Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1161816191621162316241845

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,737 ✭✭✭ersatz


    We have decent candidates for those positions and real depth elsewhere, for once. Seeing how good the A team could be gives me some confidence that it’s not as grim as it looked 6 months ago. Mad to think VDF may become a bench option rather than a dead cert starter. And would be nice to see one of the possibles join the party on the wing, there’s still room for another solid pick on the left.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,476 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    I'm totally conflicted on the 10 situation, as an Ulster fan I have zero skin in the game in terms of provincial rivalry so I'd like to think I'm looking atmit as neutrally as possible.

    After Saturday I thought as good as Prendergast was with the ball he was still a liability defensively amd as such Crowley definitely had to start against SA. That's not exactly an original thought...however as the week has gone on I've been thinking about it from a SA POV. Who would they rather face? Sure they might fancy running at Prendergast but it does seem to me that Ireland are much harder to defend against when they are playing on the gainline with Prendergast calling the shots. Do we focus more on what we want to do tha what SA might do? It's a hard one. SA will be a lot more intense in defence so maybe Prendergast wouldn't have the time and space he had last week?

    Maybe it's been pre-ordained that Prendergast would start against Australia and Crowley against SA anyway, but as the week has gone on I've gone from definitely Crowley to 50/50 on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 299 ✭✭kig


    I would definitely go with Crowley, and I'm a Leinster supporter. I can see our scrum and line-out coming under a lot of pressure on Saturday, so if we can win, it'll be built on a good defence, and we all know that's not going to happen when the rest of the team can't rely on the out-half to do his bit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,631 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Prendergast's particular skills suit our gameplan more than Crowley's currently. He kicks better, and he manages the attacking shape more effectively.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 888 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    https://www.the42.ie/ireland-springboks-possible-6879349-Nov2025/

    Prendergast, VdF, Ringrose, Aki all may or may not be starting according to Kinsella.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,227 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,900 ✭✭✭JanuarySnowstor


    Sam starting could well damage his career prospects because SA will certainly target him. Crowley sidelined again, let's hope both play against each other again at Christmas

    The chances of Ireland winning now are gone in my opinion



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,804 ✭✭✭All_in_Flynn


    Andy clearly wants to start Sam I think as in my opinion he sees Sam as having more upside but Sam has got to continue to show improvement to justify the selection.

    I really hate the discourse that's developed around Sam though. He's at a phenomenal level considering his age but people for whatever reason just want to focus on the negatives. Crowley is at present a slightly more rounded player if you take into consideration both sides of the ball but if we are thinking about 2 years down the line then I'm fine with Sam starting these games if that's the way the coaches see it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,091 ✭✭✭Packrat


    I was going to back Ireland tomorrow with a small few bob, but if Sam's starting then thats a hard No.

    Crowley starts and if we're still in it at 55, then bring in Sam to unlock a tiring team or a disjointed new pack.

    Sam starts and any hope of being in contention at 55 is gone. They'll fcuking ate us alive.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,344 ✭✭✭hold my beer




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,908 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    People sh*tting on the player before the team has even officially been announced.

    He's been better than Crowley in the series, even with his glaring weaknesses.

    People willing to sh*t on the player instead of backing him deserve no success from this team. Awful behaviour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 601 ✭✭✭thamus doku


    I can understand why you say that but I am serious this time.
    as I see it prendergast even if he don’t start will likely still have to play 30 to 35 minutes at a minimum.
    so why not start him.
    To prove my point regardless how prendergast goes this week I will not come on here and have a go at him.
    i honestly do wish him well. Seems like a decent young chap and I want Ireland to win this weekend and I will be shouting on all 23.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i agree with what youre saying overall, but i think the first two lines of the second part are quite telling of the overall problem about this whole discussion/ issue/ whatever you want to call it

    both 10 options are coming in for alot of unfair criticism and arguably SP is probably getting the majority of that. a decent amount of it is coming from people who unfortunately are just being arseholes and are going to be unhappy with him for whatever reason. a decent enough proportion will however are unhappy with how much he is being 'bigged up' despite not really earning it - you refer to him as 'phenomenal' for example but the reality is that he simply just isnt. he is a very talented player by all means and im sure he will continue to improve, but he isnt anywhere near that yet. similarly, the line thats thrown out regularly is that SP 'has a higher ceiling' - which means almost nothing when it comes down to it - JJ Hanrahan had a massive ceiling coming into senior rugby but he has never won an ireland cap (much as he has had a perfectly decent career)

    ultimately all of this type of talk is unfair to SP himself as it is hyping him up way too much before he actually shows that much. Harry Byrne had the same before him although maybe not to the same extent and it looks like Casper Gabriel is getting the same now - its just setting up these young players to fail imo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,979 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Sam is a far better player offensively but he has a glaring weakness which is defense.

    Anybody saying they don't like him based on his defensive frailties are perfectly justified with that legitimate opinion as are those saying they don't like Crowley from an offensive point of view.

    Personally I want to see Harry Byrne get an opportunity. It's very possible he's the best all around player.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,058 ✭✭✭vetinari


    Is he really though? He's a better kicker for sure but I don't really see this world class phase play aspect.

    He had a nightmare against New Zealand and played well against Japan and Australia.
    At present I'd have Australia and Japan on a similar level. Australia only beat Japan by 4 points a few weeks ago.

    In the Japan game, Ireland scored three tries with Crowley on the field and three tries with Prendergast on the field.
    It was the same again for the Australia game. How are people coming to the conclusion that he is a far better player offensively.

    In the 6 nations, Prendergast had some good games but some clunkers as well. The hyperbole around him is ridiculous.
    He is world class with kicking from hand, solid at phase play and terrible at tackling.
    It seems to happen with every new Leinster out half though. I'm sure Casper Gabriel will be called world class as well in a few years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i think the reality of SP lies somewhere in the middle of the hyperbole that is spoken about him - his attack isnt as good as it is made out to be but his defence isnt as bad as people say either



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,631 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    In the Japan game, Ireland scored three tries with Crowley on the field and three tries with Prendergast on the field.
    It was the same again for the Australia game. How are people coming to the conclusion that he is a far better player offensively.

    For me, our attacking shape improved considerably with Prendergast at 10. He fits Farrell's system better than Crowley, he's more similar to Sexton in the control he exerts going forward. He's also a far, far better kicker than Crowley currently, both in distance and accuracy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,363 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    It’s like Groundhog Day in here every single time there is a selection decision to be made.

    I honestly don’t think I’ve read an original or new take on the Prendergast-Crowley dynamic in weeks now, but we’re still just constantly re-hashing in exact same talking points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 681 ✭✭✭CONSI


    I think a lot of peoples frustrations come from the fact that Crowley came into this series the form player and AF said he was running things in camp, got a bum deal v NZ with a half baked team around him with so many returning Lions, got just over a half v Japan, scored a try, kicked his points, again with a team not firing, which I dont think you can put down to the 10, and now seemingly has fallen back behind SP again, who I think everyone can admit came into the series not playing well and hasnt really set the world alight during games. I think its hard to understand what Crowley needs to do. People keep going on and on about SP ceiling, when do we see this. His ceiling needs to include defence which at the moment it doesnt. Watch his game play, I've never seen so many phases where a 10 isnt involved. I understand the arguement of giving both 10's game time and developing options so we dont have the same issue with Sexton being our only 10 like the last world cup, but the chopping and changing cant be doing anything positive for either players confidence. Also with so much chopping and changing does this mean both Munster and Leinster lose their 10's for key games due to player welfare, despite the fact that they are playing less and less game time. Will Crowley be available for the Stormers game for Munster next weekend or will he have to be rested before Bath and Gloucester, or will we have the same issue with the internationals being rested for the inter pro's in Dec. I think thats part of the problem at the moment in mho, people dont see players playing as much as players would have in the past and yet then are rested for what feels like big big games. Anyway, lets hope or a win, a good performance and no injuries



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭50HX


    Imagine if/when due to form or injury Harry Byrne comes into the equation...this place will melt😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭50HX


    I would think buckle up re the chopping & changing at 10. There will be lots of it ahead

    We have 2 players with different weaknesses & strengths, horses for courses etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,565 ✭✭✭OldRio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 888 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    In the Japan game, Ireland scored three tries with Crowley on the field and three tries with Prendergast on the field.

    It was the same again for the Australia game. How are people coming to the conclusion that he is a far better player offensively.

    Lets look at those tries for the Aus game as it was most recent (the Japan game doesn't really do Crowley any favours anyway, we were noticeably better in the second half)

    Aus game tries:

    Try 1: Try originates from a quick tap penalty in their 22, SP shows good hands to give the assist to the assist

    Try 2: We get our territory via SP pumping the ball into their territory off a free kick, SP gives direct assist for the try

    Try 3: SP plays the crossfield kick to TOB before Hansen finishes

    Try 3.5 (disallowed from a previous knock-on): SP plays an outstanding kick-pass out to TOB who can't not score

    DG1: SP hits a nice DG to get the gap out to 8 points

    ———————

    Try 4: Close in try through the forwards, field position comes from a good Crowley up-and-under, forwards do the rest of the work

    Try 5: Lineout in their 22, go through a phase or two, Crowley doesn't touch the ball

    Try 6: JGP crossfield kick to Henshaw creates the score, Crowley feeds the ball to JGP after ball being knocked-on by Sua'ali'i in the tackle. Does well to keep play going.

    You can draw your own conclusions.

    Post edited by darkened_scrum on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    on the 10 debate - the debate the the Irish media relentlessly bring up to fill their airtime / podcasts and paper..


    It’s fair to say Crowley played behind a pack that didn’t perform well against NZ or Japan and in the Aus game they turned up the intensity and played a lot better. That makes being the 10 easier.

    Whats also the case is that having Hansen at 15 was a massive advantage, he played a lot of first receiver ball, he stepped in and SP was able to step back for the recycle distribution on 2/3phases - this must be pre determined, and called but it worked very well because Hansen is an excellent threat ball in hand and a brilliant passer of the ball. This gave SP more time to decide the attacking option and execute it outside the BR defense. I suspect we will see a lot more of it against SA - the only worry is how Hansen will hold up running into PSTD et al.

    To me there are two very different styles of play by SP and JC, and those styles benefit from having different players around them, JC would prefer the faster distribution of Casey and the safety of AKI outside him and SP would prefer the decision making JGP brings to the game - the first receiver role Hansen can do and that is allowing him to sit back and be more of a QB 10. I think Crowley wants to be the only chief on the pitch, the one who calls everything and is the main man, in the trenches doing all the work, but SP is happier to sit back and be the general, a conductor of the orchestra.


    In defence nobody can say SP is strong, he takes up the position least likely to be involved, dropping back on the wing on the short side, and when teams get through phases looking to and managing to isolate him it’s curtains as we have seen many times. Watch where SP goes when SA are on phase 3/4 of attack and it’s behind the couch stuff.


    Also TBH I think Hansen might be our best 15 as he offers a considerable threat as a receiver and distributor, strong as anyone in the air and as good an attacker as Keenan. The problem is we don’t have a better winger than Keenan is a FB so Hansen will be back on the wing when Keenan returns.

    So for me the decision of who starts at 10 is not an isolated one but one that’s made to suit the other available players in the backline.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,109 ✭✭✭irelandrover


    SP shows good hands to give the assist to the assist

    Why mention this but fail to mention Crowley's out the back pass to jpg for the 6th try. It really weakens the whole point showing very clear bias.

    The two players have got more or less equal minutes in the autumn which makes sense. They've both played ok. Crowley shown good attack and kicked well off the tee. Prendergast seems to be at least stepping up in defence more. So both players had work ons, and seem to be improving and are both getting minutes to show the improvement. It seems like good planning 2 years out from a world cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,332 ✭✭✭lawrencesummers


    I agree it seems like good planning.

    The problem I have is that this planning isn’t being done across the entire 15 anywhere near the level it should be.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 888 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    Yeah fair point, I will edit the post. The answer is I missed that pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 365 ✭✭letsbefair


    I wonder who Ireland will be targeting ? Maybe we are going for a fast game against a big pack and that is why he is picking Sam.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,063 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    the debate the the Irish media relentlessly bring up to fill their airtime / podcasts and paper.

    The media will talk about whatever people want to hear; judging by the amount of discussion the 10 jersey gets on this board, the fans are pretty relentless too.

    I think it's fair to say that Crowley got the bum deal by playing against NZ while Prendergast got Australia, but such is life. Either way, we're going to find out a lot more about Prendergast on Saturday (if he is in fact picked) and that's all we should be focusing on right now. It doesn't matter if we lose, so long as we learn something from it.

    If we are competitive, see a reasonable display from the 10, maintain a functional lineout and if Hansen can pass a tougher test at FB, I'll call that a win regardless of the actual result.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,918 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Farrell obviously has a deeply held conviction that the core group of players from 2023 have a real chance in 2027 and that this group are best supplemented by Leinster players. 11 of the same 15 from the New Zealand game in 23 will likely start on Saturday, over two years later. Two of the changes from that day are due to retirement; Sexton and O'Mahony, Keenan is due to a current injury and Ryan was injured for the 2023 game. Fans from other provinces who expect this to change and see promising players from their team get a chance in a meaningful test are going to get disappointed again and again.



Advertisement
Advertisement