer of pedestrians on our roads are yet likes to think they are standing up for pedestrian rights by focusing on the perceived dangers of other vulnerable road users. It is very odd all round.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,858 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    So, no explanation of why contra-flow cycling is "needed". Paint me surprised.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Regional West Moderators Posts: 62,440 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gremlinertia


    A warning - which I've not needed to do in a while, but there's bickering, nit picking and borderline personal abuse creeping back in here - people will get a temporary ban very quickly if this sniping continues

    Grem

    Post edited by Gremlinertia at


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,864 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    Connolly TD wants more city buses, and M-F times all weekend too. Does he not see the buses stuck in the car traffic volume, shortage of bus drivers, cars parked in bus bays?



Advertisement