Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1163216331635163716381640

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,048 ✭✭✭TRC10




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 26,591 ✭✭✭✭phog


    James Ryan gets a 3 match ban, reduced to two of he attends tackle school



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,014 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Bealham is far better than Clarkson.

    I'm a Connacht fan but I don't say these things because of that.

    We have a great no.8 but you'll never here me calling for him to be in the Irish 23 because he's not as good as Doris and Conan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I think he's definitely a better player right now, and I didn't have an issue with the selection on Saturday and don't think the outcome would have been any better with Clarkson included, but there is an argument that Clarkson needs to continue to get minutes and opportunities given the age profile of both Furlong (just turned 33 this month) and Bealham (just turned 34 in October).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,010 ✭✭✭jacothelad




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,014 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Clarkson needs to get more minutes with Leinster not Ireland. He needs to force his way in by playing a lot for his province.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,048 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Minutes played for their respective province last season

    Clarkson : 819*

    Bealham: 851

    *including starts in the URC 1/4 final, 1/2 final and Final

    In other words, Clarkson does play a lot for his province and in meaningful games. He’s not been plucked out of the sub academy by Farrell



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭jimbob955


    not necessarily, Boyle, PMAC, GMAC all have very low minutes this season and last. Makes no odds what minutes they have built up, they should get selected anyway. The other options are nowhere near as good enough



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    He's where he is now on merit, and based on the quality of his performances. He played a lot of minutes for Leinster last season (18 games, 11 starts, 819 mins) and started every game of the URC run in (started from Rounds 14 through to the Grand Final). The season before that he played in 15 games, 10 starts, 581 mins.

    He has looked largely pretty comfortable at an international level, in Europe and against some tough scrummaging teams in the URC.

    His minutes for Leinster over the past 2 seasons are broadly comparable to any of the contenders for that #3 THP in the squad role - Clarkson has played 33 games, 21 starts for 1,400 mins over that period, versus the following other players in competition for the spot:

    • Aungier - 38 games, 18 starts, 1,501 mins
    • Jager - 27 games, 16 starts, 1,018 mins
    • O'Toole - 35 games, 28 starts, 1,900 mins.

    O'Toole is the more established of all those, he's the #1 choice at his province over that timeframe, and is someone the Irish coaches know very well, but it's not a crazy difference for all that. Clarkson isn't like Paddy McCarthy, someone who has just been highlighted but hasn't really delivered yet at a domestic level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,048 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I’ll grant you Paddy McCarthy has low minutes. But point out to me all of these world class LH props around the country of which you think there are so many. Go on. Which looseheads have been so hard done by as a result Paddy McCarthys inclusion? He’s been fast tracked because there’s an absolute dearth at LH, and he’s actually been one of the few positives of this November.

    Jack Boyle having low minutes is demonstrably false. He played 688 mins for Leinster last season. For context Josh Wycherley had 504. Jeremy Loughman had 362. Michael Milne had 491. So presumably you’d be even more outraged had any of them been selected?

    Gus McCarthy playing very little rugby? Wrong again. 583 minutes last season vs Tom Stewart’s 235. Diarmuid Barron had a hefty 859 minutes. Should he be there instead? Or should we have picked the great Niall Scannell in his mid 30s?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭jimbob955


    Ya they have comparable minutes to other players or lower in some cases. I agree they should be picked. As I said it makes sense having 8/9 FRs from the one team. You can't replicate that scrum familiarity if you had more players from different teams.

    In hindsight I think Boyle may not have been selected, form not great this season and v low minutes. But as you pointed out there is no one else in the other provinces who could do the same job as Boyle did this Autumn, not one.

    I would have liked Stewart to have been involved, but again who do you drop? None of them. There is also the risk the lineout may not function as well with a different hooker. Maybe Stewart might get a chance in the A game next spring, all going well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,048 ✭✭✭TRC10


    In hindsight I think Boyle may not have been selected, form not great this season and v low minutes. But as you pointed out there is no one else in the other provinces who could do the same job as Boyle did this Autumn, not one.

    Boyle is there because he has a greater body of work than any of the alternatives in recent times. The numbers I just showed you back that up

    I would have liked Stewart to have been involved, but again who do you drop? None of them.

    You're right. None. Because Sheehan, Kelleher and McCarthy have all done a lot more over the last year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,018 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Loughman has done really well against the same TH Wilco Louw that destroyed the Irish scrum. He will be packing down against Thomas Du Toit for Bath in a few weeks. Before you guys come in with the "who would you drop?" reductive reasoning, or Loughman is not test level. He's test level at scrummaging and head and shoulders above the current options at scrummaging. Getting an international call up isn't about dropping guys, it's about options!

    Jager at 130kg and 6'4 is the biggest, heaviest TH in Ireland. So you'd be looking at Loughman (6'1) Sheehan (6'3) and Jager (6'4) is a lot better than Furlong (6ft), Sheehan (6'3) and Porter (5'11 on his tippy toes). That means Sheehan is no longer sticking out like the tip of a spear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Loughman hasn't even scrummaged against Wilco Louw since April 2024; on that day, the Bulls won multiple scrum penalties against Munster, and the turning point was Johan Goosen picking up a stupid red card. From what I can tell, that's the only time they've faced each other ever.

    Andrew Porter was at LHP when Leinster won multiple penalties against the Bulls scrum (with Wilco Louw at THP) in the URC Grand Final in June.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,018 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    That's hilarious, Munster won all of their scrums and 2 of the Bulls scrums were also won by Munster. And of course, Munster also won that game..

    https://www.espn.com/rugby/matchstats/_/gameId/598034/league/270557



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 322 ✭✭VayNiice


    Jager is not a good scrummager. Bigger isn't always better, remember Tony Buckley? When Jager was playing for the crusaders he was the back up TH behind Michael Alaalatoa, who wasn't exactly world class.

    I like Loughman, but it'd be madness to pick him ahead of Boyle or particularly Mccarthy who have far more potential.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 82 ✭✭jimbob955


    Ya exactly a greater body of work from Boyle. 110 minutes this season so far, all for Leinster, 0 for Ireland. Define a greater body of work though? 51mins v Stormers getting smashed 35-0? But I get it, there is absolutely no alternative LHP outside of Leinster right now who could compare to this incredible body of work.

    Same at hooker. The top 3 have done a lot more all season long than any other hooker in Ireland. But Imagine if Stewart gets back to form and is involved in the next 10 Ulster match day squads. Roughly 500 minutes. Would that be enough of a body of work to oust the #3 Leinster Hooker. Or is there a threshold of body of work to reach I wonder?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,018 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Sorry, I can't take you seriously after that comment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,049 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 322 ✭✭VayNiice


    So you'd rather a 30 year old who has rarely stood out for Munster and has been in several Irish camps in the past with only single digit caps?

    He'll be doing well to start ahead of Milne for Munster



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,048 ✭✭✭TRC10


    there is absolutely no alternative LHP outside of Leinster right now who could compare to this incredible body of work.

    About 10 posts of you ranting and raving and you haven’t actually named anyone.

    Who are these amazing loosehead props all over the country that are getting shafted by the Ireland selectors?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,018 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    Anyone got the game recorded? Look at Baird in the Irish lineout at 53:43. This guy is having a terrible time figuring out what he's supposed to be doing. This is pretty much an all Leinster lineout right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,018 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    I'm saying that you do not need to reduce a selection down to your best 23. Isn't it obvious? And compared to the guys already in the team, he's positively youthful. SA train scrum religiously, constant live sessions and the pecking order changes constantly depending on who does best.

    Given the squad size I doubt we even do that. There's very little competition for places going on in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,048 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I'm saying that you do not need to reduce a selection down to your best 23.

    So what you’re saying is, we solve our scrum problem by not picking our best 23?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,294 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Who are these amazing loosehead props all over the country that are getting shafted by the Ireland selectors?

    There aren't any. While Saturday night was a disaster, there's no prop out there that we could have parachuted in to solve things. Porter might have his issues but he's by some distance our best LH.

    Whatever you might want to say about Farrell, no-one can deny that he and his coaches have done their best to look at pretty much every loosehead on the island.

    Jeremy Loughman is being touted here as some overlooked titan of the scrum, nearly two years after his last cap. He was in and around the squad for the guts of two years, he toured NZ, he played in the RWC, I think people have forgotten that. Whatever he can or cannot bring to the table, he's had plenty of opportunity to show it.

    [no, I'm not saying the coaches are infallible]



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    That’s not what that scrum stat shows - it just shows if a team retained the ball on its own put in. For example - the same stat shows Ireland as 4 from 4 and 100% from last Saturday’s game.

    Munster’s scrum gave away at least two penalties early in that game, something covered in match recaps of the game.

    In any event - Loughman was hauled ashore after 51 mins, and it was almost a year and a half ago. What’s your response to Porter winning multiple scrum penalties in a final as recently as June?!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,014 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    How do you make that out?

    What he's clearly saying is we train with a much larger squad. Based off of that training we then pick our best 23.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    How big a training squad do you want?

    We had 34 players in the Ireland squad for the November series, and a further 28 players in the Ireland A squad. If you take it we can c. 160 pro players in the country, 38% of them were in a rep squad this November alone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,014 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    How about 46, two full teams? You can put your projected ones versus twos. If a one is losing out in the scrum or the lineout or isn't tackling great then you bring in the best performer in that position from the twos.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I remember watching that match back a couple of times at the time, as it was such a big win, and my own recollection is that the scrum held up manfully that day tbh. Curious what the match recaps said, as obviously in general, there was much praise for Munster iirc.

    Presumably shootermacg's point is that in those stats, Bulls also lost 2 (the same stat shows them as winning 6 from 8) which, you'd imagine, means Munster won those?

    As an aside "Loughman was hauled ashore after 51 mins", seemingly implying that the time he was subbed indicates a poor performance, is obviously flawed.

    I know Porter routinely goes 65, 70+ minutes, but it's not at all atypical for front-row forwards to be subbed off early into the 2nd half. Case in point? Didn't Venter and Thomas du Toit both come off very early on Saturday?

    I can't say I remember in detail what Loughman's scrum performance was like that day, but it doesn't at all follow that just because he was subbed / "hauled ashore" on 51 minutes that he was poor, either in the scrum or indeed in general.



Advertisement