Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Navan Rail Line

1222324252628»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,754 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    exactly, it's just penny pinching and the answer will be shur i will take the car instead of that nonsense.

    you cannot compare people changing methods of transport at one place to another as the contexts and factors will be very different.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭gjim


    "Penny pinching"? 3 billion euros is "pennies"?

    It is impossible to build a public transport "network" which does not involve transfers. The very idea of attempting to provide a zero-transfer PT service is so strange - I don't understand it at all. Transfers and transfer nodes are as vital to successful PT as the actual links between them. The best public transport systems in the world (Japan and Switzerland, imo) are all about enabling transfers as much as possible.

    There is NO bottleneck between Navan and M3 Parkway, the AADT numbers are some of the lowest of all the radial routes. The only busy section of the M3 is that between the M50 and Blanch - and this Navan rail project has absolutely nothing to do with adding capacity to this section.

    @bk's suggestion of express coaches connecting Navan with M3 Parkway - providing a transport hub/interchange at M3 Parkway is the right solution for not just Navan but much of this part of the country which is characterized by relatively low density and distance. It would get people from Navan to a DART train quicker than by the train that this project would provide. You could make the coach completely free for about 1/100th of the cost of building a new heavy rail alignment between Navan and Pace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭gjim


    An average of 31 people per train is not "lots of full trains on the line throughout the day". It's a complete waste of a heavy rail train run and a miss-application of heavy rail.

    Bus capacity between Limerick and Ennis is higher than it was before this service was introduced so it's simply not true that the train service has displaced buses in serving this route.

    And the reason is very obvious if you know the area - the location of Colbert makes the train impractical for nearly everyone - getting there by road is painful and the natural catchment area is dominated by very low density social semi-Ds. It's in the city but it's not central - about 10 minutes walk from O'Connell St. so the 6 minutes you save by getting the train is an irrelevance for most - Arthurs Quay is a far more attractive departure point and you can see it by the numbers waiting for buses in the area.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,754 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    3 billion is only an estimate and there is nothing to say it will be that cost and in all likelyhood it won't be anything near that.
    even in the event it was, the alternative of more road capacity is going to cost more due to all the cost associated with it as a whole.
    there is a public transport network which involves transfers and then there is a public transport network that has stupid transfers that make no logical sense and are pointless, and a bus between navan and m3 is a perfect example of making no sense.
    the navan rail project will remove large scale traffic from that area meaning the traffic issues are a lot less, and of course the large scale issues on the old n3 where most of the traffic travels from navan anyway.
    the suggestion of an express coach between navan and m3 parkway is not the right sollution for navan as it has little potential usership, provides no incentive to be used, and does not address the issues.
    there is no evidence it would be quicker then the train, it is just a belief to try and justify a poor quality sollution that will do nothing for navan and has no incentive to use it over the car whereas the rail line does.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,754 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    it is when the "average " is not the actual reality.
    the trains are full and are growing hense the calls for increases in capacity and frequency across the whole line, it's the perfect application of rail as it's between 2 cities and serves 2 major commuter towns out of those cities.
    ultimately limerick to galway is a successs dispite opening in the absolute pits of a recession and taking time to grow.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,200 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Are you going to acknowledge that many of those buses (the 51) only stop at Colbert.

    Tell me what other Ennis to Limerick bus is frequent and stops in more than one city centre location*

    *For non Limerick people Colbert is very central. Every bit as good as Arthurs Quay for a city centre worker before anyone mentions that joke of a Dublin Bus service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 62 ✭✭thosewhoknow


    I’m not sure why you’re so obsessed with that cost estimate. BusConnects could cost up to €4 billion and yet I don’t see you on that thread bringing it up every day. Also using the ridership stats from M3 Parkway to say there’s not enough demand is ridiculous. It’s after the M3 toll from both Navan and Dunshaughlin so why would one bother paying the €2 toll and then getting a €3 train ticket that also requires a change at Clonsilla? It’s like building a line from Dublin to Cork and ending it at Portlaoise, and then saying it shouldn’t be finished because most people travelling from Cork don’t bother with it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,530 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    I think most people coming from Ratoath and Dunshaughlin avoid the toll as it is quite easy to join the M3 at junction 5 and save yourself a few quid each day. That’s what most people I know do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,436 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    What are your parameters for 31 people per train?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭gjim


    the alternative of more road capacity is going to cost more due to all the cost associated with it as a whole.

    I don't know where this is coming from - nobody is suggesting more road capacity? Nobody on this thread that I can see believes in building more roads over developing public transport. I don't even believe the M3 was justified.

    there is a public transport network which involves transfers and then there is a public transport network that has stupid transfers that make no logical sense and are pointless, and a bus between navan and m3 is a perfect example of making no sense.

    The M3 Parkway will be a DART stop post DART+. It's a terminal station with no immediately surrounding population to speak of - so NOT providing connecting bus services to the DART here from places like Navan and Dunshauglin - 25minutes or less bus ride - would be insane. While you think it would be illogical and "make no sense" to provide such services?

    It's exactly how public transport is supposed to work - a high capacity but inflexible rail core feed with buses to extend its effective catchment area.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭gjim


    I’m not sure why you’re so obsessed with that cost estimate. BusConnects could cost up to €4 billion and yet I don’t see you on that thread bringing it up every day.

    I thought it would be obvious from what I've been banging on about.

    There are over half a million journeys taken on Dublin Bus every day.

    If the spending on BusConnects matched what we are talking about for Navan on a per passenger basis, then I'd also start asking questions - but that's never going to happen because we'd be talking about spending more than half a TRILLION Euro on BusConnects.

    This is the scale of the insanity we are talking about here in terms of cost and benefit per passenger.

    And the worst is that the improvement in terms of journey time, frequency and convenience would be slight over what could be provided almost for free by providing properly schedule connecting feeder buses to M3 Parkway from Navan via the underused M3. In fact, everyone living in a settlement within a 20 or 25 minute drive of M3 Parkway should have access to it via public transport (buses) - including Ashbourne.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,754 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    between navan and m3 as a way to try and get out of building the railway absolutely i do believe providing a bus service between the 2 is illogical as it is clear the reasons for doing it.
    if the line to navan is built and they are offering services from other areas, or they are offering services from areas which will never be rail served, then sure but that's a separate issue/discussion.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,562 ✭✭✭gjim


    Sorry, I really don't get you?

    You're against the provision of useful feeder busses/sevices to one of the best possibly suited (future) DART stations for it, because your pet project would be less compelling?

    Am I missing something?

    That's not the thinking of a supporter of public transport - that's pure rail fetishism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,754 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    the navan project which is not my project but that of the people is already 100% compelling hense why there was and is a plan and want to do it, and why the bit to the m3 parkway was built in the first place.
    an express coach between navan and m3 parkway which is likely to have little usage doesn't and will never make it less compelling because that 's not possible ultimately.
    it absolutely is the thinking of a supporter of public transport and a public transport realist who understands that lots of people while they use public transport, they do have a limit to where, when and how much they will use it.

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



Advertisement